Sandra Bullock’s People cover is set to outsell the Brangelina twins

arriving at the 25th Santa Barbara International Film Festival American Riviera Award to Sandra Bullock
Note: We got a legal letter from People’s lawyers telling us to take down the People cover with Sandra Bullock, so we’re not posting it here. You’ve surely already seen it, though

It’s been nearly a week since Sandra Bullock shocked us with her adoption and divorce news after her husband’s infidelity scandal. The question is – did Bullock’s People cover outsell the Brangelina twins? According to an industry insider quoted in Popeater, Louis and Sandra didn’t outsell Knox and Vivienne quite yet, but Sandra’s issue is likely to come out ahead. This was a real coup for People, and given how heavy handed their lawyers have been I’m wondering how much they paid Sandra for the interview and photos and if she donated the money. It must have been at least seven figures.

Here’s Popeater’s report:

It’s no surprise that PEOPLE magazine’s shocking Sandra Bullock baby cover was a huge seller, but it hasn’t yet replaced the biggest-selling baby exclusive ever. That would be PEOPLE’s 2008 exclusive photos of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s newborn twins, Knox Leon and Vivienne.

“Sandra’s cover has been on newsstands for a week and it has already sold over 2.7 million copies,” a magazine insider told me, citing early sales estimates for the issue. “That’s only 100,000 less than the 2.8 million copies the magazine sold when Angelina’s twins graced the cover — and a half-million more copies than the June 2006 issue with exclusive baby pictures of Brad and Angelina’s first daughter, Shiloh, which moved 2.2 million newsstand copies.”

So although it looks as if Sandra’s baby will ultimately outsell Angie’s twins, she still has a long way to go be beat the top two seller’s in the magazine’s 35-year history: the Sept. 11 issue (4.1 million copies) and the issue covering Princess Diana’s death (3 million).

[From People]

So tragedy outsells baby covers and Sandra’s story had a little of each with the benefit of a bitter sweet happy ending. It was truly a moving interview and as I mentioned it brought me to tears. (I wasn’t as touched by it later in the day when People’s lawyers told us to remove even the cover of the magazine, but that’s their right and it’s understandable. Again, it makes me wonder what kind of coin they dropped to secure that high selling issue.)

Sandra’s old friend George Lopez is likely to secure the first live interview with her when his show returns in the fall. Lopez told People Magazine that he’s a “proud uncle” to little Louis and added that Sandra and her baby are doing well. “Sandra is a loving, giving person, and Louis could not be in a better home and she could not be happier.” We’re all wishing the best for Sandra and her adorable new arrival.

Sandra may have something else in common with Brad and Angelina – according to reports Sandra is moving to New Orleans with Louis. There have been moving vans spotted outside the mansion she purchased there last September. A source tells Fox411 Sandra wants to be a part of life in New Orleans and she believes it will be great for Louis to grow up there.” [via Radar] She said in People that she was looking forward to taking a walk with Louis and feeling the sun on her face. Maybe she can do that in her new city with minimal interference from the paparazzi.

25th Santa Barbara Film Fest - American Riviera Award

Sandra Bullock garners award at the 16th Screen Actors Guild Awards in Los Angeles

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

59 Responses to “Sandra Bullock’s People cover is set to outsell the Brangelina twins”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. bellaluna says:

    Unlike the Brange twin cover, I bought this issue with Sandra and baby Louis. They are adorable.

  2. ogechi says:

    Lovely Sandra

  3. meme says:

    Good for Sandra indeed. The loons are going to lose their minds. How could the twin messiahs be usurped by the likes of Sandra Bullock LOL

  4. kelbear says:

    I bought her issue and didn’t buy the brangelina one.

  5. Tess says:

    If she really raises the kid in N.O. (that means staying there after the initial thrill wears off) I’ll give her credit for consistency.

    But it seems like another unrealistic and impractical decision to me. Just like overlooking JJ’s past associations and collection of Nazi memorabilia.

  6. YT says:

    Aw, don’t make it a competition.

