Gwyneth Paltrow’s literary critics back-track about that Hamptons fundraiser

This is an Instagram photo Stella McCartney posted yesterday. Gwyneth Paltrow doing some kind of “No leaks!” tampon-commercial jump-pose. I guess the bikini is designed by Stella? I’m surprised it fits. Because nothing Stella designs ever fits. As I was glancing through Stella’s Instagram, I was reminded that Gwyneth had also attempted social media too – she has a Twitter page. She hasn’t tweeted since April 12th. What’s up, Goop?

As you can imagine, people are still talking about Gwyneth’s appearance at the East Hampton Library fundraiser, where “authors” signed copies of their books, etc. We covered the shade being thrown at Goop earlier this week – Jay McInerney tweeted something and Cristina Oxenberg wrote a blog post slamming Goop. So what really happened?

Dennis Fabiszak, a spokesman for the library, said it was no big deal.

“There was not a disturbance at the event. Gwyneth helped raise a lot of money for the East Hampton Library. She signed a lot of books for guests at the event. We are very thankful to Gwyneth and all the other great authors and look forward to having them back next year,” he said in an email.

McInerney told Speakeasy today that his tweet was a reflection of reports from Oxenberg and others at the party, though he noticed “a hubbub” that he figured was surrounding Paltrow.

“I was reacting more in sympathy to Christina than to any personal injury,” he said. “I was seated about 10 places away from Christina so I was mostly engaged with the people who had actually come to see me.”

Fabiszak also said Oxenberg’s blog post “was meant as a funny yet slightly snarky post that got blown out of proportion. The author has written a clarification piece.”

[From the Wall Street Journal]

Catherine did write a “clarification piece” but it reads like one of my mock-posts on Lady Gaga’s high art or my coverage of Gwyneth’s “wardrobe suggestions for peasants.” Here’s Oxenberg’s piece:

Allow me to clarify, the divinity Ms. Paltrow was perfection itself. Gorgeous, and sweet and thoroughly professional. She was mobbed by adoring, worshipful fans and at all times she remained poised and gracious. Her bodyguards were only doing their job. And in fact she did need them.

While my writing style is cheeky and irreverent, my goal is simply to spin entertainment.

I’m delighted so many readers found my account amusing, I thoroughly enjoyed myself that day. And frankly I was grateful for the material as I knew it would make writing my Sunday blog all the easier. It wrote itself. It’s just that I then forced the episode through the meat-grinder that is my sense of humor, merely to jazz things up. Certainly not with the intention of hurting anybody’s feelings, or ridiculing anyone, that is not my style. Honestly, I have no beef with Gwyneth!

That’s entertainment, folks!

[From Oxenberg’s Facebook]

Lainey thinks that Gwyneth is so powerful, she had the criticism shut down. I’m not so sure. I think both Oxenberg and McInerney realized too late that when they were talking about Gwyneth, they would be reaching a wider audience than they expected. What was meant as “just among friendly elites” bitch-fest turned into a wider audience who now thinks that all parties are rather immature.

Photos courtesy of Instagram, WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

54 Responses to “Gwyneth Paltrow’s literary critics back-track about that Hamptons fundraiser”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. UsedToBeLulu says:

    I love that bikini!

  2. Andrew says:

    She doesn’t annoy me like she used to. She also looks great in those pics, hope she keeps that look. I know we joke about her bring an author and everything, but she just looks proud about what she’s done in the last pic. Can’t judge the book since I haven’t seen it, but I just really like her right now

  3. Amelia says:

    The second picture:
    “NO! Get your peasanty, junk-food eating, *filthy* hands AWAY from me!!!”

    • Little Darling says:

      It was used as a caption this for Michael K…that would have been a great one! 🙂

  4. kibbles says:

    Am I the only one who doesn’t find her the least bit attractive? She’d actually look a lot better with an extra 15 pounds. Maybe she’d have more curves. There are celebrity bodies I envy and hope to someday attain through exercise and a healthy diet, but I absolutely do not envy Goop’s body and definitely not her face. Insane that someone as plain looking and unhealthy as Goop thinks she’s all that and has made a career of telling people how to eat and exercise.

    • Darkladi says:

      Thank you. She looks like a piece of knobby, bleached out drift wood. I did not get that most beautiful woman thing that People did

    • sarah says:

      I agree!

    • V4Real says:

      You are definetely not the only one. With or without make-up this woman is not attractive. Even when she was considered big shit I never saw her appeal.

    • MonkeyTowz says:

      I agree. She’s about as sexy as the puddle of cat vomit I stepped in this morning.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      I’ve never seen the big deal, either, about her body or her face. I don’t think she’s unattractive, just not remarkable looking in any way.

    • sullivan says:

      Hmm. I think 15 lbs would be a bit much. She looks fine. She & People Magazine made her looks a giant target with The World’s Most Beautiful Woman cover. That was an eye-rolling stretch. It seems to make people want to point-out her flaws as proof that she is not worthy of that title (for whatever that “title” is worth).

  5. aims says:

    still pretentious, and refuse to give her any of my peasant money. She’s so much better then me, so won’t mind.

  6. Little Darling says:

    Is this the best line ever???

