Paris bans ‘Coco avant Chanel’ posters because of cigarette image

coco-3

Paris, city of lights and lighting up, has done the unthinkable. They’ve banned the new poster ads for Coco avant Chanel, starring Audrey Tautou as the famous fashion designer. The reason? In the posters, Audrey (as Coco) is smoking a cigarette. Coco was a famous smoker, as photo evidence of the designer proves. She was also probably one of the most famous residents of Paris in the history of the city.

Paris’s ban on smoking in public areas took affect the beginning of this year, and by many accounts, the ban has been pretty successful. While I think it’s a good idea to ban smoking in public areas, I draw the line at two things – bars and images of smokers. People in bars should be able to light up, in my humble opinion. And no one should be afraid of images of someone smoking, especially not an actress portraying one of the most famous Parisians ever.

The city of Paris has banned posters of the actress Audrey Tautou in her new role as Coco Chanel because she is holding a cigarette.

The transport authority’s decision to remove the posters because they were “unhealthy and inappropriate” was condemned as “ridiculous” by Chanel fans and even by the man who drew up France’s draconian anti-smoking laws.

The posters show Tautou as the chain-smoking French creator of the little black dress, gazing sensuously at the camera in silk pyjamas, with a cigarette smouldering in her right hand.

Chanel was 87 when she died in 1971, despite smoking several packets of cigarettes a day for most of her life. It is rare to find photos or her without a cigarette. However, Metrobus, the company which runs advertising on Paris’ buses and trains, said that the law came before historical accuracy.

“Cigarettes are banned on our entire transport system, and there is no reason why we should be giving them free advertising through this film poster,” a spokesman said.

The film’s producers were obliged to provide an alternative poster showing Tautou with the male lead. But a representative of Warner France said that “for us, the real poster is where Coco Chanel is smoking in a natural pose that translates her strong personality and her modernity”.

The ban comes days after a poster of Jacques Tati, one of France’s most enduring comic characters, was altered to conform to French rules prohibiting the “direct or indirect” promotion of tobacco products. The actor-director’s trademark pipe was replaced with a yellow windmill – a move which one cinema expert said would have made him “die laughing”.

Roselyne Bachelot, the health minister, admitted that the rules were being taken too far. “We’re getting pretty ridiculous with this,” she said.

Even Claude Evin, the politician behind a 1991 anti-smoking law, said the ban should not extend to “cultural heritage”. There is already concern that another film due out later this year about Serge Gainsbourg, the Gauloise-puffing crooner, will fall foul of the no smoking rules. One of his songs is entitled God smokes Havana cigars.

Coco Before Chanel, the new film starring Tatou, opened in France this week to wide critical acclaim. It focuses on the early years of Gabrielle Chanel, nicknamed “Coco” during her failed attempt to launch a singing career. The film sees her move from poverty-stricken orphan to early catwalk success, but stops short of her controversial affair with a Nazi officer at Paris’s Ritz hotel during the Occupation.

[From The Telegraph]

Usually, when I hear people talking about “the nanny state”, I roll my eyes. But this is the one exception. I’m all for the anti-smoking movement, but they can’t control everything! In America, there’s already a movement to edit out smoking in movies being shown on television. And there’s absolutely no smoking in network television. There’s barely any smoking in cable television, either – with one notable exception: Mad Men. Set in the 1960s, when everyone smoked. Can’t the anti-smoking zealots just leave the art alone? Or is the next step banning all images of liquor from art, television, films, and ads, all for the sake of the recovering alcoholics and would-be alcoholics?

Here are some stills from the film. Images thanks to awardsdaily.com.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

36 Responses to “Paris bans ‘Coco avant Chanel’ posters because of cigarette image”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Margaux says:

    I am in Paris and I’ve seen the above poster everywhere.

  2. Trillion says:

    Kaiser, I’m with you all the way. I used to smoke so I understand loving cigarettes. I’m glad smoking has been limited in public, but banning it in nightclubs is too far. And I’m really shocked that Paris of all places would ban the iconic image of their beloved Coco because of a cigarette. Not Paris!!!!

  3. Wif says:

    “I draw the line at two things – bars and…” Couldn’t disagree more Kaiser. I think bars are the perfect place to ban smoking, it’s a small space with a ton of people who aren’t putting personal limits on themselves. The bars here have banned smoking, and I can finally go and have a night of dancing with my friends (I’m asthmatic), while the smokers pop outside every hour. Why is that unreasonable?

    I do think that banning images of smoking (especially historically inspired ones) is ridiculous. But maybe I won’t if my daughter takes up smoking because she thought a poster looked cool. Hard to say.

  4. Allie says:

    That’s getting to be pretty ridiculous.

    I must say that I kind of like having bars smoke free. I think that there should always be a place for smokers to go (like a smoking room or a covered balcony with heat lamps), but it is nice because some of the bars here would get so smokey you could hardly see or breathe.

