If I have to read one more interview with Jennifer Aniston where she shills Living Proof, I am just going to give up. Thankfully, Jennifer does have more to say in this Yahoo interview. She’s not JUST talking about her hair and Living Proof. And she didn’t even mention Aveeno or SmartWater! But the point of Jennifer sitting down with Bobbi Brown at Yahoo (yet again) was that she’s shilling Living Proof. So obviously, I don’t care. But I do care about the other stuff. You can read the full piece here. Jennifer says the most eye-rolly thing ever about keeping her wedding “private” and how she hasn’t even seen the Terry Richardson wedding photos yet. She actually says that she and Justin are “very happy that we didn’t have to see our faces on the cover of a magazine.” Hahaha.
On the wedding photos: “Yeah, it was amazing. We were determined to keep it just private and to ourselves. And the thing is, we haven’t even seen pictures. But, you know, it was just everything we wanted it to be, and [we are] very happy that we didn’t have to see our faces on the cover of a magazine.”
How she gives herself a “beautiful glow”: “I always give myself a good steam. A hot steam, or I have an infrared hot box that I love that always gives me an extra boost or an extra glow to my skin….I usually do it right after a workout. Also a really good workout is something that always gets me going. Gives me oxygen and brings my chi right back to where it should be.”
Her diet: “I am consistently great with my food, and I also am not so strict. I usually give myself a day of whatever I want. I usually give myself one day a week, whether it’s a pasta or a burger or Mexican food, whatever my guilty pleasure is in terms of a greasy meal or some sort of saucy, salty or savory. I’m not much of a sweets person, so my treat would never really be sweets. And for my workouts, I’ve been doing this crazy spin class and then a yoga class.
Her style: “What works for me as far as my style is usually that I don’t change it very often. I just try to stay really comfortable. I don’t try and follow trends because it just always feels inauthentic somehow. You know, like a skinny jean and me don’t really get along… It’s so funny. I do and I don’t, it’s so personal. My husband loves me in skinny jeans, that’s like all he wants me to wear. And he loves it. I personally love a nice flared option, kind of a ’70s vibe or a ripped-up jean or something that’s kind of loose.
She loves wedges: “I like heels. I’m a heels person; I like to have some height. I love a wedge, a great wedge. Once I find a beautiful wedge, I will never, ever, ever let it go.”
What’s next for her: “I’m doing this movie called Yellow Bird in December. I have a couple of things that are in development that I’m really excited about. I think we’re finally getting a director on my Glory Girls that I’ve been working on with my partner for like eight to 10 years. It’s our baby. So that’s what I’m really looking forward to.
“My husband loves me in skinny jeans, that’s like all he wants me to wear.” Um…? That’s because Justin LOVES skinny jeans in general. Justin loves to wear skinny jeans. He loves to wear tight-fitting JORTS as well. I have to say, I’m actually with Aniston on enjoying a good flare though. I absolutely loathe the skinny jean trend probably, like Aniston, because skinny jeans do not flatter my figure. I can’t wait for palazzo pants and mega-flares to come back into style.
Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet and People.
Glory Girls? Is that the long-delayed Goree Girls movie?
“Goree Girls” is about a group of teenage girls and a couple of young women in their early twenties that formed a country music singing group while in prison. It is based on a true story.
Unless Aniston is willing to play the Mother or even Grandmother of one of these girls. she’d better give up on this project.
A young woman was found DEAD in the water after their wedding and I’ve seen very little about whether it was accidental or not. Why is this?
Um? In the water WHERE? More, please?
Thank you for bringing this up. They made sure the story got buried almost immediately, but a few outlets are coming around to how fishy this story sounds.
“determined to keep it to themselves and private”
**Which is why they keep talking about it.
I don’t get how it was “private” we knew about it the day it happened. And everyone at the wedding has talked about it. So maybe the definition of private has changed.
