Tropic Thunder, a comedy out this week that parodies the movie industry, has drawn criticism from disability rights groups over the repeated use of the word “retard” to refer to a character played by Ben Stiller. Stiller plays an actor trying to get an Oscar by playing a mentally handicapped guy named “simple Jack.” This has mightily offended disability rights advocates, including higher ups at the Special Olympics and National Down Syndrome Congress, who plan to picket the film at its premiere tonight and call for a boycott:
A coalition of disabilities groups is expected as early as Monday to call for a national boycott of the film “Tropic Thunder” because of what the groups consider the movie’s open ridicule of the intellectually disabled.
The film, a movie-industry spoof directed by Ben Stiller, is set for release on Wednesday by Paramount Pictures and its DreamWorks unit.
“Not only might it happen, it will happen,” Timothy P. Shriver, chairman of the Special Olympics, said of the expected push for a boycott. Speaking by phone, Mr. Shriver said he planned to be in Los Angeles with representatives of his group and others to picket the movie’s premiere on Monday evening in this city’s Westwood district.
A particular sore point has been the film’s repeated use of the term “retard” in referring to a character, Simple Jack, who is played by Mr. Stiller in a subplot about an actor who chases an Oscar by portraying a mindless dolt.
Mr. Shriver said that he had also begun to ask members of Congress for a resolution condemning what he called the movie’s “hate speech” and calling for stronger federal support of the intellectually disabled.
“The most disappointing thing, the most incredible thing, is that nobody caught it,” said Mr. Shriver, who, as a co-producer of the DreamWorks film “Amistad,” is no stranger to the studio. He spoke of what he described as the studio’s and the filmmakers’ blatant disregard for the disabled even as they stepped carefully around other potentially offensive references, notably in a story line that has Robert Downey Jr. playing a white actor who changes his skin color to play a black soldier.
[From The NY Times via We Smirch]
The Special Olympics chairman has a point. Robert Downey Jr. plays a white actor playing a black man using makeup, but no one uses the “n” word to refer to him in the film. Saying someone is a “retard” is just as offensive and hurtful to many people.
Ian Spiegelman over at Gawker reminds us that this is a send up of all the actors who play handicapped people, not a mockery of people with special needs. He says that their ire should be directed where it belongs – at producers and actors who portray mentally challenged people without a second thought. Spiegelman tries to explain their reasoning, “Because it’s fine for actors to cynically go bobbing for Academy apples every year by playing a special character, but it’s not okay for a comic actor to make fun of them for doing so.”
I think what the advocate groups are objecting to is the repeated use of the word “retard” and not the portrayal. There was even a ad for the film online that read “Once upon a time there was a retard.” Dreamworks says that despite objections they’re not changing a thing about Tropic Thunder. It’s probably way too late at this point anyway without pushing back the release and losing millions:
In a statement on Sunday, Chip Sullivan, a DreamWorks spokesman, said the movie was “an R-rated comedy that satirizes Hollywood and its excesses and makes its point by featuring inappropriate and over-the-top characters in ridiculous situations.” Mr. Sullivan, in the statement, added that the film was not meant to disparage or harm people with disabilities and that DreamWorks expected to work closely with disability groups in the future. But, he said, “No changes or cuts to the film will be made.”
[From The NY Times]
Dreamworks may not have been able to edit the movie but they did respond to the criticism by taking down the website for the “Simple Jack” subplot of the film.
The Times notes that this is the largest coordinated boycott of a film by disability rights groups ever. If they want to take a stand against use of the “r” word, this seems like the right way to do it. Everyone knows better than to use the “n” word in that context and maybe this boycott will help spread awareness of how demeaning and derogatory it is to call someone the “r” word.
Here are photos from “Tropic Thunder.” I’m pleased to see that Nick Nolte’s in it and am not ashamed to admit I’m a fan. It also stars Jack Black and Robert Downey, Jr. Thanks to All Movie Photo.
Shows what a bunch of humorless, limp, fruity, soft, mush-spined little PC babies people are being turned into.
When you have someone close to you that is taunted by that word maybe you’ll understand vdantev. What if you had a little brother, cousin, or neice that was mentally handicapped and cried every day from people calling them a “retard”?
Why do people even feel the need to use that word to describe someone else?
There are certain words that are not permitted to be used in my home and that’s one of them (the n word being another) – simply because of the hurtful nature and the mean spirited connotation behind the use. Words like that are not necessary.
It’s not only that the word is hurtful CB, it’s that popular usage influences public thought which then furthers discrimination. When these people have been struggling for years to lead similar lives to non-disabled peoples (getting jobs, living independently) and then to be dismissed as a “retard” because others think it’s funny, is an injustice.
It all hinges on how the word is used, too. We have been watching Dr. Horrible recently, and the antagonist, Captain Hammer sings “unless you’re a tard you’ll prevail”, that demonstrates HIS ignorance, it doesn’t make fun of a disadvantaged group.
