Rachel Zoe versus Kelly Osbourne: who looked worse at an LA benefit?

This is a great idea for Kelly Osbourne – just always appear at events with Rachel Zoe, and Kelly will always look better by comparison. These photos are from last night’s benefit for the LA Gay & Lesbian Center – Rachel Zoe was honored, and the proceeds of the evening’s event went to benefit homeless youth services. Kelly was just there because… I don’t even know. I guess she said nice things about Rachel. Anyway, we need to talk about Rachel Zoe’s face, although I feel bad about saying anything, considering she was only out and about for a good cause, and because she was being honored for her support of the gay community. But why can’t someone (anyone!) talk to Rachel about what’s going on with her face? It’s not just her (alleged) coke-and-starvation diet. She’s got other stuff happening to her face.

As for Kelly, doesn’t she looks refreshingly young and adorable by comparison? I’m telling you, this is the secret! Just stand near Rachel Zoe, and you’ll instantly looks so much cuter. I don’t even mind Kelly’s lavender hair here – her styling is so much better in casual/business appearances than on formal red carpets.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

96 Responses to “Rachel Zoe versus Kelly Osbourne: who looked worse at an LA benefit?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. kazoo says:

    Kelly. The answer is always Kelly.

    Although I think Rachel Zoe just ate my soul with her eyes.

  2. normades says:

    Ohhh that’s a tough call.

    And yes Kelly, you are that fat.

    • barb333 says:

      She is not fat! I really detest people who call other people fat. While hiding behind their computer. On your couch.

      And yes Normades, you are that disgusting.

      • normades says:

        That was a dig to Kelly who said that compared to Christina A. she was never “that fat”.

        Lighten up barb

      • TeamElton says:

        So you hate people who call other people fat?? Do you remember Kelly recently calling Christina fat?? I figure if you’re going to dish it, you have to take it as well. Kelly does appear chunky in these pictures and she is just so unfortunate looking.

      • Julie says:

        Chub

      • DreamyK says:

        Ha! What an ironic comment.

        Kelly needs to stop dressing in things that accent her fire plug physique. Petite women just can’t wear certain styles.

        And yes, her calves are fat compared to the rest of her body. Weird.

      • bros says:

        I fully agree with Kelly looking gross and unfortunate, grey gardens from the neck up and nurse ratched from the neck down, but what is a fire plug physique?

      • Nancy Perkinson says:

        Then KO shouldn’t come off like she thinks she’s a fashion forward woman. She isn’t. She’s chunky, not attractive and has a horrible fashion sense. She needs to find some other kind of work. People that sit behind their computers calling her “fat” are not on Fashion Police putting other women down.

    • Franny says:

      Gross. I think Kelly’s body is just fine. Look at her tiny waist! I think she has a tendency to have some extra weight/muscle in her legs and arms, but her waist is so small.

      • Matie says:

        I agree, she’s gross and obese.

      • barb333 says:

        Don’t get me wrong, I think it was horrible of Kelly to say it also. Where did I say I only think it’s acceptable for some and not ordered. I was just pointing out that people calling other people fat is not cool. Personally I think people who say things against others wouldn’t possibly say them to them in person. There is a way to say things out of respect or for someones own good. Being mean about ones appearance shows ignorance and quite frankly is what causes alot of self esteem issues. Btw Teamelton what did you mean I can take it? What waverly were you trying to accomplish?

      • Franny says:

        To be clear, I was saying that the original comment was gross. Not Kelly.

        Who, by the way, is no where close to being obese. Think a little about your statements before you share them with the internet. She’s not even over weight, or even close to it. Is she the thinnest girl on the block? No, but she exercises, has beat her addictions, and is making an effort to have a career. Lay off.

        I swear, some people on here are ridiculous. Act like a mature adult. Have we all forgotten what that is like?

      • normades says:

        My comment was IRONY.

        http://www.celebitchy.com/186331/kelly_osbourne_criticizes_christina_aguilera_again_i_was_never_that_fat/

        Franny: We can’t call her fat but she can be a total bitch to others about her weight? Makes a lot of sense.

        Seriously folks, lighten up. I’m here to make superficial comments about superficial things. Fat, thin, fug outfit, whatever.

        I am not here to call other posters names. I am not calling YOU fat.

      • Franny says:

        @ normades: I think you shouldn’t call anyone fat. She was blasted when the Christina comment first came out as well. All I’m saying is that people can be so incredibly rude on here. I love reading the comments because there are some seriously funny, snarky commenters. The trolling mean comments just get old.

      • TLK says:

        @normades: you might not mean to call other commenters here fat, but you know, I looked at the picture of Kelly and thought “if she can wear that kind of dress and show those plumpy legs then I can too”. Wrong, obviously, her legs are not pretty. Mine aren’t either.

