PBS suspends Finding Your Roots, citing Ben Affleck’s censorship

affleckroots
As you may recall, Ben Affleck and the PBS genealogy show hosted by Henry Louis Gates, Jr., Finding Your Roots, came under fire about two months ago during the Sony hack. The focus of that episode, which aired in October, 2014 was on race and ancestors who were slaves and slave owners. However emails from Gates to Sony CEO Michael Lynton revealed that their biggest celebrity “get” of the episode, Ben Affleck, had requested six months after taping that the references to his slave-owning ancestor be edited out. Gates told Lynton that this was the first time a guest had requested editorial control. Lynton advised Gates to take out that section “if no one knows“. Gates wrote that he knew that “to do this would be a violation of PBS rules,” that PBS and all his producers would be aware of the change and that this would “open the door to censorship.” He eventually gave in.

Affleck later issued a statement explaining his request to censor his ancestry. He compared it to a “creative collaborative process” in which he would lobby a director. Affleck included a kind of self-pitying defense of his actions. “This isn’t a news program. Finding Your Roots is a show where you voluntarily provide a great deal of information about your family, making you quite vulnerable.” In a follow-up statement, Affleck somewhat contradicted himself and stated that Gates told him the references to his ancestor in question would have been left out of the final cut regardless of Affleck’s request.

It turns out that PBS and the producing station, WNET, weren’t aware of the edit, as Gates stated they would be in his messages to Lynton. PBS just completed an internal review of this issue, with the finding that Gates hid the edit from PBS and that this was a violation of editorial standards. The result is that they’ve pulled that episode from their online archive and will not air again, that they’ve postponed the premiere date for the next season, which has already taped, and that they have not yet made a decision whether the show will be renewed. They’re also implementing stricter editorial standards. Damn. Here’s some of their statement, with more at the source:

On April 17, 2015, the media reported on hacked, private email exchanges between Professor Gates and Sony Entertainment CEO Michael Lynton referencing requests by actor Ben Affleck to omit from the episode the fact that slave ownership is part of his family history. These reports marked the first time that either PBS or WNET learned of this request. The next day, PBS and WNET began an internal review led by Beth Hoppe and Stephen Segaller, the executives who oversee primetime programming for PBS and WNET, respectively. As part of this process, PBS and WNET examined correspondence, production records, agreements, talent releases and other documentation regarding the episode, as well as publicly available material. PBS and WNET also interviewed the co-producers, who fully cooperated in this review. The law firm of Covington and Burling, LLP assisted in this review and provided an independent perspective.

Under the PBS Editorial Standards, primary responsibility for content “necessarily rests with the producer [which is] uniquely positioned to control its elements.” The standards require that the creative and editorial process be shielded “from political pressure or improper influence from funders or other sources.” The standards also require producers to keep PBS apprised of potential issues during the production process “to provide opportunities for early notice and resolution of problems.”

PBS and WNET have determined that the series co-producers violated PBS standards by failing to shield the creative and editorial process from improper influence, and by failing to inform PBS or WNET of Mr. Affleck’s efforts to affect program content.

[From PBS.org]

Kaiser loves Finding Your Roots and she feels sorry for Gates, who was only trying to placate a big celebrity guest. So Ben Affleck just pissed off PBS enough to damage the future of one of their more popular shows. This is going to affect his brand and you know that Affleck is stewing now. His tenth wedding anniversary is coming up next week and he just suffered a huge setback. I’m just saying.

Screen-Shot-2015-04-20-at-6.51.52-AM_edited-1

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

91 Responses to “PBS suspends Finding Your Roots, citing Ben Affleck’s censorship”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Melody says:

    Funny how he worries so much about being judged on his ancestors rather than his actions.

    • Yoohoo says:

      I don’t think it was him. I think his publicist or someone recommended it be edited out.

    • BangersandMash says:

      The arrow is pointed down for Ben Affleck this week. Next week, we’ll see what happens

    • Wren says:

      The really sad part is all he had to do was express disappointment and say something like “how awful, I can hardly believe that was ever okay” and life would have gone on with nary a backwards glance over it. Is it super hard to believe that a white dude whose family has lived in this country for many generations at one point somewhere along the line owned slaves? No, it isn’t. It’s hardly even a thing. Everyone has douchebags in their family tree and history is full of atrocities. At some point, some of your ancestors will have participated in them. No, the show didn’t HAVE to bring it up, but that’s the point of the show and Affleck didn’t have to sign on to do it.

