Glen Powell learned early on that Hollywood ‘is not a meritocracy & I still believe that’

Glen Powell was recently a Hollywood Reporter cover story, where they basically went all-in on the idea that Glen is the next big thing. I disagree, but I will say this – that man has been hustling for years, taking smaller roles and saying yes to every job he was offered, so I don’t really begrudge Glen his newfound success. I just don’t think he’s really got “it” and I think that’s why his attempts to become a movie star fell flat for so many years. But here we are! Glen covered a recent issue of GQ Hype, all to promote Hit Man and Twisters (a sort of revival of the ‘90s classic). Glen is genuinely enjoying his new fame but he still has scar tissue over just how many roles he never got. Some highlights:

On Batman: “I was always a Batman guy. I would have a wild take on Batman. It definitely would not be like a Matt Reeves tone – it’d probably be closer to Keaton. Oh, sick!” Although he hasn’t played Batman, he has been pretty close. “I get my head smashed in by Bane in The Dark Knight Rises.”

He’s not a nepo baby: “When you have no one championing you, you feel like you’re adrift.” He would wake up every day and look at casting breakdowns, film unsolicited auditions, find out casting directors’ contact information and get a friend of his who worked in sales to call them on his behalf. “I was like, this town’s gonna kick me out regardless. You might as well kick down every door you possibly can.”

The roles he never got: He missed out on what would become Josh Hartnett’s role in Oppenheimer by a slim margin, he says, but he’s still in touch with Christopher Nolan, and has faith that they’ll get to do something together soon. Throughout his early-to-mid twenties, Powell, who is now 35, found himself auditioning for – and ultimately losing out on – parts that went on to turbocharge the careers of his peers. In his eyes, he screwed up his audition to play Captain America. He came extremely, agonisingly close to playing Han Solo in Solo (Disney went with Alden Ehrenreich). “I can joke about it now,” he says, “[but] I blew that final audition.” Each time, it felt like he had missed his big chance.

He blew the audition for 2015’s The Longest Ride to Scott Eastwood. “I remember Marty Bowen, who was the producer, just looking at me like, ‘Yeah, this is not going well.’”

He came across as too needy: “He was like, ‘Hey man, you gotta be less punctual, like a little more cool actor-y.’ There’s definitely a bit of a game [to the whole thing]. It was clear to me very early on that it’s not a meritocracy, and I still believe that. I still believe that the best guy doesn’t necessarily get the job. You can’t just be good – you also have to be very lucky. All these guys who didn’t give a sh-t and just phoned it in were working.”

[From British GQ]

Glen also talks about how various “types” come into vogue and suddenly every script references that type – a Robert Pattinson brooding-type, a delicate Timothee Chalamet-type, etc. Which I think is true, and it also sort of explains why Glen is sort of out of sync with his “Hollywood generation.” Hollywood isn’t really looking for forgetably-attractive beefcake movie stars right now? Anyway, I’ll give him a chance because I appreciate the fact that he’s not a nepo baby and that he hustled his ass off to get here. But I’m still mad about it!

Photos courtesy of Cover Images. Cover courtesy of British GQ.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

42 Responses to “Glen Powell learned early on that Hollywood ‘is not a meritocracy & I still believe that’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Lentilcracker says:

    We saw Twisters last night and loved it. He was great in it, and Daisy Edgar Jones was surprisingly compelling. I’m in the camp that finds Glenn quite attractive though and I love his work ethic.

    • dj says:

      Unfortunately, I am going to be the voice of dissension. We saw Twisters and did not like anything about it. It was boring. They talked about the chemistry of particles of the clouds/tornados. The dialogue was completely bad. The script bad. We cared nothing about the characters. Just my husband and I’s opinions.

  2. Bumblebee says:

    ‘That’s NOT fair!’ I said to my mother when I was a kid. Her response always was, ‘Life’s not fair’. When you become an adult you finally realize what that means. Welcome to adulthood Glen. Enjoy your success, instead of complaining of the hard road to get there. Not many end up where you are.

    • GrnieWnie says:

      I think it’s important to voice the struggles. I’ve had the same ones — not in Hollywood, but my own industry also seems populated by people half assing it yet still seeming to get the best jobs. This is so difficult to deal with, mentally. It can cause depression, low self-worth and so many other things.

      I think as a white man, too, he was probably a bigger believer in some sort of meritocracy. It’s good for him to voice that no such meritocracy exists.