  7. Praise St. Angie! says:

    “Sandra may have something else in common with Brad and Angelina – according to reports Sandra is moving to New Orleans with Louis.”

    well, she WOULD have something in common with them, IF they actually did live there. I’ve heard that Pitt does go there from time to time to check on the whole MIR thing, but when was the last time they actually LIVED there, as a family? It doesn’t really seem like they “live” anywhere…just in whichever city it is they’re filming.

    could be wrong, as I don’t follow their movements as carefully as…ahem…SOME people do.

  8. Bite me says:

    See people make everything about brangelina

  9. Feebee says:

    I think the story behind this cover is infinitely more interesting, not just from the gossip angle.

    Surprised that People demanded you take the cover down. You’re doing them a favour by promoting the issue. They’re idiots.

    I thought she said in the People i/v that she planned to spent ‘part of the year’ in New Orleans. She wanted Louis to know his city inside and out. What a great life to have… New Orleans for part the of year, Austin for some and LA for some…. nice!

  10. K-MAC says:

    I carry the issue with me because it is a rare gem! She is an incredible role model….:)

  11. Charity is Chic says:

    And I bet she didn’t even charge $14 million for the photo either. Kudos to Sandy for keeping it classy.

  12. meme says:

    well if the bestselling issue was the brange twins and now it’s sandra & louis, you HAVE to be brangelina into the story.

  13. meme says:

    Brad’s MIR ‘thing’ is a complete failure and Sandra lived in Texas before Jesse so she probably will spend a lot of time in NOLA

  14. Blaster says:

    @Praise

    Yes…ahem, some people who seem to know everything right down to what they had for lunch. The funniest was “a fan” who knew about the security system they had in their house. Something along the lines of “well, it’s a great system”…..O_o

    Yeah, the Brange are like nomads, they live where they film mostly. Nothing wrong with that. NOLA was their home for a while. I’m still confused as to what Brad’s doing down there though…hasn’t he built, like, only 12 butt-ugly houses?

    I’m more questioning Sandra moving to NOLA Wouldn’t that take her far away from Sunny and the other kids she helped raise? I thought she wanted to still stay i their lives?

  15. Zeit says:

    We got the same letter at our site…

  16. Praise St. Angie! says:

    Yes, blaster, THOSE are the ones that I’m talking about.

    there’s nothing wrong with being a fan…there are people that I’m a “fan” of, but I don’t know how much time they’ve spent filming (down to the number of days) in a particular city.

    or how many nannies they have, or how much they’ve made on each film (listed, apparently memorized, in EVERY post about who’s “influential” or “bankable”), or how much time off they’ve taken.

    Nor do I remember what they wore to an awards ceremony from year to year, going back several years.

    there’s being a fan, and there’s being an obsessed stalker.

  17. Kaiser says:

    And there’s disliking them, and there’s being an obsessed hater.

  18. Praise St. Angie! says:

    true that, Kaiser.

  19. PJ says:

    This issue of People was also the annual “Most Beautiful People” issue, which can only add to its appeal. Thank God we were spared another cover photo of Julia Roberts!

  20. Liz says:

    ATTN CELEBS if you get cheated on by your hubby adopt a minority baby, have a press agent help you with the interview and sell pics to People Magazine.

  21. Beth says:

    I can’t believe that people are actually making a big deal that Sandra’s cover sold more and truely care about the stats. Of course it was a huge seller. This was Sandra’s first interview and had the huge surprise of the adoption. I never buy People but bought this one for the story. Why buy the twins cover since it’s just baby pictures and a interview that’s basically “we’re happy and tired”.

  22. simplicity says:

    Duplicate post, please remove.

  23. simplicity says:

    Sorry you weren’t able to use the photo, I, too, would think it in their best interest.

    I’m not surprised the issues are selling nearly as well. Sandra’s story not only had compassionate value, but the wow of surprise.

    I’m wondering if James behavior didn’t cause immediate concern in jeopardizing the adoption.

    My bet’s on her adopting a second baby or child in the next two years.

    And I don’t believe James will be in this baby’s life but for an occasional visit. His risky behavior placed his entire family in jeopardy.

  24. lucy2 says:

    I keep meaning to pick up a copy of this but haven’t done so yet.

