News of the World is shutting down after wiretapping scandal

wenn3345055
I haven’t been following the News of the World wiretapping scandal very closely, but what I have heard has boiled my blood. Private investigators hired by journalists working at the paper were hacking into the phones of countless people, including celebrities, politicians, murder victims, fallen British soldiers and their families, and missing persons, just to get their messages and record conversations for story leads. In at least one case they deleted voicemail messages to make room for more, giving the family of a missing 13 year-old girl false hope that she was alive and retreiving her messages. Two journalists went to jail when the news came out in 2006, but it was apparently much more widespread than it was first thought. It was despicable, and many people were outraged that Rupert Murdoch, the head of parent organization News International, wasn’t firing the editor of NOTW right away. (Reports have her trying to resign twice and getting turned down.) It looks like Murdoch had other plans though as it was just announced that Sunday’s edition of the paper will be its last.

Reporting from London— In a stunning move, Rupert Murdoch’s media empire announced Thursday it was shutting down the News of the World tabloid, Britain’s bestselling Sunday newspaper, because of an alleged phone hacking scandal that has triggered a major public backlash here.

James Murdoch, a senior executive at his father’s News Corp., said Sunday’s edition of the News of the World would be its last. In a statement, he said the company accepted responsibility for the distress inflicted by the phone hacking allegations and the paper’s breach of journalistic ethics.

“The News of the World is in the business of holding others to account,” the statement said, “but it failed when it came to itself.”

The statement acknowledged the gravity of allegations that the paper hacked into the cellphones of celebrities, politicians and even crime and military combat victims in its pursuit of scoops. Earlier this week, Britain was rocked by reports that a private investigator hired by the tabloid had illegally accessed – and deleted – voicemail messages on the phone of a 13-year-old girl who was kidnapped and later found murdered.

Such a practice, if it occurred, “was inhuman and has no place in our company,” the statement said — in effect concurring with an outpouring of public outrage over the reports that has swept the nation.

The closure will mean the death of a weekly newspaper that has been a part of the British media landscape for more than a century. The News of the World enjoys a circulation of more than 2.5 million, far beyond its closest rival.

But the elder Murdoch and News Corp. evidently felt that the hacking scandal had created too toxic of an environment for the company and that the News of the World had to be sacrificed.

News Corp.’s British subsidiary, News International, also owns other iconic publications, such as the Times of London and the Sun tabloid, which have been caught up in a boycott campaign by Facebook and Twitter users angered by the allegations surrounding the News of the World.

[From LA Times]

US Weekly reports that NOTW was the “largest-selling English language newspaper in the world.” This was the right thing to do. Can you imagine if you lost a loved one and there were people snooping in on your phone conversations and reporting details in the press? There were families of terrorist bombing victims and soldiers killed in duty whose phones were being tapped. How could any person with an ounce of compassion ever justify that?

wenn5644508

Rupert Murdoch and his wife Wendi Deng are shown at Cannes in May and also in April. She’s 42, he’s 80. Credit: WENN.com

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

62 Responses to “News of the World is shutting down after wiretapping scandal”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. mln76 says:

    This obviously goes deeper than NOTWW right to Rupert Murdoch’s door I hope that prosecuters in Australia, the UK, or the US are able to prosecute him and shut down his entire corrupt empire.

  2. silken_floss says:

    Good riddance to bad rubbish.

  3. Turtle Dove says:

    Why didn’t they fire the senior staff that would have approved this information publication? It seems as though Murdoch would rather sacrifice the paper than admit culpability.

    This is all very unseemly, and it has been going on for years. It’s sad that a 100 year old newspaper will fold and people will lose their jobs, but this publication needed to be axed based on principle.

  4. mia girl says:

    This all stinks to high heaven! Scotland Yard better get into those offices fast! I think files will be disappearing quickly and be “lost” forever. Murdock is hoping this bold move will deflect and dissolve interest. I hope not.

    I feel terrible for the 200+ people losing their jobs. Will they be required to sign confidentiality clauses in order to get severance?

    And yet, the woman who was chief editor at the time of all this keeps her current job as chief executive of News International . It’s like getting rid of the healthy tissue and keeping the cancer.

