Cressida Bonas steps out in a backless halter ensemble: tacky or sexy?

wenn21443146

Cressida Bonas went to a public event last night, so as you can imagine, the UK papers are in a tizzy. Nevermind the fact that Cressida is no longer attached to the eligible ginger prince, and nevermind the fact that everyone on his side is saying that he’s over it and happy to be single for the summer. Still, Cressida might be trying to “pull a Middleton” – Kate did this kind of thing when William broke up with her in 2007. Kate was suddenly everywhere. Her skirts were shorter, her blouses were more low-cut, and she went out all the time with Will’s group of friends.

So, Cressida stepped out in this revealing ensemble to the Art Antiques London Gala. She was there with some girlfriends, including Princess Eugenie (Eugenie was host of the event). Afterwards, Cressida stopped by Tonteria and maybe partied with Justin Timberlake. The UK papers are going crazy because Cressida’s halter top is completely backless and she flashed some modest sideboob in a couple of the photos from the gala event. SCANDAL. The pro-Kate people are like, “See? Cressida flashes her bits too. Tsk tsk.” To which I say… Cressida is never going to be Queen of England. Sorry, Kate. You still need to wear panties.

I hate this Daily Mail headline too: “Cressida Bonas switches up her style with copycat Kate blow dry and daring backless top as she joins Princess Eugenie and Sarah Duchess of York for Art Gala.” The Mail needs to stop claiming that every woman is “copying Kate.” Is Cressida twirling her sausage curls at an official event for veterans? No. Is she flashing her bum while working? No. Thus, Cressida is not copying Kate. At least not in the way The Mail thinks. Cressy may be following The Middleton Method to win her prince back. Alternate theory: Cressida doesn’t want to be a royal bride because she wants to be a “star” all on her own.

wenn21444425

wenn21443148

Photos courtesy of WENN, Getty.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

81 Responses to “Cressida Bonas steps out in a backless halter ensemble: tacky or sexy?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. aims says:

    Tacky. If it was better fitted on top then I wouldn’t have a problem with it.

  2. MlleJuliette says:

    That outfit is tacky as all get out.

  3. Abbott says:

    She’s gorgeous, but what is with the Juicy Couture-looking pants? I half expect “Q T” to be written on the butt. Or “Princess.” Ugh.

    • heidi says:

      She’s so frail and unhealthy looking, not a good look. If I looked like that I’d keep covered up

      • LAK says:

        Dancers are deceptively strong. There is nothing fragile about them despite appearances.

      • M.A.F. says:

        While that is true LAK but is she still dancing?

      • LAK says:

        MAF : She has the muscle tone of a dancer, not just in her back, but her limbs as well so i assume she’s still attending classes.

      • Dame Snarkweek says:

        I think she is too thin but I begrudgingly think LAK is right. Dancers are lean and lithe but strong and healthy. I say begrudgingly because a lot of young girls will ignore the hard physical regimen of exercise and healthy eating and just starve or binge. Sad.

      • FLORC says:

        LAK’s dancing/muscle tone facts/argument aside she does not look unhealthy.
        Her back is strong. We’re not seeing ribs and vertebra, We’re seeing defined muscle.
        This is a strong, healthy back.

  4. Alexis says:

    That outfit isn’t my style, but I don’t think it’s tacky. She’s young and slender, she can pull it off.

    • Ag says:

      i used to have a top like that (minus side boob visibility) way back in college. oh, the early 20s… 🙂

    • Dame Snarkweek says:

      That dress is so ill fitting that if Cressy so much as steps on her own hem she will, indeed, pull it off.

  5. Talie says:

    She’s definitely taking from the Kate’s post-breakup playbook. Although, it does seem that Harry has firmly moved on from her for whatever reason.

    • LadySlippers says:

      •Talie•

      I actually disagree. I think this sends the solid message that she does not want to be Royal. Kate was sexy but still covered; this ain’t sexy or appropriate. To me it looks as if she’s going the Koo route, not Kate’s.

      • Rice says:

        Yeah. I don’t think she wants to be a princess anymore. She looks over it. Or she’s a great actress.

      • LadySlippers says:

        •Rice•

        I think her issue has always been whether or not she wanted to be a royal. And she’s always leaned towards a no. The press however, wanted everyone to believe otherwise.

      • minks says:

        I don´t think that she is trying to win him back. Other than Kate, she does not want that kind of life. She comes from old money, is very well connected and has a lot of access. So why would she trade her comfortable life into a life in public, wearing boring / conservative dresses and cutting ribbons?
        Also, I don´t think she would take this movie role, when she still wanted to be a member of the royal family.

      • FLORC says:

        Yea. This just isn’t what Kate did.
        Cressida isn’t out there as much as Kate was. If this is it this is not the Middleton Hail Mary Kate did to get William back that last time.

        I do LOVE those pants.They look kind of dirty though. Maybe it’s better in person.

  6. InvaderTak says:

    I was ok with it before I saw the side boob. That makes it a big no.

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      I actually thought it was kind of sexy until I saw that.
      I just can’t with the side-boob.

