A few days ago, Jennifer Aniston’s publicist specifically denied that Jennifer and Justin Theroux were going to get married in Hawaii in a little while. Which doesn’t mean much, because her publicist specifically denies crap that’s true all the time. Even though Justin has a place in Hawaii (this fascinates me), I kind of doubt that they’ll actually make everyone fly to Hawaii to celebrate their love, though. My Spidey Sense tells me… LA area, maybe Malibu, and maybe Cabo as a secondary option. Anyway, Radar has an interesting story about Jen’s family planning for after the wedding – maybe adoption. Maybe surrogacy.
Jennifer Aniston’s nuptials are imminent, and her steps to becoming a mother are moving faster by the day, RadarOnline.com is exclusively reporting. The former Friends star has been taking adoption advice from Charlize Theron, who’s a close pal of Jennifer’s bestie Chelsea Handler. And while she hasn’t decided if she does want to follow in the footsteps of Charlize and Sandra Bullock, Jennifer now knows enough if she wants to proceed down that route.
“Jennifer has been quizzing Charlize about the adoption process thanks to Chelsea, who put the two in touch with another,” a source tells RadarOnline. “She’s seriously considering that as an option, given her age and the fact that Charlize says it’s the most rewarding thing she’s ever done.”
“But she hasn’t decided entirely, with surrogacy another possibility for Jennifer because she definitely does want to have kids. However, at the moment she’s just concentrating on her wedding to Justin. After that, she will decide what to do next,” the source reveals.
As RadarOnline.com previously reported, guests invited to Jennifer and Justin Theroux’s wedding are anxiously awaiting the details.
“Indications are it’s going to be a small, private affair with just a select few invited,” a source told Radar. “Those that are going have been told to expect a call at short notice, drop everything they are doing and head to the location when revealed. Guests have heard rumors about the wedding being held in Hawaii or even Greece, but most expect it to be staged in California.
“One person who has been told to expect a call is Jen’s mom Nancy. She has been told to hang by the phone for a call any day now with all the arrangements. John Melnick, Jen’s half-brother, has kept Nancy up to date with everything that’s going on as she continues to go from strength to strength after her recent hospitalization.
“Nancy can’t wait to be there at Jen’s big day having missed out on her first wedding to Brad,” the source revealed.
“She’s seriously considering that as an option, given her age and the fact that Charlize says it’s the most rewarding thing she’s ever done…” Does that bug anyone else? Like, it didn’t occur to Jennifer that adopting a child would be rewarding until Charlize said it? As I always say with regards to Jennifer and her decades of baby-baiting the media, actions speak louder than words. Jennifer and her publicist can play the “Jennifer talks about babies!” thing until they’re blue in the face, but until Jennifer’s on the cover of People Mag with an actual baby (as opposed to a doll, I suppose), I just feel like… meh. We’ve heard all of this before and it always comes to nothing. I would like nothing more than to actually have a pregnancy, surrogacy or adoption story to write about for Jennifer, but this baby-baiting the media thing has been going on for like 15 years.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
Correct me if I’m wrong—-but I thought before she said adoption is not her thing? I can’t help wondering why the article name-dropping Theron here. Hmmmmm…
Of course this is nothing but old Aniston name-dropping someone much more famous than she could ever dream to be. As for “adopting”, yes indeed Aniston said that was something she was never going to do, it just “wasn’t for her”. Old Aniston is determined to stay in the news, it must be a challenge for her PR team to dream up story after story, lie after lie, why can’t she just go quietly away like most other hasbeens, oh no, old Aniston has to buy a gigolo, plant daily stories via her publicist, coat-tail Brad and Angie, and just basically annoy everyone with her presence.
That’s right, the “lulu” handle is taken, by me, no other person has posted here as “lulu” since me, unless it’s one of those FF slags who never has an original thought in their empty heads.
Yes, I have seen posts, as you say, by ‘lulu’. But not Lulu. However, I certainly would not want people to think you and I are one and the same, so I’ll start posting as Lulu.T.O.
