Here are some photos of Kim Kardashian and North West going to see the movie Home in LA on Saturday. They were joined by Kourtney Kardashian and Penelope and Mason Disick. Sigh… North is back to wearing black, I see. At least she got to wear light-colored kicks. And I guess this is Kim’s version of casual-wear – jeans so tight that they looks like they’re about to split. North looks cute with her hair in a little bun though. She’s adorable.
Meanwhile, this story is amazing – you know how the Brits love their “exclusive clubs” and members-only establishments? Well, they’ve exported the Soho House to NYC and LA, to pretty decent results. The Soho House in LA is celebrating its five-year anniversary, and to mark the occasion, The Hollywood Reporter did some interviews with the people behind the scenes, plus some members. I guess we’re supposed to be impressed by how bitchy these people are and how they look down their nose at reality stars and the like. But it just sounds so juvenile. In any case, Kim Kardashian has applied to be a member several times and she’s been turned down every time.
Los Angeles’ Soho House turns five years old this year, and some members of the private club’s management are spilling secret details about who has been allowed in and who hasn’t.
“We denied access to every Real Housewife who applied,” Tim Geary, the former membership director, told The Hollywood Reporter. And the no’s didn’t end there…
“Kim Kardashian has unsuccessfully tried numerous times. Kobe Bryant showed up and chose not to join. We didn’t let him up. There was debate over Britney Spears. Not sure how that played out. We tried not to give membership to people who would fuel paparazzi or bring press.”
Geary continued, “The hardest memberships to deal with, though, were the headmistress of the school you want your kids to get into and the coaches of my sons’ baseball and soccer teams.”
The Soho House is all about privacy as well as exclusivity, which means no unauthorized cameras inside the establishment, and they don’t want a lot of paparazzi milling around outside either. I’ll say this – we rarely get pap photos outside of the Soho House in LA, and the only interior shots are “official,” like when the Soho House hosts an event and there’s ONE official photographer or something. Which is totally antithetical to how Kardashians operate, so yeah. Why would Kim even want to join?
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
can’t imagine Kim fitting in there
i’m a member and the golden rule is no photography in the Houses. you can’t even use your phone to make calls in large areas of the houses. i’m not sure she’d last 5 minutes.
Oh I am jealous!
I am curious – if you are a member in LA, are you automatically a member in NY and London too? Or is that a separate membership?
Honestly it’s a bucket list kind of deal. I’ve been twice (LA), and apart from the view and seeing certain celebs, I wouldn’t trip…especially if you’re already used to partying/dining with a who who’s crowd (which being a celebrity or living in LA- would be normal and often).
There are 2 types of membership – local and every house. I have every house – so yes can access London (x5 houses), NYC, LA + Miami, Chicago, Toronto, Berlin and istanbul. It’s great for me as I travel to lots of those places, and I use the Houses for work meetings & social stuff in the evenings (media industry). I wouldn’t be signing up for celeb spotting though, it’s not really the point of it!
I do not care about Kim becoming a member of Soho House. She is the kind of person who just wouldn’t fit in.
“I refuse to join any club that would have me for a member.” – Groucho Marx
But…Kartrashian wants desperately to be a member. They just have the good taste to keep her out.
Don’t you need to be invited by a current member or have a sponsor to submit your application? Who would sponsor Kim K?
Is it true that it’s really only art people that are given membership? I’ve been to Shoreditch House and the one in Toronto. I like the rooftop of the one in Toronto because it’s like a greenhouse.
Fitting in there. *Titter!*
I wouldn’t let her join purely on the basis of that clownarse, never mind her lowering the tone or drawing unwanted pap attention.
As Paris Hilton famously said about the giant jellyroll, “two trash bags full of cottage cheese”.
Back in the day, I am sure Kim wanted to join to hide secret rendezvous. However, aren’t we all over the Soho house.
It is not a sexy place with dancers on the wall… reason why Kobe didn’t join
Anywhoo. North is wearing Chanel espadrilles. I’ll assume they were a gift. LOL
Slut shaming is still slut shaming when it’s a Kardashian.
How is a secret rendezvous slut shaming? I am sure she had relationships that she didn’t want public before she knew where they were going.
@denisemich:
Exactly. And she has. She met up with Kanye so many times during their decade-long affair. His friend Consequence (rapper) spilled the beans on that one, the man even drove Kanye to the hotels! It is what it is. It doesn’t make her a slut at all (rather a cheater).