        That kind of calf shape is not really about bones, it’s muscles. But it seems about impossible to get those muscles thinner, at least my calves have looked the same with BMI 26 and 22.

        Kelly’s dress, especially the sleeves, is actually quite good hiding the fat she no doubt has on upper arms. Her waist also looks thin because of the shape of the dress and the belt (I do not think the shoes are best possible choice, because the straps make her legs look even shorter, rather classical court shoes would make better optical impression). Imo it would be good to have such women designing clothes, at least they might design something that fits also less perfect bodies!

        And Kelly is not obese at the moment, but certainly not anorectic either. Actually she looks quite healthy. Seeing women like her in such dresses should take a bit of the stress away from women trying to get thinner.

        I still don’t think it was smart of her to call anyone fat. Even if she does that, does not mean everyone else should be equally tactless.

        Sorry for any errors in my English, not my first language.

      • normades says:

        Compared to Xtina’s recent photos I think Kelly looks about the same size (sorry). Thus the yes you are “that fat” comment (her words, not mine).

        When a majority picks that Rachel is looking better, you know yer doing something wrong. After the awful hair and unfortunate make up, her weight is the least of her worries.

    • Marc says:

      Kelly is fat no matter how much weight she lost. She has thick bone structure. Let it go Kelly you will be always fat and heavy. Forever. And WTF with this extra pale make up. She looks like walking corpse. I like the way Rachel looks. Her face never looked better.

      • Sienna says:

        “Forever”. Haha so harsh but it’s true. Her limbs always look huge and swollen compared to her torso and hips :S unfortunate.

      • Agnes says:

        Not to mention Kelly seems like a mean, angry person. One of my friends’ mom has a saying for that – “ugly people are always mad”. Hahaha.

    • hatsumomo says:

      I see what you did there!

    • ??? says:

      I think it’s because when she got the lap- band and lipo.. she forgot to get lipo on certain key areas.. like her legs, calves and uppper arms.

  3. LAK says:

    Kelly Osbourne looks so much better now she’s put on some weight. She simply doesn’t have the body type to be skinny. She looks so cute in these pictures.

    Rachel Zoe’s face looks good in these pics. she’s definitely done something to her face, but i think it looks better rather than worse.

    • Jilli says:

      Lak, I agree. Zoe looks better as she was in dire need of some injectable intervention on her previously saggy and haggard looking face. That being said, she is still unattractive. Kelly is simply a stumpy gal. She will never be thin and willowy, but she makes do with what she has and generally looks nice.

  4. Liz says:

    Kelly would look much better if she changed the hair colour. That style is quite nice.

    The dress, however, does not work. Her legs are too fat for it.

    I wouldn’t point it out if she wasn’t so horrible and delusional. Does she really, truly think she’s a size 2? (That’s a size 6 in the UK, right?)

    She’s still fat. That wouldn’t be a problem if it wasn’t for the delusion that she (1) is thin and (2) can wear the same dresses as the (truly) thin actresses.

  5. RocketMerry says:

    Kelly’s hair is growing on me. I kinda like it, now.
    She’s pretty and cute when she smiles.

  6. Maritza says:

    Kelly does look a bit chubby but either way she looks much better than Rachel Zoe. Although I wish Kelly would change that horrible hair color to either blond or light brown.

  7. mombon says:

    Rachel wins, so obviously had something done to smoth out the raisin face. kelly looks like she might have gained a few pounds, or just bloat?

  8. Kitten says:

    Wow..Rachael Zoe. I try not to be harsh but her face is bugging me out. How old is she?

  9. lin234 says:

    You need to post pictures of Rachel’s face before she had a ton of work done. Her nickname used to be Raisin face. Forget her recommending clothes to Hollywood stars, they should be after her plastic surgeon’s number. Since Demi used to be a client, do you think Rachel uses the same surgeon as Demi? That surgeon needs to be named. His/her work is incredible.

    Kelly just isn’t someone who is naturally skinny.

  10. Tazina says:

    Rachel looks pretty in that black dress. I could care less what she did to her face. I like her – she’s a good mom to her cute little son. Kelly looks too grey and she has extra weight on her. You can see it in the arms and under the chin. Her hair and makeup are well done.

  11. Franny says:

    I think you’ll always look more youthful if you just smile and look happy to be there.

  12. Pont Neuf says:

    Personally, I think that Rachel Zoe is saved by her very pretty features – the problem is, someone should tell her that looking at the camera like a hungry cat looks at a mouse, isn’t the most flattering look. Also, shee needs to eat: when you head has more mass than the rest of your body, you know it’s time to ingest more than a diet coke per day.