    Before this, I hadn’t realized how involved Sandra was in NO. I knew she donated after Katrina, but apparently she’s been very involved with a school there as well, among other things. She seems committed to helping, and I like that.
    I’ll be curious to see how much time she’ll actually spend there though. I remember the JPs talking about how they wanted to be part of the community, and for their kids to go to school there, but they haven’t really followed through with that beyond Pitt’s project. I imagine Sandra being there more, but it will be tough with the other kids in LA, working, and her home in Austin.
    I wonder how mad Julia was that her most beautiful cover got bumped to a small corner photo??? 😉

  25. teri says:

    I like both women, will not give into chosing which one has the most gorgeous child. I’m sure SB wins by Americans standards by chosing a child from here and because she a great woman. Angelina is a wonderful woman also and I applaud her adopting from war torn impoverished countries to give these children a life that they would never have. Her children have a good chance at survival and that’s the most important.

    I’m just curious why it’s only Angelina and not Brad too?

  26. teri says:

    Yes your right it was the WOW OF SURPRISE that caught everyone off guard. With JJ cheating with a bunch of gutter scum and not hearing about how is SB coping was on everyones mind including mine. I felt horrible for her but when the story broke I was so happy for her.

  27. Jeri says:

    Go Sandy Go!! Love her. Now Angie will have to get pregnant again. Maybe Julia too.

    Sorry, couldn’t help myself.

  28. teri says:

    I’m really happy that the money made off the JP children went to charity, that’s their biggest accomplishment giving back. Tabs would have made a huge profit anyhow for themselves and would have put their family in danger with papz trying to capture a picture. So many other people but I guess since the JP rule the world and all they are the biggest target to outlast, outplay and outwit, bwahaha.

  29. Liz says:

    Sandra has homes in Austin, Los Angeles,Wyoming and NOLA. Brad and Angie have homes in Los Angeles, NOLA and France.Austin is Sandra’s home base. Los Angeles is Brad and Angie’s home base. When they finish a movie they return to LA.Since NOLA is close to Austin Sandra can spend a lot of time there. As far as I know she has no filming projects scheduled right now.Hopefully she can fly stepkids in on their school breaks.

  30. Anais says:

    I’m sorry but you are all so ridiculous, being proud to buy this tabloid’s issue rather than an other!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    If you don’t know what do to with your money give it to people who need, instead of constantly criticize people, as if your life was a model of success!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    You may like them or dislike them, but they are living their life, I really recommend you to do the same and to stop focus so much on them.

    I like Brad and Angelina but i don’t follow their news as much as people who claim to dislike them do, nor do i comment on every post about them.
    I’m sorry but you people who claim to dislike them, seem to enjoy too much these post. With all the things your perfect, wonderful and exemplar life must be full, I can’t beleive that a post about two miserable people like these two get you exited so much!!!!

    That ‘s sick, focus on something that bring you positivity.
    Even if these people life was shit, it wouldn’t mean that your live would automatically be better.

    That being said, Sandra is a good actress and seems to be a nice person, I just hope you will give her a break with your pity and and not turn her into a martyr. She is a woman like million others women who had to deal with divorce, she is not a saint neither a martyr.

  31. Ana says:

    Awww I have both of the Brangelina covers with the twins and with Shiloh. I was goign to buy this one, but I haven’t been to the supermarket in a while.
    It’s hard for me to buy magazines. They’re what $4-%5?
    I can read here for free! And the gossip is better!

  32. Alex says:

    Anais: Well Said, the most sensible post ever written on this site

  33. YeaRight! says:

    The difference?

    Sandra Bullock didn’t expect or get 14 million dollars plus for her pictures with her son..under the guise of it going to charity. So far, the majority of that 14 million is still sitting in the J-P foundation. I guess charity really does begin at home.

  34. cake says:

    Tell me, which other actor has committed to building the lower ninth yard yes that would be Brad Pitt. So don’t knock him and Angelina. Recognize both Sandra and the Jolie-Pitt are doing good things in NOLA and it just shows their similarities and not differences.

