Jennifer Aniston was on Chelsea Lately last night, because Aniston just had to stop by her BFF’s cable show to promote Wanderlust. I have to give Aniston some credit here – even though I think her friendship with Chelsea Handler speaks volumes about her real Mean-Girl personality, Aniston gave a good interview last night. Her face moved, she was animated, she didn’t seem drunk or high, and she talked about nudity and dongs rather than self-help book wisdom. Chelsea on the other hand… is that what her face looks like nowadays? She can barely move her BotoxFace!! And she’s so in lurve with her BFF, it’s really gross and sycophantic:
The bulk of the interview is Chelsea’s personal testimonial for Wanderlust. Chelsea does a better job promoting Wanderlust than she did for her own film, This Means War, which is kind of funny, especially considering This Means War’s poor showing at the box office. The grossest line of the interview? “I’ve been lucky enough to see you t-pless in our private life, but now America, when they go to see the movie, will get to see her topless running!” Oh, and Jennifer Aniston uses words like “breasticles”. Seriously. She said, “There’s a lot of penises in this movie! Finally, for once, the men have to disrobe! Trust me, there is your fair share of breasticles as well … It’s definitely … penises are promised.” Oh, Jen. It’s like she’s a 15-year-old boy.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
I like that her hair is slightly darker, she looks better with darker hair. I loved her outfit. If she does have botox she has such a minimal amount that you can’t even tell. Eh, that’s all I got. I used to like her more until she and Justin got together and broke Heidi’s heart. Boo!
@Jezi, not to get too much into the JA bashing, but regarding the ex, have you considered that the reason why there are no words from the ex, is because the ex has nothing to say?
And like her mother had stated, Jen met with Heidi, and they have cleared any misunderstandings, like mature adults.
Not needing to plant anything nasty about each other in gossip rags. Just mature adults. It happens. Even in Hollywood. Two grown women with brains, not fighting over a man. Imagine that!
What? Her mother never stated Jen met with Heidi? That was a rumor. Heidi threatened to tell all if they mentioned her name. Why she has not spoken is pure speculation? Maybe, she didn’t want to endanger her job in the film industry, maybe she was paid off, or maybe she’s classy, or over it? Who knows.
The timeline speaks for itself and was never denied. Justin/Jen were photographed together in May. (Before that, there were pics of Justin/Heidi together.) Justin/Jen totally lied about their relationship to the press/Heidi’s mother–which she reported to Radar. Heidi didn’t move out until the middle of June, and she released a pissed statement to Page 6–which called Aniston out for cheating–which was never denied. The same week Heidi moves out, Justin/Jen release photos of them together kissing to the presses. So tacky and classless.
For Aniston to do this to someone is sad, considering she called out Brad for missing “a sensitivity chip” and Angelina as “uncool.” She and her fanbase are seriously hypocritical.
Here you go, a CeleBitchy link that covered the story, and confirms that indeed, the mother had talked to Star, and had stated that yes, Heidi and Jennifer did meet and talk.
So again, if we keep calm and reason this out, if there are no stories in the tabloids about Heidi confirming about someone “stealing” her bf, is because there are no stories to be told.
And it is, yet again, because 2 MATURE ADULT WOMEN, discussed the situation, without losing their minds, and have dealt with the situation in a calm matter, and within reason.
No one went to the paps. No one back stabbed the other. All went on with their lives. Because there was obviously nothing to fight about.
http://www.celebitchy.com/193987/heidi_bivens_mom_confirms_heidis_complicated_meeting_with_jennifer_aniston/
LOL…Did you read the link before you placed all types of intentions and actions into it?
The mother commented when asked about the meeting that it was a very complicated time for all of them. That’s it…nothing else.
That doesn’t read to me like a mature moment between women with nothing to fight/be upset about.
The article also states that Heidi was crying while talking to her ex, from being blindsided/backstabbed, obviously. And that Jennifer then went into damage control. Otherwise, who goes and soothes the ex’s feelings if everything was non-backstabby? LOL
And as Celebitchy speculates, that probably meant a checkbook and confidentiality agreement was the real reason for the meeting.
