Is this Interview Mag photo shoot featuring Daria Werbowy racist?

daria2

Huffington Post and several other sites are asking if a new fashion pictorial in Interview Magazine is racist. The photo spread features model Daria Werbowy (who is considered “The Next Gisele”) and is shot by photographer Mikael Jansson, a long-time contributer to Interview, and the photographer behind many ad campaigns, like Gap, H&M and Chloe. I’ll let HuffPo explain why this could be/probably is a racist photo shoot:

This Mikael Jansson-shot editorial titled “Let’s Get Lost” for Interview Magazine is provocative, without doubt, and really got us thinking about what exactly it means for Daria Werbowy to “lose” herself in a throng of black partygoers.

From the differences in their dress (Daria’s in ethereal, angel-like gowns, the others are in knits and leathers) to their body language (A limp yet super-sexual Daria is the main focus, the others feel almost like props), the whole spread has a rather racist vibe that we can’t get down with despite the gorgeous art direction of the spread. Don’t you agree?

After all, regardless of what some say, fashion is at its core a political and social product–how power relationships are set up in editorials can speak volumes. So while the super-sexy, ethno-traditional thing is very of the moment, it all seems to be setting up a 21st century colonial construct that makes us very uncomfortable. What do you think?

[From HuffPo]

You know what it reminds me of? That old Bill Pullman horror movie, The Serpent and the Rainbow, where Pullman plays an anthropologist studying Haitians, and the drugs that are given to some people that turn them into zombies. Daria looks like a drugged-out zombie, and the dark-skinned people look like they’re the ones who drugged her. Racist? Yes. But I’d put it more in the category of “just cheesy, inappropriate and stupid.”

daria1

daria5

daria4

daria3

Interview Magazine photos courtesy of HuffPo & Interview online.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

100 Responses to “Is this Interview Mag photo shoot featuring Daria Werbowy racist?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Praise St. Angie! says:

    why are they all so shiny?

  2. Feebee says:

    Racist? Don’t see it. I like the pictures.

  3. weslyn says:

    it just looks more awkward than racist- the way she looks like she about to limbo in every pic

  4. Jackson says:

    What’s this ad for again? Body oil??

  5. Celebuton says:

    Oh give me a freaking break. I think the pictures are gorgeous and artfully done. Racist??? In what way? If you ask me, it can be interpreted the other way around: the black folks are embracing her whiteness and she’s trustfully falling into the hands of black people without fear. That’s another way of interpreting it. Fantastic spreads!!! Ay vey!

  6. LaProfesora says:

    WTF?

    I dont understand.

    A. What is racist about this?
    B. She looks etheral? How? What does that even have to do with this? Her clothes are matched for the theme, and are in different colors so she stands out.
    C. It actually looks beautiful, they styling, the way their bodies look like they are in motion through a picutre.
    D. Its fucking art – its a photo spread, and these are all models, its not a political agenda.

    People need to really get over themselves.

  7. LindyLou says:

    My vote is for cheesy – not racist.

  8. Lilias says:

    Not racist.

    But jeez, they greased those people up like Thanksgiving turkeys. Give the baby oil a rest.

  9. Joseph says:

    Why are the girls SO SKINNY!?!?

  10. e says:

    The photo spread features model Daria Werbowy (who is considered “The Next Gisele”)

    Uh Oh! Don’t let Bar hear you say that!

  11. Ophelia says:

    Not racist. But they’re all really shiny and emaciated.
    The Serpant and the Rainbow is great! The anthropologist in question, Wade Davis, wrote a few books about Haitian rituals and the hallucinogenic drug in the movie. It’s sensationalized a bit in the movie, but still really interesting. If you’re a giant nerd like me.

  12. MaiGirl says:

    People are so ahistorical these days. Just because you don’t get how or why something is racist doesn’t mean that it isn’t. This shoot is totally racist (and yes, also, totally cheesy). Here she is “losing herself” among the “natives”, all greased up and sultry since she has embraced their vital native sensuality. And, the background models are TOTALLY props to make her look all the more white and ethereal. God, read a book! These kinds of tropes have been in racist literature and art for centuries.