The K Klan LOVE freebies, unfortunately for them, in high society circles anyone classy enough doesn’t celebrate freebies. How…gauche*shudders*
You would never take anything for free ? Only celebrities do, right? Lol
I do want a membership but mostly for the events and a place to hang out after a long day. I’ve been to 2 of them and they are really just that. A place to meet up for those in the industry. Shoreditch House seems like the real “youngster” one though. When I went there, it was mostly hipsters on their laptops.
@ Artemis
The funny thing is Krish Humphries ex-gf (reportedly) used to work the front desk at a very specific hotel that Kim would frequent. She used to meet up with Kanye for flings. She was with Reggie at the time and Kanye was with Amber at the time. She is a cheater for sure, but so is Kanye. Just so wierd how the front desk clerk ended up with Kim’s ex-husband (#2).
Nah – nouveau-riche wannabes like the Kartrashian/Jenners just chomp at the bit to belong to exclusive clubs. Maybe she should do what Lohan did and try London – for some reason they seem much more tolerant of our celebrity trash.
I don’t get the hype with Soho House. Everyone seems so stuck up and they’re all pretty rude. A few of my sister’s coworkers have been before and they didn’t really like it. So I doubt I would either
She wants to join because she’s always looking for ways to legitimize herself to the public. She did Vogue, which she thought would make people accept her as high fashion, upper crust or even just fashion forward, but that sort of backfired because Vogue got a lot of flak for letting ~a reality tv star~ be on their “prestigious” cover. Then of course, there’s the Met Gala, all these fashion show appearances.
She’s so desperate for the public to love her, take her seriously and see her beyond the “sex tape girl – with RAY J” but unfortunately, people never forget. I mean, they could but so many people dislike what the Kardashians represent that it’s sort of… nice to remember her roots. Also, the fact that they continuously try to rewrite history doesn’t help.
I’m sure the Midd clan has tried at least once to join in the UK. Does anyone know any notables in this club(US or UK)?
Cumby I’m sure has a membership. He was seen at Electric House. Sofia Vegara is a member in LA (pap in the car park took a picture once).
Agree. The snubs from the Soho house is a bitter reminder that not everyone is eager to cater to the Kardashians, that they are low class despite the money. A club whose cache is privacy and discretion is not going to want pap magnets and pap callers anywhere near its establishment.
And that is their right. It’s kind of refreshing that they’re not lowering their standards by including them. Unlike others like Anna Wintour, Vogue, the Met Ball, every Fashion Week event etc. That whole family is trashy and they discredit everything they associate with. It may sound elitist but it’s also good business if you want to protect your cache status.
Yes. This!
You said everything I wanted to, but better. Dead on.
If Kim’s jeans were not so tight and just plain sandals, she would good. As for this “club” that denied her membership, if it denied her once why keep trying? Sounds very snobbish
Yeah. Only Kim can make jeans and a T-shirt look uncomfortable.
I was thinking the same thing. She looks so uncomfortable. I can’t imagine having to always wear my clothes skintight.
Totally, and her hair must be really damaged since all of the pics we’ve seen since she dyed it back dark she’s had it in a tiny tight bun.
@Mel I thought maybe the blonde was a wig but now second guessing that because she has only worn this tight bun since going dark again. I wonder if she really did some major damage to it.
She’s probably waiting for her hair appointment to get long extensions put in. Just wait for it…
Think of all the intelligent conversation the SOHO members are missing out on without KK.
“Uhm… I am not sure I understand – why aren’t we talking about me?”
Kim would want to join somewhere like that to show she is accepted by the elite. She is the joke of Hollywood and people are embarrassed to be associated with her. Admission into that club would be like lunch at the cool kids table in high school
The Housewives were all turned down too. At least they are consistent with their no-reality-stars thing.
Exactly what kind of service does the Soho House offer? That allows them to bully folks. Plus I am curious how does it make a decent profit, if it is playing the “your entirely too low rent*” for us game?
(*low rent = cheap, tacky, etc…)
I really don’t think that this can be considered bullying. Kim applied and was turned down. The End. What’s pathetic is that she keeps applying. I guess Kanye’s doesn’t have membership either.
Bullying? Really? There are children ( and adults ) committing suicide over actual bullying and you relate Kim not be accepted into a private club bullying? Really? I’m so tired of people throwing the word bully out for everything.
You’re being totally hysterical. I’m sorry will Kim’s not being able to hob knob at the SOHO lead her to kill herself? As pretty much everyone has pointed out on this blog, her membership being rejected is not a form of bullying. It is a business decision.