I’m a bit torn here. Most definitely on the side of satire and if any one group deserves a large dose of that, it’s Hollywood actors and their pretentious worthiness. Do sympathise with the disability groups’ boycott but feel it’s a bit misplaced here.
I guess it comes down to what the word ‘retard’ implies. For me, it’s stupidity not disability. But JMO.
Exactly Wif. I may not have said it as eloquently in this article, but that’s what I meant. 😆
I can’t wait to see this movie. Every trailer and every scene I’ve watched so far are absolutely hilarious.
CB, I’m with you about Nick Nolte! Ever since I saw Farewell to the King, I’ve loved the man!
As for the subject at hand: I’m torn too. I hate the “r”-word and completely agree that it should — in a way — be regarded as similar to using the “n”-word.
As to whether I’d boycott the movie because of this, I’m not sure. I guess you have to see it to decide! A classic case of catch-22…
I agree with geronimo, I think they have every right to protest against people using the word retard, but I think the context that it was used in this film is different. They weren’t poking fun at disabled people, they were poking fun at Hollywood actors who play disabled people. It’s two different things.
I’m boycotting this because Ben Stiller hasn’t been in a funny movie since FLIRTING WITH DISASTER.
Words like retard and fag (or ‘fruity’, Vdantev?) are taunts used by grade school bullies and it’s amazing how often in Hollywood whenever a character wants to insult someone else, they resort to those two words.
Instead of hiding behind satire and parody I wish they’d just tell the truth: ‘Look it’s the easiest way to insult a character and we’re bankrupt of ideas.’
Anyone ever see THE CELLULOID CLOSET where they do the montage of the use of the word ‘fag’ in films? I imagine they could do the same with the word ‘retard’.
I actually agree with the Spiegelman guy – what’s more offensive, an actor like Sean Penn playing a mentally challenged man in “I Am Sam” or an actor like Ben Stiller making fun of actors like Sean Penn for such Oscar-bait?
For me, I’m offended by Sean Penn, Juliette Lewis, etc for playing these characters. And I get what Stiller’s trying to do.
But I also dislike the word “retard” (though I am a fan of “f–ktard”). Unfortunately, boycotting or protesting will just give the film more publicity, and make the film more of a success.
Kaiser: Ftard is great. Also great, celebutard.
I have followed the work that Tim Shriver and his mother Eunice have done over the years and applaud their hard work.
But there is still the first amendment. I am curious what the ACLU has to say about this.
lol celebutard! I think this word must be used in every celebitchy article from now on!
I can kind of get what they were trying to do, but I work with kids with disabilities and I don’t see them as ‘retards’. Honestly, after you work with the kids you see them as “Becky” or “Emma” etc. I sort of see the word retard as the word ‘n*gger”. I just think it’s beyond offensive and wouldn’t say it. I mean, they could have substituted words like “special” or “a little slow”, ANYTHING other then retard. I still cringe at South Park’s ‘Timmy’ character.
This overly PC stuff has got to stop. WHat these people don’t get: maybe someone who uses the word will watch the movie and realize how rude and stupid they look while using it. Spiegelman is so 100% right on.
My cousin has hydrocephalus. The only person I ever heard call him a retard was his sister.
The word doesn’t bother me. What bothers me is how his father (my Aunt’s ex-husband) uses his son’s handicap to his advantage. He exploits him. My former uncle is a world-famous horse trainer and sort of uses my cousin as a “loook, if my retarded son can do this, I can teach YOU to do it too!” A google search reveals people calling my cousin “inspiring” and that bugs me more than the word retard. Why is it so inspiring and amazing and outrageous that my cousin can do things everyone else can? He’s a real human being, of course he can do those things. For some reason it also bothers me because some person posted pics of my cuz on their flickr and even called him by the completely incorrect handicap. They just, like, assumed, he had a certain handicap.
Say retard till you’re blue in the face, it’s just a word. Just don’t TREAT them differently.
I was going to come add a link by editing my old post, but I can’t do that anymore.
My cousin has hydrocephalus, not cerebral palsy. THAT stuff bugs me.
BTW, my cousin’s quite the character with a great sense of humor. He does more “making fun” of others than anyone has ever done of him. He could almost do stand up.
I’ve been counting the days until this movie opens and I’ll be there in two nights. Looks awesome. I see the Simple character as mocking self-important actors (in fact, that seems to be the general running theme of it) more than anything, but we’ll see on Wednesday.
isn’t this movie about the ridiculous lengths actors will go to get an oscar nomination, hence RDJ playing a black man and stiller playing someone who is mentally handicapped, you know they do these controversial things to get award nominations. I think people may be getting sensitive and not looking at the context, But I could be wrong, i’ll have to wait till the movie comes out
I don’t have any problem with the word retard either elisha, just how it is used. For example, my neighbour has a son who’s mentally challenged and if you inquire she’ll tell you he’s retarded. She loves her son and does not use the word in a hurtful context, to her its just a word that describes his condition without getting into the actual medical specifics.