  13. shorty40 says:

    Oh for Christ’s sake. It is NOT racist…EVERYTHING is racist in today’s times and it is such shit. Everything’s racist and everyone’s gay. Grow up already.

  14. shorty40 says:

    Oh, and aside from NOT being racist, they’re just plain ol’ ugly ass pictures.

  15. meme says:

    ick.

  16. bros says:

    this isnt racist. I liked it. its very eerie, exactly like kaiser said. it reminds me of an anne rice book or the zombie thing-there is something very occult looking in the mood of it and i don’t get the sense from it at all that there is any negative portrayal of the black people surrounding this white model. she seems to be the one with the problem in all the pics-not the black people, who are all awake and normal. im fine with this and are we really at the point where any white person in african garb with paint or any white model photgraphed in a setting with black people is now considered racist? wtf.

  17. Aitch says:

    Ooooohhh they are trying to be “arty” : FAIL

  18. Jason says:

    I don’t see it as being racist at all…. I see it as ART.

  19. Lala11_7 says:

    I’m a Black woman who is THROUGHLY plugged into “hidden racism” et al…and this, this ain’t racists…its HOT…I can see where it would be uncomfortable for some individual’s sensibilities…but racists?!?!

    NAW!!!

  20. Cath says:

    This spread is obviously playing on the old racist theme of “What will those big black animals do to our WHITE WOMEN?” These photos are only shocking because in large parts of America, fears about “miscegenation” still exist.

  21. Vajayjay says:

    I think its racist that all you see is their skin color… Who knows where each and every one of these models are from.

  22. fi says:

    Yeah, I definitely see some racist undertones to this, but I do think what they were going for was contrast. What they got was some pretty stupid looking shots of a white girl about to be man-handled by some black men. If she wasn’t posing like some fainted waif, the whole scene would be beautiful, but because of the character she is portraying, it’s totally ruined IMO.

  23. bros says:

    he is from Sweden Cath. I don’t think he is using that American trope in the facile manner you accuse him of. there is nothing whatsoever menacing about any of the people in these pictures. nothing negative. nothing provocative besides the model. this looks more like a gritty favela shoot to me. people arent a historical maigirl, just not completely reactionary because there is one white girl in a sea of black people. this hardly screams referential.

  24. me2also says:

    I don’t like the pics, the people are pretty but the posses are dumb. I don’t get the racist vibe but I understand the view point.

  25. A.K.A says:

    Racist???? I don’t see it! Wow! Anything for an excuse!

    @ MaiGirl – And how is ” “losing herself” among the “natives”, all greased up and sultry since she has embraced their vital native sensuality.” interpreted as racism???

    So if I moved to a country with a different culture and adapted myself to their way of living and embraced that culture and lived as the natives, then I’d be a racist???

  26. JoGirl says:

    Yes, I agree that it’s racist. The black models are shot in such a way that they appear to be totally interchangable. Also, Daria looks like their plaything – either a freshly-killed corpse or one of those creepy “real doll” sex dolls…. except in that last photo where her eyes are open.

  27. Adilys says:

    Her skeletal structure appears to be insufficient to support her body.

  28. bros says:

    jo girl, they look completely dismissive of ol passed out white girl to me. she is in their way with her floppiness. there are a million and one ways to read this.

  29. JulieNewmar says:

    Tacky –yes
    Racist– No

    IMO

  30. original kate says:

    they went way overboard with the baby oil – i feel like i need a shower after looking at these photos. i’m not sure if “slimy” is the feeling the photographer was trying to evoke.

  31. a says:

    looks like somebody slipped that girl a roofie…

    I think I would enjoy the photos more without the model in them looking like she’s about to OD.

  32. Green Is Good says:

    *Off to Netflix to rent The Serpent and the Rainbow*

    To be perfectly frank, these photos would be hot WITHOUT Daria in them. There’s nothing sexy about her. Oily, yes. Sexy, nope. The other models are giving off the real heat.

  33. Risa says:

    how will she be the next gisele when she can’t even stand up straight?!?!

  34. JulieNewmar says:

    So… THIS is what goes on in Jesse James’ garage afterhours..hmmm.