  5. Rita says:

    I watched the coverage of the British “Prime Minister’s Questions last night where the PM got grilled over this mess. It must be really big in England and congrats to the Brits for not tolerating this.

    If this is thoroughly investigated by the government as well as the press, they are going to find the illegal activity is pervasive and goes all the way to the top (bet members of the House of Commons were illegally tapped). Murdock would not shut down the largest selling tabloid (3 million subscribers) unless he needed to protect his son who runs it and the top editors.

    The world does not need the fourth estate acting like the government they are meant to oversee.

  6. bros says:

    Here’s a really good article that takes you all the way through all the craziness they were doing

    http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2011/06/rupert-murdoch-news-of-the-world-201106

  7. Cheyenne says:

    About damn time! They are also under investigation for illegal payoffs of over $200,000 to the London police.

  8. MollyB says:

    The worst thing, I think, isn’t even the hacking. It was the fact that they deleted overflow messages, leading the family of one of the murdered children to think that their daughter was still alive and out there somewhere, erasing her phone messages. How awful.

  9. deej says:

    The editor at the time, Rebekah Brooks is best mates with David Cameron, UKs PM…sad that all those people lost their jobs when Murdoch and Brooks should have taken the fall.

  10. thals says:

    @ Rita It’s huge in the UK at the moment. Twitter nearly melted this afternoon.

    But it goes deeper than just the NOTW – Murdoch is about to take over BSKYB would allow him control of 40% of the UK media – which is disgraceful. Lots of online campaigning and petitions going round to get this stopped.

    NOTW is just a sacrificial lamb – News Int (the owners) having been talking about making The Sun (NOTW sister paper) 7 days a week for a while now.

    And rant over!

  11. N.D. says:

    Honestly without a warrant typing into ANYONE’s phone is illegal as well as immoral and can not be justified.

    Everyone deserves the right to privacy, no matter how much of it they willingly sign off. It’s still their right, and it’s up to them and them only to decide what part of their life is to offer to public consimption and what (if any) keep to themselves.

  12. KsGirl says:

    Ohhhh my GOD this is freakin’ huge! I wonder if it will work for Murdoch (re: the BSkyB deal)? I hope it doesn’t. I also believe he’s protecting Rebekah Brooks, and wonder if that will pan out. Holy crap she must know about some skeletons because he just shut down the NotW for her!! Seriously, how can she *not* be held responsible for this? Bets on whether or not she’ll end up gone, and if so, when? Will this move by Murdoch successfully deflate the pressure or ramp it up even more? My opinion – she’s gotta go, the buck stops with her and with Murdoch himself.

    Wow. Wow. Wow. Still can’t believe this.

  13. Sloane Wyatt says:

    Rupert Murdoch is a disgusting old plutocrat and is a completely corrupt human being.

    He puts the ‘fat’ in Fat Cat.

  14. the original bellaluna says:

    Murdoch shut it down for two reasons:

    1) To protect those who were involved;

    2) In an attempt to mitigate the financial liability of the publication and those involved.

    That’s it.

    I wondered when (if) we were going to see this story on CB – thanks for covering it.

  15. GoofPuff says:

    Totally a polical move to try to get his other deal through. I hope the Brits force him to back down and this is throughly investigated. Bring him down!

  16. Lady Lupton says:

    It gets worse:Not only did the NotW do all of the above, they also paid police officers for info about victims and perpetrators of crimes. This includes rape victims`details ending up in the paper.

    It`s disgusting.

  17. gg says:

    The real shame is that this lying rag has such a giant subscription base. People treat it like it’s a legit newspaper and apparently don’t know any better, somehow.

  18. Girafe99 says:

    Sadly I don’t think it will make a difference the rot runs deeper and higher

  19. Nanea says:

    Rupert Murdoch is so disgusting in most everything he does.

    And I don’t get how so many people still believe that Faux News is actually a news channel.

    I’ve been logging on to the Guardian’s coverage* of this scandal several times a day this past week or so, ever since the story got bigger with every new detail that came to light.

    *Just skim the headlines, it will make one sick with anger.

    The most recent development is that James Murdoch will be donating the proceeds of the sale of NotW’s last edition to charity and that Andy Coulson, one of NotW’s former editors and the former director of communications for Prime Minister David Cameron, will be arrested tomorrow.