Yup, considering we saw the cake being brought in uncovered, the priest arriving and now all this non-stop 2 month stream of info and details? Do you think she can stretch the mileage out to the Oscar noms? Hey, I’m serious. I was only half-serious when I initially wrote that about the Oscar noms, but just thinking about it as I proof-read, I do wonder if that is her motive. But yeah, I think her definition of ‘private’ completely differs from us normal people.
So I take it you’re not a fan then….
So, it seems the paparazzi was there because they knew it was justins bday and on the lookout. People are so harsh on her. Others sell their wedding pics to tabloids. She did not (probably after being haunted forever over that pic from other wedding). It is true we have not seen any of hers. If people at the wedding are asked about it, specifically they were * because * Jennifer and Justin did not provide details, and what others choose to reveal is pretty much out of their control. you can take cell phones away and have secrecy but not exactly ask people to sign a non disclosure agreement!
Mer1, these JP stalkers, literally, want to see pictures of the wedding, dress etc.. so bad, its truly causing them relentless pain. They, Aniston and Justin, did right the opposite of the JP’s in releasing nothing, instead of everything.
.
Happy it was kept private and NO pictures were released!
Mer, You are correct. I don’t know why some people cannot understand it. It is so simple. No photos provided for free and no compensation received from saling them. That is private. The rest is just called conversation and it is not particularly detail oriented either.
Goo: Haha. I can see we’re on the same page here. That poster wrote a small novella about Jen. WTH. If you weren’t interested, you wouldn’t invest so much time spewing your hatred. If it wasn’t so sad, it actually would be funny. My oh my!
@Mer1, who wrote: “So, it seems the paparazzi was there because they knew it was justins bday and on the lookout. People are so harsh on her.”
It wasn’t Justin’s birthday, but you’re right … people are ‘so’ harsh on her. Where oh where is @Doofus to defend?
Does anyone think Huvane and Aniston are planning on releasing some pictures next week, say, around the 5th of November.
This famewhore is so obvious, it’s embarrassing.
Sad. Do you hate Jennifer more than you love Jolie. I just don’t get it. I remember poor Rodney King saying, “can’t we all just get along?”
I think she has to stay in the spotlight because she has some projects in the works. I also think the products she shills wants her to promote through interviews.
Good for her she got what she wanted. Now go away and get back to work, Jen.
Hard to believe she hasn’t seen her wedding photos yet, wants her vows kept secret, and is glad her wedding face pictures weren’t on the cover of a magazine…yeah
Was that a dig at Brangelinas People spread?
Sounds like a dig at all the People magazine coverage Aniston has gotten before and after the wedding, including the cover story pictured in this post. She’s getting a lot of mileage out of the whole thing, considering the absence of wedding photos.
Yeah, so private that the Priest was photographed arriving and the wedding cake was photographed being brought in (because, yeah, no one ever heard of putting a sheet or something over the cake, I mean you only do that if you don’t want it to be seen, right?), details leaked continuously for the last 2 months and now more details in an interview. Look: just give one interview/spread, and be done with it. All this continual dropping of info is not ‘private’ at all.
Didn’t I read somewhere Justin said they gave him a “bachelor party”? So this was a surprise? How did they know to give him a party if it was supposed to be such a surprise? Guess this has a different meaning for me. I would respect her more if she’d just come on out and say I get facials. I love facials, but I also use Aveeno. And shilling Living Proof? How does she know it works when all she does is wear weave? Is she shilling Living Proof as being good for weaves? And these are the same people who admitted they love being apart. Why did they get married then? OK. we get it now. Your wedding was “top secret” and such a “surprise”. Now shut up and go away. I’d also like her more if she talked about something other than her beauty routine. She’s a plain woman and I really don’t think makeup does much to help her. Waiting for her to do something like Goop next.
Her hair is two colors in the index photo. I thought it was a bad Cruella de Ville costume for a second.
This is an extremely inoffensive interview. Maybe it should just be left alone?!
I agree on the one hand. On the other, I’m always left a little depressed when an interview of a woman near my age seems to focus only on the superficial. It’s not like I expect rocket science from this people, but some tiny bit of substance would be nice. I’ve always thought she had good comedic timing and thought that there must be something a bit more intelligent/substantive about her, but I don’t think it is there.