  35. Christina says:

    It looks like they’re pulling that white girl out of a concentration camp…

  36. GatsbyGal says:

    Everyone in the photo shoot weights like 80 pounds. Totally gross and distracting.

    I’m not sure if the pictures are racist, exactly. But they just don’t seem to sit right with me.

  37. Shay says:

    My first impressions. It’s like a well dressed ‘white’ woman has been plunged in a black ghetto.
    When I say ghetto, I mean a manufactured ghetto. An intentional ghetto.
    It has a seedy ambiance. The fake smoke and sweaty bodies connote an unsavoury environment.

  38. Sudini says:

    I don’t see this as inherently racist at ALL. The image is such an open narrative. It leaves enough room for interpretation that the viewer could apply a racist story line/theme to it if they chose to, but by doing that they’d really only be projecting, IMO.

    And I agree with Green Is Good – the other models are what make it beautiful. Daria just seems unnecessary and in the way.

  39. fizXgirl314 says:

    oops, my name is all weird on this laptop…

  40. Ally says:

    Ditto @ maigirl.

    It plays on racist tropes. The darker-skinned are a dehumanized, de-individualized backdrop to the pale, fainting delicate pansy of a white girl. The “backdrop” is dressed in ethnic and lower-class sloppy duds, while the pale girl shimmers in silks and giant jewellery.

    Unimaginative & promoting racist imagery into the 21st century. This is a pictorial Rush Limbaugh would be comfortable with.

  41. k says:

    I agree with MaiGirl

  42. Bee says:

    @MaiGirl I completely agree with you
    And to all those who are saying this photo shoot is not racist, you need to look at these photos through the lens of racial iconography throughout history.The photographer probably didn’t mean to invoke racist imagery. But, you have to ask yourselves what is the point of these pictures? What message are they trying to depict. Black people have often been portrayed as the hyper sexual and exotic “other” in films and the media. Films such as the birth of a nation, portrayed societies fear of innocent white women being preyed on by menacing black men. In these pictures you see a seemingly helpless white women lying prone in the arms of black men. This is a very interesting setup considering fashions aversion to depicting African Americans. And when fashion does depict black people it is often in a very fetishized way. From Giselle posing on the cover of vogue with a black athlete, who many people believed reminded them of the movie “king kong”, to painting white models black in photo shoots, to designers only wanting to hire black models who “look like white women dipped in chocolate”, the fashion world often seems to be stuck in the 1950’s in terms of depictions of ethnicity and race.

  43. viper says:

    Look like japanese anime porn to me. I’m thinking gang banging ie not racist.

  44. mel says:

    damn everything is about race in this country. who cares.

  45. Seri says:

    CAN’T SHE CLOSE HER LEGS? In every single photo– I was waiting for someone to point out–the girl has her legs thrown open! Waiting for bugs to crawl in, perhaps?

  46. Bee says:

    @MaiGirl I completely agree with you.
    And to all those who are saying this photo shoot is not racist, you need to look at these photos through the lens of racial iconography throughout history.The photographer probably didn’t mean to invoke racist imagery. But, you have to ask yourselves what is the point of these pictures? What message are they trying to send? Black people have often been portrayed as the hyper sexual and exotic “other” in films and the media. Films such as “The Birth of a Nation”, portrayed societies fear of innocent white women being preyed on by menacing black men. In these pictures you see a seemingly helpless white women lying prone in the arms of black men. Why is she there? Is this woman looking for adventure, sex, or intrigue?

    Films and media have often portrayed the romantic idea of western/european women “going native”, and having affairs with exotic men from foreign countries. It goes back to the days of Rudolph Valentino. You can also see this in films like “Eat,pray,love.” Even today there is a thriving sex tourism industry in which western/european women go to places like Jamaica and Bali to have affairs with young men, who they often give money and gifts to. This photo shoot is just part of the continued fetishization/romanization of the “exotic other.”

    It is also interesting setup considering fashions aversion to depicting African Americans. And when fashion does depict black people it is often in a very fetishized way. From Giselle posing on the cover of vogue with a Shaquille O’Neal, who many people believed reminded them of the movie “king kong”, to painting white models black in photo shoots, to designers only wanting to hire black models who “look like white women dipped in chocolate”, the fashion world often seems to be stuck in the 1950’s in terms of depictions of ethnicity and race.

