Here are some photos from last night’s De Grisogono Party at the Cannes Film Festival. I was going to lead this off with Sharon Stone (who looked AMAZING), but I decided to go low-brow with Paris Hilton and her headpiece. It’s unclear to me who was the “star” of the party – both Sharon and Paris posed a lot with the De Grisogono dudes and it seemed like Paris was even called on stage to dance or something. Plus, Paris is just desperate for attention, so let’s give it to her.
Sharon Stone wore Roberto Cavalli, and honestly, her body looks WAY better than most of the 20-something girls trying to pull off Cavalli anyway. I think the dress is what it is – sexy, tarty, obvious. Sharon wants attention and why not? She looks amazing. Perhaps some fresh – and extremely well-done – plastic surgery? It’s also notable that Sharon’s young boy-toy wasn’t there. There were some rumors in last week’s tabloids that she was over it. Maybe he didn’t even come to Cannes.
Alessandra Ambrosio in a surprisingly beautiful dress in a color that few women could pull off. She looks great.
Stacy Keibler seems to be flying under the radar more and more these days. I have no idea if she and George are still together or what. It’s almost time for George’s summer at Lake Como – is Stacy going to fly from the south of France to Como? Oh, and I like her dress too.
Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.
THAT’S Paris Hilton? Dear God.
Have you ever heard this rumor about Paris? P. Hilton is HIV positive and she spent her first year in LA as an independent apartment hooker because her parents would not support her. She was a favorite of young Hollywood because she would f^&* bareback.
She looks like a clone of her mother; that is NOT a compliment to someone who is 32 or 33.
I saw that rumor on CDAN yesterday, but I thought it was a troll. Herpes? Yes. HIV? I seriously doubt it.
That is such nonsense. Good try, troll! But points off for transparency.
Bread and Circuses = Paris
paris gets a “girl, that’s not your eyebrow color” from me, but the rest of em look pretty damn amazing……
But it is her eyebrow color. She’s neither blonde nor blue-eyed. Astonishing, how long she’s kept up the façade …
She’s definitely trying to go for a more ’80s look with the heavily contoured eye makeup and the drawn on eyebrows.
I like the look, but not on her.
Paris looks like a very special snowflake delicately wafting on her way to a pile of yellow snow.
This made me spit out my coffee! LOL!
You win for best imagery today 😀
ouch – very well phrased
i can’t imagine how uncomfortable it would be to wear color contacts 24/7 like that.
especially paris hilton gets photographed a lot with flashes. it would be not good for her eyes…
Wait, what?
Are colored contacts bad for your eyes or something? Because I wear contacts for about 12 hours a day or more, and they don’t bother my eyes. And camera flashes don’t especially irritate them either.
I’d imagine as long as you’re cleaning them properly and keeping eyedrops nearby you’d be fine.
Colored contacts hurt. I’ve tried them and couldn’t bare them for more than an hour or so.
They’re also TERRIBLE for your eyes-some brands can do permanent damage if you wear them all the time.
Wow. I wouldn’t have thought they’d be that much different. I was considering buying some acuvue color enhancers. I wonder if they’d be as bad.
I’ve worn a few for costumes for conventions–they’ve been ok for me except for the silver ones for my Riddick costume. Those itched like a mother because they were thicker than normal contacts.
I’m with Monica. I’ve worn them to conventions many times, and they don’t hurt at all as long as you get and eye exam and order them in the proper size.
I’m not a doctor, but if you don’t have an issue with wearing regular contacts 12 hours a day, then I doubt you’d have issues with the coloured ones, as long as they’re in your size and prescription.
Though when I recently tried to switch contact lens brands I had an issue – my doctor wanted to switch me to some brand that had newer technology or something. I put the samples in and within a few minutes my eyes were drying out. I tried to give them a chance for the day but couldn’t manage it. With my usual brand I can leave them in for 12 hours or more with no problem.
I tried to switch to some of those opaque AcuVue colored contacts and HATED them. Been wearing soft contacts since they were invented and these made me crazy. Wore them to a nighttime concert and could not see a single thing. The opacity obscures a wide retina (nighttime) and blocks your vision.