    As for that creature with an ego the size of the galaxy and a brain the size of a grain of sand (sorry, grains of sand! It wasn’t my intention to imply that you’re anywhere near as stupid as that horrid cow), her outer appearance reflects what she has inside: grimy grottiness covered by white powder and pork chop sauce.

  13. sarah says:

    Kelly’s not the one to judge people (Aguilera, for example), because she’s fat herself. I’ve seen heavier women who don’t seem fat at all but she does. Her figure is just unfortunate

  14. NeNe says:

    I might be the outcast here, but I think Kelly looks better than Rachel. Sorry!

  15. ThatBoyLuke says:

    Can you just imagine after a few (or a lot ) glasses of Champagne kelly on the phone to her 18 year old BFF Miley bitching about how fat Christina is and miley being like “… ”
    She really needs to get a life lol

  16. Heather says:

    Kelly needs to learn how to use toner.

  17. bea says:

    My grandmother’s lavender rinse is “in” now? WTF

    Kelly’s dress looks good on her from the waist up. Her knees do not need to be shown nor should she wear those straps crossed across her feet.

    I never like what Rachel has on. Her personality ruins anything she wears for me.

  18. truthful says:

    uhh, they both look horrible but I’d have to choose Rachel, Kelly irks m w/all of her mean words to Christina A. about weight, when its obvious–she looks like a ummpa loompa.

  19. some bitch says:

    Kelly looks… kind of cute? Still, it bugs me that her waist is so tiny and her limbs are still so chubby and lack any definition. I feel like this girl lost weight strictly through diet and doesn’t exercise very much.

    Rachel Zoe reminds me of a viper. Those eyes are terrifying.

  20. sundaygal says:

    Kelly’s got amazing skin. Rachel is channeling The Night of the Iguana wearing a wonky velvet duvet cover.

  21. juju says:

    Oh Kelly is so cute !! NOT

  22. LL says:

    Rachel Zoe’s eyes gave me the chills. Yikes.

  23. meme says:

    Kelly’s dress is fine. That hair and those shoes ruin it. And poor Rachel. It’s too Joan Crawford darling. Hideous. Just Hideous.

  24. ladybert62 says:

    Who looked worse: Kelly

  25. lena says:

    kelly is short and her head is huge

  26. Matie says:

    Kelly always looks worse: massive jaw, huge chunky legs, porky arms. And she has the nerve to call Aguilera fat!

  27. Amy says:

    I think Rachel looks pretty good here actually. MUCH better than she’s looked in the past. Her arms look somewhat toned rather than totally skeletal. And she’s made a wise choice to cover her (typically terrifying) chest area.

  28. Blue says:

    Kelly needs to wear long garments. Her legs are too short and fat for that dress (have the same problem) She kind of looks like an oompa loompa.

  29. Lady Satan says:

    Rachel Zombie.

  30. Fatkid says:

    These pictures of Rachel Zoe remind me of the death-eaters in Harry Potter.

  31. Cathy says:

    In that last picture Rachels face looks like somebody out of a b grade vampire/zombie/monster movie. I don’t care for that dress on Kelly, it’s doesn’t look good on her body type.

  32. gab says:

    Wow, it is so difficult to choose who looks better/worse between these two people. They are so different looking that they don’t even appear to be the same species! My brain hurts and I need more coffee. I just can’t …….

  33. taxi says:

    Kelly is just overweight & boring. She’s got a pear-shaped face that is never going to look very good.

    Rachel has done so much botox & filler that she’s got the scary stare & can’t move her face. Maybe she did her eyes, too. Imagine being her kid & having that zooming in for a goodnight kiss! Nightmares for sure.

    ps: She’s very shiny.

  34. Jackie says:

    i can’t believe either of these women make a living in the fashion realm. they are both horrible looking with awful style. just sayin.

  35. april says:

    I think Rachel is beautiful but too overfilled. I would like it better if she would have done about half the filler. She lost the lines around her mouth that gave her character and uniqueness.

  36. anne_000 says:

    Omg at Rachel’s dress… It looks like Scarlett O’Hara made that dress out of her curtains or carpet bag in the middle of the night with no candlelight. And then someone bought an “as seen on TV” rivet(?) applier and enclosed her in the fabric.

    You can kinda see where the curtain rod would have gone, the left shoulder…

  37. fabgrrl says:

    Well, looks like Skinny Kelly is no more. I hope she dropped the attitude when she packed the weight back on.

  38. I am not quite sure what you are trying to say. Kelly is young enough to be Rachels daughter! Rachel looks good…for her anyway! Much much better then she did a couple of years ago before she started using botox and fillers!