  47. thegoodrain says:

    i know the tone of the article makes this comment inappropriate, but I keep looking at the second picture and think, “bootybootybootybooty rocking everywhere.”

    fantastic legs and bum.

  48. Mikaila says:

    I totally agree with Maigirl and Ally. This is totally racist and those who don’t think that it is probably aren’t well informed regarding the use of black bodies as props historically. And to LaLa: I, too, am black. Being black doesn’t automatically make you an authority on what is racist. Many black people don’t understand a lot of the racist culture that they are consuming because, like many others, they aren’t studying history and understanding where these images come from. They also aren’t thinking about the hidden messages associated with these images — all of which have been detailed by MaiGirl, Ally, etc. above.

  49. jc126 says:

    Gisele was on the cover with a smiling LeBron James, not Shaq, and he was smiling, as was she. I don’t think he looked like “King Kong”. Not to me, anyway.
    I don’t like that half the people in the photo look like they’re about to pass out, and they’re all covered in baby oil. I’d like turn on the air conditioning in there, or have everyone come outside and jump in the pool.

  50. Squirtle says:

    @MaiGirl & Bee: I think you two really need to get over yourselves! You’re really reaching on the race issue…Ugh
    Hypersensitive people are part of the problem with society today; they take every little thing and pick at it until they can find what they are looking for, a reason to be offended.

  51. Squirtle says:

    Isn’t there another white woman in the second photo on the left side….Dun Dunnnn DUNNNNN! I wonder what that could mean; I can definitely can see the racist factor now…right!

  52. irishserra says:

    Not racist…but stupid as hell. LOL!!!!

  53. Oi says:

    I think its just plain stupid looking, but the obvious racist undertones are lost on me. How do we know she’s not supposed to be in Kenya or something? Does it make me inherently racist if I am the only white person in a bunch of non-white people? Is this supposed to be a story?

  54. alexandra says:

    Stop THE INSANITY. Is just a re-enactment of Lindsay Blohan past out in meth at some club in sunset.

  55. lena says:

    hmmmmmm, black/brown people being used as props behind a white woman….yeah it’s racist

  56. moi says:

    maigirl – totally in agreement.

    While it is “nice” that so many people think this photo shoot isn’t racist, I must disagree. It is inherently so.

    Black people are depicted as the “Other” in these photos, as dark skinned props who blend into the background purely as a means to an end in terms of visually supporting the white model. Anyone remotely educated in the history of colonization and the post-colonial struggle of peoples subjugated in the past would immediately see the problem with these photos.

    What’s so dangerous to me about this is the fact that so many people find no problem with the pictures – they don’t think twice about it.

  57. Bee says:

    @Squirtle why don’t you get over yourself too! I have every right to express my opinion about an issue I feel passionately about. If you don’t agree than fine. But, there’s no need to simply dismiss the opinions of myself and maigirl just because you don’t agree. Grow up.

  58. d says:

    Maigirl made a really good point and I agree. I also think there’s way too much oil everywhere. Blech. NOT sexy! I actually think the photographer was trying too hard to be edgy and whatever. Not really impressed on any count here.

  59. A.K.A says:

    Actually , for me, the “other” person here is that dumb white model!I agree with those saying she looks like she’s ODing and completely useless.

    The “props” ( like some think they come across as ) are all actually looking good.

    In that second photo the guy looks like he’s thinking ” get off me, you ODing bag of bones!”

    And in that fourth photo with the car, he looks like he’s saying “wtf is she still doing here ?” 😀

  60. Kazoo81 says:

    i don’t think it’s racist at all.

    it’s a gorgeous shoot.

  61. westcoaster says:

    What bothers me about the photos is that the model looks high or drunk. It almost appears like she got really high and staggered into a club. Forget about the other models looking like props, she is the one that looks more like a prop!

  62. bros says:

    I am familiar with the practice of othering, etc, etc. historically aware, have a masters degree in cultural studies, have done all kinds of course work that deals with the post colonial condition, and am pretty well versed in african american studies. this, as someone else said, is an open narrative. you bring your own interpretation to it and see it through a specific interpretive lens. its just not inherently anything.

