Scientifically speaking, Hugh Grant movies can ruin your life


The Daily Mail is calling it The Notting Hill Effect, but I’m calling it Hugh Grant Syndrome. Scientist have recently conducted research that proves people who watch romantic comedies are more likely to have unsatisfying love lives due to overblown expectations.

Researchers found that those who watched romantic comedies were more likely to believe in predestined love than those who preferred other genres of movie.

They were also more likely to believe that perfect relationships happen instantly, and were less likely to believe that couples need to work at relationships.

Watching just one romantic comedy is enough to sway people’s attitudes to romantic love, they found.

Dr Bjarne Holmes, who led the research, said: ‘We are not being killjoys – we are not saying that people shouldn’t watch these movies. But we are saying that it would be helpful if people were more aware and more critical of the messages in these films.

‘The problem is that while most of us know that the idea of a perfect relationship is unrealistic, some of us are still more influenced by media portrayals than we realise.’

[From Daily Mail]

The study maintains that people who watch romantic comedy films are more likely to believe in fate and soulmates, and tend to be more forgiving of cheating by their lovers. Score one for the Hugh Grant Syndrome name being more accurate.

The idea is that they set themselves up for a greater fall if they succumb to the ideals put forth in stories about instant and perfect love, even when they know better. Not only do they expect love to happen quicker, but they expect more from their partners as well. It easily becomes something neither party can live up to.

I think this phenomenom pre-dates Sleepless in Seattle by hundreds of years. Maybe we should blame Hans Christian Anderson, or even the Brothers Grimm. Actually, if you read Song of Solomon in the Bible, it sounds like a script for a present day romantic movie. We have rom-coms and previous eras had fairy tales. The idea of “happily ever after” has been entrenched in our psyches for as long as there have been stories to tell.

So I guess we can’t blame it all on Hugh Grant. I’m still blaming him for my attraction to English accents, though.

Hugh Grant is shown in a still from Notting Hill and in a more realistic candid out in London on 11/17/08. Credit: WENN

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

14 Responses to “Scientifically speaking, Hugh Grant movies can ruin your life”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Jeane says:

    Duh. I’ve been saying this for years. We’re all being brainwashed into thinking life is some kind of fairytale, when in reality it’s a lot of hard work and mostly very boring. This is why everybody (including me!) loves christmas, it’s like a holiday of make-believe peace and joy!

    By the way, I never found Hugh Grant very attractive until Bridget Jones, where he’s a total jerk. I wonder what that says about me…?

  2. Alix says:

    Andersen…

  3. Syko says:

    You mean I’m single because I like chick flicks?

  4. adleisia says:

    I blame Edward Cullen and Jamie Fraser for my unrealistic expectations in love. Hugh Grant does nothing for me.

  5. meow mix says:

    I have been saying for years that the only reason that fairytales were invented was to keep the young female population from jumping off of cliffs.

  6. joe says:

    Men who watch his movies are destined to get caught being sucked off by transvestite hookers also.

    😛

  7. rbsesq says:

    What a crock. They have it backward. Movies don’t give us unrealistic expectations. We already know what to expect, and it’s not pretty. The movies let us escape from the reality of our far from perfect lives.

  8. naive_charm says:

    Brothers Grimm and Andersen wrote stories about incest, cannibalism, death, and punishment. They didn’t really specialize in the optimistic, happy-go-lucky romantic department. Maybe you’re confusing it with how Disney whitewashed their stories?

  9. Ling says:

    The Princess Bride did it for me, actually. For some reason, I can’t take rom coms seriously, but I absolutely can take the sprawling fantasy period epic seriously.

  10. kate says:

    i hated that “notting hill” movie. the scene where julia roberts’ character is sitting with a bunch of people -including someone in a wheelchair- complaining about her life of being a movie star actually made me leave the theater. but i thought hugh was very hot in the first bridget jones movie…his character was so naughty. grrr!

  11. Jessica says:

    Adleisla I agree, Edward Cullen. Now there is my perfect man! Super strong & obsessively protective, MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM.

    Jeane I agree with you, although I have tricked myself into denial. How do you not be depressed with that outlook?

  12. Aspen says:

    Well, it’s really unfair to blame Hugh Grant. Jane Austen has been selling the fairy tale of melodramatic love and fortuitous rendevous with Prince Charming for more than 200 years.

    Screw Edward Cullen. I want Fitzwilliam Darcy.

    Weak-minded people don’t need romantic comedies to mess up their love lives…but it’s sure nice to have something to blame.

  13. Sarah says:

    Yeah, Hugh Grant spoiled it… as any other Englishmen with that great London accents such as my bossboss (!, yeah, I am nuts), the doorman at Harrod’s or other random guys in the tube talking to their London chick gfs.

    So, thanks for telling, I need therapy now…

    PS: What’s the thing with that Cullen-guy? I guess, I am too old for that…

  14. Sickitten says:

    Ceil, this is a great write up. You hit the nail on the head. I think we should all sue Mattel toy company and Disney for damaging the psyche of many women. Kidding but we need to be aware of the damage.