JA: So I have questions: have you gained any weight, did you HAVE to cut your hair, can you get them in a French style, and is there any way I could store it at your house when I go to Cabo?
CT: No, no, yes, no.
JA: Awesome. So are you getting more fashion spreads or is it mostly E! hits?
CT: …..Probably both.
JA: Can you get trained acting ones? Is that what you got?
CT: I don’t know….no..
JA: How much is a really good child stylist?
CT: —-
JA: Do you think Justabulous will photo better with a boy or girl? I was thinking Heath Ledger, girl, edgy, but then there’s the Uncle Terry baby picture thing.
CT: — I don’t really —
JA: Finally, do you know if they are allergic to tanning? Because that would be a deal breaker. I don’t want something that looks like tofu.
CT: I really must go —
JA: Don’t forget to tell everyone we had this talk!!
That was funny, and oh so true. As for Charlize, some have asked if Huvane is her publicist, I don’ think so, unless she’s changed recently. But something really interesting is that Stephen Huvane’s brother, Chris, is west coast editor os none other than GQ, so that’s why Aniston is always at the top of these ridiculous “polls”, and Kevin Huvane is Aniston’s agent, or at least one of them, that was a gift from Brad Pitt, he had to call in a favor for them to handle a “tv” actress, even though Kevin, himself has probably turned her over to an underling, she’s not exactly Meryl Streep, who is also a client of Kevin’s, not Stephen (publicist). The gay Huvane brothers are an ambitious group, and strange too that all 3 brothers turned out to be gay, “not that’s there’s anything wrong with that”.
Hey, @Lulu, that handle is taken. Try again?
Ding ding! Winner!
Hilarious.
Why wouldn’t she discuss adoption with HER friend Sheryl Crow adoptive mother of two? Yes she told Mario Lopez adoption wasnt for her.She also said she wouldn’t do artificial insemination when she was promoting Switch but she supports women who choose that option.
Oh please, she and Justin don’t want kids. It would interfere with their drinking, smoking and tanning schedule in Cabo. I will be absolutely shocked if these two ever have children whether natural, surrogate or adopted. I honestly do not think she wants kids (which may be the reason Brad was so attracted to AJ since she already had one and he got to play surrogate daddy during Mr.&Mrs. Smith).
No shade on Jennifer and Justin. I don’t think they want kids and her PR people should just stop with the baby stories.
Im totaly with you and i Think her pr Team makes Jennifer look realy bad. Not good for her Image. she just should stop to talk about it at all. but well, on the other side, it is what she does for her living. it is her Job to talk about her private life. nobody wants to see her movies, they just want to see the fairytale Ends good, finaly.
Because there’s a 99.9999% chance Aniston never spoke to Charlize about “adoption”. Can you even imagine Aniston with a child of color, she’s only seen with people of color if absolutely necessary, unless there’s a child of Brad Pitt’s out there available for adoption, you can put this story in the “absurd” category.
“Can you even imagine Aniston with a child of color, she’s only seen with people of color if absolutely necessary”
THIS!
I’ve never seen her with anyone of color other than Oprah. That was during the “pity party” tour.
When I say “people of color”, I’m referring to anyone that’s not lily white, she goes to Mexico, as long as she never has to come into contact with “Mexicans”, the woman is a racist through and through.
She was asked some years ago if she would be open to adopting, and her response was a flat-out NO.
Yea true. I havent ever changed my mind either.
Aniston is consistent, she rarely wavers, look at what she does, eats the same food (but still manages to gain 20 pounds), has the same hairstyle forever,plays rachel in every bad romcom,never lets anyone forget she was married to Brad Pitt for a WHOLE four and a half years, pays men to date her, and last but not least, hires trashy women to bad mouth Angelina Jolie and the JP children.
Yeah, I remember that. Maybe it was just a dig on Angelina and she’s changed her mind in time but I suspect this is just the tabloids way of keeping the baby story going now that the bio clock is running out on the pregnancy story lines.