  63. flourpot says:

    I get it. The car is missing a tire – they’re all greasy from taking turns changing it. Finally the all gave up and said fuck it, let’s get high. What a stupid photo shoot. I have absolutely no clue what they’re selling. Pot, maybe?

  64. del says:

    @bros. please. EVERYTHING is seen through a specific, interpretive lens. that doesn’t have any bearing on the INHERENT nature of these photos. They are a regurgitation of a historically hegemonic theme. the fact that there are other ways of interpreting these photos doesn’t change the visual roots from which they came.

    congratulations on your masters.

  65. Paula says:

    Racist or not, most high fashion photo shoots like this one are just plain stilted and dull. Exotic backdrops are the worst. Maybe other people get images like that of a tall, willowy young woman in a $3,000 dress surrounded by peasants on a dusty street, but I don’t. I want to see clothes I’d actually wear in places I’d actually wear them. Fashion shoots can be art, but artificially exotic, bluntly edgy crap like this fails.

  66. Vi says:

    i’m kind of seeing the racist bent, i mean skinny white girl looks like she’s been rohypnoled and is being held by big black men

  67. Chico says:

    Let’s see . . . these pics show a hyper-sexualized “African tribe” (dressed as exotic AFRICAN Natives or sleezy ghetto people) turning out a rich, white girl.

    Gee, I don’t see anything wrong with that. No stereotypes or race issues whatsoever.

  68. Jo 'Mama' Besser says:

    The cynical wheels of industry keep on grinding. We’ve got our controversial black people photo shoot of the month, so I guess we’re about due for another token plus-sized model spread.

  69. Lukie says:

    Racist?
    Not really.

    A bit insensitive?
    Yes, especially if you don’t consider old school Black-White stereotypes about Black Mandigos lusting after snow white princesses, or the concept of White people slumming it up with the jungle bunnies, or the power of the lusty negroes charming the innocent white woman into their world as particularly artsy.

    Um yea, Definitely somewhat insensitive.

  70. jover says:

    All I know is that there isn’t an autobody or mechanic’s garage anywhere around me that looks like that. And, no I don’t think it’s racist, I agree with Paula, trying too hard to be something (not sure what) that’s open to interpretation but I don’t see racism here, I see a garage – I think – that I would like to visit. Lighten up, please ppl.

  71. grrrlgrace says:

    I think it’s cool & sexy (way too greasy, yes!) with a celebration of the contrast of skin color. Had it been done the other way around, no one would have skipped a beat. Nope. Not racist. And yes I’m 100% black.

  72. Barbara B says:

    “Had it been done the other way around, no one would have skipped a beat.”

    This is a pretty empty statement. When do you EVER see white people used as background contrast to the black model?

  73. RhymesWithSilver says:

    I don’t think these black models look like “props”- not any more than the white model. The black people look just as “sexy” as she does. I don’t think this is racist; the photographer is “painting” with skin tones here- he’s bringing out the dark skin tones as well as the light. Pointing out contrast in skin tone isn’t inherently racist. If you see a narrative involving colonialism, othering, miscgenation and what have you, those are valid interpretations, but they are entirely your interpretations. This is supposed to be edgy- edgy things by nature might take some of us those places. I’m more concerned that everybody here looks alarmingly flammable.

  74. Macheath says:

    After studying colonialism and history at uni, my understanding of themes, imagary and memes in popular culture has increased.
    I recommend everybody read Orientalism by Edward Said. That book will OPEN. YOUR. EYES.
    I keep thinking of Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad when I see the pictures. The film adaptation is Apocolypse now but HOD is a better connection with the photos because it is set in colonial Congo.
    As for the racism? I believe it is inherent in the imagery and Bee, Ally and Maigirl have explained why better than I can.
    At the end of the day, if you haven’t been subjected to a lifetime of said imagery/racism or have studied it with a fine degree of detail, it will be difficult for you to empathise with people who become highly atuned to it through victimisation and/or constant thinly veiled exposure in the media. Then you have unhelpful and unsympathetic attitudes like “Get over it!” “You’re the real racist!” “Why do you see this in everything?” For the last question; maybe it’s because race impacts some people in a much, much stronger way than others.
    The phrase “Walk a mile in someone elses shoes” comes to mind. Add history to those shoes and you’ve got a good recipe for understanding and progress.

