Matt Damon took part in a Save Our Schools march and rally on Washington on Saturday for teachers’ rights. Damon’s mother, a former teacher, was at the event along with his former high school history teacher. The famous actor rallied the crowd with a speech praising teachers for shaping his life and outlook. Save Our Schools is calling for teacher empowerment and grassroots support to help end the practice of tying school funding and teacher salaries to standardized testing. Damon made many thoughtful comments about the cause:
Matt Damon dedicated his Saturday to a cause close to his heart, rallying with teachers on a march to The White House.
The Bourne Identity star, whose mother was a teacher, joined the Save Our Schools March to protest the use of standardized testing throughout the education system.
In a touching speech to the amassed crowd, Damon, 40, discussed how he feels his own public school education impacted his life.
“As I look at my life today, the things that I value about myself, my imagination, my love of acting, my passion for writing, my love of learning, my curiosity, came from the way that I was parented and taught,” Damon told the crowd as the sun beat down on his head, shaved bald for his next role.
“And none of these qualities that I just mentioned, none of these qualities that I prize so deeply, none of these qualities that have brought me so much joy, that have made me so successful professionally, none of these qualities that make me who I am can be tested,” he said.
“Now don’t get me wrong. I did have a brush with standardized tests at one point. I remember because my mom went to the principal’s office and said, ‘My kid ain’t taking that. It’s stupid, it won’t tell you anything and it’ll just make him nervous.’ That was in the ’70s when you could talk like that.”
Damon also voiced support of all the educators throughout the United States.
“We love you, we thank you and we will always have your back,” he said.
[From Radar Online]
Both of my parents are retired teachers, and I admire the work that educators do and know a little about it. It’s a tough job for low pay and there’s a ton of bureaucracy to deal with. I’ve been out of the loop since they retired, but it sounds like it’s even worse now with these new federal policies. It’s heartening to see Damon lend his celebrity to this cause and you can tell that it’s one he cares about deeply.
Damon has been sporting a bald head for a little over a week. He shaved it for a role in a science fiction film called Elysium, which he’s been filming in Vancouver. It also stars Jodie Foster and Sharlto Copley. As Lainey points out we’ll be seeing plenty more of Matt this year. He has two films coming out: Contagion in September and We Bought a Zoo in December. I always love to see him on the big screen, with hair or without. (I much prefer with, but I’m not going to be picky.)
I love this picture of him spraying sunscreen on his head.
photo credit: Fame Pictures
I’m grateful he used sunscreen on his head – those kind of burns are nasty.
Oh, and LOVE. HIM.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAdorable.
His gameshow-host teeth are my favorite thing about him. And even though I’m sure he’s a super nice guy, some white guys just look like neo-nazis with a bald head. Adding Damon to that list.
Matt was bald at a U2 concert in Baltimore on 22 June. It’s not that recent.
With no hair his blue blue eyes really stand out. yum. I think he looks hot with no hair.
I love him for standing for this cause.
his mum was teacher
And just like that, I have an obsession with bald heads. Goddamn he looks hot.
The words coming out of the mouth also add to the hotness. Massachusetts, in particular, has a crappy standardized testing system that teachers hate. It’s a ton of pressure for the kids and hasn’t done anything to improve ed standards.
I’m late to this topic, but I’ll throw in anyway. Standardized testing is fine; it’s a nice tool. It shouldn’t be the only tool which is what it is now. Teachers are no longer permitted to teach; they do test prep. The kids that have no problems with the test get shunted aside while all the resources go to getting the low performing kids up to speed. Nothing wrong with that, but again it’s at the expense of other kids. And the test scores are just statistical games anyway. Texas state testing showed tremendous gains in student achievement over the past two years. However, that achievement isn’t matched on national-standard testing. Mostly because for two years schools and districts were getting credit for students who failed the tests but were “expected to pass”. Hmmm….
Tooey: I agree. I think it is a good tool but shouldn’t be the only tool.
As for MD, I am NOT feeling the bald head but good for him for using his celebrity to call attention to something like this.
Some guys can rock the bald head, some no. My hubby can rock it and apparentely so can Damon – and I’ve never found him attractive!
Good cause, glad he’s lending support.
Standardized tests, as tooey pointed out, are good as a contributing factor but not as the whole pie representative of the child’s skills and abilities. Further, if we’re going to rely on standardized tests to be a determiner of these things, we need a national standard (something that is being moved toward, hopefully, and tested in multiple regions starting in 2012, increasing in 2014, and maybe being accepted by 2018). If you look at the Louisiana state standards, where I teach, and the California or Colorado state standards, you’ll find oceans between them. What a 3rd grader learns in inner city NOLA will not necessarily be what a 3rd grader learns in San Francisco, and that is egregious and criminal, since that sets even the kids who do well in those schools behind – because the rubric they were held to means nothing. I see high school seniors go to college and swiftly drop out because they can’t handle the material and aren’t on the same level as other accepted seniors. It’s blasphemous to me.
/End teacher rant
Reminds me of Eurotrip
It isn’t just a US problems- it’s happening here in Australia too. Kids aren’t learning anything anymore- they are just having test facts drilled into them. The government recently changed the education system so I don’t know if that has/will improve things but my 12 year old cousin has trouble with spelling and reading still because not enough time was spent on basic learning. And she isn’t a dumb kid- she is quite bright- she was just left behind because the curriculum had to advance before she and other kids like her were ready.
I feel for teachers. They have a hard job and the red tape just keeps making it harder. I especially feel for US teachers as from what I understand they get incredibly low pay and have to fight for resources. In Australia teachers are paid properly. If memory serves most teachers start on around 40 to 50k and that goes up as the teacher gains more experience (teachers end up earning quite a nice sum). Anything you buy for your class (like say the set of Harry Potter books to read them) is tax deductable and the government is pretty good with school funding.
But no matter where you teach you need to be allowed to actually educate the children instead of just training them for standardised tests.
I am trying to understand something? In this particular case, is this doing charity to promote a movie that is coming out like the Jolie-Pitts are constanty accused of or a different kind of charity work. Just asking as the pattern seems vilified in one case and applaulded in another.
Then it would seem it is not the charity work thats the problem, but who is doing it. How’s that?
I know 6 years ago the hammer fell on folks head and hate is now only directed in one direction towards the evil ones. Oh, and when his movies come out he sure likes to discuss his family and kids ALOT. Is that okay too?
This isn’t charity work but believing in a cause. He didn’t send out a media release or hype it up – he just appeared, gave a talk and answered questions. And it’s got nothing to do with promoting a movie (his comments on political issues will probably deter more people than he would attract).
And he never shares specific details about his family – it’s all very generic.
When he just appeared and did the speech, is this the 1st for the rally or was he there before to believe in a cause? Publicity is publicity. See, I don’t know cause I don’t follow this, so my question is sincere.
As to no press releases that you are stating as fact, since when does interviews in magazines no less, not count. Generics or specifics, he discusses his family (wife and kids). You seem to feel there is a difference. Did Meryl Streep do it either way? Again, just asking.
I love you Matt Damon, passionately and from a distance.