‘Cosmopolis’ director: “The strength of the ‘Twilight’ movies is not the acting”

Ah, so many Robert Pattinson stories. What I’ve learned this week is that Rob deserves some kind of medal (a small but quietly substantial medal) for being a total professional and managing to get through a week in New York, full of interviews and appearances, without going completely insane. I think Rob earned a lot of respect from a lot of different people this week. Of course, I’ve also learned that the media can be a fickle bitch, because even though every media outlet would love an exclusive with a sparkly vampire, every media outlet has been running negative reviews of Cosmopolis. Maybe not all – Rotten Tomatoes’ Top Critics rating is 53%, which is decent enough. But I’m surprised to see two prominent bad reviews at People Magazine and Us Weekly, and E! News is running a process story about all of the bad reviews in general. So, while people like Rob and he’ll definitely get more and more work, he’s yet to prove that he can do any kind of role but “sparkly vampire.”

Meanwhile, the Los Angeles Times has this unintentionally hilarious Sparkles interview – Rob sat down with David Cronenberg for the piece, and all of the asides with and about Cronenberg are hilarious. My favorite part is when Cronenberg subtly bashes the Twilight franchise – here are some highlights from the piece:

“Media culture is a monstrous thing,” Robert Pattinson lamented Wednesday afternoon, jamming fries into his mouth between puffs on his electronic cigarette. “You can’t win. The annoying thing is that you can’t attack them, but you can’t defend yourself. The best thing you could possibly do is punch a paparazzi and give them their big payday.”

Sitting alongside Pattinson for moral support at the Mandarin Oriental hotel on Columbus Circle was “Cosmopolis” director David Cronenberg. The Canadian filmmaker, whose challenging art house films almost never garner such wide attention, was there as a sort of buffer but also appeared to be quietly amused by the media circus. The actor’s manager would not allow Pattinson to sit alone for an interview with The Times, and even suggested that reporters not ask him about his personal life, or “Twilight.”

While both of his “Twilight” costars, Stewart and Taylor Lautner, have each taken center stage in studio pictures, Pattinson has mostly stayed in the indie world. His biggest non-“Twilight” film to date was last year’s “Water for Elephants,” a modestly budgeted period romance with Reese Witherspoon that took in a respectable $117 million worldwide. Pattinson’s less-commercial projects, however, have tanked at the box office — the Sept. 11 drama “Remember Me” only collected $8 million domestically in 2010, and the 19th century-set drama “Bel Ami” flopped in June, never expanding beyond 15 theaters.

Cronenberg, who adapted “Cosmopolis” from Don DeLillo’s book of the same name, said he felt Pattinson was right for the part largely because of his good-looking face, which appears in nearly every frame of the movie. Before casting him, the director watched all of the films the London native has appeared in, and viewed a number of interviews with Pattinson on YouTube to get a better sense of his personality.

“The strength of the ‘Twilight’ movies is not the acting,” acknowledged Cronenberg. “But it’s not understood that doing ‘Twilight’ requires presence and professionalism. Are you saying this is an Academy Award performance, or Alec Guinness? That’s a whole other discussion. But you throw somebody on a grueling set like that — a normal person would be dead in an hour.”

Warming to his own defense, Pattinson interjected: “With this movie people keep saying, ‘Is this gonna be the movie where he can prove he can act?’ It’s like, ‘What do you think I have been doing?'”

“By the way,” Cronenberg added, “he’s a British guy doing an American accent. People don’t realize that there are a lot of very good actors who cannot do accents, and they don’t give Rob credit for that.”

“Oh, give me anything!” Pattinson said with a laugh and taking a drag on his cigarette, which glowed an electronic red with each inhale.

Still, it’s clear Pattinson sometimes questions his acting ability. Before production began on “Cosmopolis,” he said he was so unsure of his ability to pull off the role that he sat “trembling, absolutely terrified” during the first screen test.