      • lucky says:

        Hard agree, GrnieWnie, talking about challenges isn’t the same as whining and equating the two is what makes people clam up and internalize everything.

    • Cait says:

      I didn’t read his comments as whining, more as acknowledgement of his experience grinding away as an actor without the benefit of nepotism. It’s surprisingly insightful for an actor helming a summer blockbuster movie – who is a cishet white dude who was probably raised to believe that hard work would for sure lead to success – to observe that the film and entertainment industries are not rooted in meritocracy.

    • Wendy says:

      Let me ask you a question real quick here: do you think this man called up a journalist at random and said, “I’ve got a great idea for an article, let me talk at length about all the roles I didn’t get, the chicks are gonna dig it,” or do you think it might be sliiiiiiightly more probable that since the narrative about Glen Powell is that he’s been slogging away for years and finally getting some big breakout roles, that this interview was set up as promo for the big summer flick that just dropped in theaters today and that the journalist… wait for it… asked Glen Powell to talk about his experience as a working actor and to talk a bit about the roles he had been up for that might have given him an earlier springboard to his current status?

      I swear, sometimes people here are just so damn weird.

      • Thinking says:

        I don’t think there’s anything wrong with what he said but I do think Hollywood is the most competitive place on earth. So in a way I was surprised at his naïveté. The biggest movie star I can think of who hit success very young and maintained it is Tom Cruise, and, well he’s sort of insane. That said, I think he was just explaining the process of marketing himself, not necessarily whining.

      • Isabelllap says:

        We loved him in the Hitman. Didn’t even know who he was . Handsome and hilarious. He looks and acts differently in all his movies, perfect for that role, where he had to change character with each new case.

        Disagree that he hasn’t worked with good actresses. Are you kidding me? Sydney Sweeney. Adria Arjuna. Daisy Edgar Jones. Dream casting

  3. Myriam says:

    He’s not my type of actor. I don’t look for his movies, and I have no interest in his movies. I’m not sure if it’s because of him per se or because of the type of movies he’s been in recently. But I really liked what he said. Everything he says is 100% true. I mean, how is Scott Eastwood getting f**king roles? I can’t even remember what he looks like, let alone anything he’s done. Glenn’s a hustler, and I’m rooting for him. I’ll probably never watch anything he’s in unless the female co-lead draws me in. Sorry, Glenn. But I’m rooting for you!

    Edited to add: I hope he doesn’t venture into Armie Hammer territory. Cannibalism aside, I remember when Hollywood was trying to make him happen, and everyone was like, nuh uh.

    • Latine says:

      This is the key. They need better actress to play off of. There is another actor that is plagued with newbie actresses. Can’t think of his name but his career isn’t going anywhere because his audience isn’t growing. He needs new people to be exposed to him.

  4. Thinking says:

    He really wanted to make it and he did.

    He’s attractive in a “I should be on Survivor” type of way, but I think the way his eyes photograph, both in stills and sometimes onscreen, might hinder his chances sometimes.

    If he lost out to Chris Pine, well, it’s not that surprising. A lot of actors are objectively equal to him. His point about luck still stands though — I don’t disagree. But his competition isn’t terrible haha.

    If he messed up his auditions (which he seems to be admitting?)…..I guess it makes sense that he wouldn’t get some of those roles. Losing out to Josh Hartnett and Chris Pine isn’t so bad. But maybe he’s bothered he lost out to Scott Eastwood haha. I’m wondering if his perspective on it not being a meritocracy was ultimately referencing that one guy. The rest of those guys aren’t awful haha.

  5. Gwenda says:

    Thing is, does he want to be an actor, and act, or does he want to be a ,,’movie star’ ? The current ‘trend’ in most things, music (Katy perry??) tv, music, is authenticity, depth. Hence the more popular artists are gorgeous, but that’s not it. It’s that they speak to us on a visceral level. 2 of my major celeb crushes are gay brit men. In a world of COVID, Climate catastrophe, war .. I dunno, I think the kids just want meaning . He’s not bad, he’s great, but what he wants doesn’t seem to exist any more .

  6. sevenblue says:

    Good for him saying that. When nepo babies say Hollywood is meritocracy, it really annoys me. There are far more talented people out there than them who don’t get the same “luck” as them, so they aren’t competing with the best of the best. Glen and Sydney really hustled to get to this point and I respect that. I am gonna check out his new movie for sure.

    • Christine says:

      Yep, I’m with you. I appreciate that he recognizes the auditions he blew, and I respect his hustle.