Buying someone’s silence isn’t the mature moment of zen you are trying claim. Geez…did Jennifer tell Heidi she had her eye on the house cat too when they met?
Sorry, but this doesn’t paint the picture you think it does.
I agree. I didn’t care too much for Jen before but she lost points with me after dating Justin while he appeared to still be with Heidi. The only reason for that though is that she has been playing the wronged woman for several years and her fans never shut up about that. As for Heidi possibly meeting with Jen, if that is true, I would tend to agree there may have been an agreement of some sort to not speak of any of this to the media for either side and Heidi may have received a settlement for her silence.
She is not much of an actress. And her skinny jeans wearin’ boyfriend is kind of a dork. Why do we care? Seriously.
In a more important matter, does she really wear blue contacts?
Yes, she does, google her old pictures. She’s actually Greek but trying to be a beach blonde California girl
could the contacts have anything to do with the small pupils?seems unlikely,but just been wondering for so long why are they so damn small.
“but just been wondering for so long why are they so damn small. ”
if you are talking about the first pic i guess its because of the flashes of light from the paps. bright light: pupil gets small, darkness it gets wide.
She does not wear blue contacts. There are older pictures of her where her eyes look very light.
Nice weave ms. Aniston
Who told Chelsea those boots were a good idea with that dress?
She should avoid up the nose shots.
Isn’t that what Chelsea their for to promot Aniston movies.
She seems to possess the emotional maturity of a 15 year old girl…
Birds of a feather..these two women are friends for a reason..they are exactly alike.Except that no amount of plastic surgery can help Chelsa like it did for JA.JA is another plastic star. I saw picutres of her before Brad and after and she ahs been sliced and diced. The jaw the nose the eyes and lips.lol I dont hate her but am done wasting money going to see movies that suck. She cannot act. I saw friends and understand whyPitt didn’t want to make an appearance on it and he also didnt want to be used by her anynmore than he already was. She waS A c actress when she met him and cheated on her finace’ with him . She used him to further her career and he finally wised up and left lol Chelsa screwed her way to a TV show litterally lol SHe took lessons from JA how to do that as that is what she did by marrying Brad.
She’s promoting a silly comedy, why shouldn’t she use words like ‘breasticles’?
I thought the interview was funny and light and appropriate for what she’s promoting. But I have no doubt in my mind that this will turn into yet another hate-fest.
I’ll bring the popcorn.
I don’t really get the hate either. Everyday we go through this. I’ll join you for popcorn though.
I think this comment thread would be more appropriate.
Well, this is going to get a lot of people p-ssed off:
Wanderlust just got an 80% approval rate on Rotten Tomatoes!
Of course, now some will backtrack and say stuff like it’s an ensemble cast, and it’s not because of Jen, even if they had been hammering on that she ruins all her movies… Just like the GOP, they just can’t admit when someone on the other side does anything good.
Let me point out that this is how you promote the movie: you talk about the movie, you let the whole filming the movie experience take center stage, and you let the stars of the movie shine on the red carpet.
Who was the Director of this movie again?
Must google and see what he/she looks like.
5 reviews at the moment…I think it’s a bit early to be talking about it’s % rating on rotten tomatoes just yet…don’t forget the bounty hunter initially had about a 30 something percent rating in the days before its release but then it’s at 9% right now….
Count me in. Where do I sign up?
I think the “breasticles” comment was probably a little jab at that certain online clique who claim she ices her nipples before every scene or pap shot.
I do not understand her appeal. I feel an actress should most importantly be talented. Jennifer Aniston cannot act. Every character she plays is the same. She is 20 years too old to be the naïve daddy’s girl!
Jennifer can actually act decently well, it’s just that she chooses the same type of role over and over again. I mean, she’s as good as Jennifer Garner, JLo, Sandra Bullock, etc. for comedy films.