WTF?
I think she was asked in a 2005 Vogue interview about adopting, and she said, “That’s not me.” But since Brad and Angelina were about to pick up Zahara I thought that maybe she’d had advance warning from his assistant and that what she meant wasn’t “I wouldn’t adopt, it’s just not me” but rather, “The rumor you’re thinking of is about Brad and not me.”
Her hair looks crazy messed up in the back in all of these pics…….
Ya got SEX HAIR and ya got it from meeee yeaa. Andy Dwyer has a song for everything.
I really don’t think she wants kids. Of all the things I dislike her for that is not one of them. Wish she would be honest about it though.
I agree. There’s nothing wrong with not wanting children.
Amen.
Also, I wanted to say that at my wedding reception a pregnant girlfriend of mine asked, “When are you going to do this?” and pointed to her belly. ON MY WEDDING DAY. I replied, “Well, let me at least get out of my wedding dress first.” Jesus, kids weren’t even on my radar that early on. Anyway, this story about what JA is going to do about BABIES when she’s still planning her wedding annoyed me. It’s like marriage to some people is just a means to an end – the end being BABIES, of course. Women get married to reproduce! Ugh.
As an aside, I have 2 boys now and love them dearly. And having or not having children is such a personal thing. I wish more women were vocal about their choice not to, and I wish society (especially other women) was more supportive of them.
True.
When I was enjoying my life as a single, people would say “When are you going to start looking for a boyfriend?”
And when I have a boyfriend, they would say “When are you going to get married?”
When I married already they would ask, “When are you going to get pregnant and start a family?”
When I have one already, they would say “Don’t you think it’s time for your child to have a little sis/little brother before you get too old to get pregnant again?”
It’s a never ending cycle. Sigh…
Thank you!! All of that 🙂
I find it so annoying when married ppl can’t stop asking you when you will marry, then they have babies and can’t stop asking you about it, and so on and so on. Usually the only ones that can’t say anything are the ones that have a carrier, no marriage and no babies and are demonized if they praise any of these things in their lifes. Yes, people are different and not everyone is looking for the same in life. Maybe if ppl could live without having to fulfil society expectations, we could all be a bit happier. So, no hate for JA if she doesn’t want to have a baby, but it would be nice if she would just admit it.
@Rhea
It’s all about
a) Their trying to validate their own choices
b) Their being so boring they have nothing else to talk about.
Don’t even think about it.
ups, wanted to say career and not carrier 😉
Exactly. Motherhood is an over rated experience in MANY many ways. I could care or less about the occupancy status of her womb, that is why we have the michelle duggars of this world.
More than likely it’s too late for bio kids, and that’s OK, she doesn’t have to want kids, just stop with this incessant pregnancy (laughable at her age) story planting by her PR guru. If she doesn’t want or can’t have kids that’s her business, but don’t make it running tabloid fodder for years on end.
I think she would lose a big portion of her fan base if she just outright said she does not have a desire for children or to me a mom ever. Though that is completely OK (IMHO), it would turn off a lot of people who would take offense to that. Another PR strategy.
I dislike her for it only because she continually lies and baits the media about it. She is so married the image that she portrays that she keeps talking about kids she doesn’t actually want because if she dared to be honest maybe people would go, “Oh, well Brad did so I can see why they split” and then she couldn’t play the victim anymore. It would ruin her victim/girl next door image.
This is just another plant to keep her in the headlines. She’s realized that at her age now, pregnancy rumors are likely to be ignored.
Just because someone said “no” to something years ago doesn’t mean they can’t change their minds. Especially when it comes to fertility.
She’s getting married again – I would give her the benefit of the doubt that she’s considering kids. But am super annoyed by these stories.
Oh, please. If you want something you do it. Simple as that. She and Brad were together for 7 years and married for 4. And nothing. She has friend like Sheryl Crow who did it on their own with no problem. If Jen honestly wanted kids she would have one by now.
No matter what she does she will get crucified by the haters.
