Why is Nicole Kidman holding her stomach?


She must have just worked out her abs hard, because Nicole Kidman no longer has a hint of a bump in these pictures taken outside her Hollywood gym on August 5th. Either her stomach is sore or she’s teasing the paps, because she really doesn’t look pregnant. The 39 year-old actress is said to want a biological child with her new husband, country crooner Kieth Urban, 38.

Reader Millie points out that fertility treatment can make a woman bloated, and that could explain the baby bumps on otherwise skinny “older” actresses.

Kidman has lent her name to an ad declaring support for Isreal in the Middle East Crisis. She signed an ad in the LA Times along with Michael Douglas, Danny DeVito, Dennis Hopper, Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis, Don Johnson, James Woods, Kelly Preston, and Patricia Heaton, saying she was “pained and devastated by the civilian casualties in Israel and Lebanon caused by terrorist actions initiated by terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah and Hamas.”

Now we know which side of the Hollywood fence she stands on. I’m not touching the subject this time people, discuss amongst yourselves.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

4 Responses to “Why is Nicole Kidman holding her stomach?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. MollyGood says:

    Morning Mess: ‘If it was vagina themed there would be vaginas all over the walls’

    • Lohan’s man Harry Morton on the Daily Show. American Hero, my friends. [DListed] • Kate Beckinsale, looks like all that exercise (and cigarette smoking) pays off. [Egotastic] • Hold up! Veneers Duff stole Paris Hilton’s dog. [Teddy &…

  2. millie says:

    I couldn’t believe she signed this thing.. this sudden sucking up to Rupert Murdoch is very unsettling–he was even a guest at her wedding.

  3. xiaoecho says:

    ‘Isreal’ is right, all you forgot was the question mark.

  4. art says:

    Hollywood idiots again and again, need their finances.

    Thats the disturbing side of their deep thought level at work.

    So without any paranoia, why does the Hollywood loser list (don johnson, keaton, wow, etc..) and Arnie-democrats like de vito, suddenly sign on the,er.. “deep thought” level as ONLY, solely demonstrated by George Bush… Is Israel that overwhelmingly scary for them, they have to make such statements for fear of recrimination? To align with the most extreme sides of Bush? Now you know why no presidential candidate will dare to have another opinion about israel and mideast policy….fundraisers beware.

    No where else in the world is such a stupid statement said, connecting those two differnet nationalities, and organisations together as just “terrorist” and so thats end of argument. Only in the Bush land.

    Nowhere. Its scary really. So simply stated in an ad…huh..

    And on the other side, officially from every kind of agency that is engaged in such things, it is CLEAR the disproportionate response of MORE than 100-1 civilian deaths, and the illegality of going into Lebanon destroying infrastructure not related at all to their so-called target.

    Oh, that USA-Israel thing again…

    But.. truly odd, a statement could have been made that was less extreme. Support Israel fine, but why insist on the whole RAP of showing the country is innocent, when even their population is angry at Olmert for this mistake.

    I mean, no ONE except rightwingers even connects Hamas to what has happened this time?! No one! Only Fox type idiot spokespersons, the same guys who tried to inflict the word “suicide-terrorists” for “suicide bombers”…

    Hollywood Jews are out of touch and stuck with their obligations to sign such things if they want to be part of the “community”. The others like Kidman are anyway power-hungry idiots for gods sake she married CRUISE…

    And now you see the flip side to the gossip blogs, and the right-wing news bloggers, the dark side of why entertainment-industry alone can not be standing in as, for, or even with, the whole world view, nor for civic duty to think and participate.