That said, her best is decent. Even though her performance in the Good Girl was good, that’s relatively speaking…nowhere near oscar/golden globe nomination level.
I agree.
Sell that movie, Jen, any way you have to. Come see it. We’re nude. LOL
Jen is cute with a really hot bod and a sweet personality. What I realized isn’t that attractive about her is her voice is kind of like a grandmother’s voice, something very unsexy about it.
Her voice always remind me of the one of a woman who has spent years in cheap bars from highway motels drinking tequillas, smoking and talking to trunk drivers.
That’s it! LOL!! I’ve been trying to figure out what was weird about Jen-Jen’s voice. Thanks for nailing it! 🙂
word
wouldn’t it be great if Aniston could read all these bitchy comments.
too bad she’s too busy living her amazing life (you gotta admit , she does have one)
O please you can say that about half the celebrities that people bitch about on this website and I’m sure it’s not going to stop you from bitching about other celebrities here is it.
If you have such a problem with bitchy comments than why are you can a web site called celeBITCHY?
yet you’re getting upset by my bitchy comment
this site is called celeBITCHy 😉
Actually she gave you a pretty good reason and asked you a better question. You seem to be more offended/upset, as you feel the need to put in that smiley face icon that online posters generally use to try to say “oh look at me, haha, i’m so happy at you getting angry. silly you”
Actually, I think she does read them. She is pretty tuned into the comments said about her and responds often.
A controlling person doesn’t let such things go by unanswered (can you say uncool) and she has always commented about that trait of hers.
Needy, controlling, mean-girl – she’s definitely reading. LOL
Oh she does read the comments. She has herself on Google alert.
She knew and cried that Rod Stewart’s daughter called her plain/homely (which it the truth), knows what Perez says about, in her Instyle interview she touched on every single tabloid story about her (her weight, justin’s clothes, lack of babies.)
good story Kaiser
love you
I agree
i don’t. it’s getting old.
Traffic girls traffic….ad $
Aniston’s fans are always complaining. If you don’t like what kaiser says abo
ut your precious Aniston then don’t post on here. It is not that hard people
Aniston’s fans ? im not sure. Probably aniston PR
You don’t have to be a fan to find constant, pointless ranting/taunting annoying. By no means is Jennifer Aniston “precious” to me, I have no opinion on her or Angelina Jolie. But this is just one example of so many posts about her that aren’t even gossip-worthy, it’s just dumb.
Plus, I assumed there was a comment section for a reason lol. For, ya know, comments?
I agree! It’s just getting old already with the JA hate and the trickle down to anyone remotely related to JA. Why can’t someone be an AJ fan WITHOUT hating JA? There’s room for both women!
There’s a mindset that if someone makes a remark, about one actress, that it automatically reflects upon the other actress. I’m fine with them both, I’m not taking a side just because I have an opinion.
the story posted by lainey is also good and true
aniston PR is uncool
She was point on. I love it cause it is so true
Wow alot of time on your hands huh lol
She should ALWAYS be interviewed by one of her friends. Did anyone see her red carpet interview with one of the entertainment shows (Access or Extra,don’t remember which one)? She was horrible in that, couldn’t answer a question and kept covering her face. Her minion Huvane had to drag her away. I couldn’t believe it. Stick with her friend CH, at least she seemed relaxed and could answer questions.
patw-they asked her questions about the damn movie and she was stumbling all over her words. It had nothing to do with her personal life now or before. What was there to be guarded about. It was painful to see. Let CH interview her everytime. I can tell she is relaxed with her, obviously she knows what CH will and will not ask. If she can’t answer a question about her movie she is out promoting, she shouldn’t do interviews with anyone but CH.
agree with you!
she seems so insecure in her interviews,always touching her hair,roling her eyes…thats not pleasant to watch.
i
Guess what kaiser dosen’t like Leann Rimes or the Kardashians ether but I don’t see you people bitching about that, we’re is the outrage for them.