Just as you do with Jolie. Hypocrite.
it seems like it is so easy for celebrities to just adopt a childe. Do they have to go on a waitlist or do they just throw money?
Sandra Bullock applied to adopt three years before getting Louis.Money always helps,Im sure.My cousin adopted a,child months after applying, the birth mother really liked her bio.
Several have adopted kids in their own countries, like Nicole Kidman and Charlize Theon, so perhaps waiting lists are not as long there. And Sandra Bullock had discussed the process and it doesn’t seem like there were any short-cuts. In the United States, adoptions are quicker if you are not specifying the blonde, blue-eyed baby.
What I object to is baby as PR stunt. I don’t think any of the women above are guilty of that at all, but there are plenty who seem to use their kids as props.
To me, Aniston just doesn’t seem like mother material. I can’t see her focus being on anything other than drinking, tanning, obsessing over her food intake, and going on vacation. She strikes me as way too superficial and self-involved for motherhood. And the guy she’s with seems too immature. When you’re still trying to prove yourself as alternative at that age, you’re probably not the most secure guy.
Which kids are you referring to of Nicole Kidman’s?
She gave birth to the first one and used a surrogate for the second one…
@Emma I guess she means Connor and Bella were adopted in Australia??
Connor and Bella are not from foreign countries. They were adopted through Scientology from other Scientologists. Charlize Theron and Sandra Bullock both adopted in the States and both were on waiting lists. Charlize mentioned in an interview that it took her two years to adopt and Sandra it three years. I think people just assume because the see celebs with kids that they got quickly them because they’re rich and famous but we have no idea what’s going on behind the scenes because of the fact that most adoptions are confidential.
Rachel will never have kids… That’s more of a Phoebe thing.
🙂
Well, I read it’s either a baby or a new hairdo. Whichever makes her seem younger…..
Funny (and sad).
Tabloids know this stuff sells and gets attention, so they keep it going.
If they do decide to have a kid, great. If not, great.
Maybe she doesn’t have kids because she hasn’t met someone she wanted to have a child with yet…
Too late now, at 44, to be thinking about getting pregnant for the first time, and no, I did not say “impossible” but highly unlikely even if she underwent extensive fertility treatments, or used a doner egg. But really, does anyone think for a second that Aniston would want someone that might take attention away from her, heck no.
Perhaps PERHAPS she wanted children with a partner. Who knows? I love how everyone is an expert in all things relating to a celebrity’s life.
The original Lulu.
Jennifer wouldn’t get married in Malibu as that is where she married B.
*Yawn*
Aniston seems like she’d be an uptight, pedantic mom. The type who won’t let their kid eat in the livingroom because THINK OF THE COUCH AND THE CARPET! That’s when the nanny has a break, that is, and Aniston allows the kid to see her between manis/pedis/drinking/massages/tanning/ getting a haircut.
More tabloid BS. She has already stated her view on adoption. And yes, Kaiser, the implication that she didn’t know parenting was rewarding until Charlize told her, bugs. Big time.
From the article: “One person who has been told to expect a call is Jen’s mom Nancy. She has been told to hang by the phone for a call any day now with all the arrangements. John Melnick, Jen’s half-brother, has kept Nancy up to date with everything that’s going on as she continues to go from strength to strength after her recent hospitalization.
“Nancy can’t wait to be there at Jen’s big day having missed out on her first wedding to Brad,” the source revealed.”
LOL!! ‘Staged’ is the key word above. Jen is ‘shamelessly’ catering to her delusional fans, who (hopefully) can now (finally) see that this woman religiously reads every single thing written about her in the tabloids and then has her PR guru manipulate the press–and her fans–accordingly.
Likewise, wouldn’t she already know the rewards of being a mother from her former BBF Courtney Cox, or from being Godmother to Courtney’s daughter Coco?
And the Oscar for Best ‘Famewhore’ in Hollywood goes to … Jenifer Aniston! You go, girl! 🙂
That’s exactly what I was saying above. She’s famewhoring the baby stories. If she were interested in kids, you’d see her hanging around with her friends with kids. You don’t. Those friends (Cox) have been dropped in favor of friendships with childless party girls (Handler).