The nerves are somewhat surprising, considering Pattinson’s part in “Cosmopolis” doesn’t seem all that distant from his own life. Like his character in the film — who remains isolated in a limousine for hours as he slowly traverses Manhattan to get a haircut — Pattinson said that since “Twilight” opened, he has “had four years of gradually being put more and more into smaller and smaller boxes, and you have a desire to break out.” He’s also a part of the 1% — according to Forbes, he earned $12.5 million for the last two “Twilight” pictures — a number he says is “completely not true.”

“Weirdly, I went to the bar the other day and there were a bunch of people protesting some 1% thing,” he recalled. “I drive this kind of [junky]-looking truck sometimes because I started surfing — it’s this 2001 Silverado I bought off of Craigslist for, like, $2,000 or something. So I was hiding in the back of the truck when I saw the protest thinking, ‘I don’t want to get involved in this.'”

The demonstrators, Pattinson said, didn’t recognize him and a friend. “When the protesters saw us, they were like, ‘We’re not even shouting at you. You’re driving this piece of …. You’re not part of the 1%.'”

[From The LAT]

Yeah… I came away from that loving David Cronenberg: “The strength of the ‘Twilight’ movies is not the acting.” LOL. Thank you!! And then he goes on to say that all he learned about Robert from Twilight is that Rob is present and professional.

Rob also sat down with MTV, and he ended up talking about the end of the Twilight franchise, saying: “It’s an amazing experience. It’s a huge chunk of my life, and the end of the movie, the last few scenes, kind of look back at the whole series. It’s so sweet. I feel so much older now. The idea of if I had to do a sequel now, it would be like ‘I’m not 17 anymore.’ “ Here’s the video:

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

54 Responses to “‘Cosmopolis’ director: “The strength of the ‘Twilight’ movies is not the acting””

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Reece says:

    lol + 100000 for Cronenberg!

    The movie was never going to be well reviewed because the book is nuts. I’m still curious to see how it is adapted.

    • Emma says:

      Yep! I love Cronenberg. The funny thing with those outlets is that they’re only picking up bad reviews from critics who seem like they can be bought. A lot of well established critics like NYT, Rolling Stone, Variety have given the movie outstanding reviews and almost every critic has praised Rob Pattinson. Eh, what’s the agenda?

    • Jan says:

      I think 64% fresh on Rotten Tomatoes is well enough.

  2. TheOriginalKitten says:

    Cronenberg is amazing, a creative genius. Never really paid much attention to Pattinson but I find him very hard to dislike.

    Can’t wait to see Cosmopolis!

  3. Lila says:

    Lets look at this from a cronenberg perspective. 53% top critics on rotten tomatoes is his lowest score in a decade. This film underperformed in his home country as well as across most of europe with the exception of france (cannes promo) and italy even though robert and david did promo in several european cities. And 53% top critics on rotten tomatoes may be decent to you but that means you have to admit swath did really really decent bc it got a fresh top critic score of 63%. I think cronenberg wanted to take an actor who Industry people dismiss and say, i can make a mediocre actor shine. Cronenberg said during adm that he wanted to prove keira k could act. I think this was the same thing. Question is, is cronenberg satisfied?

    • ORLY says:

      The film did not “under perform” in his home country. In a city as big as Toronto, the film was only in 2 theaters. It was never intended nor expected to be a box office hit.

    • T.C. says:

      True about Cronenberg. Last year Keira Knightely was his pet project this year Sparkles. Does he want to win the prize of miracle worker? Lol. Sparkles is much nicer than Keira so I can’t hate on him. It’s like kicking a puppy. Hope he moves past Twilight and gets better roles.

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      The truth is that Cronenberg always has been and always will be a very polarizing director. Not every critic loves his work and Pattinson shouldn’t be blamed for that.

      Cosmopolis is a novel that has been largely criticized for DeLillo’s cold prose; trying to translate that isolated, removed feeling to film was a big focus for Cronenberg when making this movie. Make no mistake-his decision to cast Pattinson as Packer was a very deliberate and strategic one and had NOTHING to do with him proving that Pattinson can act. Why? Well because seasoned directors’ movies are not vehicles for actors to prove themselves, they are creative endeavors that mean everything to directors like Cronenberg-he’s not going to risk making a bad movie just so help out an actor’s career.