      • lunchcoma says:

        Yeah, I thought his reaction was bizarre. The country is full of people whose ancestors owned slaves. I don’t think anyone would hold it against Affleck individually.

      • tracking says:

        Exactly. It would have been an excellent teaching moment. He is having a rough month, even if entirely his own doing.

      • mom2two says:

        Exactly, I am sure we all can look back on our family trees and probably find someone who did something we are not proud of and would not condone today.

        Sorry the show is ending because of this. If Affleck was going to be that sensitive about what they could find, he should have never agreed to do the show.

      • Kitten says:

        I completely agree.

        They said four out of five of their guests descended from slave-owners including Ken Burns (!) and none asked to have that info edited out.

        I’m like, one of three people here who actually like Affleck so I’m disappointed in how he handled things.

      • Esmom says:

        Wren, you are spot on. This whole thing is such a mess. I’d argue that it’s not affecting Affleck’s brand as much as it is PBS’s. That really sucks.

  2. Pinky says:

    Wow. Overkill. It’s an interesting and important show. Why not do a special on what happened rather than axe the show altogether, punishing audiences and even people in command who seems to be trying–even if ultimately misguided–to do the right thing (by maintain their integrity)?

    • pf says:

      I think the show is great. So interesting. I remember when they had the former NAACP President Benjamin Jealous on the same episode. He found out he was more white than black (and this was long before in the Rachel Dolezal story). Unlike Affleck, he didn’t ask to edit anything out. I think doing a special on what happened is a good idea. Why punish the audience just because Affleck is a douche?

      • FingerBinger says:

        Ben Jealous’ father is white. Obviously he was going to find white relatives.

      • pf says:

        I meant his African-American side. Like, he found out he was pretty much white. It was an interesting take on how we view race in this country.

    • Gauchita says:

      GREAT IDEA!!

    • Maria A. says:

      I’m really ticked at Affleck right now for this. I love this show. Meryl Streep handled the slavery issue with real class. She wasn’t happy to find it in her ancestry, but she said, “It is what it is.” You can’t change the past, as she acknowledged, however much you dislike it. Affleck and his people are beneath scorn.

  3. Kiddo says:

    Delayed reaction much?

    • Sixer says:

      I’m all for any media outlet upholding its standards, no matter how protracted the process, since so few of them actually do that. The BBC has similarly tortuous internal procedures for this sort of thing.

      • Lori says:

        Yes. Perhaps they could give some lessons to TLC.

      • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

        Agreed. It’s a shame since it’s a good and intelligent show but seriously, we’ve got to stop letting things slip when it comes to poor decisions made in honor of celebrity.

  4. lisa2 says:

    the sad part is someone NOT BEN may lose their JOB because of this silliness.. Ben is not responsible for what his ancestors did 100s of years ago. You are responsible for the way you live your life. This should have been handled as a teaching moment. Not a coverup.

    • Lola says:

      Was it “100s of years ago” though? Some people who owned slaves are still alive today.

    • FLORC says:

      Ben is responsible for requesting the information be removed. And the bigger your name the less of a request it becomes.
      That the edits were made and kept secret is another issue imo. It does lead back to Affleck.

      Slightly late and off topic, but anyone catch Mindy Kaling on Wait Wait? She was talking about meetig Ben and Matt. And the view of Ben was just not great. She described him how he seems to get descibed in these threads. Only she was hilarious telling it. Meanwhile Matt seems like an awesome guy.

  5. QQ says:

    Thanks Roid Kitty Batman, You aren’t just content with screwing over your wife, now you had to mess with our PBS too!!

    • Abbott says:

      BEN AFFLECK RUINS EVERYTHING.

      • Kiddo says:

        That would be an excellent headline for Star Magazine or the Enquirer.

      • Lola says:

        @Kiddo, I think it’s actually from InTouch.

      • ell says:

        he really does.

      • Kiddo says:

        @Lola I’d like to also see it on the Daily News and the NY Post covers, on the same day; like classic coverage of the Hindenburg.

      • Boston Green Eyes says:

        Remember “From the Desk of Ben Affleck” anyone? Someone should really have a go at it now!

        BTW, I live/work in the Cambridge, MA area and know people who knew Matt n’ Ben. Everyone says that Matt was the decent nice one and that Ben was the d-bag one.

        So there’s that.

      • laura in LA says:

        I’m tired of the “Blame Obama” rhetoric from the right! Let’s all instead blame Ben for EVERYTHING.