If you looked back on the Oprah post kaiser has given a number of reasons for her dislike of Oprah which has nothing to do with Aniston.
If you dont like kaiser go to dlisted they hate AJ.
Michael K dislikes Jennifer Aniston just as much. (OK, this was inresponse to luce’s comment about dlisted… not sure why it’s down here)
Michael K hates everybody. His saving grace is that he’s hilarious.
@Jill and Paranormalgirl:
yeah, but I thought it was really suspect and weird that when Aniston bought that ‘hottest woman in the history of the universe award’ Michael K didn’t say a peep. I don’t even think there was an article about it and man, he could have had a field day with that one… maybe he was paid off? Or maybe it was just too easy, where was the sport?
Agreed. He made one snarky remark about it. I think something about the voters or editors must be smoking crack.
He doesn’t post on everything to do with Aniston, Jolie, Pitt, etc. If I recall, he said that Men’s Health should drug test their readers before allowing them to vote. Soemtimes, a one liner is all it takes to get one’s point across.
if you don’t like the site, or the writer(s), you are welcome to leave it.
i love it!
@patw, they are welcome to go elsewhere too.
She does the same thing with Leann Rimes or the Kardashians dosen’t like them but still post about them so what’s your point?
Wow, now Aniston fans after controlling many sites that are majorly pro and even ass kissing Jen want to monitore and control one of the very few left that doesn’t behave that way.
You people have no shame ganging up and bullying the owner of a site that doesn’t belong to you to oriente informations about Jen the way YOU see fit.
See? It’s stuff like this that a lot of us are sick of. I feel the same about AJ and JA. They’re both beautiful women who make movies that I sometimes watch. But most of you ladies are just nasty to each other and anyone else who disagrees with you. Beyond bitchy and just plain old mean.
@ Heather,
Totally agree!
@ Heather
And yet i have yet to see a Jolie fan having the gall and the pretenion to go relentlessy after the owner of his/her own site in a blatant attempt to control it because that owner back up Aniston and not Jolie.
That’s pure controlling arrogant attitude, trying to dictate how one, let alone the owner should speak about their beloved star because they can dish it out all they want about others but can never take it when it’s about Aniston.
Angelina’s fans have class, like Angie. Jen’s? Not so much.
Oh come on, she said “breasticles,” so what? I do not get the Aniston hate. She’s not out clipping babies with her car or being a cracked out mess. Honestly, me and my girlfriends say all kinds of silly stuff like that when we hang out, and still hold jobs and pay bills and raise children and all sorts of “mature” things. It’s funny to see you refer to her as a “mean girl.” I could be wrong, but I’m guessing you’ve never even met the woman, yet she’s constantly trashed on this site for the most mundane things. Just admit you hate her for no reason and move on, it drags down the otherwise entertaining blog.
it’s called freedom of speech, this blog will not be controlled as perez hilton
Word.
Amen! However, I have to laugh at all those giving Jen so much power. Obviously, she is doing something right!
Kaiser-
Keep up the great work calling out a spade… and that is Aniston. She is certifiably cray-cray and behaving more like a reality star each day.
It is year 2012, and Aniston’s passive-aggressive behavior is still burning…
Just before the Sad Spook (Aniston) comes on this show, snarky BFF Chelsea Handjob does a skit about Brad’s movie, “The Tree of Life.” She spoofs it, implying the award-winning movie is a dull movie, AND THEN dead-eyed Chelsea invites Aniston to come onto the stage… Right!
Oh, I am sure you Jenhags think it is all a coincidence, eh?
Really? Last year in 2010/2011, BFF Chelsea Handjob did this a few times before:
1. Called Angelina a wh*re/b*tch seconds before introducing Aniston to come onto her show.
2. Spent Thanksgiving with Aniston in Me-hee-co, and then within 2 weeks later called Angelina a “c*nt and a f*cking wh*re” as part of her stand-up comedy act.