I can’t blame them for not wanting a circus and ultimately sacrificing their privacy of their other members. Kim K. was simply turned down which might bolster their more applicants. I’m sure their are other swanky clubs who will be happy to have her. Please get a grip.
She seems like a really hands on mom.
Imma gonna finish that one for you. She seems like a really hands on mom…when the paps are around.
Best comment today!
And the nanny isn’t in the picture
Nearly every single photo of Kim holding North over the past months has featured 1) North anxiously glancing about for her nanny, never looking at Kim; 2) Kim stony-faced, like she’s carrying a large iguana instead of her little girl.
Exactly. Kim looks at that child with such a stone cold face even in front of the paps. The best is when North was walking behind her in the airport and north stopped and stared at the Paps and Kim kept walking. The security guard had to tell her north wasnt behind Her then she turned around walked back and grabbed her. Yeah real hands on. There’s a video on YouTube.
I hope you’re joking.
Where is the diaper bag? The Toys? The bottle? The Blankie?
That child looks miserable.
North is always in black. Always.
She is dragged around the world like a suitcase to show off.
Her mom is obviously disconnected from her emotions. I.E. Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
And the little baby? North has NO idea. She is just a kid. Like I was.
*Seems* being the operative word here, IMO. Looks like damage control to me, after all the snark about her being exactly the OPPOSITE.
There were lots of pics on Daily Mail with her sister and her two older children on this outing. A couple of photos showed her holding North, but looking at, and possibly talking to, Mason (?). She was SMILING. In all the other photos with her and North, she had her normal sour face firmly plastered on. This woman is bonkers.
Fun Factor: “…carrying a large iguana instead of her daughter.” Too funny, and too apt.
Imagine that tight red ring imprint around her chunky waist for being so tight. She looks porky from the back.
cupcake: THIS!
Does she not see how ridiculous she looks from the back? At least she is not showing her midriff as well I guess. This FAMILY IS SO TACKY.
I hurt from seeing how tight those jeans are. How can she sit down? Or move?
It looks like she pooped her pants
She NEVER wears anything that looks even remotely comfortable. How miserable and what a lack of self esteem she must have to constantly think she has to wear the tightest clothes with stilettos in order to always try to look “sexy”.
If she were my sister and I went someplace with her, I would tell her to change those pants. She looks ridiculous and it appears she’s gained some weight? My sister wouldn’t go across the street with me if I wore something like that. Does anyone ever tell her the truth? Her demeanor with Mason always makes me think she wanted a boy. She’s actually smiling at him. North is adorable!
I just recently got a pair of 7 for all mankind jeans that are really tight. And I have to tell you that they are the most comfortable things ever! Depends on the fabric, I guess.
She doesn’t seem to understand they don’t want her. The more she tries, the lamer she looks.
If she has to wear sunglasses in the bright sun, why doesn’t she put a pair on her daughter? The sunglasses will match their black clothes
Putting sunglasses on North would be a responsible mother thing to do. Kim only tries when paparazzi are around. The nanny might have sunglasses for her but Kim won’t let the nanny too close in public when cameras are around
In fairness to Kim, at North’s age, there is a good chance that she won’t keep sunglasses on. My daughter wouldn’t keep those things on if her life depended on it. We even got the straps that go around her head, and she just yanked them off.
Now a hat? That would help. Assuming North wouldn’t just yank that off too.
Everyone always says Hollywood is like high school and this story is the total proof of that. It is amazing how bitchy they sound and either don’t know or don’t care.
Soho House rule –
“On Wednesdays we wear pink”
How long before Kanye Kardashian claims racism?
Her would be sorta right. You don’t need to be a racist to nix Kim, yet I can’t imagine that these clubs have real diversity. A few token non-whites, maybe… 🙁
It’s their club and they can do as they like. I highly doubt any non white members were invited or accepted as “token” members. Not everything needs to be turned into a conversation about race.
It must be nice to not have to carry around a purse and diaper bag. If she didn’t have people for that, walking in those jeans, wobbly strap sandles while carrying bags and North would be an accident waiting to happen
The diaper bag! So that’s what’s missing. I’ve never seen her carrying a bag full of diapers, snacks, a bottle, maybe a picture book or toy.
I never was able to leave home without the heavy diaper bag full of evrything. Seeing North with a toy in her hands might make her smile and look away from all the people standing around.