  75. Katyusha says:

    Well, clearly the art and point of editorial shoots have escaped most commenters in this thread. If some people think it’s racist and some people don’t, then it’s subjective, isn’t it? Just because some people think it is, doesn’t mean it is.

    The contrast is gorgeous, along with all the people in the photos. I love it and I love Daria.

    @ Bee

    The cover of Vogue you’re referring to w/ Gisele and LeBron James was about people who are at the top of their game in their field; those people happened to be LeBron James and Gisele – nothing more, nothing less.

    Sometimes people read into things that aren’t there. It’s silly.

  76. Twez says:

    Stupid-looking isn’t the same as racist. It just looks like someone was trying for artsy and hit pretentious, instead. Also, I was distracted by the fact that all of the female models’ arms are as big around as a toddler’s leg.

  77. Ruffian9 says:

    Odd shoot, I’ll give you that. I honestly don’t see the ‘racist’.

  78. Strawberry says:

    @ Twez: Right on! Total lollipopheads. Eat some damn sandwiches people! My arms are bigger than some of those legs.

  79. ligeia says:

    this looks rapey, not racist. yuck.

  80. canadianchick says:

    Yeah it’s racist, too oily, and I have no idea what they’re selling which means the art director and photographer missed the goal of the ad. If African American people were in luxury clothes also and more white people were in it, I’d think it less racist. I saw a similar shoot recently of a white model in a luxury dress surrounded by African models in tribal wear. I was aghast at the racism of the white photographer and art director. I get that photographers and art directors want the item being sold to stand out, but there are lots of ways to show contrast without using racist images.

  81. hannah says:

    as to the people saying the background look like props, they are models, they ARE props, as is the white girl. And since she is the focus of this particular shoot, it would make sense for her to be the center of it. just saying.

  82. Aspen says:

    I think America’s obsession with race is immature and borderline comic. There’s nothing racist about this, and if someone chooses to find racism to be offended about…I suppose that’s one way to go in life. /shrug I prefer to just look at the pretty people and the pretty clothes and enjoy it.

    The pictures are hot, but the entire group needs to have a sandwich and use some handi-wipes to remove the sheen of grease.

    Other than the too-much oil on the protruding bones thing, I think they’re beautiful shots. If the article hadn’t been about racism, my first thought would’ve been, “Wow…these shots REALLY make you look at the clothes!” So. Successful shoot, imo.

  83. Celebuton says:

    People playing the race card again for something that is not a racial issue (SHOCKER). The shoot is ALL black models with the exception of one. They’ve given black models jobs and paid them. God forbid you throw in a white girl, cause all of a sudden the blacks are props, blah, blah, blah. The people pulling out the race card don’t see the art behind it. I compliment the art director for including blacks and giving the shoot a beautiful black soulful essence; it’s complimentary actually. The fact that blacks were chosen to be a part of this art piece is fantastic. Geez…it’s art for godsakes and it’s very cool.

  84. hairball says:

    It does seem somewhat racist to me. The poor ‘ghetto’ environment, the women wearing head wraps and like African like print on some of their clothes. They seem to have poorer clothing on.

    Of course it is art, but what message exactly was the artist trying to say??

  85. Darlene says:

    not racist. I like them! It’s like an artful composition of mannequins.

  86. ViktoryGin says:

    Goddamn it. I’m late to the party.

    @ Bee, Ally, and Macsheath…thank you so very much. I love Orientalism. I want to get a copy and chuck as this daft Swedish photographer. I bet he trolls for vadge in Thailand. I haven’t read it in its entirety, but I was at the book store recently, and it was seriously calling my name.

    Now, let the admonishment commence:

    The unregenerate ignorance is abound in this thread. This photo shoot reeks of Colonial Primitivism. The European who finds her primordial sensuality slumming with natives. Pray tell, where’s Gauguin when you need him?

    I wasn’t upset when I say the photo. I was willing to dismiss this as lingering racial stereotyping and stagnant cultural dialogue. No need for anger. But then I read the comments.