3. In another show appearance on Chelsea’s show, there was a skit where the person’s name was Brad. This skit was written in such a way where it prompted Jennifer and Chelsea yell together at the guy “Shut up, Brad!” Wouldn’t you just love to have mean girls like these in your inner circle?
When these two get together, they are worse than any of the Housewives of NJ, NY, OC, Beverly Hills OR Atlanta.
Aniston STILL has a grudge against anything Brad and Angie, and it has been over 7 years.
I have said this before. This is NOT the media’s fault. Fabricated tabloid triangle my *ss. It actually bothers the Sad Spook to hear or see news of Brad, and especially Angie. It rubs her the wrong way. She keeps reacting and she won’t control herself when in public.
Aniston is a needy, neurotic wreck who still thinks she is better than Angie and plans to continue her fight in public using any media outlet and crazy *ss friend her money can buy. Therapy has not made a dent in this blunt instrument.
This fact still has her head spinning today. And the Jenhens wanna back this caricature of a woman?
ALL of her future boyfriend relationships are doomed because there won’t be any room for him. Her nostalgia will squeeze him out.
Name another stalker, ex-wife actress that is as loco as Aniston. NAME ONE.
haha I really hope you’re still a teenager.
So I am a hag if I like JA, talk about Meangirls!!!!!
Exactly!
And those are all the reasons why I can’t sit through one of Chelsea’s shows. She is such a mean girl normally, but bring out Jennifer and it goes to a whole new level. The hate that is spewed their way as a result of those two ‘ladies’ together is creepy.
I had an…eh…it’s yet another Rachel movie towards Jennifer’s career. But her passive-aggressive actions towards a family with children is bizarre and makes her films even less viewable. All you see, by the time the film airs, is all the swipes Jennifer took while exploiting the media access of a film junket.
How she could stand by and let Chelsea dish it out during all of those appearances is bad enough. But clearly, Jennifer is participating in the escalation of the verbal abuse and the construction of the skits after SIX kids!?
Thanks for watching so I don’t have to.
Wow! Why do you allow people you seem to hate so much power? To come on a gossip blog and write a “thesis” (mostly all BS) about two people you supposedly hate, only tells me how insecure you are. Bless your heart!
Huh? How exactly is calling someone out on their bs, giving the bs’er power?
Believing the bs would be giving the bs’er the power they crave. Otherwise they wouldn’t be spewing bs.
But thanks for playing.
Karma, my response was to Josephina…
Thanks, but I’m not confused about who you were responding to but how calling someone out on their bs is giving them power?
Jennifer wants the nice girl next door, who has been done wrong, PR, but goes all mean girl every chance she gets.
Jennifer is the one who has given her power over to AJ and BP, not a poster calling her out on her bs.
MS and Karma,
Josephina oftens posts on Aniston threads. She is virulently anti-Aniston. Her posts are often so long that I don’t bother to read them at all. Of course, it’s her time and she can do as she pleases with it but some posters rants from either Pro or Con on either Aniston or Jolie just become a little over the top in their intensity for me. Josephina does come across as over-invested in trash talking Aniston.
Just thought I’d throw in my two cents.
Kara Ann,
Thanks for the heads up, especially since I am new here. I have to admit normally spending time at political boards and just needed a break from all that doom and gloom.
But at least all the posters here are feisty which reminds me of those debates. And, not only do they bring up all sorts of little bits and pieces of gossip I had forgotten, Kaiser does as well in his write ups. So it kinda helps bring newbies like me up to speed.
Fun stuff after those political boards…LOL.
Thanks again for the heads up. It’s clear there is A LOT going on here that I don’t know, so I appreciate it.
🙂
to add to her being loco,People mag will annouce she is pregnant sunday which is oscar day.
Well-said. JA is pathetic.
@josephina
I don’t watch anything Chelsea, I find her repulsive. But thank you for the update. I can’t believe they are in their 40’s acting like high school mean girls. They are so pathetic.
My only comment is – Jennifer Aniston is sweet, cute, talented, beautiful & endowed.