    • Elisa the I. says:

      Roid Kitty Batman! OMG, that’s epic!!

    • Mia4S says:

      LOL! RKB for short? He’s so ridiculous.

      Come back Christian Bale! Come back!

  6. serena says:

    This isn’t right, I loved that show! I really hope Ben is ashamed of himself, for THIS reason not for his ancestors!

    • MinnFinn says:

      Gates and the other coproducer are just as guilty of wrongdoing. They should have not given into Affleck. By doing so they defied standards of integrity for the professions of journalism and history.

      • Robin says:

        Gates doesn’t HAVE any integrity. He showed that in the debacle with the police officer.

    • Abbott says:

      I hope he’s more ashamed for his ancestors, TBH.

    • angie says:

      Thank you, MinnFinn. Affleck did the lobbying, but Gates made the decision. He’s a tenured Harvard professor, who’s supposedly all about truth, and he decided to go Hollywood rather than stand up to an obnoxious movie star. And for what? It’s not like Affleck or his buddies have any influence with either Harvard or PBS, so what was the pressure that got him to damage his own credibilty?

      • MinnFinn says:

        angie, I have the same question. The leaked emails indicate Gates readily caved.

  7. GiGi says:

    You know what’s more interesting to me – generally, on this show (and on Who Do You Think You Are?) they really only trace one line of ancestry. It seems like it would be no big deal to have just gone with a different lineage – in this way, Affleck is happy and the show still maintains its integrity.

    IDK. For me, I wouldn’t want to deal publicly (on a TV show) with my ancestor’s sins. A better way to handle it would’ve been to make the show and then have Affleck write an OpEd about what was revealed but didn’t make the show. #PRbasics

    • Kate says:

      But that’s pretty much the point of the show. They don’t do episodes where someone finds out their ancestor was a farmer who never did anything of note. Either they focus on that one ancestor who was awesome, or that one who was a real douche. And as more of us have a few shitty racist, criminal, cruel ancestors than a few ancestors who invented something or who were activists or other people of note etc. about 75% of the people on this show are confronted with their ancestors sins. Having a slave owning ancestor is totally run of the mill for this show and others like it, at least half the episodes touch on the subject.

      If Ben couldn’t handle that, I’m not sure why he agreed to do the show at all. Didn’t they end up talking about his mums activism instead? What’s the point of that, he could have just had a conversation with her.

    • Wren says:

      All he had to do was be like, “OMG how awful!” and nobody would have thought twice about it. Or not agreed to do the show at all. The whole point is finding interesting people (for good or bad) in your ancestry.

      • laura in LA says:

        +1

      • Blue says:

        Do you really think Ben Affleck is that self aware. Ben freakin Affleck! all he cares about is using his PR people and his power in Hollywood to spin lies and cover up all the bad things in his past and today.

  8. Tiffany says:

    Who the hell would put their credibility and livelihood on the line for Ben Affleck.

    Gates credibility has taken a hit as well and I am sure he is stewing.

    • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

      Seriously, the worst part is you know Afleck only cares about the part effecting him and would be unbothered if his name just didn’t keep popping up with this story.

      I’m sorry, I don’t know why this man put himself, his show and integrity on the line like this knowing the consequences.

    • Lola says:

      Actors can be charming. I’m sure the guy though they were going to be friends afterwards.

    • curleque says:

      At its core, this show was about research. Gates is an academic, and now his credibility as an academic and researcher may be questioned.

      Love that show. This is a shame.

  9. Hautie says:

    Yes, this is complete overkill. Dr. Gates and his crew… getting their entire reputation tossed under the bus, over Affleck, is ridiculous.

    As a long time viewer of the “Finding your Roots”. I am not offend by what happen.

    Dr. Gates and his team got put into a horrible position. But it does not take away from their integrity. At all.

    There is so much about everyone’s tree to explorer. And when the decision was made to explorer the other branches of Affleck’s tree… it did not make me question the shows researcher and producers. Or their integrity.

    There is more to your tree, than the old slave owning grandfather from 150 years ago. Why even bother with exploiting that? Sadly, there are lots of folks that have them lingering back there on a branch.

    But the thing that wafts off this whole sh*t storm of ugly … is Affleck is a jerk.

    What a grandparent did 150 years ago… does not reflect onto who you are now. Genealogy is a great hobby. And the PBS show is the one that I have always enjoy their approach, to telling a story.