If you have light eyes and want to TINT them another similar color, like blue to green, not opaque, no problem. But my best advice is to try out the opaque ones before you spend a lot of money on them like I did.
Allergic to a contacts could seriously irritates your eyes. My sis couldn’t open her eyes for 3 days,and whenever she had to open them for a prescription eye drops from her ophthalmologist, she would bloody scream. It was a nightmare.
I found that I’m also allergic to a certain brand during my graduation party. It was a cheaper set than one that I usually have, thinking I could save some money. Needless to say, I was in a red, teary eyes in all my pictures! Everybody thought I was very emotional during the ceremony when in fact my eyes were hurt, to the point that I have to took the contacts off and went to the stage with a blurry vision coz I left my glasses in my car. LOL. Thank God, I didn’t trip and fell in front of thousands people!
I decided not to take my chances anymore and just stick to one brand after that.
Welli hate that I know this, but Paris’ contacts are hand painted and cost thousands of dollars, per pair. I wear contacts and know they can get uncomfortable sometimes. But let’s face, women do painful things for beauty ie Kim’s sausage feet.
And that clearly failed because it was so not beautiful…
I have congenital vision impairment, and when I was 19 had a brilliant optometrist who suggested contact lenses.. In my case, the closer the lens to the eye, the better for my vision, hence contact lenses. As I got older my vision has deteriorated further and I now wear glasses as well as contact lenses.
Contact lenses are a foreign body in your eyes, so they will irritate the eyes. It takes about two weeks to get used to them. Ophthalmologists usually advise wearing them for short periods, morning and night, gradually increasing the times until you are wearing them all day. I’ve found this is the best method. If you leave them in too long at the start, they will scratch the cornea. I think some people think you can just pop them in and off you go. Not so. I’ve never tried the obviously coloured ones, though, but since I wear contacts all day every day with hardly any bother, I’d probably not have any trouble with them.
@ VioletCrumble (awesome name btw!): how long ago were you first prescribed contacts? When I was first prescribed contacts 20 years ago, all the strong scripts were coloured. (Or at least, that was all I was offered.)
Not fully opaque like the cat’s-eyes costume ones you can get, but far more than a handling tint. About this level of colour: http://eyeinfo.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/enhancer1.jpg
They finally started making disposables in my script about 5 years ago. I tried them for a week, and quickly figured out why the lenses I’d been using were coloured … when you’re blind as a bat, you can’t see a handling-tint-only lens once you’ve dropped it on the floor!
I have no idea how you’ve managed to cope with non-tinted ones (it sounds like your script is stronger than mine if you now need glasses”+ contacts).
She appears to have ptosis (wonky eye), which is actually exacerbated by contacts
Her eye issue is rumored to have been a botched eyelid surgery.
As for contacts, the party type that you can order without a doctor are the ones that can permanently damage your eyes. Contacts that you get through your optometrist aren’t supposed to hurt.
Back when I wore contacts (before LASIK) I tried the colored ones a few times and the didn’t seem different. But I have light colored eyes, so I suppose they were tinted, not colored. Those may be more hard core.
Anyone else read about that crazy surgery that turns brown eyes permanently blue? Stroma, I think.
Eye color can permanently change as a side effect of some prescription drugs and some medical issues, it can also change slightly naturally as we age. I’ve heard of a laser procedure, Stroma, to change eye color but it’s not FDA approved yet.
Ooh Sharon no.
Stacey Kiebler wins: age appropriate,glamour and a good fabric.
Holy crap Paris Hilton looks…older.
So stop with the tiara. 2001 called. It’s mad.
That yellow dress looks like something you could smuggle snacks into Iron Man 3 with. It’s not that cute to me. It is obvious I also have zero fashion sense.
She does look older, but I think it’s mainly the makeup.
Lmao!!
As far as Stone is concerned, side boob is ok (sort of) but under boob is never in style.
Everyone else looks beautiful, with the obvious exception of Paris. She has been enjoying another moment in the press, which I hope ends with Cannes.
But Sharon’s side boob looks a little too saggy (or maybe I’m just used to seeing perky fake side boob!). She does look good though.
Alessandra always looks like a drag queen wearing minimal makeup. She has such masculine features and I think her zero body fat just makes her features look more harsh and masculine. Beautiful dress though.