Sorry. You are confusing her true personality with the character she played on Friends. Aniston’s nothing like Rachel Green and it’s a little bit tragic that some people don’t know the difference.
lol
+1
You people are getting be too sensitive and riled up over Kaiser’s comments on Jen. If she acted as if every other acted had roses coming out of their asses but Jen, then I could see your point but she doesn’t. She makes fun of and dislikes many celebs and I find it refreshing that she isn’t such a Aniston ass kisser.
If you don’t like what is written here, I think you know what to do- don’t read it. I am sure there are plenty of Pro-JA sites out there for you to go to instead.
Breasticles AND penisicles? Thanks but I’ll take a pass.
Re: Chelsea talking up Aniston’s film versus This Means War.
Short answer – she’s not scared of Reese. If anything, it’s Reese that’s running scared, given her recent lackluster box office, which seems a shame, given that the woman has an Oscar. In fact, the same can be assumed about Paltrow.
Personally, I think that Chelsea is more scared of Aniston, hence her willingness to be her obedient hellhound.
Maybe I’m too old (her age?) but why is JA relevant? She’s not on TV, she’s not making blockbusters, and she’s not a noted actor. When was Friends – 20 years ago? What is it about her? I love this site, and I’m all for some juicy gossip but I don’t care about her. AND, I didn’t go to high school with her, but a boy I liked did – they dated and she dumped him bad. I’ll never forgive her. HA!
Her ONLY relevancy is “the triangle.” That’s why she continues to bring it up. It’s all she’s got.
Wanderlust got a pretty lack luster review in Variety.
http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117947141?refcatid=31
“Whatever Elysium means to the slightly confused Linda, who has struggled to find direction, for Aniston, it’s a turn down a dead-end road she’s traveled too many times before. “
Here’s the kicker, Pity Party Patrol: I actually thought I was being NICE to Aniston in this post. This was one of her better interviews from the past few years, no joke. The only unbearable thing here is Handler, not Aniston.
Re: “breasticle” defenders – this is a woman who consistently has the vocabulary of a 13-year-old. She says stuff like “uncool” and “retarded” when she’s on the record, for the love of God.
agreed.
Since I’m new to the site you take this with a grain of salt, but I love how you call them like you seem them.
Provide a bit of context and then dissect the video or article. In fact, just seeing the link for the same video at the Daily Mail inspired me to come here for your break-down rather than stay there.
Thanks.
Plus, “breasticle” sounds like some kinda growth. Just give me beavis and butthead any day.
Thank you Kaiser for finally calling a spade a spade. This woman has been given an “all clear” signal for everything and anyone she has done wrong. But in her mind, she’s still “America’s Sweetheart”. As my grandmother said, if you lay down with pigs, you come up smelling like a pig. Aniston, that should tell you something.
OMG ! LOOSER… RUN JUSTIN RUN
Truth is, seven or eight years ago I didn’t mind Aniston and I was neutral about Angelina. But, after watching both their behavior, what they say and what they DON’T say over the years I am now firmly a huge fan of Angelina’s. Aniston just rubs me the wrong way. She’s a dishonest, immature, untalented, hypocritical mean girl.
Yeah, I’ve always said she gives out this bitchy vibe no matter how hard she tries to play the sweet/girl-next-door part
I love her style in this casual outfit. I especially like the long necklace. The woman does take care with her appearance and good on her as we all know you have to try harder as you age. If you’re lucky enough not to know this yet, don’t worry you will.
She and Handler are obviously good friends, very comfortable together with lots of silly jokes etc. I actually like that she can be herself during the interview whether you like her or not. She is not trying to sell you on her relationship with Handler only on her movie. My sis and I can get kinda silly when we get together without the usual boatload of responsibility we each usually have.
I really don’t get why people who dislike JA so much watch her interviews at all. I usually don’t watch someone I really don’t like although I will look at pictures. It seems to take an awful lot of interest to tune into her interview just so you can tell everyone how “not that into her” you are. I don’t mind it though because I come to Celebitchy to Bitch about those I don’t like and “hear” you all “bitch” about those you don’t like. Wouldn’t the world be awfully boring if we all agreed? We’d end up with one post and everyone after that would say, “Ditto.”