  20. Maritza says:

    They’ll just open another newspaper with another name and keep on their business.

  21. kat says:

    I feel really sorry for any innocent reporter and their families who are now out of work. I have been an avid reader if this paper for years – it provided the sunday necessity of mindless celebrity gossip. If I had known about them phone hacking the dead of 7/7; any war dead or murdered children then I would never have bought the paper – this is unbelievable what they have done – a friend of my husbands was one of the victims of 7/7 – it makes me sick to think his was one of the phones that could have been hacked. I cant even begin to think what the families of those that were hacked are going through now.

  22. Katija says:

    You know, I have a hard time finding sympathy for celebrities, so if it were JUST a hacking into Sienna Miller and company’s phones, I might not be so incensed. But to hack the phone of a missing girl, thereby interfering with the investigation?

    Cold. Downright evil. I hope these people are blacklisted from the industry and forced to work as telemarketers or beg in the unemployment line.

  23. N.D. says:

    Good news but even better one would be Murdoch being arrested. It’s him who is ultimately responsible for all that shit.

    And imho he’s literally responsible because he’s directly involved at least in some of these “investigations” a.k.a. smear campaigns

  24. Cheyenne says:

    @bros: Thanks for the VF link. Everybody on that paper, from assistant editor up, should go to jail.

  25. gloaming says:

    Everything you guys have already said!

    Let’s see the Murdoch’s putting forward their sacrificial lambs….. But they’ll continue to protect Rebekah Brooks the- then editor, who will continue in her position as chief executive as she could easily sail them down the river.
    The investigations will be a sham and Murdoch will probably be successful in his attempt to take over BskyB when this all dies down because he has control over politicians who have been cosying up to him for years.

    That’s what galls me so f*king much. The top three in this will be fine.

  26. Ruffian9 says:

    Papers like this cater to the worst of humanity and represent the very bottom rung of ‘journalism’…what silken_floss said. Good riddance.

  27. the original bellaluna says:

    I tried to log in to comment on NotW site about this story, and GUESS WHAT? I was offered 4 free issues if I registered! (Time to catch up the site to the drama, no?)

    Here’s a good read: http://news.yahoo.com/uk-phone-hacking-targets-more-slain-schoolgirls-133032366.html

  28. Ja says:

    It was going to happen anyway as they plan to introduce the 7 day Sun. As for crimes against journalism, NOTW were certainly not the only offender.

  29. Mairead says:

    NOW you guys know why I have been hailing Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks (née Wade) as the root of all evil for years now.

    This vile creature was responsible for one of the most disgraceful tabloid incidents since the coverage of Jack the Ripper in exploiting the death of Sarah Paine in 2000 and leading a witchunt against paedophiles – and causing innocent people to be attacked by mobs in the process. So I rather think it was “inconceivable” that Brooks didn’t know or even instigate the phone hack.

    Quote: US Weekly reports that NOTW was the “largest-selling English language newspaper in the world.” This was the right thing to do.
    Hold on to your naiveté as long as you can CB. The pulling of NOTW is NOTHING to do with “doing the right thing”, and EVERYTHING to do with advertiser flight (Ford and Bulmer’s this morning alone)and securing the deal to gain full control over BSkyB and Sky News.

    Besides, they’re just going to release a Sunday edition of The Scum – sorry, The Sun. I’ve heard that they even registered the website for The Sun on Sunday two days ago!

  30. garvels says:

    @nanea-I feel the guardian has a very left leaning agenda and I feel that Fox News with its news commentary programs offer a more conservative view. If a person prefers a liberal view they will read the Guardian if a person has more conservative views they will gravitate towards Fox. The beauty is that the U.S. is a free country and you can always change the channel or read another paper if you don’t like what you see or read.

    It sounds like Rupert did the right thing in shutting down the paper and now people should wait for the completion of the inquiry before convicting someone through the media,(which happens to be Murdoch’s competition.)

  31. gloaming says:

    @ garvels The thing is that Murdoch also owns Fox, as you probably know, so If I wanted to hear the truth about this I’d watch the Channel 4 News here in the UK or read The Guardian, or another paper that “Rupert’s” empire doesn’t have control of.