On the flip side, if she’d tried to say anything “substantive” she’d be slammed for being faux intellectual or Jen-splaining something she had no business discussing. I can see why some celebs try to stay innocuous and superficial with their remarks.
I agree with Esmom. If she quotes Rilke or talks politics she’d be called pretentious or a pseudo intellectual. She’s trying not to alienate anybody.
I’d like it if she talked about her dogs…..her house flipping……her margarita fountain….It just seems like every interview she gives that isn’t about her movie is some kind of shill. Even in the “normal ones”–like talking about how Justin uses all of her Living Proof (TM) shampoo and they have to fight for it.
I actually feel sorry for Aniston. What an empty life she must have. No real husband, or at least not one she knows is there because he’s madly in love with her. No kids, no family she speaks to, just her “women”.
Oh well, she chose to be to a narcissist, so, it’s her own fault if people make fun of her for her shallow life. It’s not anyone’s fault, not even her’s, that she wasn’t born beautiful, that was just genetics. Some hit the jackpot, some don’t, and she didn’t.
I completely agree. In her print and TV interviews, its the interviewer who always asks about her wedding, health and beauty routine. I feel like she’s just answering the questions very sincerely. And so what if she shills a little. There are so many celebs right now who are doing the same thing. I find her so neutral.
Why is she still talking about her 3 month old wedding pictures? Do people really care?
Bobbi should have asked her why she let a pervert take those pictures as well.
I was very uninterested myself. Can’t speak for anyone else. But the engagement just dragged on and on and on – the wedding seemed anticlimactic.
No, no one cares, but when has that stopped Aniston and Huvane.
Never.
They failed at keeping it private. There was video and photos as it was happening. Also people like Howard Stern, are talking about it. Everybody knows everything.
It’s possible that I am way too naive, but it seemed to me that it was a private wedding, regardless of whether someone saw the cake or guests talked. Good for them!
+1 no pics of bride and groom, no details on the ceremony other than generalities yapped by Howard Stern.
exactly.
They did keep it private..they didn’t invite People, US., Vogue, Okay, to the location or arrange for pics/promotions in advance..there was no gown designer pimping..it was the opposite of conspicuous coupling. I give her a big + for it. If you want her to refuse to answer questions about it, then that’s a different subject.
“I don’t try and follow trends because it just always feels inauthentic somehow.”
I didn’t realize that drop crotch pants were a classic. She’s been seen running around in those God awful Bieber-like pants. But usually her style is something I can get on board with. Simple, casual.
I find it so pathetic that Jennifer constantly has to take digs at other people – whether it is her ex husband, boyfriends, friends – she always has something negative to say and to try and put them down.
And for the record – calling the paps to take pictures of the priest and the cake and leaking your honeymoon details and getting your friends to talk about and leaking where you bought your dress etc is NOT being private.
This woman is the biggest hustler in Hollywoid and it’s about time she and fans admitted it. Everything she does and says is manipulated and calculated to get the best attention to her and her products.
Hallelujah!!! Preach on girl!!!
I can’t believe she has time to film a movie, with all her commercial endorsements! I thought, endorsements, WERE HER CAREER now! (I can’t tell you how much I loath that Emirates Airline commercial)!!!!!!
Then, change the channel… No one one is MAKING you watch it.
Wow…that’s a lot of anger over an f–king commercial!!!!
No, dear… The anger lies with you. Why in the hell would someone get upset about a commercial? Never mind. It is so very obvious! And it is “loathe”, not loath. Your welcome!
Skinny jeans are not my friends either.
And I get what she means about having a consistent style. I’m around her age and I’ve been dressing in the same general style for years. In fact I bought a new pair of ankle boots last week thinking I needed a new look, brought them home and realized they looked incredibly similar to two other boots I already had!