And I like Stacy but she always looks cheap. I don’t know why – she looks good — but cheap.
Sharon FTW!
Bitch is working it, ’tis true.
Sharon is who I want to be in 10 years, she’s gorgeous! She is really owning her age and showing the rest of us you don’t need more than a tiny tweak to age gracefully, sexily and happily. If she’s done more than botox I would be amazed. And she uses the botox with a very light touch.
Definitely. She has lines and her face doesn’t look like a rubber mask. She just looks like a healthy, vibrant older woman.
I agree with both of you. She has the perfect amount of wrinkles. And I’m not saying that to be mean. She looks incredible — so natural and fresh-faced and glowing.
I agree that Sharon is just stunning but she has had more than a bit of botox!@ Definitely mini face lift. When they are done right like hers it is almost impossible to tell. Except no women her age has that jawline and placement of cheek fat naturally. It just doesn’t happen. However I want the name of her surgeon!
I think she looks great, but that dress is ugly
She looks amazing, and it’s not just a doctor’s touch, she clearly has good genes.
Alessandra looks stunning, hands down!
She’s the most beautiful out of them all. American women have nothing on her.
I say weirdly shaped head/face accentuated by the awful hair, and an ugly dress, but JMHO
I think Stacy Keebler looked better than anyone.
I really like her dress and I have nothing against Kiebler but she often looks like Vanna White/Vegas Showgirl/Beauty Queen to me.
I don’t think it’s really her fault-it’s just a combination how she styles herself and her natural look, which is leggy with kind of plain features.
I agree. I think it is the generic blonde thing, coupled with her styling, coupled with the way she poses on the red carpet. (As if to say, “And HERE’S what’s behind curtain #2!”)
That said, her shoulders are SICK. She looks awesome.
Paris = who cares.
Sharon also looks great, but the peeping boob just looks droopy.
Amazing shoulders and her legs are incredible. But yeah you nailed it with the description of her posing.
Alexandra is so often a hot mess on the red carpet, it’s wonderful to see her looking absolutely divine and right in every way.
Paris’ left boob… What is on the edge? Tape?? Gross.
I was Coming to ask why Stacy’s cleavabmge looked Marbly!?!
The boobs were my complaint! The gown wasn’t fitted correctly on Stone, hence the side/bottom boob. And stacy’s implants are clearly visible.
I think Sharon Stone has an amazing face and body, but what’s up hairline?
I think it’s a cutlet, I noticed it too, she should have taped the dress to ensure the cutlet didn’t show.
Since Stacy started being styled by Brad Goreski I think she routinely looks better than “higher tier” celebs she attends events with.
I agree.
Sometimes…but she still somehow seems to retain that budget look. I think her dress looks kind of prommie here and her makeup looks cheap. She does look way better than when she first came onto the scene as GF of though.
Paris is only 32? She’s morphing into her mother… which is not necessarily bad, but, she looks so much older for just 32 somehow
I was thinking more like her aunts. Kathy has been looking rough lately but in these pics Paris, Kim and Kyle all look about the same age.
Paris is really starting to age. She looks so much like her mom here.
I’m sure I saw that Cavalli dress on someone else ages ago. Sharon’s boobs are totally wonky, one of them is being pushed up by all that ruching. Not a good look.
I love the skirt of Ambrosio’s dress, the way it drapes, but the top part looks like a really cheap, tacky halter top a teenage girl would have loved in 2001.
I hate Stacy’s dress. It’s so similar to what you see in suburban ‘formal’ dress shops. Nasty fabric, dated design. Plus her boobs look uber fake here, which I’ve never actually noticed before.
You can see the ripple in her right breast. Yuk.
Was beginning to think I was crazy but felt the same way about Stacy’s dress. It looks like a prom dress. And, while her body looks good, she’s lost so much weight, she’s gone from toned to lollipop girl.
Have to disagree a bit about Stone. Not a fan. Never have been. But she looks good! She looks fresher than any of the others and since no one in Hollywood has real anythings, her fake ones look as good as the others! And, unlike the others, I don’t think she’s doing fake hair anyway. So tired of weaves!