    Plus this obsessive need to judge the sh*t out of everyone, has gotten old.

    • quantum entanglement says:

      ITA about Ben Affleck being a jerk. But… I feel for Dr. Gates, but he made his choice. It does ding his credibility AND integrity, in a big way. He got caught covering up stuff to placate a celebrity, and HID IT FROM PBS, rather than standing his ground and letting the research speak for itself. He could have easily circumvented this, by going to PBS and letting them be the bad guy. He didn’t do it. Actions have consequences, and I hope this is a lesson to him.

      • Hautie says:

        Cover up what exactly? This is a genealogy show. Not a court of law. Who cares about some old slave owning grandfather, really? I don’t. And the branch of the tree they did eventually show… was all properly sourced. Their dedication to sourcing their work, is always shown. So there is not a issue of anyone with the actual producing of the show… being lazy about their work.

        As someone who does genealogy research… it does not do anything to the credibility of the show. The show decided to look at a different branch of his tree and told another story. With it being sourced.

        If I recall correctly. Affleck’s own Mother was the one who told the story about her “freedom riders days” to the researchers.

        And it was allegedly, a story she had been telling for years. So that little issue is on her.

        Maybe having trouble with facts is a family trait?

        I don’t recall Dr. Gates putting forth any proof of that fact. Than it was something that was brought up in conversation with Affleck, during the show.

        I do not recall it actually being a researched and sourced fact. Does anyone else?

    • MinnFinn says:

      I’ll still watch the show too but with the expectation that their historic research may not be very rigorous. That is because after that show aired, Affleck’s mother said she was never a freedom rider.

      • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

        …smh, you know if he hadn’t been trying to hop on something that’s popular Afleck should have just avoided the show completely.

        Clearly his family line has some issues I’m sure he doesn’t want on prime time.

    • Geekychick says:

      Isn’t the guy a Harvard professor and a scientist? He’s running the show witht that premise, and for a scientist to hide part of results of research..well, that’s not honourable thing to do. His integrity would be compromised and I don’t see how this is different. He wasn’t part of Top gear and a Harvard professor, he was running the show thanks to his academic status.

  10. PBS NO says:

    PBS is being ridiculous. The show could focus on any number of ancestors and the producers use their discretion about what might be of interest. Who cares if Affleck or his people put in a request. The show as a whole does not hide from the topic of slavery in any way. I love the show and I’m pissed at PBS.

  11. MinnFinn says:

    I really like that show. If WDYTYA really is popular, they will have it back on the air as soon as the probation period is up.

    PBS had 2 big back-to-back PR problems in 2009 (CEO Schiller and Juan Williams) that caused a lot of people to question their neutral position on issues and some even demanded they lose their federal funding. Given that history, PBS has to put Gates, the other co producer and the show in a very public time out.

    • MinnFinn says:

      Oops again, I meant to say – I really like Finding Your Roots and if it really is popular, they will have it back on the air…

  12. GreenBunny says:

    While I think this is overkill, I’m amazed that PBS has responded this way over a breach in their editorial standards, but TLC has yet to make a decision on what to do with their popular show on a family being investigated for molestation.

    • angie says:

      I don’t think it’s overkill at all. Credibility is a crucial element in any broadcast that deals in facts, and it’s not like it was a “Real Housewives” type of reality show. And Hautie, Dr. Gates is 100% responsible for his own choices, and he’s the one who did the choosing here.

      • MinnFinn says:

        +1 angie – And Gates let go of a “Tell me about that” teachable moment that would have been very poignant for viewers. If they had shown Ben’s embarrassed or ashamed emotional reaction Gates could have responded with ‘you look upset about this news’ followed by Gates saying what he so often says that works so well — “Tell me about that”.

  13. The Eternal Side-Eye says:

    I think the question now is: “Was it worth it ?”

    We live in a society that is too desperate to placate celebrities for no reason. Afleck doesn’t own the station and he’s not the last celebrity on earth. The Dr. should have made the decision himself not to use Ben’s episode since the man was creating controversy with his demands, instead he falsified information and hid it from the network that’s actually given him the show.

    Such poor decision making. I feel bad in the sense it was/is a useful intelligent show that explores a topic worth discussing, but everyone’s actions here are so dumb I almost can’t pity it. I wish TLC would show as much backbone and integrity as the people of PBS.

  14. Elfie says:

    I think it’s a positive sign that they are taking censorship and manipulation seriously. The show loses credibility when they do that and so does the station airing it.