      The Scott Eastwood point is well made. I am with MYRIAM upthread, I cannot for the life of me picture him in my head. All I can conjur up is something vaguely blonde-ish?

      You got me, I am rooting for you, Brisket’s Dad! Michael Keaton is far and away my favorite Batman, and I think I would have enjoyed your spin.

  7. Nerd says:

    He’s an attractive man who I have to agree that his business is part work or talent but also a lot of luck. I enjoyed him in the backstory of Hidden Figures, his interview with Stephen Corbert and another mention of the movie has it on my watch list for this weekend. It’s a great movie and it’s one of the rare movies I enjoy watching often. He’s attractive enough that he briefly took my focus off of the actual movie. The Hitman movie was great and I’m interested in seeing the the Twister movie. I hope that he finally finds the luck he needs to truly get the trajectory he needs to be a really sought after leading man in a huge blockbuster movie.

  8. Sydneygirl says:

    He works his ass off, and he really gets behind the marketing of any film he’s in.

    I like him. He’s genuine but with old school charisma IMO.

    I watched Set it Up again for the first time in ages and he’s so dorky-good in that.

  9. Digital Unicorn says:

    I watched Hitman and thought he was good in it – he’s a good enough actor and its interesting that he lost out on playing the young Han Solo which am not sure he could have pulled off. Enrich wasn’t bad but Ford left very big shoes to fill with that role.

  10. Elsa says:

    I think that he is totally the next big thing and he absolutely has the “it” factor. I love him!

  11. Libra says:

    The article and comments use the term ” luck” . I was told early on that “you make your own luck through hard work” , but after having lived many years now and having witnessed the ups and downs of lives of those I know, there truly is a big element of luck involved. Being in the right place at the right time with the right credentials is a result of the stars aligning and you as the lucky beneficiary. I have known many deserving, hard working and educated people who just never “made it”, while someone less deserving (in my eyes) scored big.

  12. Ameerah M says:

    He has zero rizz. I find him infinitely boring.

  13. Talie says:

    It’s funny he lost out to Scott Eastwood on a part – he is a much better actor than him, but Scott has that laissez faire attitude of the idle rich and famous. He knows he’ll be fine. I always see pics of him just surfing in Hawaii. That’s why it’s easy for him to have the cool guy persona. Glen, on the other hand, wants to hustle, needs the work. I can see why Tom Cruise is championing him.

  14. Kateee says:

    Chad Radwell forever.

  15. Blithe says:

    I’ve only seen Powell in Guernsey… and Hidden Figures – so: in support roles where he did a very good job in small but pivotal roles. I find him likable but not particularly memorable. The recent pieces here have made me appreciate his work ethic and his humor, so I’m pulling for his continued success even though I’m probably not the target audience for his movies.

    Personally, I’m not getting much rizz from him — although I do enjoy his self-deprecating humor. Brisket, though, has major rizz. My suggestion: a movie with the tandem team of Glen Powell and Brisket would take them both to another level. It might even soothe some jagged brittle souls in these horribly tense and divided times. It’s an odd comparison, but Shirley Temple movies — some with Bill – Bojangles – Robinson — served that role for varied audiences during the stressful 1930’s. Maybe Glen Powell and Brisket are just what we need right now! lol. I’m wishing them both much luck!

    And maybe I’m completely wrong and Twister will do it for Powell.

  16. SKE says:

    I don’t love the way he photographs but he is consistently good in everything he’s in and he’s got the rizz on screen, Loved Hit Man, loved him in Scream Queens, enjoyed Set It Up and Anyone But You. The fact that he works his butt off and is succeeding in a business full of nepo babies makes me toot for him.

    • BanjoVino says:

      He was so funny and endearing in Scream Queens, even in a douchebag role! I actually remember thinking “who is this guy?! He’s got IT!” So whatever he’s got going on charisma-wise works on me, that’s for sure.

  17. ohwell says:

    He is a good actor but like Jeremy Allen White, he has this goofy look to him.

  18. assdf says:

    His PR team is trying to sell him as both the new IT boy and as an underdog story, which is fine, but ultimately you can’t have both.

    If he ever becomes the new Hollywood IT boy (press X to doubt, he’s too generic, and Hollywood isn’t looking for that rn) they can’t do the underdog story anymore, he’ll be just another cis straight white guy in Hollywood.