    Ironically, nevermind that this spread once again plays on white ethnocentricism (which is inherently racist when combined with the objectification of different ethnic groups). What upsets me is that so many on this forum don’t seem to understand why. Or worse…they understand objectively but don’t seem to take into account that many will take offense to this. No, there isn’t anything “inherently” wrong with the photos as a poster said above, but where I vehemenently disagree is that any study of symbols and symbology reveals that symbols have meaning and hold power precisely BECAUSE of culturally-agreed significance and what we attach to them. And despite our would-be postmodern setting, we haven’t progressed far enough culturally and socio-politically for these pictures to be an “innocent play on color contrast”.

    We don’t have to be mental slaves (no pun intended) to this kind of residual imagery, but PLEASE pick up a book and attempt to understand the racist dialogues that underscore it.

    End rant.

  87. asiont says:

    racist? the white chick looks much worse than the rest of the models

  88. Crash2GO2 says:

    I agree it’s terribly racist and it offends little white girl me. Every layer of meaning in this ‘art’ is steeped in racism. I’m offended by what it is saying about men and women of both races.

    Blech.

  89. EMV says:

    @Katyusha- I agree!

  90. Tara says:

    The desired aesthetic of that shoot seems to be “Black folk find white mannequin.”

  91. Lori says:

    TOTALLY RACIST!!!! Completely racist and I won’t discuss why since I am apparently the only one who is thinking it. You guys are wacky.

  92. ChelseaD says:

    I think it’s something different…unique. I also think it’s a bit too greasy but beautiful. As a black woman married to a white man (2 children, 1 on the way), it worries me that so many efforts towards multiculturalism are thwarted by labeling it as racist. Not everyone has immersed themselves in literature which deeply details racism; therefore, they don’t realize that just about EVERYTHING could be, in some minute way, considered racist. Heck, we could also label millions of things sexist and homophobic, but don’t we have to get up and move on? It’s enough to drive us all crazy and stop swirling.I think most of us, with how crazy the world is today, are just trying to mix together happily and live. I am in no way saying we shouldn’t speak up, but I am saying ease up. Let’s stop dissecting everything.

  93. Jo 'Mama' Besser says:

    Where are the Black Crusaders when you need them?

  94. She-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named says:

    Racist? Yes, very. Intentionally racist? No, that might take an intellect.

    A bunch of posers trying to create “ART?” Yes.

    Failing? Yes.

    Let’s not even get into the sexism, that’s at least obvious.

  95. lucy2 says:

    As a group, there’s something about the photos that doesn’t sit right with me. I think it’s the top 2 photos that seem questionable, the bottom 3 on their own probably wouldn’t be as much an issue.

    The greasiness is too weird for me, as is the drugged out thing – an unconscious looking woman draped over other people, regardless of anyone’s race, is off putting to me.

  96. Dawn says:

    I just think the photo spread looks awful. Half-dead looking white girl and oily shiny black people. Oh, yes that’s high art at it’s best.

  97. Luci says:

    Love D-Werbowy
    but why does she have her neck so backwards in all the pictures? that has to ache!

  98. Ally says:

    @Tara: Thanks for finding the LOL in this tawdry topic.

    I would also like to add re: the “color contrast” defense, that for some reason, one never encounters the black model with white backdrop theme. Somehow the “artistic inspiration” to use white people as wallpaper or props doesn’t occur as readily.

    On that note, Britain’s Next Top Model also did a heinous colonial shoot for its finals in South Africa not long ago:
    http://www.fabsugar.co.uk/Britains-Next-Top-Model-Did-Catherine-Cheat-1750454

    Have a look and see if you can spot the thematic thoughtless insensitivity common to that shoot and the one discussed here.

  99. ViktoryGin says:

    ^LMFAO!!!

    Super tasteless. And the shoot looks pedestrian, too. Who the hell comes up with these asinine ideas for these layouts?

  100. lorrr says:

    they are trying to show the contrast in skin. its not racist! this is art. if a photographer tells me to take a picture with milk drippin off my body cause im black and the contrast looks good, its because if i was white you wouldnt see the damn milk! this race thing is ridiculous.