After reading that article on the opening of the LA club, I totally agree with Kaiser that is sounds completely juvenile. the interview with the founders itself just sort of makes my skin crawl….these places are HUGE over here in the UK, and I see the need for a place for famous people to go and relax, but imagine not being able to pull your phone out and take a picture of the FANTASTIC looking plate of food someone set down in front of you, or just having to be scrutinised that severely just to “belong”. Perhaps its the Yank in me (American expat here), but this is one import that we could do without. Besides, these places have already existed for eons in New York, so its not exactly like they’re bringing us anything that doesn’t already exist. As my husband would say, they just sound like “a shower of tossers”
Yeah, I can’t decide who I would find it more unappealing to spend an evening with – KK or those members.
Tough call.
I agree but I also kind of don’t care. If a bunch of pretentious people want to get together behind closed doors and pat each other on the back while they drink overpriced scotch, more power to them, especially if they exclude Kim.
When my daughter was little I had so much fun dressing her in pink – AND white AND denim AND yellow AND blue… Stripes AND polka dots AND stars AND flowers AND elephants.., They are both missing out on a really fun part of being a little girl. (And yes, she also wore flannel shirts and work boots and I bought her dinosaurs and a Ghostbusters gun.)
Mine too. I had a ball.
Black is horrible on a cute little girl. I’m trying to think if I ever dressed my daughter in it, and I can only think of one holiday dress that was black velvet but had a pink satin color and pink satin buttons.
Agree. Even if you don’t “full girly” they just make such beautiful, simple, sweet dresses and sweaters and little tiny shoes…she’ll only be a baby for a short time.
High five Belle Epoch. Put that beautiful baby girl in color. Any color, besides black all the time. Some bows or cute hats would be nice too. Girls clothes are so fun, and she would look adorable.
I should admit though, that my sweet little girl is currently running around our house in Disney Store Hulk Pajamas because the Hulk is the coolest person in the whole world. Haha!
Her rear needs hiking up; the implants are definitely going south.
I can’t believe what she did to her rear end! She used to look so good before her butt implants. And the baby in black again…
I feel like North is really young for the movie theatre? My son is the same age and there’s no way he’d sit still for that long!
She’s really young for fashion shows too. My daughter wouldn’t sit still or be quiet at Norths age either. We watched movies at home
I’m not sure why KK would want to be a member. In London at least, its mainly music industry people (including myself) that go for corporate deals and a few drinks. Its exclusive, but not something to be jealous of.
I can’t see the attraction either, a club that’s so exclusive they have employee gossip to the media about who they mean girled.
It sounds so pathetic. I wouldn’t want to hang around the Klan but I wouldn’t want to hang around with anyone who join that club either and hang around with the sort of people that do, and more particularly those that feel so superior to be in a club that is perfectly OK with letting the CEOs of arms manufacturers in but won’t ever lower they’re oh so special tone for a reality show participant and thinks that’s something to brag about.
Does anyone know if she really got butt implants or her body simply changed after pregnancy?
There was an episode where she had an x-ray taken of her butt to prove it is real. Kourtney had her breast implants x-rayed to show the difference between real and fake tissues. Her butt was real, but it was a few years ago
She never had traditional “implants” that’s why she did that whole X-ray thing to throw people off. That butt is all fat transfers, lipo and sculpting- Brazilian butt lift stuff. She can lie without lying because people don’t ask her about that , they ask her about implants.
Kim’s grotesque ass was just as huge before she got pregnant. The x-ray episode on TV proved ONLY that she didn’t have butt implants. Kim has fat injections, not implants, and that wouldn’t show on an x-ray.
fat transfer not implants, which is why is sags so much. it cant be removed. every few years to combat the sagging, the only way to fix it (since apparently leaving it alone isnt an option) is to put more fat in.
The only thing I’m taking away from this piece is kim just needs to admit her size and let go of the stupid crap kanye keeps making her wear. I’m a size 8/10, and my body looks just about the same, possibly thinner than kardashian’s. I am taller than her, but my point is if I wore some of the outfits she does, I would be mortified and feel like a fat cow for days. If she’s accepted that she likes her body at this weight, cool, but start dressing for it. If not, then girl actually needs to go to the gym and not just talk about it. I’m not bodys shaming, like I said I am her size. But I also know that this is my body out of shape bc I never work out and am softer than I’ve ever been. So yeah. Decisions Kim.
This, exactly. Kim makes herself look sloppy and super chubby because she finds it necessary to wear everything skin tight and 3 sizes too small.