Hold the phone. I’ve been avoiding this film and its press, so I didn’t realize it was directed/written/acted by the comedians from “The State.”
I had an unhealthy love for “The State” and Wet Hot American Summer, so I guess I might have to see this, too.
Jennifer Aniston is uninspiring in almost every way. But, I do like her discipline in working out. I’m too bored to say anything else….
Oh boy, not the breasticles 🙄
Honestly, you people are nuts! I like her, but everyone can have their own opinion. I’m guessing some posts got taken down, but if these posts are any indication as to the class/elegance of ja /aj’s fans,then there is some work to be done on both teams.
And please stop saying you’re protected by the first amendment while trying to bash anyone with a differing viewpoint. The first amendment protects everyone, not just people you agree with. Good grief.
Well technically it protects you against infringement by the federal govt but judicial applications of other amendments probably exPanded that.
am i the only one who has wondered about how her pupils seem to be really small almost always..
It’s because she has brown eyes and wears colored contact lenses! Want to see her with brown eyes? Scroll down until you get to the photos:
http://forum.purseblog.com/celebrity-news-and-gossip/jennifer-aniston-327004-7.html
That is why her pupils are so small – to block out any hint of the brown she needs to wear blue lenses that have a small opening in the middle where the pupil is. Otherwise it would be too obvious that she wears colored contacts.
Her pupils always seem small because she’s on red carpets when you get close-ups of her face. Red carpets are not only insanely brightly lit but there are flashes from cameras going every second. Pupils constrict when flooded by light.
It would be odd if her pupils were normal or dilated when flooded by light.
Truth Fairy’s link actually has a link within it that proves she has naturally light eyes.
welp..maybe it is the lenses then,but yeah i was aware of the bright lights etc.but thia is just not the only scenario where i´ve seen her eyes looking really weird..and on top of that the talk of her always slurring her words in interviews etc.
Her eyes are blue not light, but a nice dark blue. Probably the flash makes them appear light, or she may wear lighter lenses sometimes to add a pop of brightness to her eyes, but they are blue.
She is Beautiful like a fresh breath of air.
http://www.hollyscoop.com/photo-gallery/2012/02/12/107397
I’m not ging to hate on her for using the word “breasticle” because I laugh like a 10 year old when you use the word: “dong.”
It may just be the angle, but her nose looks like it’s caving in on one side.
When it comes to the Bermuda Triangle of Irrelevancy, there are nasty rabid fans on BOTH sides. No “side” has the lock on being classy.
To me (as actresses), Aniston is all milk chocolate – a little too sweet, light, and not much depth, but good when all you’re in the mood for is something fluffy. Jolie is more complex, like dark chocolate. Perfect for when you’re in the mood for something with more depth.
Josephina: Um, do you have any FACTS to back up your completely ridiculous (if unintentionally hilarious)theory about Jen being insanely obssessed w/ her ex husband? No, I didn’t think so—just a bunch of overly personalized, biased, crazy obssessions of your own.And, no, I am NOT a “Jen-hen”; I far prefer Angelina over Aniston—but to accuse her of such made-up and over-the-top motives, emotions, and behavior is absurd.It only proves how obssessed that YOU are, how “not over” the so called triangle you are–SEVEN ENTIRE YEARS LATER. Your obssession with it all does not make Aniston look unbalanced and unstable, only you.
As for anyone else calling JA a “mean girl”, or theorizing that JA reads these blogs b/c of her “controlling” nature–get over yourselves.Like her or not (and no, i myself don’t especially like her, she seems very vaccuous)she is NOT so derranged, bored, or insecure to be reading sites such as this one;like her life or not, the woman HAS a life. Stop flattering yourselves that she would *ever* be bothered to care so much about her image that she would read a site like this one, to find out what ANY of us think about her.