Not a chance Aniston’s Mother will be invited, nor will the younger brother that lives in a van with pictures of his sister half naked plastered everywhere. It will be interesting to see if any of the gigolo’s family shows up, they’ve not exactly been vocal about this “wedding”, then of course who would be proud of a middle-aged gigolo as a son. As for being a “godmother”, Aniston stated years ago that she “did not babysit and don’t even bother asking her”, when asked about Courtney’s daughter, so that pretty much tells everything we need to know about how Aniston feels about children.
I still don’t believe that JA wants kids.Maybe the tabloids want her to but she doesn’t.There is no way she is waiting around to be a 50 year old mother.
Isn’t all 3 ladies mentioned rep’d by the same publicist?
I don’t think she’s interested in babies, but FWIW, at age 44, she’s not in need of a surrogate as much as an egg donor. Unless she has a history of miscarriage (SJP), if she wanted to go the ART route, she’d presumably try IVF with donor eggs first.
But these are stupid conversations. There’s no indication she’s baby hungry. 20% of women over 40 never have a child. It’s not a crisis. Sheesh.
Why is Charlize Theron everywhere? Shes in the middle of everything. Lol its like her desoerate attempts to go after fassbender. Omg those were embarrassing how she gushed about the guy and he didnt really retuheron the same manner. Is her career waning or something, because she seems to be doing pretty well.
I definitely do think Charlize has finally realized how to play the “game”.
She realized that even though she’s one of the most beautiful actresses and a fantastic actress (watch Monster!) to boot, she has absolutely zero box office draw.
Mark my words, it’ll be 5 years until she stars solo in something again….until then, she’ll just keep doing big budget movies that don’t depend on her to be successful (Hancock, Prometheus, SWATH)….
For a girl’s girl, Chelsea Handler only seems to have made all her female “best friends” in the past 2-3 years……
Also, I mean this seriously…if Jennifer adopts, do you think she would go for a blonde/blue-eyed baby or an ethnic one?
I feel like she wants a blonde/blue eyed one but obviously an ethnic baby will make her seem more “open minded” and blah blah.
I was wondering that too. I imagine she would go the Sharon Stone/Sheryl Crow route.
If she went for a blonde/bue-eyed baby…..i guess that answers your ethnic question. Yes, the ethnicity would be of blond-blue-eyed people. Inter alia: EVERYONE belongs to an ethnicity, including white people. Sheeeeesh!
“her steps to becoming a mother”?
Bwahaahaa. I guess the pregnancy ship has sailed, and now everyone is boarding the adoption boat.
I would rather read about her hair.
There is a special niche on Celebitchy for Aniston discussions, but I notice that the reaction to the wedding stories on ROL, TMZ etc have been pretty underwhelming.
I think this story is an attempt to up the ante. The shared representation of the parties named makes it obvious.
I did not know that Charlize and Chelsea Handler were pals. Wow. Pardon me while my mind boggles.
A lot of women don’t want to adopt. They feel like it won’t be the same bond as having the child be yours genetically.
so jen might be opening her mind/reconsidering after talking to someone who has been through it
Is this the point that we’ve come to now? Where (seemingly) perfectly healthy women won’t even TRY to get pregnant themselves in favor of turning to surrogacy?? I take no issue with surrogacy in and if itself for families who actually need it (infertility, illness, gay couples), but ever since that Sophia Vergara story last week (“She and he didn’t wan’t her to ruin her beautiful body!”), I’ve been left really scratching my head about this…
No one should forget that women who act as surrogates are living, breathing human beings with feelings, families, careers and private lives of their own and deserve the same respect as all women. I worry about the implications of surrogates starting to be treated like mere “wombs for hire” *shudder* by healthy, rich, privileged and or famous women who just don’t feel like being pregnant or “ruining their bodies” (MAJOR shudder). If it’s the case then it’s unbelievably exploitative and a very slippery slope for all of us.
