Last week, Roman Polanski’s lawyer made this big farting deal about how Polaski “wouldn’t accept” extradition to the United States, and how they were petitioning the Swiss courts to let Polanski out on bail. Given his track record, I thought it would be a cold day in hell before the Swiss courts started listening to weepy lawyer stories about poor old Polanski, sitting alone in his jail cell, being persecuted. But I was wrong! The Swiss have granted Polanski bail – and if everything goes as planned he’ll soon go under “house arrest” in his Swiss home. Or rather, his “chalet”. So really it’s a “chalet arrest”. And Polanski is going to wear an ankle monitor.

Roman Polanski was granted $4.5 million bail Wednesday, clearing the way for the fugitive director to move within days from a Swiss jail to house arrest and electronic monitoring at his Alpine resort chalet.

The Swiss Justice Minister said she saw no reason to appeal the surprise decision by the Swiss Criminal Court. Polanski would have to remain in Switzerland as authorities assess whether to extradite him to the United States for having sex in Los Angeles in 1977 with a 13-year-old girl.

Ministry Spokesman Folco Galli said the final decision on transferring Polanski to his chalet in the Swiss resort of Gstaad would be made “quickly.”

“The 76-year-old appellant is married and the father of two minors,” the court said as it considered Polanski’s offer of a cash bail secured by his apartment in Paris. “It can be assumed that as a responsible father he will, especially in view of his advanced age, attach greater importance to the financial security of his family than a younger person.”

The court said Polanski would be subjected to “constant electronic surveillance” at his chalet and an alarm would be activated if he leaves the premises or takes off the bracelet, adding that the filmmaker was still viewed as a high flight risk.

Polanski’s lawyers Lorenz Erni in Zurich and Herve Temime in Paris declined to comment. The Los Angeles County district attorney’s office also had no reaction, spokeswoman Shiara Davila-Morales said.

The decision came as a surprise after a series of setbacks for the director of “Rosemary’s Baby,” “Chinatown,” and “The Pianist.” The Swiss Justice Ministry ordered Polanski arrested Sept. 26 as he arrived in Zurich to receive a lifetime achievement award at a film festival.

Swiss legal experts had said earlier that Polanski’s chances of bail were slim, and even U.S. authorities expressed confidence that a Swiss court wouldn’t grant his release. The court last month rejected Polanski’s first bail offer of his Gstaad chalet as collateral, which the director claimed made up more than half of his personal wealth and would definitely guard against his flight because he has two children he must support through school.

The court demanded cash instead, and this time looked favorably on Polanski’s offer of a bank guarantee and the threat of sacrificing his family’s home if he fled justice.

“Cash is king,” said Peter Cosandey, a former Zurich prosecutor. Still, he said he could “hardly remember a case where bail is granted to someone who isn’t even a full-time Swiss resident.”

A decision on extraditing Polanski to Los Angeles is still pending, and would also be subject to appeals.

[From The Huffington Post]

The way those gossipy Swiss lawyers (who knew?) make it sound, it’s almost as if Polanski greased a few legal wheels with some kick-backs, right? Do you think that really happened? I thought the Swiss courts were a lot more righteous than that, but perhaps when several million dollars/Euros are floating around, everyone is like, “To the chalet!” Anyway, does anyone want to take bets on Polanski figuring out a way to flee Switzerland for France? Ten bucks says it happens.