Since we last talked about Nadya Suleman, she’s made several new videos that are now posted on Radar Online. In each she comes across as we’ve come to expect: completely insincere and more than a little crazy.

I can always tell when my four year old is fibbing because he gets this huge grin on his face and has to look away. That’s exactly what Nadya Suleman does in a recent video on Radar Online in which she apologizes for ripping up Kate Gosselin’s bikini picture in the video posted last week. She says she regrets going off on Gosselin and tries to convey that she can relate to her, but it looks like she’s trying to stop herself from busting out laughing. You can see her twisted mouth curl into a smile when the interviewer brings up the incident, like she’s remembering fondly how she got so upset at Kate’s bikini body that she had to tear her picture into shreds.

We asked the truth expert at Eyes For Lies to analyze Suleman’s supposed apology, and she has some excellent insight on what an obvious manipulator this woman is:

What caused Nadya Suleman to do an about-face on Kate Gosselin? I can’t help wonder if TV execs who supposedly signed Nadya up for a reality show got upset at her for dishing a woman in her exact shoes. When I watch Nadya share her regrets, it seems less than sincere to me.

The interviewer says to Nadya, “It seemed like you had some sort of apology.” Watch Nadya’s body language after he says this. Watch her shake her head as she says, “No, just after it happened, I kind of self-reflected on why I did that. I felt really guilty.” The words “kind of” are what I coined as hedge words. Either Nadya self-reflected or she didn’t. She didn’t “kind of” reflect. When people are less than honest, they often use hedge words like this to say something concrete that they didn’t actually do. Nadya goes on to say, “I was kind of probably displacing my frustration…” I can’t help but notice the words “kind of probably” again. Do those words seem sincere to you? It’s like she kind of probably did something, but not really.

Later Nadya says, “I of all people should understand the public scrutiny and then the… um…being condemned and judged, and..you know I’m genuinely apo…(head shake no)…I feel genuine…regret for having said that.” Notice how Nadya will not say the word “apologetic”? She does everything she can to avoid saying it! Why does that bother her so much if she is regretful? It squarely inconsistent. It tells us she is not sincere about her regrets, without any doubts. People who are regretful are sorry for what they did, which is supportive of an apology. Clearly, Nadya is playing a word game here with us, trying to convince us of something she really doesn’t mean. I can’t help but feel she is trying to manipulate us here for an ulterior motive.

[From Eyes for Lies received via e-mail]

Suleman has another video on Radar in which she is questioned about the sperm donor. Last week Radar posted an “intimate chat” with Suleman and her supposed best friend. Suleman told her friend that her sperm donor was once willing to meet his biological kids, but that she went and got pregnant again with the octuplets behind his back.

In this second video, she rolls her eyes multiple times and looks annoyed that she’s even being questioned more about the sperm donor. She says that people close to the guy are understandably upset that she’s talking about him, even though she didn’t reveal many personal details. She then promises to cover more information about the father in her book without revealing his identity. Given that it’s not possible to trust this woman in any capacity, the guy has got to be shaking in his boots.

Despite saying many times that she regrets things she’s done – like feeling guilty for getting pregnant this last time behind the donor’s back, Suleman makes a ridiculous statement that she no doubt believes is true. She says at about 1 minute into the video “In regard to my own past, I’ve never done anything wrong in my life ever.” She goes on to explain why she lied and previously claimed she didn’t have a sexual relationship with the donor in the past, as if she ever needs an excuse for lying, “but that [the sperm donor] was just one more detail of my life. I just felt more comfortable talking about it. [recently].”

Suleman says she’s heard secondhand that the sperm donor has seen that video where she talks about him and says she “regrets opening up like that. it’s not fair to him.” How does she regret anything she’s done if she also claims to have “never done anything wrong in my life, ever”?

Having grabbed headlines last week for her candid comments regarding the father of her 14 children, Nadya Suleman continues to be full of surprises. In RadarOnline.com’s latest exclusive interview with Suleman, she hints that the sperm donor has been struggling, especially from “opposition” from certain people in his life.

In the newest video, she also reveals that since her explosive comments last week she has had “indirect communication” with him through other people. While she probably will continue to protect his identity in her new book she is writing, she will delve further into her decisions, her reflections on what has happened, and her relationship with the sperm donor.

[From Radar Online]

Nadya also tells another whopper about 3:15 into the video, saying “I’m not trying to get any financial gain out of this story. If I ever wanted that, I would have disclosed more about him by now. I will talk about my feelings in the book I’m going to write, while continuing to retain privacy for him.” If she wasn’t trying to get financial gain, why would she even be talking to us?