I hate to argue, but I would gladly hire a surrogate if I could afford it. My first pregnancy and the resulting ppd were absolutely horrific. And even if it wasn’t hard for me, I’d still love to do it just so I could spare my body the strain and stress that everyone inevitably feels. I can’t blame these stars for using these resources. And it’s not like being a surrogate is equal to being held against your will in a human trafficking ring. These women willingly do this and they get paid a fortune.
To me, not being able to suffer the aches, pains and inconveniences of being pregnant suggests that you’re not ready for the responsibility and sacrifice of being a mom. If you have true health issues, and it sounds like you did, I think that’s different, but going straight to surrogacy because pregnancy is inconvenient is different, especially when you have no idea how pregnancy would be for you.
That is so, so judgmental. Don’t ever say that someone isn’t ready to be a parent because they’re not up for pregnancy. You don’t know her story, you don’t get to say things like that.
Patrice have you read The Hand Maid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood? The story is similar to what you describe, only much more horrific.
Patrice – That is already happening in India! Rich women go there to buy a womb. it’s disgusting because these women get little to no pay. Their living conditions are awful.
Just because she wants a baby? What about what Justin wants? He didn’t seem to want kids before….I feel he just goes along with whatever she wants since she’s the upper hand.
She’s probably the one who’s paying the bills, so she’s the one who makes the big decisions. He’ll go along with it until he meets a younger and prettier meal ticket.
I’m sorry to both Janet and Kellyinseattle! My comment was meant for cece, above! Carry on.
Wow. That was harsh on more than one level. Mommy wars are alive and real. Why not just say something along the lines of, “this doesn’t sound like something I’d do, but to each their own”, and leave the judgement out of it? The motherhood experience, or lack thereof, is different for everyone and to criticize the way one person or another arrived at it is quite narrow, IMO.
Well said.
LOl at the comment saying motherhood is overrated. It is to YOU, perhaps. Maybe your mom did not nurture you, or you have other issues regarding that. But I roll my eyes when single childless (what is with the insistence with ‘childfree’ now, people so overly sensitive) women rant about mothers and how they have ‘nothing more interesting’ to talk about. I am a mom and do not ask when anyone is having kids, including close friends. It is not my business and they can share news when /if there is any to share. But the anti mother brigade annoys the ever loving hell out of me, it sounds bitter and ugly and just as bad as someone who harps about when someone will start bearing children
I am a 40 year old woman without kids and am not a fan of the terms childless or childfree…neither one feels right somehow. Anyway, I agree with you that there are some very militant childfree people out there. I think they feel marginalized because they are in the minority and have had to deal with a lot of negative comments about not having kids over years. Unfortunately, as a result some get very defensive and negative. I don’t like it. I have chosen not to have kids for various reasons but if my life circumstances were different I probably would have had them. I really enjoy kids and don’t click with the militantly childfree people but I think I understand to some degree where they are coming from. It’s annoying to have to justify/explain your decision not to have kids on an ongoing basis and to feel like you are an oddball because you did not do what they majority of people do. Still, there’s no reason to be nasty or criticize other women’s choices just because people criticize yours-I have problems with that on either side of things.
Thanks @ Becky1- good explanation, and rational. I have a few friends the same age as you who have apparently dealt with that sort of scrutiny (people asking why no kids) at their jobs. Even more invasive b/c um, you can’t go off on them the way you want to as it is work. Sigh. I wish people could just be ok with their choices and those of other people. Makes sense to me!
I noticed some people speculating if Aniston would adopt a blue eyed/blond kid only. And.. if she wanted that, sooo? Again, her life, her choices. And I like both JA and Jolie’s acting so no one can slag on me here lol. But does it make her a bad person for not deciding to adopt a kid from another country/ethnicity? Nope. And I know pro adoption people say people who choose to ‘breed’ (lovely word lol) are selfish and should take an unwanted kid. But that is not for everyone. Some choose IVF, surrogacy, or to adopt a kid from whatever ethnic group they are, etc. Point is, a lot of projecting and assuming going on and it’s not fair or factual. It’s kind of ridiculous. As for people calling JA flat out racist, haven’t heard stories about that. Couldn’t find links on any either. It’s odd people think that though.