    Nobody else tried to censor their families history and there’s no excuse for trying. The past happened, bad things were done by normal everyday people and families have all sorts of good and bad in their history. Normal people know that. Ben is so narcissistic that he sees everything as reflecting on him and only wants the glow of those who make him look good, no matter how false. Then he can feel superior to everybody else. They also lied about his mother being a freedom rider which she has openly admitted that she wasn’t. That lie hasn’t gotten nearly as much coverage as it deserves. The show needs an independent fact checker if it’s to be continued.

    I hope Ben has learned his lesson. By putting his ego first and burying the truth he got caught and now everybody knows what he didn’t want them to know with a thousand times more coverage than had he just owned it like everybody else. Now he is judged for hiding the truth because that is the offence here. That and the lie about his mother to give him the nice progressive glow by association.

    This is why people don’t like him. I feel sorry for him when he’s hounded by paps with his family but then something always happens to show how insincere and fake he is. And then I think he deserves every bit of bad press he gets.

    • Lola says:

      He didn’t learn anything. Next time he wants something he’ll throw another tantrum and blame others for whatever goes wrong; it worked this time. People are going to lose their jobs and a show will get cancelled, but he can continue doing walks for the paps.

  15. lamamu says:

    It sickens me that a dilettante like Ben Affleck could have any influence at all over the career of a respected guy like Henry Louis Gates Jr.

  16. anne_000 says:

    DM had an article out that pointed out that the segment about Ben’s mother was untrue as well. She was never a Freedom Rider, was nowhere near the Summer of Freedom nor the famous bus ride either. So basically, the WHOLE ENTIRE EPISODE was false.

    So I think it wasn’t just about hiding the slave-owning ancestors that they both conspired to do. But also, I think it’s about Ben going home and talking to his mother about the Freedom Rider part, her telling him that it’s untrue, and him not correcting Gates. And/or Gates and his researchers coming up with a phony story about Ben’s mother whether on purpose or by honest intent but based on really worthless and error-filled research.

    I think that when the show execs found out that there’s slave-owning history in Ben’s family, they came up with something to balance that out for Ben’s benefit, which was the false story about his mom being a civil rights activist in a famous event. And again, I don’t know if they knew it was false at the time of filming. So I think after they filmed the two topics, and then the editing happened over the slavery history, they left in the Freedom Rider story. It made Ben’s family look good (though based on ‘censorship’ and a fake hero story), but it hurt Gate’s reputation and credibility.

    • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

      I’m guessing this is why PBS came down so hard on the show, that’s pretty bad when you not only leave out the bad thing you were planning to show but also don’t properly vet the false positive story.

    • anne_000 says:

      Better yet, I should have used the word “compromised” as in “the whole entire episode was compromised,” because I’m thinking the parts besides the Freedom Rider segment may have been true but also because I think the show being compromised was the issue for PBS.

    • KellyBee says:

      I don’t think Gates and his people came up the phony about Bens mother I think it was more like Ben/his PR person came up with the story.

      Even during the mamy times Ben addressed this he never said anything about his mom not being a Freedom Rider.

      • anne_000 says:

        @ KellyBee

        Yes, I too wonder why it looks like Ben hasn’t corrected the false story about his mother, especially since it’s been circulating for over a decade:

        “It is unclear why PBS said Mrs Affleck was a Freedom Rider ‘in 1964’. The assertion that she was a Freedom Rider has been made before – it is on Affleck’s Wikipedia page, and has previously been reported by The Hollywood Reporter in 2012, among others, and the now defunct Talk magazine in 2000.

        Today PBS updated the website for Finding Your Roots to say that she ‘joined activists in 1964′ – which is still at odds with what she told Daily Mail Online.”

        – From the DM article mentioned above

        ((For those who don’t know, his mother admitted to the DM that she wasn’t part of the Freedom Rider campaign and wasn’t even in the South during that year, 1964.))

        You’d also think that since this false story has been out since 2000 and has been in/on some major media publications/sites, he’d have known by the time of the PBS filming that this was a fake story. He had all these years to ask his mother if it was true or not .

        So did Affleck just sit there during filming, pretending to be surprised and awed by his mother’s story, knowing all along it was a lie? If he did, did he not care about Gates’ and PBS’ credibility?
        …………………………
        As for why Gates went with this fake story, I don’t know. But the same DM article states that Gates has the “same show business public relations firm as Affleck.”