    Allow me to clarify, the divinity Ms. Paltrow was perfection itself.

    That is snark at it’s BEST!

  7. mimi says:

    Kaiser, I agree with your take on this…that both authors realized after-the-fact how their criticisms were being received by the general public so they decided to issue explanations for their original comments to soften the blow.

    • TrustMeOnThis says:

      Jay McInerny is a conceited, misogynist jerk. That he was one of the critics was a disappointment to me in the first place.

      I do agree that it went farther than expected, but I also think the library contacted them both and said “hey, knock it off, we need the money!”

  8. Annie says:

    I rather liked the “putting it through the meat grinder” and “having no beef” lines. Lolol

    • NerdMomma says:

      Hahaha I think the snark is 100% intact in this “clarification” piece, if only from those two lines

      • Liberty says:

        Me too. It then softens into a light “who, me?” apology (I do imagine one of the GP bodyguards breathing menacingly into her ear as she types!), but the tang of snark is still there. And why not? Gwyneth can comment as she pleases endlessly about what the world eats and wears and does; others should have the same right.

        Just because it isn’t pretty doesn’t make it false, a wise man once taught me.

    • Charlotte says:

      yes, she was being literal; she most definitely did not have beef with Gwynnie. Not any. At all.

  9. MademoiselleRose says:

    She either needs to get a boob job or put on some weight. She doesn’t have a curve on her. She looks like a boy. I find her incredibly unattractive.

    • Dingo says:

      Goop is often a little annoying, but I think she has a nice body. She trains a lot for it but is not scary thin – try and compare her with Jolie or Bosworth.

  10. Lisa says:

    Only peasants tweet in summer. Important people are off on holiday or at library fundraisers.

  11. Eleonor says:

    ” adoring, worshipful fans ”
    nothing less for the perfection itself. LOL

  12. lisa says:

    in those white dress pics, she looks like she is covered in butter

    some people need mascara, goop is one of them. she looks like a mole

  13. j.eyre says:

    I am so disappointed they backtracked.

  14. Jennifer12 says:

    I think that’s true. I don’t see ANYONE sitting under a table eating meat at these events. I think people were mocking her and then felt bad that the pieces were taken seriously.

  15. Bodhi says:

    Lainey thinks that because she is up G’s ass, hard core. Gweneth doesn’t have the power to “shut down” anything more that tabloid stories

    • Wrachul says:

      I usually enjoy reading Lainey and agree with her take on things a lot of the time, but her worship of her “G” is something I can’t get behind. I don’t think her people shut anything down either. I think their remarks garnered more attention than they expected and they’re just backtracking a little, softening it up. And the author’s follow-up blog post was pretty amusing.

    • Keats says:

      Right? Otherwise she’d have had the whole internet shut down ages ago.

  16. taxi says:

    Oxenberg re-snarks & her husband, McInerney, backs off? Wish I’d been a fly on their wall because I’ll bet she tore him a new one.

  17. junegorilla says:

    DO you think that she actually considers herself a writer? Like all of those bimbo Bravo housewives call themselves writers? What baloney.

    • aims says:

      yes I do. I think she takes herself very seriously. In fact, Saint Paltrow will be curing the worlds problems, one at a time. She’s that amazing, eyeroll.

    • pantalones en fuego says:

      I am sure that she thinks that she is a serious writer. Much in the same way that she considers herself to be a “working mother”.

  18. Decloo says:

    Can’t stop laughing at your description of Goop’s jump pose. I was a kid model and did that exact jump pose for a tampax ad.

  19. Guesto says:

    I preferred yesterday’s version of events. I hate when people backtrack.

    Oh and that’s a very ugly bikini.

  20. paranormalgirl says:

    I was there. No one could get past her bodyguards to get to their tables. And why on earth would she need bodyguards? No one else needed them. It was a fundraiser for a library that was mostly attended by very well heeled, well behaved, wealthy people. And her line for book signing wasn’t any longer than Padma Lakshmi’s or Lidia Bastianich’s line. While I didn’t buy a word of Christina Oxenberg’s “stinky steak” and “burger” thing because the food at the reception was mostly Swedish in nature.

  21. velourazure says:

    I really need for Gwyneth to disappear from life.

  22. pantalones en fuego says:

    Maybe it’s because of the post Met Gala article that said that she had BO there but to me, she looks kind of stinky in these pics.

  23. Ally8 says:

    “I have no beef with Gwyneth.” Lol, I think this is a smart-alecky reference to yesterday’s steak & burgers.

  24. Mitch Buchanan Rocks! says:

    In the second photo Goopster looks just like Chris Martin.

  25. judyjudyjudy says:

    I think it is nonsense that these two people didnt think their comments would get around. They just learning about the internent? ha.

    They made fools of themselves over CHARITY. But the truth is I never heard of her and dont care about him, so there’s that. Pffft.

  26. Chris says:

    Her face and her neck are hideous.

  27. Chasay says:

    PROOF:

    She’s not vegan: Youtube video: “Gwyneth chicken”

    She’s cooking meat and in her blog you can see her with lobsters!!
    Lobsters and chickens are ANIMALS!!

    She’s A FAKE.

  28. judyjudyjudy says:

    by the way, she looks great in that bikini!