Paris just looks excited to be invited somewhere, anywhere. She always looks awful.
Stone looks amazing.
Kim Kardashian, your future’s calling….
Alessandra & Stacey look the best.
Sharon=under boob=No!
I refuse to waste (more)type space on that other one.
Sharon looks stunning and far fresher and soft looking compared to Paris. Paris isn’t aging well and is looking a lot like her 45-year-old aunt, Kyle, of RHOBH.
I actually love Paris’ look, just not on her. Headpieces are awesome and that dress is amazing!
This year’s Cannes just seems so budget. I know there are always lots of parties, but the real class and stars just seem to not be around.
Not to just pick on Keibler, but besides being Clooney’s (ex?) girlfriend, what exactly does she do? Stone used to be a working actress at least, but I just don’t get the others. Hilton looks so strange, but I guess she always was and just wants attention. Just not impressed with this crowd at all.
And you forgot Tamara E and the other really odd D List and lower group attending all these parties. When a former WWE wrestler, known pretty much now only as GF of is considered one of the more famous guests, Cannes needs to reboot. And Paris…does she not get she’s a laughing stock?
I find it kind of refreshing to see something about Paris. So tired of the endless pregnant lady actually got/looks fat posts on Kim Kardashian.
Paris’ agent?
Actually, I have to agree. I am so tired of Kim posts that a little Paris throwback is kind of…yeah, refreshing. And no, I am not anyone’s publicist or mother or dealer.
Why do people keep saying that? Both of them need to go and stay gone. Why a choice, they are both overexposed, talentless attention whores. If I HAD to pick though, I would still pick Kim…
Agree! Sick of Kimmy! Kim overload! Fun to see how Paris has aged physically not mentally!
I think Paris has crossed the boundry into costume. I think it’s the scent of “party girl” clinging to her pores that’s makes her look aged.
I imagine she smells like desperation, vomit and lip gloss, ew.
G-damn, Stone looks good.
Casino has been on a lot lately and I’d be hard pressed to say she’s really aged that much! Don’t care for her bitchy attitude that you often read about but I’ll give her credit for all of her AIDS charity work and for her apparent ability to NOT age.
I love Stacey’s dress, but I am not loving that “dent” in her left boob. Time for a new pair, girlfriend.
Love Sharon! She looks great. I am pleased to see the older ladies getting their “sexy on”.
Pairs looks cartoonish in these pictures, and seems to be ageing rapidly.
THe ONLY one who looks good is Stacey Keibler.
Paris looks horrible and is not aging well at all.
She needs to stop her child-like posing she looks ridiculous.
How does she manage to arch her back AND slouch at the same time? So predictable.
She think’s it’s so hot and it’s so not. She looks like a swayback nag every time.
I yet have to see a Cavalli design that i like. It always looks so trashy.
Sharon stone has had a tasteful facelift. You can tell, and I know her surgeon. 55 yo faces are a little more lax- Botox can’t help that.
yep, i agree. she is the picture of good plastic surgery. looks natural but good. wish i would have the money for her surgeon when i get to be her age!
Paris’s face looks odd. More than usual.
Alessandra looks awful – her face looks more manly than ever. Her bod is great but I don’t think she looks beautiful at all. Unless it’s the angle of this pic.
Paris must have hired a new PR firm. She’s had more press in the last couple of days than she’s had in the last year.
Hurts to say it, but I love Paris’ pretty, pretty princess outfit. Yay for flowy dresses and sparkly bits!
I miss crazy Sharon..
Sharon looks the best by far!!!!!!!!!!
Of anyone
Sharon Stone is a perpetually hot bitch!! Love it! Her skin looks really amazing.
Paris’ clothes ALWAYS look like she is going to a costume party…no matter what. Her gawky Big Bird body doesn’t help and neither does the fact that she’s a washed up hag trying to act like a 20 year old. F A I L.
Sharon looks amazing. I scrutinized. Well done, and I’d like to have your contacts, Sharon.
PLEASE don’t start bringing Paris back. please??
she and sharon stone… overblonde, overbaked, blah, blah, blah…
Paris – you are looking more and more like your Mom. She is HOT.
Looking like your Mom when you’re 30-some years younger – NOT HOT.