    Ban’s like this though, they take the colour out of society. Whitewashing the world isn’t going to fix anything, and worse it will make things boring.

  5. geronimo says:

    What a pile of merde. Agree with the ban in principle but this is just sad. The logic is so warped and mindlessly draining.

    Tautou looks amazing in the poster, looking forward to seeing this.

  6. layla says:

    As a non smoker – I LOVE a smoke free bar …… but am not upset when people are still able to smoke in bars.

    Banning images of people smoking is a little ridiculous.

    Where I live a new by law passed where all the places the sell cigarettes (gas station, corner stores etc) now have to cover them up.
    So behind the cash registers are these large stands covered in essentially sheets. It just doesn’t make sense.

  7. Trillion says:

    Allie, that’s a perfect solution. Agree with all your ideas. When I see people huddled in the cold outside for their smokes, I think it probably brings them closer together and gives them an “us vs. them” feeling. I imagine it’s fertile ground for striking up conversation with potential dates.
    Margeaux, I’m glad the posters are up in Paris. Ahhh Paris! Quelle chance, sallope! 🙂 🙂

  8. Codzilla says:

    Trillion: You’re right about smoking areas being fertile ground for meeting people. My best friend and I met on a smoke break, lol. I’ve since quit (although I still enjoy an occasional cig when I’m inebriated), but our friendship is as strong as ever.

    Oh, and I don’t understand the idea that exposing the public to photos of people smoking is going to somehow affect things in a major way. Talk about insulting our intelligence and ability to make decisions without celebrity influence.

  9. leigh says:

    i thought the same thing about the whole “no smoking in bars” movement when it first started happening here in canada but honestly, it’s so nice to be able to go home after a night out and not stink of cigarettes. every once in a while i get nostalgic about the days when you could light up at your table, but the benefits far outweigh the costs. it just becomes very customary very quickly.

    and i totally get the desire to limit the images of smoking in media, especially media that is being consumed by children and teens, but when you’re talking about portraying a real person or time period, you can’t just edit that stuff out. so on this one, i’m totally with you kaiser.

  10. Bellatrix says:

    The posters are all over Paris. And other cities in France.
    It’s just in the subways they were forbidden, isn’t it?
    http://www.lefigaro.fr/cinema/2009/04/22/03002-20090422ARTFIG00382-la-cigarette-de-coco-chanel-nouvelle-victime-de-la-loi-evin-.php : this French article proves it (mind you, I do NOT read Le Figaro and my personal beliefs are in no way related to that media outlet but it was the first thing to pop up when I googled it).

    The Evin law in France is a shame. I am not a smoker but I still can’t believe we went to such a repression of cigarettes these past few years. I now have to go along my friends when they leave the restaurant or bar to have a cig’ break in order to keep up with the good conversation and gossip! It’s absurd & sad, really.

    The Parisian subways have not allowed the poster but that is all! The rest of Paris has the poster. Not to fear.

    By the way, the picture is beautiful and Tautou looks very much like Chanel on it. It is also a bet among my group of friends to be the first to snag the poster (without major rips or tears). I’m going to hunt in my city tonight in order to try and catch one.

  11. the original kate says:

    i love smoke free bars. before the ban i hated coming home and having to shower becasue i reeked of cigarette smoke, not to mention the sore throat i’d have the next day. i agree that there could be a smoking section, though. that seems reasonable. banning a movie poster because of a cigarette is dumb, especially a famous smoker like coco. but the movie looks awesome!

  12. Lem says:

    wow paris coco chanel c’mon

  13. skldfj says:

    wow thats great!

  14. geronimo says:

    Bellatrix – I’ll keep my fingers crossed for you! It’s a beautiful image, I would love this on my wall.

  15. Trillion says:

    Did any of you see Shirley Maclaine as Coco? She’s a great actress, but that was some terrible casting and the script was awful. Can’t wait to see this movie!

  16. Ggirl says:

    Audrey is stunningly beautiful!

  17. Annie says:

    I’m allergic to smoke. I hate it.

    HOWEVER. I know that if I walk into a bar, smoke will be there. People smoke when they drink, it happens.

    That, I’m ok with. It’s the fuckers who choose to stand right next to you when you’re outside a building, even though there’s a ton of space around you and then light up and puffpuff. That bug the crap out of me.

    Bars. Fine. I just choose not to go to them. (Go to a club instead if you wanna dance with friends).

    Also, I was under the impression that almost all Parisians smoked? My sister says that while she studied over there, she pretty much just had to get used to the fact that everyone is a smoker.

  18. Kaiser says:

    I’m perfectly willing to accept a smoking section or area at a bar, rather than a full-bar smoking zone.

    Every other place, I get a smoking ban. Not bars – what’s worse for you, a white Russian or a cig? F*ck it, have both. TGIF. (Or TGIThursday, whatever, I need a drink).

    Edit: And yeah, this poster is gorgeous. Love love love.