  19. Elizabeth says:

    I am definitely one who finds this guy eminently forgettable. (I watched Anyone but You and Hit Man.) and his PR team should give him some new notes because “oh I had such a hard time” gets old fast.

  20. eh says:

    “he still has scar tissue over just how many roles he never got.”

    Some white men that haven’t benefited from class privilege have this entitlement going on as if they’re owed something by life and they’ve been cheated out of something that was rightfully theirs. It’s not cute and can turn dangerous.

    “it also sort of explains why Glen is sort of out of sync with his “Hollywood generation.” Hollywood isn’t really looking for forgetably-attractive beefcake movie stars right now?”

    It’s not that Hollywood isn’t looking for that. Hollywood already has more than enough bland beige beefcakes named Chris. A Glen isn’t needed. Beefcakes aren’t even what women are into anymore. It’s all about ugly-handsome British men or rat boys (affectionate) since Millennials. Maybe even since Gen X.

    It’s funny because the only demographic that’s hardcore into traditional manly types is gay men, but Hollywood doesn’t want to cater to them.

    I don’t dislike Glen. It’s great that he’s not a nepo baby in a time when the wealthy have stopped pretending they don’t want to push the poor out of the arts. But I can’t root for him. He’s lowkey flirted with conservatives and the right. His team knows what they’re doing when they position him as a wholesome conservative white boy that pulled himself from his bootstraps. They position him as the opposite of woke Hollywood elites. I can’t root for someone like that. Same with Sidney Sweeney.

  21. Latine says:

    Glen here is the dirty secret. Scot Eastwood was always going to get that role. They had auditions to make it
    A. seem like he was the best candidate
    B. Steal roles in THAT ACTOR category
    C. Sometimes they use it to Get some traction for the other auditioners. Like Glen Powell was able to get some press by audition for a part that Clinton Eastwood son got.

  22. Karen says:

    He’s just missing something… Remember Tom Cruise in Rainman or Top Gun? He was droolingly attractive. Kind of like Mel Gibson in Tequila Sunrise. (Yes, I know Mel is a racist axxhbite now, but man, was he eye candy in those old movies.) This guy sort of looks like a wombat to me. Sorry, that’s all I got.

  23. Thinking says:

    There’s nothing wrong with him — there are just too many stars nowadays. Who can keep track?

    He probably would have been a big star in the 80s with his conventional looks. He does sort of look like a Bachelor contestant as well. Not sure if that hinders him in 2024 where looking or being a little different is considered cooler now. Timothy Chalamet stands out (as a white guy) because he’s a bit ethereal looking. Even Robert Pattinson’s features look a little unusual, though I have no desire to see his emo-Batman. Glen Powell’s face is from a different time. He should be scoring a lot of period pieces at some point.

  24. Stef says:

    This site, its bloggers and commenters, have all gotten so mean. Over it

    • Blithe says:

      So, to validate your sense that the “bloggers and commenters have all gotten so mean” you’ve chosen to come to the site and post a disparaging “mean” comment. That’s an interesting choice. If you really are “over it” why post at all?

    • lol pls says:

      >people don’t throw themselves at the feet of Wholesome Conservative White Boy #272627 omg u guys are so mean!!11

      This is a very “why won’t someone think of cishet white men” Helen Lovejoy comment.

      We’re allowed to not find him interesting or attractive. And his flirting with the anti-woke makes his hairy axx even less attractive.

  25. Miss J says:

    Agreed. Have enjoyed reading the stories and comments here for around 10 years but am definitely finding the tone of many comments to be unreasonable and unkind

  26. East Villager says:

    I didn’t get the fuss over Glenn in Maverick. I thought he was great in Hit Man, though. I like that he took initiative on the direction of his career and wrote something for himself with a serious director like Linklater. Being just the tiniest bit quirky-looking sets him apart. He seems like a genuinely nice, intelligent guy and not an a-hole. He can stay!

  27. Sarah says:

    He was great in Anyone but You. He’s a really handsome guy. George Clooney hustled for years too. He was in a ton of sitcoms before he hit it big on ER. Glenn was a kid actor too – he was in a Spy Kids movie. I think he just needs to find a memorable role with which we can identify him . He’s a man and once he hits it big he has at least 30 years to enjoy success. Look at Harrison Ford.

  28. Blackbetty says:

    I haven’t seen him in anything. But I’m rooting for him. I’m so sick and tired of Nepo babies

  29. Capri says:

    I will never NOT see him as the capybara who made a wish to become human. That was devastatingly on point.