Julia Roberts is pissing off Hindu faithful while filming in India

fp_3573374_uno_roberst_set_090909

Back in August, when Eat, Pray, Love was just about to start filming in New York, several prominent Hindu leaders took to the media to complain that the book – and now the movie – was in danger of showing a bastardized version of Hinduism in an attempt to rebrand the ancient religion as some trendy New Age crap. The leaders were doing some kind of pre-emtive strike against the movie, which at the time had yet to begin filming in India. My thoughts last month werethat if you found the book offensive to your religion, you would probably find the film offensive. The source material is what should be criticized, in my opinion, rather than the film.

Of course, I thought that before the film crew closed down a Hindu temple for filming right before Navratri. And before Julia Roberts hired a reported 350-person large security staff to protect her and her family. 350 security people? Seriously, Julia? Is she creating a human barricade around her hotel? The BBC has more:

Villagers in India have accused the Hollywood superstar, Julia Roberts, of interrupting one of their most important religious festivals.

They say that her huge film set in the town of Pataudi near Delhi has prevented them from celebrating the Navratri religious festival.

The Pretty Woman star used the Hari Mandir temple to shoot scenes of her new film, Eat, Pray, Love. Neither Ms Roberts nor the film makers has commented on the claims.

A spokeswoman for Sony Pictures Entertainment, which owns the production company making the film, told the BBC they did not want to say anything about the allegations.

Some locals are unhappy the actress is using the temple during the festival of Navratri, marked by Hindus through nine days of worship of the Goddess Durga.

Police say they are under strict orders to stop devotees from entering the temple while filming is under way because of security considerations.

The restrictions come at a sensitive time because a number of Hindu festivals take place in the autumn. One worshipper said: “It’s the holiest time of the year and we are being stopped from visiting our own temple. It’s outrageous.”

Eyebrows have also been raised at the scale of the security operation to guard the Hollywood star – some newspapers have described it as “presidential”.

Reports say she is also using a bullet proof car and a helicopter for protection.

Up until now, the star of Erin Brockovich and Notting Hill has been seen as one of the West’s most “Hindu-friendly” actors, even sporting a bindi spot during a visit to India earlier this year.

In Eat, Pray, Love, Ms Roberts plays a woman hoping to find herself in Hindu spirituality after experiencing a traumatic divorce. The film is based on the novel of the same name by Elizabeth Gilbert.

[From BBC]

As much as I would love to give Julia a good thump for the closing of the Hindu temple, it’s not really her fault. I lay the blame at the producers who organized the film shoot at the temple during an important Hindu festival, and I blame whatever genius Hindu committee or organization for letting the film crew in. Someone had to give their permission, and that’s the person to blame. I will thump Julia for the 350-person security brigade. For goodness sake, she’s not shooting a film in the Northwest frontier, it’s just Delhi. Live a little, Julia. Mix with the locals for a day, it seriously won’t kill you.

Here’s Julia filming scenes on the set of “Eat, Pray, Love” in Rome on September 8th. Images thanks to Fame Pictures .

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

26 Responses to “Julia Roberts is pissing off Hindu faithful while filming in India”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Ron says:

    350 people. I just don’t buy that at all. I used to live in the same neighborhood with Julia and she would walk her dog all the time and I never once saw her with “staff”. I am sure she has security on set as most big stars do but i really don’t buy that number.

  2. Anna says:

    I doubt the 350 people thing. I’m sure it was 35 (tops!) and somebody added a zero for effect. Julia Roberts may be protective of her family and want some privacy, but even she would not really hire 350 for that. I totally agree with you Kaiser that it’s the producers and whoever gives clearance in India who is to blame. Julia is just the actress who shows up to work and I’m sure she meant no disrespect, just wants to get her job done as best as she can. But she’s the most public figure in this whole mess, so she gets to bear the brunt of it.

  3. Firestarter says:

    She pisses me off, I know that!

  4. princess pea says:

    Whoa. I read in the NYT that her staff was more like 40 people. Which is still large.

    I couldn’t care less about Julia one way or the other, but I do think it’s ridiculous that I’m seeing this story all over branded as if it were her fault (nice one, BBC). She is the star, but she didn’t arrange the locations or the schedule. And SOMEONE on the temple’s side okayed this; it’s not guerilla film-making.

  5. Diane says:

    I agree producer issue. I also wonder if this was very few complaints, magnified.