But that would mean she would have to grow a spine to tell her husband to back off and then she’d be reneging on her contract with him SMH. Not to mention admit that her self-esteem is non-existent and start working on improving her emotional life… not gonna happen. No money in that…..
Sizes are really irrelevant, since they not only vary by country (US vs. UK) and most major retailers use vanity sizing. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/25/business/25sizing.html?_r=1
I’ve seen KK in person and she is TINY, like a doll. All of the injectables and plastic surgery make her look like a circus clown so her ass & boobs are disgustingly huge in relation to the rest of her, but overall she’s a mini-person. Many people in show business are like that, they look “normal” in photos/on film, but in person their physical proportions are miniature.
When did you see her in person? She is not the same size as she was years ago. And yes, I’m sure we’re close to the same size because my body looks similar to her in pictures. I know sizes can range differently in retailers, but all I’m saying is she def no size 2, as she has claimed.
Without putting a number on a size, all you have to do is look at how tight her clothes are.
Okay she is supposed to be 5’3″ but I get the feeling she is closer to between 5′ 1″ and 5’2″. Now if you don’t look at her butt, (I know it is hard), but look at her calves, arms and waist especially she does look kind of small, not size 2 but I could buy a tight 4 or 6, US sizes not UK. Now you put the butt in there and all bets are off. I can’t tell from the photos whether her butt really is as big as it looks or is it an optical illusion like the blue/white dress and her butt looks like another planet just because her waist and legs are so small. I am not body shaming either, I am 5’4″ and size 12, and she would certainly look better in her size. I think she is at least 2 sizes too small and altered to boot, because I know I can’t fit into a size of jeans that are 2 sizes too small for me there isn’t a good enough seamstress for that. Who knows maybe they lie to her.
Maybe she likes her body? It would certainly seem to be the case. While I think KKs motivations might be slightly different but who says only tall people or only skinny people “should” wear something? I usually agree that she doesn’t “dress for her body” but lately I’ve been trying to avoid that. If you like belly shirts but don’t have washboards abs why shouldn’t you wear them, like mini skirts and have chunky thighs? The only reason we think that certain things don’t suit certain bodies is social conditioning. Theres no real reason for it.
When I run I always used to wear belly baring tops because I felt 100% less sweaty. Now I’m older I don’t do it because my stomach isn’t socially acceptable any more and every single run I feel uncomfortable and stupid because I follow those “rules”
If she liked her body she would not continually go under the knife to alter it.
Holy sh*t, that’s one big ass!!
But I’m sure many pedophiles and sex abusers are welcome there.
Yep, and CEOs who fleeced public treasuries to bail them out, and who treat their workers like crap, who hide money in offshore bank accounts to avoid tax, and who’s products include weapons that slaughter children.
Considering that the Soho house people clearly say in the article that they have rejected rich and powerful people who were known to be abusive to their assistants, or who had a bad reputation as assholes, I’d try reading the article first.
And they cater explicitly to creative/movie industry types, not arms-dealing CEOs.
I feel like if she was wearing a pair of jeans that actually suited her body, she would look pretty good. Like a normal mom, more or less (the way she’s jacked her face up is depressing). But she really needs to do something about that butt if she’s going to continue to wear jeans like that in public. I know that sounds really snarky, but if we must be bombarded with pictures of her, I can’t look at that alien creature booty anymore. I just can’t.
Also, I think some of the analysis of her body language with North is kinda harsh. Granted, there are moments I can definitely see why some people would make the case that Kim and North don’t have a very strong bond (that was going to be “bong” thanks to autocorrect and I considered leaving it). Maybe it’s just me, but in these pictures I just see a curious and independent toddler who wants to look around at the world around her.
Do they make jeans that fit that body shape?
Yes they do but you have to get the correct size and we all know if it’s not 5 sizes too small, Kim isn’t interested.
Her clothes are always so tight they look spraypainted on. And who in their right mind carries their baby while wearing stilettos???
The photo of her in that semi squat to pick up the baby is hilarious ! ..The jeans are so tight she can’t get down any farther….
As for taking that baby to a movie theater ….just for show …20 month old would not be able to set still long enough to watch the movie . It would make it a living he(( for anybody setting close to them to enjoy it…
.Just like taking her to dance class , its all for show…and for media attention…. Poor baby ! I can see her trying to figure out what the world are the other kiddies doing and wandering off to find something to interest her…..Taking babies under 4 to any class or group is more for mommie then baby anyway…They are contend setting in the floor by themselves tearing up a magazine or something. Or cursing around the house grabbing and touching things …Those classes are for Kim and the Photographers….”See what a good mommy I am ” …..