  35. lucy2 says:

    YeaRight – have they said how much they paid for Sandra’s exclusive? I haven’t seen anything about it yet, and maybe it wasn’t quite that high, but I’m guessing it was a pretty penny. If they haven’t already publicized it, we may never know how much or where it went.
    As for the JP baby pic money – it does seem slow moving out of their foundation. Maybe there are donations going out that aren’t publicized, or maybe there’s a long term plan that only releases so much every year? Or maybe they just like hanging on to it, I don’t know.

    no clutter – good point! I used to save some old magazines I thought I wanted, and then years later would think “why am I keeping this?” The whole article must be scanned online somewhere, I’ll probably just read it that way. Save my $ and a tree!

  36. nnn says:

    I wonder if she will give the money to a charity since she sold her baby image.

    Maybe she will give it to a charity against racism and bigotry.

  37. Kim says:

    Donations from Jolie Pitt Foundation- $ 4 million to Doctors W/o Borders 2006, 2008, 2009 and 2010(Haiti) Couldn’t find info on 2007, $1 million to Pakistan Refugees, $5 million to MIR,$2 million to Global Health for Aids/ TB clinic,$1 million to Children of Conflict( American and Iraqi kids), $1 million to hospital in MO named after Jane Pitt in 2009, $1 million to SOS Villages,They gave $1 million to Human Rights Watch in 2008. $1 million to Global Action for Children google Looktothestars.org or Jolie Pitt Foundation for more info. I didn’t list smaller donations like $100,000 to Daniel Pearl Foundation or $100K to Lost Boys Fund. To Yeah right- Ignorance is not bliss,dear. No foundation distributes all its funds at once. Look at Red Cross they have 80% of Haiti donations still in coffers.These are donations from Jolie Pitt Foundation, not from their own money like the donation Brad make to Proposition 8.Their personal donations are not public record like Foundation donations .Have a nice day everyone

  38. Miranda Ann says:

    Thanks, Kim. Some people are totally ignorant. No Foundation gives ALL their money away. There has to be some left for emergency donations and just to continue the Foundation. Without money, there is no Foundation.

    Sandra Bullock got plenty of money for those pictures and story, trust. No way would she do it out of the goodness of her heart and she shouldn’t have to. “People” is making tons of money from that cover, why shouldn’t Sandra get a piece of the pie? Plus, I don’t care if she gives the money to charity or not. Its up to her. I just wish her all the happiness with her new life.

  39. kiki says:

    And, let the baby wars begin! I can just see Baby Louis and Zahara in the future chatting about their celeb lives.

    “My People cover sold more than yours!”
    “You take that back, or I’ll give you the stink eye!”
    “No, anything but that!”

  40. Kim says:

    I know Sandra supports a high school in NOLA she’ll probably give money to them. Of course I’m just guessing.

  41. Ashley says:

    Tess – Well she’s lived in Austin ever since she was with Matthew so I’m willing to bet she’ll split her time.

    Kim – I hate to make it a competition but at least she’s not blabbing to everyone she can find that she’s doing something charitable. I can’t count the number of times I’ve read she’s donated a million here and a million there years after she’s done it. Why can’t celebrities be more like that?

    Love Sandy. Even my mum who never reads anything celeb related and couldn’t care less about celebrities commented on how much she loves Snady because she seems like a down to earth Southern girl who you can have a beer with.

  42. bellaluna says:

    Oh for Pete’s sake! This thread is not about a contest between who does more for NOLA or donates more to charity. It’s about Sandra & Louis’ story, and People’s unwillingness to “share” their cover or interview (RUDE!).

    I was simply stating my opinion (which we’re allowed to do in the “responses”): since I adore Sandra, I bought this issue; since I don’t particularly care for the Brange, I didn’t buy theirs.

  43. Miranda Ann says:

    . . . at least she’s not blabbing to everyone she can find that she’s doing something charitable.
    ——————————————————-
    Well, the Haiti tragedy just happen in January and everybody knew right away that Sandy had given $1.5M . . . about the same time that everybody knew Angelina had given $1M to DWoB. Funny, that!! And, just to set the record straight, it is the United Nations who takes the photos and reports that Angelina has gone to yet another country in support of the refugees or helpless people there, not Angelina (who, by the way, does not have a publicist).