  6. Persistent Cat says:

    It’s 100% the temple side’s fault. They agreed to it, do you really think the producers are aware of all the holy Hindu celebrations? The temple side is making money off this.

  7. barneslr says:

    You’re right, Cat. It’s not like they forcibly invaded the temple guns ablazin’. There was some sort of agreement in place. If they are unhappy now, that’s their problem.

  8. marie says:

    Come on Julia, you’re just not that important. Oh, thats right you’re the only one who thinks so. I guess you need all that security to reinforce the fantasy that anyone really gives a shit.

  9. QB says:

    Is really disrespecful of the committe and the producers to film during that festival in the temple especcially if there is also a proble of how the religion is shown in the book and now the movie from the beginning.

  10. MizzExpert says:

    We’re all pissed because it’ll be a crappy movie from an even crappier book, which is a perfect use for her imagined talent…

  11. elvisgrace says:

    ” I will thump Julia for the 350-person security brigade.”

    Hee!

  12. DottieDot says:

    They wouldn’t keep me out of my church if there was filming in my church!

  13. JaundiceMachine says:

    An entourage 350 strong?
    Closing a local temple during Navratri?! For production?!?!
    During Navratri!!?!!

    This is why I claimed I was from Canada while backpacking in India. How disgustingly egocentric.

    You couldn’t drag me into the theatre to see this steamer – but now Ms. Roberts and Sony are boycotted until further notice.

  14. Emily says:

    I wonder if they’d film in a Christian church during Lent or Christmas…

  15. Sakota says:

    I wish someone would get these celebs to realize that if a bomb drops on them, their’s wouldn’t be a major loss.

    I remember how the National Guard was called in to protect people going to the Oscars. Would someone explain that to me?

    The stuff these celebrities get away with is obscene.

    http://www.businesslinkshere.com

  16. Anna says:

    Oh please people, you don’t really believe this? I maintain that she’s probably got a staff of 35 working for her (which is still a lot, but not exorbitant) and that someone added a zero for effect. There’s no way anybody is as conceited and paranoid to have 350 people for protection and other services.

    If this were true, the Jolie-Pitts would not be above travelling with an entourage of 800. This is ludicrous.

  17. RubyKaur says:

    I truly hope she gets run over by a rickshaw, bitten by a cobra, vomits profusely from Delhi belly and then dropped down a well!

  18. Ursula says:

    Isn’t she a B- list actress these days?

  19. Granger says:

    I’ve always thought Julia is an over rated actress with one of the biggest egos in Hollywood, but I too find the 350-person-security-detail hard to believe. As full of herself as she seems to be, she generally tends to avoid that overly excessive celebrity lifestyle.

  20. princess pea says:

    Anna, I don’t think they’re reading the comments. Or even the article. Or they’re so anti-Julia that they want for it to be true? (Why be anti-Julia? She hasn’t been around annoying us for AGES… she’s no Kardashian.)

    Seriously, this is a totally ridiculous attack and a clearly false story. And again, IF the material IS ACTUALLY offensive to Hinduism (which I highly doubt), that’s a flaw with the book and the script. Not the actress.

  21. JD says:

    Sorry India. We don’t like her either.

  22. lucy says:

    I don’t like her all that much, but I doubt the 350 people story. If she does have a big staff (even 35 is big, IMO) then she should either 1) not bring her family to an area she feels is unsafe or 2) not do the movie.

    But as far as the scheduling problem, that lies on the production company, not her, and I absolutely agree that whoever is in charge of the temple is responsible too. As someone else said, you know they’re not filming there without permission. Someone there OK’d it, and should have warned the film crew that this time would be off limits.

  23. Persistent Cat says:

    @Emily, they don’t just wander in and start filming. They get permission and agree to scheduling. If the church only saw dollar signs, you can bet they’d film during Lent or Christmas or Easter. The temple agreed to it, it’s their fault.

    And even if it was 350 people, it’s 350 people with jobs so who cares?

  24. 4Real says:

    She kinda looks like Madonna in that picture. Blondish hair doesn’t suit her.
    At least her big mouth is closed. Her laugh grates on me.

  25. Nirvan says:

    She is not famous here,why she need security at all…

  26. Neeraj says:

    I agree with Nirwan, Julia Roberts though a very popular film artist in the western world (and the urban areas of India) isn’t a known face or even a name in the area where the movie was shot…and I am pretty sure there were not even 350 people living in that village !!!