Did Gwyneth Paltrow get herself a new pair of boobies as an early Christmas present? That’s the word over at Page Six. Though they don’t claim it’s anything drastic, they say Gwyneth is sporting some cleavage now, whereas she use to be flat as a pancake. And they also make a super creepy comparison to a 15-year-old.
SOME fans of Gwyneth Paltrow (above) wonder if her new curves are the result of more than her two hours a day working out with Tracy Anderson, who also trains Madonna. After checking out her cleavage on the cover of Gotham magazine, Gwynophiles are speculating she’s had breast augmentation surgery. “She didn’t use to have anything up top,” said one expert. “Now she does, and they are perky.” Paltrow, who’s been wearing micro-minis lately to show off her legs, flashes one breast in “Two Lovers,” her movie with Joaquin Phoenix opening in February. Says a fan who’s seen it: “It’s like the boob of a 15-year-old girl.” Paltrow’s rep didn’t return calls.
[From Page Six]
Look, I don’t want to hear than ANYONE has the boobs of a 15-year-old. Even a 15-year-old. I’m never one to defend Gwyneth, but I seriously doubt she had a boob job. Her breasts have always been very small and she probably has good genes. That’ll keep your boobs high. They’ve probably filled out a little bit over the years, but it’s either a good bra or Photoshopping. It’s a magazine cover, not candids. Paris Hilton is another small chested celeb who’s often the topic of implant rumors. Every so often she’ll wear a bra that hikes her boobs up to her neck, and it makes her look drastically different and everyone goes berserk. Then the next day she looks totally normal.
I’m not saying Gwyneth would have to go hog-wild and gotten a huge set if she’d had a boob job. But she still looks relatively small/medium chested in the pictures. It’s nothing that dramatically different. She probably just took all that Goop money and invested in some smart bras.
Here’s Gwyneth at the Cannes Film Festival on May 19th. Images thanks to Fame. Header from Gotham magazine.
I still prefer ‘breast’ to the other obnoxious word that seems to have infiltrated our daily lexicon. Gwyneth has a lovely figure in both pictures, and I hate her for it. Oops, I mean I’m envious of her for it. 😉
What is it with Gwennie and her undies, all the pics of late, even the ones with the super hot upper thigh muscles were mared by the creepy undie lines, and here again we are treated to that… ponderous is all im saying…
im gonna go out on a ledge here and assume that the photoshopper took a few liberties if you know what i mean…
I’m guessing she’s worked her pec muscles enough that they’re pushing her breasts out a bit (see: Goldie Hawn!), and she’s wearing excellent bras. Photoshopping is a given.
No. They look exactly the same as they’ve always looked. If anything, they’re smaller in the top pic, but what she’s wearing would do that anyway.
The two times I really became aware of Gwyneth’s boobs were “Shakespeare in Love” and that horrible chicken-cutlet dress she wore to the Oscars. She’s never been stacked, I’d say it’s probably just going up a cup size from pregnancy/breastfeeding?
I don’t even see what “extra cleavage” they are talking about here. I mean, it looks like they did that blush on the chest trick to make it look like there are lines. But if you look at the silhouette of the clothes, there is no extra….same size she’s always been.
Photoshop. For sure. I have to do that crap at work all the time.
Really? Don’t see it… but then again, maybe she’s pregnant like every other female celebrity in town who’s body changes from one photo to the next.
still droopy
She’s put on weight since she’s had children and some of it was in the breast area. She was stick thin before and in nude scenes in films was completely flat chested. I don’t mean to imply she is heavy at all, but now she is a bit more average size rather than Twiggy-size.
If she had breast surgery, she really got ripped off. They look like they always have, just a bit photoshopped, I would say.
Her tits look the same to me.
Maybe she’ll blog about it.
ZZZZzzzzzzz…
It’s a water bra or a push-up number. She needs a personality implant.
Are you blind? She’s still small and she had a child. The woman is still in her early 30s. It’s also called a pushup bra. Heck, I’m a man in my 30s and I understand that. L2PHOTOGRAPHOFWOMAN.
Sorry but I see nothing. Why would anyone want to enhance her boobs ever so slightly that the rest of us have to wonder whether she did or didn’t?
Lots of women have larger breasts after having children…and they don’t necessarily shrink back down once the breastfeeding is over.
Wonderbra and having two children in rapid succession are more likely than a breast augmentation, imo.
“she probably has good genes. That’ll keep your boobs high”. This woman is famous for her saggy rack. Share that good ‘chronic’ with everyone, JayBird.
I vote no boob job. She is healthier now so they could’ve naturally gotten a little bigger. She does need a stylist though. That dress on the bottom is fuggugly, like most of the ones she wears. And as far as the panties issue goes, at least she wears them and isn’t flashing her hoohah for the cameras.
that horrible chicken-cutlet dress she wore to the Oscars.
****************************************
You mean that pink thing? Good lord, what was she thinking of? She looked exactly like a plucked chicken in that dress. I never understood why the fashion commentators said it was such a great dress. It would have been, if somebody with some boobage had been wearing it. And that color was the exact shade of Bazooka bubble gum. Yuck.
Yeah, that pink dress really was awful. And the way the bodice dangled off her concave chest just made it worse.
“that horrible chicken-cutlet dress she wore to the Oscars”
No, that refers to that heinous black chiffon Goth-meets-Heidi schmatta that was nearly transparent on top, which gave an unfortunately clear view of Gwynnie’s chicken cutlets. Even worse than the Bazooka bubble gum dress, in which she was tragically incapable of filling out the bodice.
“an unfortunately clear view of Gwynnie’s chicken cutlets”
Thank God I missed that one. Why are some people so anxious to show off what they ain’t got?
photoshop!!
ugh it makes me FURIOUS when the photoshoppers add big breasts to pictures. like a woman is only attractive if she has big, fake, boobs.
it realllyyyy irritates me.
i like her small, saggy ones! at least theyre real.
She has a nice figure and she works for it. I don’t know why everyone on this site hates her so much. Her and Nicole Kidman always get mean comments here and as far as I can see both are low profile, classy and understated. GP is not a beauty, but so what? Not everyone wants to go under the knife to look cookie-cutter. I think her breasts were not enhanced. When you have a small frame, a different undergarment or a different time of the month make the bust look larger/smaller. I speak from personal experience.
Either way- her body was and is- very unattractive.
if she did, she didnt over do it, unlike others in hollyboo.
her blog is the dumbest thing ever…and i love it!