  19. Wif says:

    Ah but Kaiser, if I choose to put a white russian in me, that’s my choice, the smoke of 400 others is not my choice. That’s where the difference lies. Which is why I support not smoking in public places

  20. TJ says:

    The smoking ban was put in place January 2008, so about a year and a half ago.

  21. Annie says:

    How about TGI-God I need a drink day?

    Cuz let me tell you, work has been super *great* so far….

  22. Trillion says:

    When I lived in Spain, people smoked in grocery stores. Can you imagine rolling your cart through Safeway puffing on a cigarette? Europe is pretty much an ashtray. Looks like that’s changing now. I was in downtown Tokyo 3 years ago and noticed that you can’t even smoke outdoors unless you’re in a designated “smoking spot” which is like a little hot dog stand looking thing. It really gives smoking the feeling of being a socially outcast and weak thing to do.

  23. Zoe (The Other One) says:

    Amazing poster, love Audrey!

    I used to think it’s against the law NOT to smoke here tho they banned it in malls and restaurants last year – everyone pretty much ignores it tho!

  24. ChristinaT says:

    this sounds scary… reminds me of that movie “demolition man” maybe soon they’ll start fining us for using the F word… i’m concerned…

  25. sauvage says:

    But you can see naked women on posters everywhere. So that’s healthy and appropriate?

  26. HashBrowns says:

    I’m glad they banned smoking in bars as well. Whenever I go outside to get some air, it’s full of smoke, but to be honest, I’d rather have it waft away in the wind than be stuck inside 4 walls.

    I choose which drinks I wanna drink, I don’t choose to inhale the cigarette smoke of the 30 of 300 people who insist upon smoking.

    Anyway, banning it in a movie poster about a woman who smoked is stupid. It’s like creating a poster for Frida without the unibrow. It was just a part of who she was, I don’t see anything wrong with that.

  27. ChristinaT says:

    second hand smoke has been blown out of proportion… everybody knows that…

    they lumped all lung cancer incidents involving non-smokers into second hand smoke induced category… but we all know there are many other reasons people get cancer…

    smoke, by the time it reaches your orificies, has been highly diffused… it’s diluted considerably by air molecules…

    so please do not act overly-dramatic next time you pass by someone who’s smoking…

  28. Jill says:

    banning it on this poster is stupid, but banning it in bars is good sense– i’m with wif. i have asthma and it is triggered mainly by cigarette smoke. it’s great to be able to go out with my friends and not cough blood for the next three days.

  29. gg says:

    I saw this movie recently. Audrey Tatou is brilliant as usual. A + + +

  30. STFU says:

    To all of the smokers–STFU. You do NOT have the right to smoke around the rest of us. Smoking causes cancer. Second-hand smoke causes cancer. End of story. Banning smoking in all public spaces–bars included–is one of the best things the government has done.

  31. Ned says:

    Images have encouraged millions of people to start smoking.

    The first thing they should ban is the images.
    When Coco smoked, nobody thought that they will die of cancer and have other lung diseases.

    Now we know.

    Encouraging more generations to become addicts, just so some tobacco companies would gain from their addiction, is hardly a good idea.

    Bar is a public place, just like a restaurant a shopping mall etc.

    If you can’t brace yourself for 2 hours than you are an addict and should seek treatment- Not force your addiction on other people.

  32. Ned says:

    “But you can see naked women on posters everywhere. So that’s healthy and appropriate?”

    I am not sure what is your point. Do naked women cause cancer?

  33. Trashaddict says:

    Sorry, Kaiser. I hate to be the lone party-pooper in this crowd, but my mother died of lung cancer three years ago. She was diagnosed in August and dead by November. I watched her fighting for breath in her last 24 hours, she was basically suffocating. It was a painful death because morphine did not kill the air hunger. Try as I might, I never could get her to quit (and she did try multiple times), and it’s quite clear that nicotine is more addictive than heroine (read the literature). So many young people take up the habit because it looks glamourous to them in pictures and movies, and then they just can’t stop.
    I believe in people’s right of choice, but smoking kills 400,000 people a year so it’s actually more dangerous than many other illegal drugs. Why should we endorse that behavior in movies and the media?
    PS if this posting gets one reader on this blog to quit smoking, I’ll be so happy for the family that doesn’t go through what mine did. Peace.

  34. sauvage says:

    @Ned: Will looking at a picture of a smoker cause cancer?

  35. Hieronymus Grexx says:

    Ah the French, while one half of them were surrendering to Germany the other half were conspiring to subvert the rest of the country.

    Smoking causes cancer. Second-hand smoke causes cancer. End of story. Banning smoking in all public spaces–bars included–is one of the best things the government has done.

    I’ll smoke. I’ll get the tumors. I’ll die. Deal ? For healthy people you sure do cry a lot.

  36. Heather Pedersen says:

    No deal. You will die slowly, gasping for air, but not before you spend thousands of taxpayers money on your excruciating end of life, while those who love you have to watch you die. Since you asked, no deal.