I disagree with your opinion of classes for little ones…they are a fun way for children to interact with other children. Movement, learning to follow simple directions, gross motor skills, exposure to other kids are all good things even at that age. It’s not like the expectations are too high, the instructors know they are dealing with toddlers. It is also a good way for new moms to meet other new moms. I actually think this may be the most normal thing I’ve seen Kim K do with/for her daughter and I am not about to criticize the one thing that seems to allow that poor child to wear a color other than black!
I did dance class as a toddler (and kept it up till boys became more interesting around 15). As you say it’s more about socialising with a bit of motor skill development at that age. I loved it, so do lots of kids. I find the very existence of the Klan and the fact that people give them money to be valid, consumeristic and shallow, really depressing but people’s justifiable distaste for them means they get criticised for things other celebs get a pass, or even get praise for.
If some celeb people liked took their kid to dance class everyone would say it was adorable. KK taking her kid to a fashion show = terrible mother but Beckham? KK dressing the poor kid in impractical high fashion crap = terrible parenting but Aila Wang?
The view from behind is what matters most in a pair of jeans. Hers looks laughable.
She reminds me of one of those inflatable bottom-heavy clown punching bags we had as kids.
My one wish is North going full on teenage rebellion, turns to her parents and says ” F— this! I’m not only letting MY f-ing gorgeous curls reign free but I’m also getting a f-ing education and going to college!”
And yes, replete with f-bombs. *crosses fingers*
Contrast that with how Zahara and Shiloh adore their mom, and were so excited for her when she won at the KCA last night. Kim and Angelina are sooooo far apart on the loving parent scale.
it would be the ULTIMATE rebellion if North went and became, say, an accountant.
Can you imagine the fits that famewhore family of hers would have? And yes that includes Kanye too.
You know the nanny had to have been there. No way would a mother bring a toddler to a movie without a diaper bag.
Also, didn’t Kanye just recently rant about elitism and classism? Yet his wife is trying to be all about it. They need to make up their minds.
Lastly, I love how Kim always looks like she’s just so annoyed with the paps when really we all know she’s the one that calls them ! She’s not letting her child have a normal life. She could easily go shopping and do fun stuff with her daughter without the paps around. She does this on purpose.
The nanny probably took Nori out somewhere during the movie, bringing her back only for the exit pap walk. She’s really too young for movies in a movie theater. The paps work with Kim (she gets a commission on what they sell), so most of the time the nanny and the child can probably move around freely. Kim’s paps deliberately keep the nanny out of the shots. But you know the nanny has to be there, especially since Kim is never carrying anything that every parent with a baby or toddler has to drag along. Also Nori often seems to be focusing on and reacting to someone she knows who is off camera. I hope Nori is getting more used to Kim the Ice Queen, but the kid really is just being used as a prop. My bet is that the nanny is being instructed to make gestures etc. to get some reaction out of Nori.
I agree with everything you said. A two year old should not be in a movie theater. I bought my 4 year old niece to a movie once and she was ready to leave after 20 minutes ! They can’t sit still that long no matter how good the movie is. No way Nori sat there the whole time. Of course Kim has a deal with the paps and that’s why the nanny is never pap’d. Kim doesn’t leave the house without the nanny. I just wonder if that poor nanny gets fed all day. She’s not allowed to sit at the table with Kim and North. It’s like Kim can’t even take care of one child without help? Normal women do this on a daily basis and many times with more than one child !
Sorry K.K.; the ‘establishment’ doesn’t want you. Never will. Perhaps you should change your behavior so your daughter doesn’t live the same denigration you and yours live, as chosen by you and yours.
Did anyone see the clip of their show where Kim talked about how Kanye yelled at Kim’s fitness trainer. Kim said she wanted to lose 15 pounds and the trainer said it was impossible for her to do it. Kanye went ballistic and told Kim to fire the trainer. Well maybe the trainer is being realistic. The only place she needs to lose weight is in her butt. However, she keeps adding fat to it instead ! Also, why is Kanye so worried about Kim’s figure? I thought he said she was “perfect” the way she is? I thought Kim was “proud” of her curves lol?
i hate her too tight jeans and hanging out boobs allthetime! but i kinda like how those jeans are cut, i like that idea. although im sure she didnt come up with that herself, they might be cut originally!
Her ass continues to look like an ultra full dirty diaper
North is ADORABLE. That’s all I got.
I’m glad there’s someone out there who wouldn’t pander to her.