Ronan Farrow’s New Yorker article on Harvey Weinstein’s decades of abuse, assault, rape and harassment had many in-depth stories from Weinstein’s victims, on the record. The story of Ambra Battilana Gutierrez was of particular focus, because she was one of the most recent victims detailed in the article, and because she was one of the few women who went to the police after Weinstein assaulted her. She worked with the NYPD on a sting operation, she wore a wire, she got Weinstein on tape admitting to the assault. The NYPD detectives thought they had a good, solid case, and they were prepared to see it through to the end. But the district attorney declined to prosecute. And Weinstein immediately began attacking Gutierrez in the press, questioning her history in outlets like Page Six and more. So the case was dropped and everything sort of faded away. That was in 2015.
It’s some strange kind of world we live in where all of these women are coming out and speaking on the record about the abuses and harassment they were subjected to over the years, and no one really thinks “well, he should go to jail.” I mean, we’re all thinking “he belongs in jail,” but do any of us think that he will actually spend even one day in any kind of jail cell? Of course not. We’re all adults here. We know the way the world works. Still, the NYPD still wants to pursue this. London police are on it too.
The New York Police Department has opened a criminal investigation into Harvey Weinstein, The Hollywood Reporter has confirmed.
“Based on information referenced in published news reports the NYPD is conducting a review to determine if there are any additional complaints relating to the Harvey Weinstein matter. No filed complaints have been identified as of this time and as always, the NYPD encourages anyone who may have information pertaining to this matter to call the CrimeStoppers Hotline at 1-800-577-TIPS,” police told THR in a statement.
On Tuesday, Weinstein added criminal defense attorney Blair Berk to his legal team. Berk is a West Hollywood-based attorney with past clients that include Mel Gibson, Lindsay Lohan, Kiefer Sutherland and Kanye West. Los Angeles police told THR on Thursday morning there are still no investigations into Weinstein.
London police also on Thursday said the department opened an investigation on Weinstein.
“We can confirm we received a report at 8:40 a.m. on Wednesday (11 October 2017) of an alleged sexual assault in the London area in the 1980s,” London police said in a statement.
British Celebitches, tell me about your sexual assault laws: are there statutes of limitations? Could the Met police conceivably prosecute a sex crime that was committed more than 20 or 30 years ago? I’m trying to temper my expectations about this. While I believe that Weinstein was still assaulting and harassing women well into this year, I truly wonder if many of the most recent victims will be coming forward. I don’t know. We’ll see.
As for where Weinstein is right now… some sources still say he flew undercover to Europe. People Mag’s sources maintain that he flew to Arizona, but People’s new report says that he’s actually not in any kind of rehab facility. He’s staying at a luxury resort, I sh-t you not. A source says that Weinstein “doesn’t want to go a place where he can’t use his cell phone…His team set him up at a secure place to get him the help he needs — he knows and wants help.” Basically, this fat pervert is staying at a five-star luxury hotel and probably taking “meetings” there. Heads up, Arizona ladies: don’t go to his hotel room.
Covers courtesy of Time Magazine, The Week, additional photo courtesy of WENN.
There have been a number of historical sex abuse cases here in the UK against celebrities for crimes that go back to the 70s/80s… but I think all of them have been accusations of abuse against children?? People like Rolf Harris – who was a TV presenter – have gone to jail, but I don’t know if the same applies to sex crimes against grown adults?
I’ve been thinking about those NDAs — should it be legal to force someone to agree not to report a crime you’ve committed, even if you’re paying them a settlement? Seems weird.
Pretty sure there are ways around them. They protect privacy but not illegal actions.
I listened to an interview with a lawyer yesterday who was talking about this. He said they can be hard to crack but that there are ways around a NDA, and one way is if the person signed the DNA without legal representation.
He represented the maid in the Dominic Kahn case and it sounded like he was working on some Harvey cases too.
Exactly! My limited understanding of contract law is that criminal law overrides contracts where the contract involves a criminal act.
I know my interpretation must be wrong. But I still kinda don’t get it.
Same here: are these NDA written in stone or what? How come people like Rose McGowan have to stick to their NDA when their testimony on a committed crime is vital for building a case?
The only thing I can think of is that in USA law, I am guessing a victim of a crime has to agree to make a complaint/statement for the police to charge an offender, while in the English based system (where I am in Australia), any offence is an offence against the “state”, so the courts/police can pursue regardless of the victim’s wishes, as long as there is sufficient evidence beyond that statement.