  32. MB says:

    Wow, just WOW.

    Either Rebekah Brooks is the best executive NEWS Ltd has ever seen or KSGirl is right and she knows something BAD about Rupert. He is not only shutting down the newspaper for her but he has refused her resignation and is keeping her in the Cheif Exec position? Amazing.

    That said, Rupert doesnt do anything unless it will benefit him financially so im sure he is fine with the decision to close NoTW as it will be benefit him in other ways.

  33. Rita says:

    @Bellaluna

    Free stuff is cool. So, did you register?

  34. fizXgirl314 says:

    Yeah this stuff really made me cringe… I hope these people get the pants sued off of them and they give all the money to their victims.

  35. Truthful says:

    I cannot stand this vile sack of skin & bones, he’ll get his…he’s 80-LOL

    he’s been doing his dirty deeds for centuries.

  36. JennJenn says:

    I want Rupert to live 20 more years just so Wendy will have earn that prenup payout by feeding him and changing his nappies.

  37. N.D. says:

    @Mairead: “The pulling of NOTW is NOTHING to do with “doing the right thing”, and EVERYTHING to do with advertiser flight (Ford and Bulmer’s this morning alone)and securing the deal to gain full control over BSkyB and Sky News.”

    True that. Murdoch is just looking at the bigger picture. He’ll reopen NOTW in one form or another as soon as it’s safe for him to do so without hurting his bigger business interests.

    And I don’t think him refusing her resignation was any favor to Rebecca, he needs a scapegoat after all, doesn’t he? He wouldn’t want it to be his son.

  38. REALIST says:

    Good riddance to bad rubbish!

  39. Carolyn says:

    Original bellaluna you’ve got it in a nutshell. Murdoch has a lot to answer for.

  40. Jana says:

    Murdock should be arrested.

  41. Ruby says:

    I actually put a curse on NOTW years some years back. Wow, it worked lol.
    This won’t destroy Murdoch he is like a pimple on the backside of print and online media. It just won’t go away

  42. Violet says:

    Long overdue good riddance to bad rubbish.

  43. Emily says:

    I hope they carry out a proper intestigation and really go after the bastard. If this could stop his deal going through that’d be great.

  44. Shay says:

    The move to shut down the paper only shows Murdoch’s sneakiness. He is trying to distract people now but everyone surely knows this man is evil incarnate.
    This man shouldn’t be allowed to own any more media stakes. He doesn’t care about the moral implications. How many journalists has he fired when they’ve investigated the unethical practices of his own advertisers?

  45. Sloane Wyatt says:

    @#31 garvel: It’s not a free country when rich bast=rds like Murdoch own the Lion’s Share of the media, and the government is owned.

    The obscenely wealthy have succeeded in their brainwashing that fake news is real. Google, facebook, etc. have provided despots the world over the means to trample freedom.

    You know I try not to think about it and just read gossip.

  46. the original bellaluna says:

    @ Rita – Naw, I just bought toilet paper last week. 😉

  47. gloaming says:

    @ Sloane Wyatt And gossip isn’t part of that ‘brainwashing’?

  48. Chris says:

    Murdoch is a tax dodging, war mongering, climate change denying, POS. I’d love to see his empire crumble and see him behind bars. But unfortunately he’ll get away with saying he didn’t know what was going on. I hope opposition media outlets seize this opportunity to inflict maximum damage on Murdoch and his grubby organisation. I also hope the victims and their families sue the hell out of him.

  49. garvels says:

    @gloaming-I agree. I also watch CNN,MSNBC and I read the daily telegraph as well as the Guardian and the Daily mail. That is why I made the comment that Rupert did the right thing in dismantling the paper. Just how extensive the corruption is within the paper is something they will discover upon the completion of the inquiry. Regards.

  50. Cheyenne says:

    Time magazine says arrests are coming up: journalists who hacked into people’s voice mail and e-mail accounts, and policemen who accepted payoffs from journalists.

    This is major suckage. I would love to see the entire Murdoch news empire go down the drain where it belongs.