I might follow color trends but am less apt to follow a major style trend, especially if that trend is what I wore in my teen and early adult years (ie highwasted jeans, flannel, etc)
The proposal was on his birthday. The wedding was on his birthday.
I would feel uncomfortable have my wedding on my spouse to be birthday. That day should always have and be a priority.
I don’t have strong feelings about her one way or the other, but I never thought of her skin as glowing. So I think it’s odd that she’s giving skin care tips.
I totally agree. I bet she just puts shimmer or something or the sort on her body to give her a “glow”
How can it be private when neither of them has stopped talking about it?
Stretching, aren’t you? She is talking about it because it just recently happened, and the media keeps asking.
Stretching that excuse aren’t you? Aniston has veto over all questions. The media asks, because she allows it. She as all these paps and CAA have testified, has the final say on questions. I do admire JPs for releasing far less info than she has so far. JA is a pr whore who will do absolutely ANYTHING for publicity including staging a wedding and leaking details for MONTHS after. The JPs were classy, dignified and very discreet. If only JA and her douche cheater ho man were as discreet and private. But without her private life, and her coattailing of the JPs, Aniston would cease to exist in the public eye. Morality and class and human dignity isn’t something that extends to people like her.
Here in Cali, all kinds of jeans including boot cuts and flairs are in style. And yes, palazzo pants. Just check the Tilly’s website.
I like her.
She’s fine with me. The hate for her on this site is cray cray. I like some of her films, I don’t like others.I feel like any time she makes a comment there is someone treating it like a Dan Brown novel.
Talia: Isn’t that the truth. I understand some of these posters are die hard fans of Jolie, but JC that sh!t died a decade ago. Move on people. The golden couple (in your eyes) needs no help from the townspeople. Lord let it die already.
I have never seen her in a film and had never watched an episode of Friends all the way through until I watched it on netflix earlier this year with my 14yo daughter. She, of course, loves Rachel and has taken to trying to dress like her, mom jeans and crop tops, overalls, etc.. It’s a cute style. Everything I know about her I have learned here and I also don’t get the hate. She seems harmless to me.
Private wedding–yes. However, that doesn’t really matter when we got all of the details….and I do mean ALL of them two seconds after it happened. And then Howard Stern spilling all of the details on his show. And then we got a front row seat to the honeymoon. Literally. We saw what plane her and her guests used…….we saw the boat/ship/whatever they were on…..we saw them paddle boarding in Bora Bora. We know that Joel Silver’s assistant drowned while she was accompanying him on the honeymoon…….. I wonder how all of that happened.
I don’t really care–but it’s kind of disingenuous to talk about how glad you are it kept private, when you’re also a) secretly leaking details, and b) inviting blabbermouths like Howard Stern so he can tell everyone all about it.
And I’m completely grossed out that they had Terry Richardson take those pics. I wouldn’t look at them either.
Wait, what on Joel Silver’s assistant?
I’ve always been amazed at how good Aniston is at giving us a ton of information without actually giving us any *real* information. We never saw any pics from her wedding with Pitt aside from what they intentionally released, and it’ll probably be the same way. She stays on message in her interviews and her press, and manages to never really say how she feels about stuff.
Joel Silver’s assistant: http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/joel-silvers-assistant-found-dead-in-bora-bora–2015218
I agree with you on the pictures—she doesn’t do photoshoots/picture releases LIKE THAT. But I find it disingenuous–her saying she likes that it’s not on the cover of a magazine…..she is the QUEEN of having BS reasons for being on the cover of a magazine…like the 5 Years After Brad PEOPLE cover. The 2012 Oscars where she got a shot of her on the cover in her poofy, red Oscar dress for her wedding that was supposed to happen in the spring. Another cover saying that they put the wedding off. Numerous covers JUST about what she’s shilling vs. promoting a film.
That’s not someone who only goes into the spotlight when necessary i.e. promoting the film that she was paid millions of dollars to do……that’s someone who shills what she signs up to shill (no shame in the game or $$), and has no issues being on the cover of a magazine in that way.