I’d imagine the settlements themselves would provide fairly strong evidence.
No statute of limitations. We have successfully prosecuted several high profile men in the entertainment industry – and jailed them – in the fall out from the Jimmy Savile scandal. These were TV celebrities, not film, but even so. Some examples: Rolf Harris, Stuart Hall, Dave Lee Travis, Fred Talbot.
Most were under Operation Yewtree which at first concentrated on child sex abuse but then widened to all historical sex abuse in entertainment. Many child victims but also victims who were young but adult women, similar to the circumstances vis a vis Weinstein of Cara and Kate.
The good news about the Scotland Yard investigation is that Operation Yewtree means they have the infrastructure and the officers with understanding to investigate historical sex abuse properly. Um… hopefully.
It seems unlikely the US would extradite Weinstein, especially if he is under investigation here. He would find himself in the same situation as Kissinger, unable to travel abroad because another country may honor the extradition request.
Yes. I imagine it would be something like that.
I hope the Met can establish enough criminal behaviour on his part for the CPS to authorise charges, however. If nothing else, it would mean he can’t come here any more. Not a real punishment but at least some sort of sanction.
Although that wouldn’t be nearly enough, it would still be something, and it would probably be painful for Harvey as it would be a limit on any attempts to worm his way back into independent film and put a cramp on his jet setting lifestyle.
There is no statute of limitations (SOL) in the UK for sexual abuse, sexual assault, or similar sex crimes. This is a good thing as many victims are reticent to come forward for many of the reasons HW victims remained silent. More US jurisdictions should eliminate SOLs for sex abuse and sex assault.
NYPD got him on tape admitting it, and that wasn’t enough. JFC.
It’s sick that it takes victims in big numbers to make something happen. Happened to a friend who was scammed by someone, but they wouldn’t arrest him until there were X number of people filing complaints. Insanity. No one waits until a bank has been robbed 10 or 20 times before prosecuting the first robber.
It might have been enough if Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance hadn’t decided to drop the case before getting a nice campaign donation from Weinstein.
Manhattan people: Vance is running for a 3rd term unopposed but there may be a write-in candidate.
Vance also dropped the criminal fraud case against Ivanka and Don Jr Trump and took $$$$ from Trump Company lawyers.
The world would be a different place today if Vance pursued these cases. Trump would not be president and Weinstein might have gone to jail.
In Canada, prosecutors don’t run for office, nor do judges. Keeps $$$ out of the system.
Vance is the epitome of greedy politician. Thanks for ruining lives. I hope people write in Kermit the Frog instead of this nut bar.
The write-in candidate is: Marc Fliedner
Please help get the word out, including the *correct spelling* of his name (as I think misspelled ones will not count, even if it is clear who is meant). He was asked by many before he agreed.
Vance also had funny-looking business in other matters – eschewing prosecution seemingly in return for hefty contributions.
Here’s info on the troubling aspects of Vance’s actions:
https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2017/10/10/16454182/cyrus-vance-harvey-weinstein-ivanka-donald-trump-junior-prosecute-donations-write-in
Here’s info on the write-in candidate:
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/10/scandal-plagued-cy-vance-suddenly-has-a-write-in-challenger.html
An admission ON TAPE isn’t enough?! Mother-effer. Harv isn’t going to see the inside of a Criminal Court ever.
I absolutely love the cover The Week magazine because Donald Trump is in it. He will hate looking at this cover because in his mind he is not like O’Reilly and Weinstein.
I think he will hate it even more because he is in the background not front and center
HAHAHAH PITA!! you win with this comment! that’s the first time i’ve laughed on one of these harvey-related threads. thank you for that.
That was my thought, too. To him it will look like he’s a co-star and not star.
Is anyone surprise that Harvey is not in a rehab but in a luxury hotel living it up. As many said yesterday the hoagie suicidal was a manipulative strategy.
Im so loving the the cover The Week magazine
Bill Clinton should be added to that cover.
Agreed Blondess!
That second cover nearly made me lose my breakfast.
And – yes, this is off-topic and not the point at all – but Weinstein really is quite the ugly bastard, isn’t he? He has always been viscerally unattractice, but knowing what we know now, the ugliness seems to exude from every pore.
Call me crazy, but I think the possibility of gaol time is very real. All it would take would be underage victims and/or recent, multiple rape victims willing to prosecute. I think there is more of a chance of a prosecution in the UK, based on recent cases.