  51. Unaugh says:

    So this picture is the defining image of our future world…..? Old overly-powerful men getting the most delicious young females (under contract) to play with their winkies while they run EVERYTHING.

    And we wonder why teens wear less and less clothing on tv under this tyranny.

    Teens & very young women are being groomed (for the last 20 years) to be the future winkie twirlers for old powerful men.

    The worlds future female generations are in great peril, I am sad to say.

  52. KsGirl says:

    The outcome of this is going to depend on whether or not the inquiry has any teeth. Somehow I doubt it will be given sharp enough ones to take down the big players (Brooks, Murdoch himself) – Andy Coulson looks like he’s being set up to take a fall and I wouldn’t be surprised if he was being rewarded for it.

    I just also want to say that although I have little time for the Guardian’s editorials and columnists (too left wing for me), their coverage of this issue has been SUPERB. Anyone looking for the straight story here should read the Guardian’s coverage, imo.

    There’s alo the fact that the British police seemed to be implicated in this as well, so if it’s them investigating then…?

  53. the original bellaluna says:

    @ Unaugh – This is nothing new. Unfortunately.

    @ Shay – Please read my previous comment. Murdoch did this only to cover his own (and his son’s) arse and attempt to limit financial liability. Nothing in the world will ever convince me otherwise.

  54. LunaT says:

    Murdoch is a skeeze. Ditto on all the comments calling him out on being a rich, controlling, law dodging ass. When I read what he’d done, it was so obvious he was trying to avoid more intense scrutiny of NOTW and his other media holdings.

  55. Ally says:

    Shutting down that paper is such bull-puckey. The 200 people being fired had nothing to do with the scandal in question.

    It would be like Bill Clinton shutting down the west wing of the White House in response to his scandal. Or George Bush responding to the torture memos crisis by replacing the office printers. Give me a break.

    Also, it might be an attempt to facilitate destroying evidence in the News of the World offices.

    Beyond the details, this scandal is interesting in that it reveals the incestuous relationship between British politicians, police and the hackiest press there.

    Much like the DSK scandal revealed France’s antiquated views on the boundary between seduction and harassment, and the rights of women generally in the public sphere.

    The fact that the current British prime minister hired one of the guys directly involved in the first wave of eavesdropping revelations is astounding. He’ll be lucky if he doesn’t end up having to resign.

  56. bugsy says:

    I totally agree with Katija. If they had only been wiretapping celebrities, I kinda doubt there would have been as much backlash. Actually, the thought of them listening in to conversations that celebrities were having is a little bit funny. They probably talk strictly about their careers, their looks and their diets. Ha. But yeah, the other stuff is pretty satanic.

  57. Jazz says:

    Won’t be sorry to see that trash rag go. I’d only use it to line the bottom of my bird’s cage but even he won’t shit on it!

  58. katnip says:

    I agree regarding the double standard. It was fine for them to write lies about celebrities and maybe even wire tap. But when it was learned they did it to regular families then it became an outrage. Thing is when people turn a blind eye to wrongdoing it grows and finally touches the lives of the “common man”..

    People should have been outraged before.

    Murdoch shut the mag down to deflect. To keep his upcoming takeover BSkyB.

    that is what people need to get upset about too. The media has lost all its integrity and trustworthiness. When I see journalist/news shows..quoting tabloid stories I stop watching them. When means I don’t watch news shows anymore. SAD

  59. Linda says:

    This isn’t the first time you’ve heard that rich people are corrupt, is it?

  60. Linda says:

    This isn’t the first time you’ve heard that rich people are corrupt, is it?

  61. UKHels says:

    there’s more stuff to come
    and you’re right, when they’re tapping the phones of celebs and politicians who are complicit in their relationships with the press no one really cares

    but when they interefere with a police investigation, tap the phones of relatives of dead soldiers and murdered children well, how the hell can they sleep at night??

  62. Mark says:

    I don’t feel sorry for the employees at all! They knew what the “paper” was all about and chose to remain working there. Anyway, they’ll all have jobs when the Sun on Sunday is up and running.

    This is all a stunt so we’ll say “Donating the proceeds of the last sale to charity and closing it down…. They’ve done the right thing… aren’t they saints?” They don’t get off that light as far as I am concerned.