Pregnant with twins Angelina Jolie, 32, and screen legend and multiple Oscar-winning director, Clint Eastwood, 77, posed together for a photocall for their film The Changeling, which is in competition at the Cannes film festival and premieres there today. Angelina wore a long black pantsuit and peep toe heels with a tight shirt that showed off her pregnancy. The Changeling is set in Los Angeles in 1928 and tells the story of a mother’s quest to find her missing son. It also stars John Malkovich as an ally of Angelina’s character. It doesn’t premiere in the US until November 7, 2008, which may be an attempt to increase the film’s chances for an Oscar nomination.
Last night Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie had dinner with with a group of celebrities that included Clint Eastwood, Mick Jagger, and director Brett Ratner. A waitress at the restaurant praised the group as being “super nice.”
Thanks to WENN for these photos.
i think she looks great in that outfit. very down to earth.
It’s Clint, of course he’s saving it for Oscar time. Dude is on the academy like white on rice, baby!
I can’t help but compare Nicole Kidman’s pregnancy pics with Angie and Cate Blanchetts. You can’t tell me with all the crap Angie pumped into her body in her younger years and the way Cate Blanchett looks so ageless year after year that Kidman couldn’t have aged beautifully. Plus look at the belly posing. Kidman is more of an attention whore on the red carpet than Angie has ever been (boinking billy bob in the limo on the way over excepted)
Clint is a class act all the way.
I didn’t realize he is that old! I knew he was climbing up there, but it felt more like a perpetually 55 kind of thing. Crazy.
angie looks good – but old. girlfriend looks 43.
I do not think Nicole Kidman is an attention whore at all, she just seems too excited because this is her first pregnancy and she is a little older then Angelina Jolie. Being married to Tom cruise for so long and having miscarriages she might have thought that this could not have easily happen for her, so now she is understandably very happy. Plus most pregnant women tend to repeatedly touch their stomach, Angelina is doing it in most of this photos.
She looks old (my guess is around 45).
I work with a 37 years old woman, and she does NOT look as old as Angie (and she doesn’t have all the nannies, and assistants as Angelina)…
I think she should stop with the Botox and lip injections. Her lips are way too bloated.
and please, do not even try to compare a class act like Nicole Kidman, who DO NOT LIE about her gae, to Angelina Jolie.
Riri, have you seen pics of Jolie as a child? Those are her lips, mama
And please, please, please, like Nicole all you want to. But you cannot honestly blast Angie for botox and lip injections without doing the same for kidman?
Have you never seen Dead Calm, Malice or Days of Thunder?
Yes I have. Angelina has a fat lower lip and a thin upper lip, so when she got to her 20s, she started using lip injections to balance her lips.
I can understand that, but now she is pregnant and should not be using plastic work done.
Nicole is Not using any Botox ever since she has gotten pregnant.
Where is this ‘looking old’ coming from?? Angie looks like she’s in her mid 30s but, more importantly, will probably still look very much like this when she’s in her 40s and possibly 50s because of her very good bone structure. She looks way more natural than Nicole Kidman who has destroyed all the natural icy prettiness she had with the totally unnecessary work she’s had done to her face.
And whether Angie’s had work done to her lips or not (and I think not), she can carry it off.
Why do you need to bash beautiful and classy Nicole Kidman, just to defend Angie for having work done while pregnant.
Nicole is a natural beauty.
Nicole never had a nose job, like Angelina.
She doesn’t use Botox while pregnant, and Angelina should not be using Botox while pregnant as well.
Kidman doesn’t lie about her age, and it’s simply ridiculous that Angelina would expect any of us to believe she is 32 while clearly, she is in her 40s.
wow, didn’t know there were nicoloonies out there.
God, she’s gorgeous! Hate her all you want for who you think she is, but it’s just petty jealousy to go negative about her looks!
I think Nicole Kidman is adorable with her tummy touches. As a 35 year old woman who has desperately wanted a child for over a decade, if I’m ever blessed to carry a child, I will be holding on to that baby inside 24/7! I suppose all the people who get to take having babies for granted will roll their collective eyes at me, too, lol, but I SOOO wouldn’t care. Go, Nicole, hold your baby tummy! 😀
I’m not talking about the fact that she’s holding her tummy. All pregnant mommies rest their hands on their tummy rather subconciously as a protective gesture I guess. Angie and Cate did it throughout their pregnancies. What I’m referring to is the odd way Nicole holds her belly and actually, she’d not even holding it so much as gathering the fabric of her dress under it.
It’s just odd to me. That’s all.
I am wondering if this is also the same movie that came out in the 70’s? It was a ghost story with the exact same title. I’m not so sure Clint would do a ghost type flick though. It was a great movie though, scared the crap outta me.
I think Angie looks natural and beautiful in these photos.
@Riri – Not bashing, just stating an opinion. That’s allowed, isn’t it?
And I hardly need to point out that you’re on very thin ground here with your Nic-bashing lecture when you’ve done nothing but Angie-bash on here. I, unlike you, am fairly indifferent to both so what I’m giving is an objective, unbiased opinion. For the record, Nicole WAS a natural beauty. I personally don’t think she’s that any more and it’s a shame. OK?
Angelina has had surgery and botox like a large majority of celebrities. Once someone has their features inhanced via botox or any other cosmetic surgery he/she is no longer natural looking, including angelina.
angelina is a natural beauty who happens to have had cosmetic enhancements, i.e. she does get upper lip injections which is very apparent in beofre and after pictures of when she was younger compared to now. lips do grow continuosly, as do heads, noses and ears but the dramatic difference between her pictures only indicate cosmetic enhancements (i’m married to a plastic surgeon.)
for her age, my husband and myself agree that although she has great bone structure, she does appear to be older than her siad years. to me, she looks to be in her early 40’s.
and…congrats to nicole kidman. i agree with other users that i would feel blessed to be pregnant, especially after so many known difficulties, and i for one do not see this as a way to seek attention.
Now let me state that I am not “anti-Nicole” – she’s a fine actress, a tad mannered for my taste, but still is excellent in nearly everything she does.
But seriously, how can you call Angie “fake for having botox” (as well as an alleged nosejob – it looks a tad thinner to me, but as monica posted, head size changes) and celebrate Nicole as being “natural”
I mean – seriously? Clear your screen love.
And while we’re at it – Nicole used to “naturally” have a very high colouring (look at her Aussie films and photos from the 80s) – so her icy beauty is a much more recent creation.
As for Angie’s age and lips. I had always heard and seen lips get thinner rather than bigger as a person gets older.
Now the age – unless the Antilinas are going to accuse a dead woman of being a lying attention-seeker, Marcheline Bertrand’s birth year is listed as 1950. If we’re pretending that Angie is into her 40s (i.e. 41 or older and born in the mid-60s) that would mean that Marcheline was at least 15 or 16 when Angie was born. Therefore even younger when James was born!!! It’s a brave person who’d accuse John Voight of having such a child bride.
Now can we consider the images taken of Angie at the 1986 Oscars (with the big collar) – you’ll note a full top lip btw. But are the Antilinas trying to pass that girl of as being 18 in that photo??
But hey, let’s not let anything as inconvenient as logic get in the way eh?
Oh dear – it looks like I didn’t let reading the comments properly get in the way of a good rant. 😳
I apologise for stating that the commentators here were saying that Angie WAS in her 40s rather than LOOKING LIKE she was in her 40s.
I had read similar sentiments on another thread and confused the two.