If this is satire, making fun of actors protraying the mentally handicapped/challenged and not outright making fun of the mentally challenged then I don’t think the film warrants a boycotting but I’ll reserve judgment as to its offensiveness after seeing the film.
Just an observation, people with other mental conditions like bi-polarism or schizephrenia get made fun of and are stereotyped all the time. I can recall many ‘crazy’ Britney jokes for ince, how come nobody talks about that?
They chose some pretty awful language in “There’s something about Mary” and no one said anything….it was worse than ‘retard’.
Coincidence Ben Stiller was in that film too? 😉
I remember that from “Something About Mary”. He said “I love working with the retards” to ‘Mary’ who of course looked appalled. I actually wasn’t offended by that because it was to show how stupid and ignorant the character was. But if they had spent the whole moving saying “retard” to a certain character, I don’t know.
As a pretty big advocate for people with disabilities, I’m not appalled in the slightest by this. If the movie is making fun of people who ACTUALLY disrespect folks who are differently abled – e.g., actors who portray people with disabilities as walking stereotypes (hello, Juliette Lewis.) – I don’t think these activists really need to get chapped.
I can rattle off a list of movies that are truly offensive to people with disabilities – that horrific Tom Green movie from a few years ago, for one – I don’t think it sounds like this movie is being out of line.
I can tell there are a lot of people a generation or two older than I am on here. The only reason I point that out is because I don’t think I’ve ever heard anyone from my generation use retard to attack a person with a genuine mental handicap.
Like someone else pointed out – it’s become synonymous with moron, dope, dumbass, fool, ect. It’s something you call your friend when he backs into his mailbox, not something you would spew with real venom behind it. We’re a little behind on the PC front here, and most people still refer to the mentally handicapped as either ‘slow’, or ‘special’.
And lets be honest; Stiller has a really good point about Hollywood. I actually find it less offensive for someone to call someone a retard than I do seeing a Hollywood actor ape being handicapped in an obvious Oscar ploy. At least the bigot is being honest and straightforward. The actor is taking advantage of public sympathies towards the mentally challenged to better their career.
Here’s a thought – how about you just employ a person with a REAL mental handicap. My cousin Brian suffered brain damage from birth complications, and I know for a fact that he could still act circles around Sean Penn.
What if you had a little brother, cousin, or neice that was mentally handicapped and cried every day from people calling them a “retard”?
And what if people grew the hell up and realized it’s a comedy film and it’s not to be taken so seriously?
There was a time around the age of 8 when that moniker was attached to yours truly- and I went on to high school and then graduated college. Yeah, it hurt my feelings, but made me stronger, made me buckle down and prove all those chumps, those REAL RETARDS in the world were wrong.
Damn shame the rest of our species is still so far behind the curve and can’t rise up to the challenge.
———
edit by Celebitchy: vdantev please don’t bold everything. One or two words or like a sentence is fine, but not everything.
———
God this PC crap has GOT to stop. As someone else said you can be just as insulting calling someone “mentally challenged” than “retard” and you can be just as matter of fact. The problem isnt the word its the intent. Retard and its derivatives is used by people to describe themselves and others in harmless ways and also to describe people in matter of fact ways also. What the hell is “mentally challenged”?! That’s non sense. That’s like saying that if you are obese you are “weight challenged”. No, you are retarded or you are fat. You’re not “challenged”. Geez!
The movie looks hilarious and is a clear send up of all these actors who just seem to win awards for putting on 70 lbs or “making themselves ugly” (whatever that means) or playing people with some for of disability or the other.
Hooray for the 1st amendment!
I apologize, my passions tend to get in the way of my judgment at times; but in the simplest terms- there are better ways to help people that don’t involve coddling them like babies.
This is taking it too far, maybe this disability group wanted some air time. I am trying hard and failing to see their point. I am looking forward to this movie because it seems very funny and worthwhile after watching the mummy rubbish last weekend.
This PC mess has just gone way overboard. I am offended by the NY which has been used as a medical diagnois to the “n” word, which has always been derogatory.
I am so sick of the protests involved with this movie. How dare they try to censor the artistic integrity of this work. The director of the Special Olympics is mad because they use the word retarded. Come on this was the scientific name associated with this disability like 10 years ago. Now they change the name every year or so because they don’t like the negative connotations associated with the word de jour, but every time they change the name the same connotations are then associated with the new word. Really they are mad because people think retarded people are funny. That is not going to change, even if you try to attach serious sounding words to the disability. Ok, so what happens in five years when intellectual disability (the Special Olympic director’s word of choice) becomes passé. Will we then label this man as a bigot for uttering this insensitive word.
Celebitchy, you said, “When you have someone close to you that is taunted by that word maybe you’ll understand vdantev. What if you had a little brother, cousin, or neice that was mentally handicapped and cried every day from people calling them a “retard”?”
Celebitchy, how can you so calliously call these people “mentally handicapped” the proper term for these people is intellectually disabled. Maybe you will understand how hurtfull the word “mentally handicapped” is when you have a family member who is retarded.