I don’t know if I’m getting across my point right–I find it annoying, but ultimately fine/great/whatever that she makes all this extra money. Someone wants to pay me millions of dollars to shill some lotion, great. And I get that she doesn’t want to put personal pictures out there–no side eye there (except UNCLE TERRY). But I’m like BYE FELICIA on her attitude of “it’s great I’m not on the cover of a magazine”……
Maybe it’s part of her “I’m a serious actress now” phase…because in “Yellow Birds” she plays a small role (the leads are Jack Huston and a newbie) as the mother of a soldier (I think of the newbie)…….but yea. She called PEOPLE every single time she might’ve had a new boyfriend (remember the cover w/Bradley Cooper i.e. The newer, better Brad–the tagline)…..so like really? I’m not saying she’s supposed to let it allll out, but quit acting like you’ve never seen your face on a magazine for some bs reason.
I think she’s been able to separate her personal and public persona. Most of what we see of her are either formal shoots, red carpets, or set up shots. It’s like being on the job, and she’s excellent at it. She stays on message, promotes her products like a champ (including when the product is her), and is completely and totally bland an inoffensive. At this point, I actually kind of respect her game.
Bridget, um the problem *is* EXACTLY that she has NOT been able to separate her personal and public persona. She is a celebrity known only for her PRIVATE LIFE. Anyone with an IQ of a 7 year old can see her passive-aggressive digs, slurs, insults and attacks for what they are. She has never made a secret of how she feels, she makes sure she goes all out to destroy her (perceived) enemy. Her life revolves around destroying the JPs. She has used her personal/private persona for 10 years, to sustain her public one. Evidence of this is everywhere. She uses her private life to sell her public life and obsessed fans of hers who make it their life’s mission to destroy the Jolie-Pitts, can’t see through her manipulations, and lap it up. I swear you could do a Jonestown essay on Anistonloonies.
I’m also tired of listening to her shill for Living Proof, mainly because the stuff sucks. I’ve never actually purchased any, but I’ve received a few different products from the line as samples and they’ve all been weirdly sticky and foul-smelling.
She’s on to something with the steam, though. I recently had to get a steam inhaler for an unrelated health issue, and it’s coincidentally made my skin look great.
It’s great that she knows what works for her and feels comfortable in her skin.
But I hope she doesn’t stay too stuck in her look or else she will be like my Aunt Edna who still wears her hair in a 1980s bouffant with big bangs!
Here is a though, no magazine offered her a boat load of money because she married a Z-lister, and uncle Terry took the pictures.
People magazine standards are low, but they were not touching pictures by the Perv.
I thought he was suppose to be a good photographer, now it seems like even he can’t Photoshop them enough for her to like their pictures, “oh I have not seen them yet” bullocks.
His aesthetic is definitely recognizable…..I was looking at a GQ lineup….various covers/photoshoots of an actress that’s done GQ….and I came across some one’s with a stark white background…and I was like EWWWW this looks like Terry Richardson’s bs (the poses too)…and sure enough, they were.
But how many magazines actually stopped working with Terry? I think just Vogue……
I luv Jen! I find her smart, funny & very down-to-earth. I can’t understand why people who obviously dislike her keep on reading articles abt her then complain. When I dislike a celebrity, I don’t read any articles abt her coz I believe that’s just a waste of time 4 me.
“If I have to read one more interview with Jennifer Aniston where she shills Living Proof, I am just going to give up.”
Girrrl please. You will smack talk just like you always do. Don’t act like you don’t pray for reasons to dump on JA. 😉
Or you for reasons to dump and talk smack about AJ. Hypocrisy is the name of it.
I love the skinny jeans trend and never want to go back! Well, at least I felt that way before getting pregnant. Now I’m all about slouchy boyfriend jeans and anything else that’s loose and comfortable. And … um … flares ARE back in style. There’s a HUGE 70s revival going on in fashion right now, as we speak.
Why the heck is she still talking about this? Does anybody still care anymore? Did anyone care to begin with? STFU Jennifer Aniston!!