      Also, Cronenberg has stated many times that a large part of Pattinson’s draw for him was his physical appearance. Cosmopolis is a stylish and sci-fi like tale and Pattinson’s slightly androgynous, almost alien-like appearance matched the stylistic quality he was gunning for.

      I have yet to see the movie but I don’t think Eric Packer’s dialogue requires an Oscar-worthy performance.
      Ultimately, I trust that Cronenberg is satisfied with what Pattinson put out there.

    • Emma says:

      The Cronenberg movies that got him to the status of being an adjective “Cronenbergian” are the movies that are most polarizing. His highest rated movies are the more mainstream and conventional. Cosmopolis being so controversial is how people are able to recognize that Cronenberg is back to his old form. This is what made him Cronenberg.

    • Jan says:

      Check Rotten Tomatoes again…64% fresh for Cosmopolis and the reviews for Rob are outstanding.

  4. celine says:

    awww robbie.

  5. mia girl says:

    Reading the reviews posted on Metacritic (at 58 currently), you get a sense that the film is definitely provocative. It’s either a loved it (NYT, WSJ, Playlist)- or hated it (TIME, NYPost, USA Today).

    The MTV interview was great. Favorite part is when Horowitz asks Rob how it feels to be getting the best reviews of his career and he replies “It’s nice not to get sh*t on. I’ve been sh*t on a lot.”

  6. jess says:

    JMO, but I think Rob is the best actor from Twilight and hes the only one that I hope sticks around after the series ends.

    • Emma says:

      Rob has always clearly been the best actor from Twilight’s main cast in my opinion. Kristen has been in the industry for a longer time and is known to critics so even with her limited range they tended to fawn over her more. When Rob has been in the industry for a few more years and made more movies it will be obvious that he’s the real break out talent.

      • Anname says:

        And he is interesting, charismatic and likeable offscreen, so he should have a nice long career if he chooses it.

  7. HappyJoyJoy says:

    Is it weird that now that that dark cloud that is K-Stew is out of the picture I start to find him attractive? never thought much of him, but he’s kind of hot.

  8. foozy says:

    …as i said before, he should stay with kstew. she, unlike him, is a brilliant actress. he’ll end up nowhere, whereas she’ll go through hell for a while and come out on top..

    • menlisa says:

      Go away Kstew..

    • ORLY says:

      …and staying with the “brilliant actress” kstew will somehow make him a better actor? 😉

    • someone says:

      honestly, i have to greatly disagree. I have seen several of her films, all of which she’s played different versions of herself. Even in SWATH, she just seemed to play Kristen Stewart in a medieval costume. I tried giving her chances with different movies, and she just continued to be emotionless and twitchy…

    • Emma says:

      L.O.L.

    • another nina says:

      oh yeah, stew won’t drown ’cause stew is a shit …ahahahah

  9. Alice says:

    Well I don’t know how Bel Ami is going to be a success in 15 theaters!!!!Gees I am STILL waiting to see it! I totally LOVE that Rob stays pretty much with indie films-they ususally have substance and that’s what I enjoy. I can only wish him the best career and life.Have a feeling Cronenberg has really ehlped Robert through this tough time-more respect for him for that too.

  10. Jordan says:

    In other startling revelations, David Cronenberg states the strength of 50 Shades of Grey is NOT the writing.

    • Cindy says:

      LOL the strength of both Twilight and 50 Shades is that they play on all the people with daddy issues who think controlling men are romantic.

  11. booboocita says:

    Let’s face it: neither Don DeLillo, the author of Cosmopolis, nor Cronenberg, the director of eXistenz, Naked Lunch, and other intellectually challenging and decidedly weird movies, are light years away from the usual fare of the average reader and/or moviegoer, both in taste and in the demands they make on their readers’ and viewers’ intelligence. I’m not surprised that the NYTimes, WSJ and Playlist loved the film, just as I’m not surprised that Time and USAToday (which are both written at a 9th-grade reading vocabulary and comprehension level) didn’t. The NYT has never steered me wrong when it comes to movies, so I’ll be seeing this, definitely. I also expect to see a lot of confused, irate Twihards at the multiplex.