      • FLORC says:

        And while it’s a great side boob I can’t like a top that shows that much side boob.

    • LadySlippers says:

      And it’s almost all her boob in one shot. So this is a beyond tacky for me (the whole outfit is a mess).

      However, her hair and make-up were stunning. And Sarah and Eug were smashing.

    • JenniferJustice says:

      My thoughts exactly. I thought she/it was sexy and playful, but then….waaaay too much side boob. I don’t think she realized how much showed when she moved around and the top blouses. She seems very conscious of it in the last couple pics like she’s trying to cover herself. So glad I don’t get followed by paps. I have made clothing mistakes. How something hangs and looks when you’re standing still, erect and in perfect posture is not necessarily how something looks once it loosens and you’re moving around. But nobody followed me and took pictures.

    • someone says:

      It’s not even good side boob. It’s just meh. She’d have come off more sexy not showing it.

      • InvaderTak says:

        Do you have an example of a good side boob? I hate side boob but if someone did it right I’d like to see.

      • FLORC says:

        InvaderTak
        I hope link posts. Other bits are side boob on youtube.
        http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/08/sideboob-on-other-things-photos_n_1578363.html
        Huffpo side boob slide show.

        Great Family Guy clip for this. Peter documents side boob in TV. Family guy Side boob should do the trick.
        Red Carpet Oscar side boob has a few examples of how it works.

        What it comes down to is no sag, so fake, small, or amazing gravity defying chests and only showing about 40% or less of side boob. That’s the science.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      Agree. Side-boob never looks flattering or elegant. Looks like an accident.

    • Tiffany :) says:

      I think side boob can look very sexy if done in moderation and on certain people. I think this was actually cute…but the 2nd shot is too much sideboob. It looks fine in the 3rd picture IMO.

  7. Allie says:

    Awful outfit. I do love her hair though. I don’t like her at all.

  8. DanaG says:

    Cressida knows she won’t be a princess or we wouldn’t be seeing so much side boob. She wants to be an actress, Harry is better off with someone who wants to be with him.

  9. maria says:

    It looks good from the front but from the back it’s ugly. But maybe I’m just jealous her tits are perky :/ Damn you e cups!

  10. Hillshmill says:

    It looks cute and appropriate from the front but it’s just SO big and poorly fitted from the back. That doesn’t look like intentional, well executed side boob but rather tacky ‘I can’t buy clothes in the right size’ side boob.

  11. Beatrice says:

    Her hair looks really good, but I don’t care for that top–she’s lucky she didn’t flash a boob! Yes, seems she’s using the Middleton playbook to get Prince Ginger back.

    • LadySlippers says:

      •Beatrice•

      Go look online, she flashed boob. A lot of boob and there’s no way she didn’t know as that top is VERY loose.

    • Bohemia says:

      I love her hair but the top looks super tacky from the back. A near hit. She certainly has a beautiful face.

      To me, her behavior since the breakup is obviously an attempt to get Harry interested in her again. But that’s just me! Why else would she go from sparkly high-top sneakers to a more high-end look within weeks? When someone’s behavior changes, there is usually a reason for it. 😉

  12. Anon says:

    The top is the least of her problems here. It looks like pajama pants with heels? This look is a mess.

  13. Regarded says:

    The side-boob is tacky but pales in comparison to not wearing underwear on a windy day in a fluttery dress.
    On a side note, I hate how media in general always tries to pit women against each other.
    Can’t we acknowledge that Kate is a tacky exhibitionist without a single regard for the potential of her position, AND that Cressida has poor style and needs to ditch that ridiculous outfit, without making it World War 4? Smh.

    • DameEdna says:

      It’s not only the media who pit women against women. I’d say with comments like “tacky exhibitionist”, we do a darned good job all by ourselves.

      • Regarded says:

        Fair point!
        But in my defense – I would say “tacky exhibitionist” is pretty accurate. I think Kate is tacky because her style is tacky at times – what with the huge sausage curls and her button obsession. It’s not really a slam on her character.
        As for calling her an exhibitionist, she has exposed her nether regions numerous times, so…

  14. Peri says:

    I’ve always just thought she wanted to do things her way aka she wants to be a star in her own right not as “Prince Harry’s Girl/Ex-Girl”. No shame in your game. Do your thing, girl!

  15. Miss M says:

    Tacky. Side boob showing..

    Ps:Is it only me seeing the underwear line? Or is the light In the photos combined w/ the fabric?

  16. Laura says:

    The outfit is fine, but I would’ve used fashion tape to avoid any flashing.

  17. Jackson says:

    Royal castoffs need to go the way of Clooney castoffs. They only get the spotlight when they’re dating the dude.

    • LAK says:

      Royal castoffs never go away no matter what they go on to do. We are still talking about royal cast offs from ye old times…….

    • wow says:

      Lol. Well even the Clooney castoffs get about a year or two of press mentions, or at least until Clooney gets a solid new girlfriend contender. Even with his engagement, his last girlfriend is a regular in the press. Cressida will always be mentioned due to her being an aristo, being besties with The York, running in a royal crowd, and until Harry gets serious” with the next girl. Even then her name will probably keep popping up, just like Chelsy’s does.