        I don’t know whether this had anything to do with the way the episode was skewered and compromised for the benefit of Affleck’s public image, but it does make me wonder.

      • Tiffany says:

        There was a rumor that his mother did not like Lopez. And the reason was because of her image.

        I was surprised when this take about his mother and her civil rights participation because rumors were anything but.

        Considering what Affleck did, I believe the rumors.

  17. BeckyR says:

    I hate hearing this! I enjoyed the program very much. Why would BA object to the content of the information found? I was told years ago that one of my distant ancestors worked on a slave ship. Don’t know what he did, who he was or anything else about it and although I was appalled, you can’t change history, one must take the good and the bad.

  18. Triple Cardinal says:

    Ken Burns, Kim Cattrell and Sally Fields found out unpleasant things about their ancestors. They handled the news with grace and humor. Brooke Shields and Cindy Crawford found out they are descended from royalty. (Crawford traced her history back to Charlemagne.) Both took the news like pros without going berserk or becoming unhinged.

    What in thee h#ll is wrong with Ben Affleck?

  19. ell says:

    sorry, but why did Gates give in to Affleck? it was silly. he’s just a celebrity, he should have just told him no.

    • tracking says:

      I know, I don’t get this. In the real world, Gates is a very big deal. It’s a shame he tarnished his own reputation in this way.

    • holly hobby says:

      He may be pressured to give in? I never watched the show so I don’t know too much about it but sometimes the office politics will make someone just give in.

    • anne_000 says:

      In a previous story, it was said the Ben dangled Matt Damon’s name in front of Gates. Gates wanted Matt to be on his show too.

      So I guess it was a trade-off for Gates and Ben.

      • ell says:

        well then gates deserves it. affleck is the actual worst though,there’s nothing likeable about him.

  20. LadyKarinsky says:

    I 100% stand behind PBS decision, because it is exactly the standard of integrity I expect from them. If you want an entertaining show that edits its content to placate celebrities at the expense of accurate storytelling, then TLC is the channel you’re looking for, not PBS. I don’t get the anger being lobbied at them – they have a set of rules that were broken, knowingly. The people to be angry at are Gates, Affleck, and to some degree, Sony. If PBS had ignored the edit and continued on with the show as is, it would make me question the content of all their programming.

    • tracking says:

      Oh, absolutely. I respect PBS for taking an ethical stand here, particularly with all the shoddiness that passes for journalism these days. Or else Brian Williams could have taken over this show.

    • Geekychick says:

      This!

  21. holly hobby says:

    I really don’t understand what the big deal is. Yes, Ben, a lot of America’s ancestors were slave owners. It was what people did at that time but no more. Why did he demand that this be erased? I’m sure all of us have ancestors who did something quesitonable but I’m not going to deny it or apologize for it. That’s on them and we don’t do that kind of stuff now. Simple as that. I hope Ben is happy that that Gates just lost his livelihood.

  22. db says:

    I guess PBS is drawing a line in the sand here, because standards. But I understand why Gates and the producers chose to accommodate Ben, since this is a show that relies on access to big names. Still it’s galling the show is suspended and Gates under a cloud, which that spoiled, whiney Affleck goes bumbling on with his life.

    • Jag says:

      Exactly!

      I do think that there should be some reprimand since he went against editorial standards, but scrapping the show is a bit much!

  23. Corrie says:

    I doubt he cares and I love this show too. Ben can you get it together.

  24. The Original Mia says:

    Gates made his bed when he decided to compromise his standards for Affleck. I hate that Finding Your Roots may be cancelled, as it’s not only an interesting show, but an important one as well. Gates shouldn’t have caved, and if he was going to cave, he should have been upfront with PBS about it or about the request to edit. Then PBS could have decided yea or nay, but he didn’t. He hid it and now they all have egg on their faces.

  25. justagirl says:

    He just looks like a big pile of douche and smug. Totally humorless.
    And very focussed on himself, previous pics with his wife at her event, she’s smiling at him & he’s all “lights! camera! they’re looking at ME!”

    With the PBS/Roots mess, if he’s that controlling about ancestral history, that people have said is not that big of a deal, that he himself was not involved in…. imagine what he must be like over current-day gossip about himself, his activities. AND I would not be surprised if it’s actually him, not his wife, who calls the paps on his picture-perfect family….

  26. JoJo says:

    Guessing this could change any divorce plans … for now at least.