Who cares!? I am sick of being told you are a self centered person or less of a person for not wanting children. I do not want children. I do not want to be responsible for the lives of others and I enjoy my freedom. I don’t not even really like children for more than an hour at a time, depending on their age. I like my freedom to get up and go. Her not having children does not make her vain and so what if she considers it a lot or not? Maybe she’s torn into between freedom and diapers. A concept I can’t fathom, but hey, to each their own.
Maybe the much younger Heidi Bivens could be their surrogate Mama? 😀
DONT BOTHER DOING IT FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS..GO TO CABOS …HAVE ADRINK
First of all, ROL is an arm of the National Enquirerm so there’s that. Next… as it reads (by, again, ROL), being told how rewarding it is to have a kid versus actually being around kids just doesn’t ring true, unless you’re the most shallow person on Earth.
That said, it’s Aniston and Theroux’s business whether they’re going to have kids or not. I’m hoping that this isn’t just more baiting, because seriously, why waste the time and energy on that.
The main problem people have with Jennifer is that she’s ” boring” or that they feel insanely hurt that she’s said she wants children and doesn’t have them yet. Why? There are other vapid stars who have done things far more offensive and who take far less credit. Is it really just an attempt to invalidate her because she was once married to Pitt? Because no other excuse seems legitimate enough to believe tabloid articles like the bible and scream on every thread that she’s a famewhore. Even Kim k doesn’t get the same vitriol. People just roll their eyes or skip the article. At the very least they remain logical and articulate in their comments. ??? Someone care to explain?
People are not “hurt” that Aniston has not had kids. Annoyed that she strings the media along and plays this baby card for years!! She will probably talk about babies past 50.
It is how she acted after her divorce. She and her pr team acted like BP did the worst thing EVER. She cried to Vanity Fair, had the writer bash AJ, cried some more, screamed at the ocean, had her friends bash AJ some more.
She said a cartoon of her holding a gun while talking to Jolie was the “funniest thing she ever saw”.
She is a famewhore. Her pr team sends weekly stories to People about how she glowed at dinner, how she is happier than ever!!! Never forget that every year she is happier than ever.
Annoyed is ok. Peeved is ok. I’m annoyed at Zachary effron when he’s in a movie, for example. That level of annoyance is normal. To go on an abrasive attack about someone you don’t know and who, by all accounts, hasn’t done enough of anything to deserve the punishment? That’s a little weird. That’s all I’m saying. If she’s shrewd and wanted public sympathy, why is that equitable to someone who has committed murder? As feeling human beings, it should be a default to feel bad for someone whose husband left them. I would think. If she’s your zach effron, and you hate her acting, that’s one thing. To HATE her because of the Pitt association suggests that you think she’s a big enough threat to need your condescension. Pitt and Jolie are doing fine, right? I would think if all was well in your mind about it, there’d be no need to “handle” Anniston. She’s got nothing to do with them anymore, even if she tries.
@Wingnut, who wrote: “If she’s shrewd and wanted public sympathy, why is that equitable to someone who has committed murder? As feeling human beings, it should be a default to feel bad for someone whose husband left them. I would think.”
(Blinks) First of all, I don’t think anyone on this thread has accused Aniston of behavior worst than murder. If so, please point out the post, if not … melodramatic much??
Second, it’s not that Jen connived to get sympathy and attention after Brad wanted out of their marriage to be with Angelina Jolie, it’s that its nearly a ‘decade’ later and she’s ‘still’ trying to get sympathy and attention because she divorced a man 8-years ago after he confessed he was attracted to another woman and wanted to be free to act on his feelings.
By the way, where is your defense and compassion for Heidi Bivens? Now ‘there’s’ someone who deserves our sympathy.