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      “The NYT has never steered me wrong”.

      I think that’s the key when it comes to sifting through movie reviews-find a source or a reviewer that most closely reflects your taste in films and if they give the movie a “thumbs-up” then you can ignore all the other critics.
      My guy is Ty Burr at Boston.Com (The Globe).

    • another nina says:

      NYT has 3 critics and they are very very different – like this Manola, who transferred from LA, is certifiably insane. I don’t like Stephen either but I agree more times than disagree with a third guy, whose last name I can’t recall at the moment, scott something I think.

  12. cynicalsmirk says:

    LOL!! The strength of the Twilight movies is indeed not the acting. Or the writing. Or the characterization. Or the original series of books, which were poorly written tripe, for as much of them as I could suffer through.

    The strength of the Twilight movies is that they are a virgin fantasy, with attractive casting and a target audience of young teenage girls. A gorgeous hero who will be always loyal and protective to his lady love, coupled with the fact that they can’t indulge in sex? Indeed, he refuses to hear of it!! Add in some occult themes, clashes with parents, conflicting emotions for more than one boy, and there you have it. What a well-manufactured obsession for a dreamy 13 year old, and perfect for them.

    I just don’t get the appeal to grown-ups.

    • Justyna says:

      +1 My young cousin forced me to watch the movies and to read the books (“You can’t say it’s crap without watching and reading it”) and I hated every minute and every page of it. The first two movies had decent music, that’s all but the last one was just terrible from the beginning to an end in every possible way.

      I don’t get the appeal even among the tweens and teens. They like to watch the movies and dream about the perfect relationship like the one the characters have and to look at the beautiful Prince Charming but Edward’s and Bella’s relationship is far from perfect – it’s totally toxic, the imprinting thing turned Jacob into a pedowolf so he’s hardly a catch either and the characterization made Pattinson look 10 times worse than in real life, so I’d rather watch his photos in the blue suit than waste my time on Edward Cullen.

    • Booboocita says:

      Two things:

      1. Maybe Edward and Bella are just an empty fantasy for 13-year-old virgins, but dammit, I’d rather little girls were swooning over some dude who wants to protect and cherish them morning, noon and night, than go bananas for trash like Chris Brown — and let’s face it, there are more than a few little girls who are doing just that.

      The Twilight books and films have some serious problems when it comes to woman-man relationship dynamics, but at least they’re nominally respectful of a woman’s right to live free of violence. I say nominally because I was infuriated when I read Eclipse’s cavalier dismissal of Jacob kissing Bella against her will (for crying out loud, her father’s the chief of police! His daughter broke her hand defending herself from unwanted advances! Shouldn’t he have arrested Jacob, or at least have had a more angry response than “Good for you, kid”?). I’ve never been crazy about the whole passive Bella/autocratic Edward scenario, and I’d have been happier if even once, Bella had looked Edward straight in the eye and said, “Cullen, eat a bag of dicks.” But Edward is polite to Bella, protective (yeah, overprotective, but still), and is at least willing to consider the notion that premarital sex isn’t always the best idea for young folks (no, I’m not anti-sex. I just think there are too many people jumping into bed with no heed for possible consequences.).

      2. I will always be grateful to the Twilight films for introducing me to the music of Sia and Muse. I’m an old fart, and I’m not always up to speed with what’s popular on the radio. I doubt I would have discovered this wonderful music otherwise.

      • T.C. says:

        Booboocita,
        Edward Cullen is a creepy 100uear old guy who climbs into the bedroom of a 16 year old to watch her sleep. He could lose control at any time and kill her. He is controlling, tells her who she should be friend with. Let’s not forget that 17 year old Bella gets married, knocked up, leaves her friends and family so she can die to be with Edward forever. You think that’s healthy fore a 13 year old to fall in live with? You twihards are insane. There are health relationships in many books not having to do with Chris Brown or Edward Cullen. Sheesh.