    Both of these women give their time and money to causes that need their time and money and we find out about it. There is nothing wrong with that. There is no competition here. Only more crap to try to tear down Angelina. Won’t work, but keep on trying, if that’s what you want to spend you time doing!!

  44. Beth says:

    Nobody knows how much they got for the photos. Price is all rumor. I’ve heard everything from $10-$20 million. As mentioned charities/foundations don’t spend everything at once. Brad and Angelina don’t announce most donations. The tabloids do because it’s public record. Of course Angelina’s UN trips are covered because that’s her job as a spokesperson.

  45. Lisa says:

    I bought this issue, Love her!!!

  46. Anj says:

    Love Her!!

  47. teri says:

    Thank you Kim for posting that, so many naysayers are just too lazy and spout off lies.

  48. gg says:

    Love Sandy

  49. James says:

    Here is the tip for Brangelina: now only your break-up news can outsell this issue.

  50. mslewis says:

    Here is the tip for Brangelina: now only your break-up news can outsell this issue.

    ———————-

    HA!! I seriously doubt Angelina cares if Sandy Bullock’s cover sells more copies than her cover!! Both women got money for their cover and the amount didn’t depend on how many copies were sold. Besides, the “competition” is for bestselling BABY cover. The bestseller overall is the 9/11 cover. Nobody will break that record.

    Besides, as they said over at “Gawker” . . . it only took a scandal, a divorce, a dozen slutty women and a pretty black child to get Sandy on the cover of “People.” Angelina only had to give birth to twins!!

  51. lisa says:

    Really sick that this turns into a bash Brad/Angie.. hmm

    really like they are the only celebs that sold baby pics..and where are the attack on the others..

    Sandra has a baby, and that has NOTHING TO DO WITH BRAD AND ANGELINA

    BUT YEAH their fans are loonie..this is just beyond silly.. Who freakin cares..

    but per usual.. EVERY story has to be attached to them in some way. just so STUPID

    Thanks for your post Kim.. research takes time. A rag lie is the easy way.. I see many took the easy way.

  52. Camille says:

    Excellent post Anais! I could not agree with you more!!
    Its ridiculous to turn this into a competition and as much as I like Sandy as an actress, of course she will have been paid for her story and pics. People are naive and stupid to think otherwise.

  53. moo says:

    I used to like Brad. I used to like Angelina. But, somewhere along the line, it changed. Maybe it’s because I don’t believe in cheating… for having children out of wedlock (I know, but I am old fashioned that way)… for letting yourself go to waste – Brad’s recently scruffy whogivesashit sloppiness and Ang’s sanctimoneous self rightousness.

    Sandra, on the otherhand, is MUCH more entertaining, even in those stupid Speed movies, and just seems “real” to me. Plus, she isn’t shoved down your throat every f**in day in some rag mag or another. She just appears to be workin for a livin, just like all us regular folk.

    But these are just my own ramblings and opinions, so all you die hard freaks who do or don’t support “The Brang” shouldn’t start to argue with me, because I won’t get sucked in. And frankly my dears, I don’t give a shit!

  54. HeartBrangelina says:

    I bought both. Both sold well and made tons of cash, who cares?

  55. Missy Pants says:

    Sandra is graceful and magnificent. She beat out stupid Jesse James, his stupid ex-wife Janine, and those stupid mistresses hands down. Yay! Sandra wins!!! =)

  56. Confuzzle says:

    Brangaloonies are scary o_O

    I bought this magazine. So nick off People lawyers! Celebitchy is giving you free publicity!

  57. Kim says:

    Brangelina haters are scarier. BTW the JP Twins were featured on Hello and several international covers ie Hola. Sandys’ cover is for US only. FYI I bought both issues. I’m a fan of both. BTW the charities that received the money I posted yesterday released the press statements . Google their websites they list the contributors to their organizations.

  58. Majosha says:

    Confuzzle, looks like Kim was kind enough to prove your point.

  59. For Sooth? says:

    Because people see a genuine person and not a woman schlepping herself out to media every other day. She has kept private in a time when you can’t go a nano second without some Hollywood twit telling us how to live, all the while drugging behind the scenes and/or porking male and female groupies because they can. Sandra is not perfect but I will take her over the Jolie-Pitt Circus anytime, anywhere.