  39. SHump76 says:

    I wish Kelly was a nice person, but she isn’t. Like, at ALL. She looks kind of cute here, though. Rachel looks about 15 years younger than I’ve ever seen her look. Whatever it is she’s had done, it’s doing the trick.

  40. Meanchick says:

    Rachel is wearing casket lining and Kelly looks like she sleeps in a casket.

  41. JT says:

    Wow, all the comments about Kelly looking fat is sorta blowing my mind. There is a vast difference between dense muscular definition with a combination of thick bones and obesity. Most of you probably need to take a look in the mirror and compare. Kelly is fit and muscular you are probably fat. It would take an ignorant fat person to harp on Kelly and call her muscular calves fat ??? She has come along way from how she once looked, people need to stop bashing women at every opportunity and be more supportive.

  42. LBeees says:

    Both. They both look worse.

  43. Katie says:

    Kelly looks worse. The lavender/grey hair is so bad! But Rachel looks like a soulless vampire. She’s way too skinny and it’s just gross.

  44. Tanya Degano says:

    Why can’t Kelly Osbourne seem to keep the weight off?!

  45. corny says:

    apples and oranges or in this case carrot sticks and eggplants

  46. Bobby sue says:

    I’m sorry, I know it sounds mean and judgmental because she works out a lot but I just HATE Kelly’s calves. They’re like bloated and plump looking despite her newer, more slim physique. I can even take the grey hair but as I scroll down the photos I wince as a I see the exposed legs.

  47. bored says:

    Zoe needs less severe eyebrows to try to tame that unfortunate crazy-eye she has going on.

  48. Redd says:

    KO is a disgusting twat and she’s a fat one at that. And I am not thin, and I don’t earn a living snarking on the appearance of other women. KO does so she is fair game. And someone please explain how someone with the “fashion sense” of Ozzie and Sharon’s little piglet gets hired to be on such a television show. And for those that take offense, this is Celebitchy, you must have dropped off site from Celesweety if you are offended.

  49. Dotty says:

    Ugh…squared. I don’t care for either.

  50. Adrien says:

    Kelly looks great and healthy. When she’s older, her face shape will be a blessing.

  51. Snowflake says:

    If Kelly’s fat, then what are the women I see around me every day? B/c they are much bigger than Kelly. Just because she’s not an anorexic like Zoe, doesn’t make her fat. comments like these are what give girls insecurity and body issues. Kelly is a healthy weight. and yes, her calves are thick, but only in an alternate universe such as Hollywood, or ya’ll world would she be considered fat. and christina called kelly fat a long time ago, which is why kelly said what she did about cristina. i exercise by running and the lowest size i can get to is a ten. so i guess i should kill myself b/c god forbid some mean bitches like the ones posting on here should call me fat. yeah, well, i don’t think so. well here’s news for them….fat girls like us still get laid so suck it. i am so sick of people acting like you’re fat if you’re not a size two.

    • Lindsay says:

      I agree! I think Kelly looks healthy, and she’s a beautiful girl. But because she isn’t emaciated that means she’s “fat”. She’s actually normal, in my opinion. Women in the real world look more like her (except for the hair – yikes) than they do RZ. Women who look like RZ in the real world are in rehab for an eating or drug disorder. Do we really want out young women and girls to risk their health by trying to look like the women they see on tv and in the magazines? Why is THAT what is “attractive” and why airbrush the shit out of pictures so that what we see isn’t even real or attainable.

    • Noi says:

      I think the main ppl are calling her fat are for the same reason I will and do just because someone did something to you when you were younger gives you just right to do it now your older no. Grow up one would think she would get a new healthy self esteem along with a new body but that’s not it. When Christina comes along she just turns bitter for why? Why care about name calling in the past. Your (Kelly) using a public tv show blasting CA. Looks petty and bitter.

      &&

      Way to misread everything and twist it in your mind. Kelly claims she is a 2/4 so yeah continue to fight the good fight

  52. Brittany says:

    Rachel Zoe has that weird naturally frowny mouth that very few people have… it’s very unfortunate for her, because if her mouth was shaped differently, she might be an attractive woman.

    Aside from the sweat and bad makeup, Kelly’s skin looks really good.

  53. sosuzy says:

    It is Kelly. Kelly always wins the hideous contest!

  54. Tommy says:

    I think Kelly looks awful. That periwinkle-gray hair is just abominable.

  55. melissa says:

    not fair, kelley does look gorgeous and Rachel a total freak, but then Rachel is old enough to be kelley’s mum, or if she isnt she’s dieted and smipped enough to look old enough to be kelley’s mum, who incidentally is older than her than her and looks way better.