      • cynicalsmirk says:

        While I agree that a popular series of books and movies supporting abstinence is not a bad thing, the depiction of it takes away any self-autonomy. Bella and Edward don’t agree to abstain because it’s a good choice, but because they can’t do it or he’ll kill her. To me, that takes away the concept of actually making a decision. It becomes just a safe place, a non-issue for the young things this story is targeted at. No scary grown up choices necessary; just the prom king with no expectations.

        As the mom of a young adult woman, my biggest complaint about Twilight is that it showcases, and so somehow supports the idea that a 16 year old girl should have no friends and no ambition, be completely immersed in her boyfriend, and lock herself away at the thought of life without him. Is this the message we want our girls to have? That without a guy, life’s not worth living? That message is quite appalling actually, I really thought we’d all come a bit further than that in the last 4 or 5 decades.

      • Cindy says:

        Abstinence is great and all, but I would rather my daughter have safe sex with a normal boy than date a weirdo who takes apart her car’s engine so she can’t visit her male friends.

  13. Alexis says:

    Yes, because driving a piece of shit makes you not part of the 1%. Those particular protesters are silly.

  14. lo says:

    Just wanted to say cosmopolis is at 63% for top critics NOT 53% Kaiser.

  15. Skins says:

    I started watching the 2nd Twilight movie, but I had to give up after about an hour. I could not understand one word that Sparkles said the entire time

  16. Adeli says:

    Rob has also signed on to movies by acclaimed filmmakers David Michod and Werner Herzog, both to start filming in the new year. Nothing to scoff at.

    • Vee says:

      Adeli –

      Great point. Rob is being sought out by really interesting and acclaimed directors. He has talent and with his continued varied movie roles, I’m confident he’ll shed his “wooden Edward” albatross that so many want to shackle him with and succeed.

  17. sharylmj says:

    I like him so much more without her.. he seems more relaxed and at ease. His personality is sweet and humble. I hope he stays that way. He’s very engaging and real.

  18. Vee says:

    I’m a fan of Rob and not even close to a Twihard or teenager. I like this guy. He’s charming and funny and humble and sweet. He is being given the opportunity by top notch directors and he’s wisely taking them. He is making great choices career wise.

  19. GirlyGirl says:

    Cronenberg added “It’s not the writing either, or the special effects, or the costumes, or the music…. I think the fans are intensely rabid and the next installment could be Sparkles standing in a room for 3 hours and it would make a gazillion dollars”

  20. Flora says:

    I tried to watch this film, but had to leave the theatre after 30 min. This film is crap! It’s vague and infuriatingly pretentious and Rpatz makes Channing Tatum look like Al Pacino. Cronenberg is right about the acting in the Twilight films, but he fails to realise that Sparkles is partly to blame for that. This man needs some training/talent ASAP.

    • Anname says:

      If you only watched for 30 minutes, your critique is meaningless. How can you possibly pass judgement on something you haven’t even seen.

      This movie is a journey, but you barely made it past start. It’s supposed to be a difficult journey, and it’s definitely not for everyone, but that doesn’t mean it’s “crap”, just not to your liking (this is, what you actually saw of it).

    • Mazunte says:

      I also watched it a couple of months ago and I disagree with you. I think it is a very good movie with a powerful script and many great visual details. The dialogue is dense, it is true, so the movie requires some concentration. Pattinson has an estranged face, though handsome, which is perfect for the Cronenberg world, and Paul Giamatti was great. I loved all Cronenberg’s movies except Crash, which I hated.

  21. Lisanti says:

    north simple terms, learn how to find blogging which fit whatever i prefer to find out about? Does indeed any person learn how to Research blogging by topic area or possibly no matter what on blogger?

  22. Jaycee says:

    With the baseball cap, he looks like “Joe Average”.

  23. Mary says:

    Robert Pattinson is not yet a great actor but he will become one someday. Acting is a craft. You honed and learned from it. And only the willing like Robert could become great at this craft. As Mr. Cronenberg has said, here is an actor who hasn’t trustd his instinct yet as an actor but has shown subtlety in all his portrayals. Sadly, most of audience and critics as well, has been raised to believe of the histrionic acting of Jack Nicholson that we forgot what subtlety is.