      I would hate that. I bet the only thing worse than being a “royal girlfriend” is to be an “ex-royal-girlfriend”.

  18. Frida_K says:

    She’s a skinny-flabby. Thin, but not toned. She would look a lot better (if she’s so determined to flash her back) with a little bit of muscle on her.

    My vote? It’s a tacky play from the Middleton playbook.

    • Suzy from Ontario says:

      I agree. Her back is skinny but not toned so I don’t think it looks that good. Plus those pants just look dirty. I’m sure they aren’t but the colouring is strange.

    • BamBam says:

      ^This. her back is not her best feature.

  19. Loopy says:

    She always ends up pulling her hair up by the end of the night lol

  20. Dany says:

    pic2: yes, i know everyone looks at the side boob, but WTF is that guy doing? Who stands this way? And his eyes?!

    • Delta Juliet says:

      LOL I thought the same thing. He’s super-intense.

    • Green Is Good says:

      Dany: He’s sexing her with his eyes!
      Or he’s a serial killer.

      • Dany says:

        either he is a serial killer 😉

        or he´s just a nice tall guy who tries not to tower over her. His split seems to hurt his crown jewels… no wonder his eyes pop out

    • ncboudicca says:

      YES! I’m fascinated by him. I think that a stance like that is body language for looking powerful – like he’s staking the area for his.

    • Bohemia says:

      Yeah my first thought was that he had been hitting the ski slopes, if ya know what I mean.

  21. cali says:

    Forget the tacky sideboob – who is the hottie she’s chatting up??

  22. Mitch Buchanan Rocks! says:

    From the juxtaposition of the photos it is amazing how much Cressida B resembles Brad Pitt have similar facial features; and from the back she could be mistaken for Blake Lively.

  23. wow says:

    I hate the whole “copying Kate” angel the press throws on this girl to. Like, really? And it just shows,again, partly why Prince Harry keep having his chicks walk away. Who wants to be compared to Kate ALL THE TIME? And over such silly stuff? So Kate has now invented the ‘ol wash and blow dry? Eyeroll. Even Kate would probably laugh at their description.

    Cressida is okay, but when ever she cleans up in appearance, she comes across as a pre-teen playing dress up in her mother’s clothes. But she does show potential. I just don’t think she has a shapely back to pull off a top like this. Nor is her torso long enough. This outfit doesn’t do her any justice. Its a bit too sloppy. Shame, because she does have a great figure. But again, this outfit doesn’t compliment her.

    I also wish the press would stop acting like she is dressing this way to get PH’s attention. I’m sure he’s already seen all parts of Cressida, just as PW had already seen all of Kate. So I never see the point of the press thinking that either girl dressing sexy is what will get these princes running back, when they’ve already seen and had what little they are showing the public.

  24. someone says:

    The pants are terrible, in my opinion. They look dirty and mud splattered in the top picture and are not at all flattering. If this is her “I’ll show Harry what he’s missing” outfit she’s not missing him too much.

  25. QQ says:

    She has the ass of a 30 year old Lilo …or what we in the having-a-butt business call: A Long back

  26. Penelope says:

    Hideous, unflattering outfit. This girl’s about as interesting as a Kardashian.

  27. Kaylen says:

    She looks like an attractive, young, fashionable lady. The outfit is all one piece, Cara Delevingne wore something similar to an event a few weeks ago. I’m not sure why people here don’t like it? But it’s very much in style. It’s just backless, she’s barely showing any skin. A little side boob isn’t much different than cleavage. In my opinion, it’s classier. More subtle.

  28. feebee says:

    I love the style… I wore it 20 years ago, very briefly before back fat made it a no-no.

    Mine was fitted though like a waistcoat – and that’s the only thing wrong with this picture. I mean a little side boob is fine but unless she has double sided tape ‘somewhere’ it looks potentially dangerous, esp with paps around.

  29. Dena says:

    I like the outfit. It looks sexy & sophisticated. It also has a throwback 70s vibe via Farrah Fawcet.

    I think Cressida finally looks like a grown-up in the outfit. (Can someone please step in to help Eugenie?)

    Re: the poorly fitted shirt: It gives me the impression that it’s borrowed and not hers. Most people wouldn’t leave a shop with a shirt/blouse so poorly fitted or if one did then an alteration would be on the agenda.

    • HH says:

      RE: (Can someone please step in to help Eugenie?) – I think Eug looked fine for this event. She and Bea have had their misses, but I always enjoy that they at least try.

      • dena says:

        No, you are right. Eugenie did look nice at this event. I should have been clear. I think she has a lot of misses–clothes too tight, etc.. The dress she wore was very flattering. I think she has a nice hourglass figure and she should do more with it (e.g., wear a lot of fun clothes/styles). Perhaps she’s just a no-fuss kind of person.

        Slightly off-topic: I have often wondered about the Windsor ladies style-wise (sans Princess Margaret when she was alive). I often look at Zara and Princess Anne (and QEII) and wonder if their style sense was dictated by the Queen Mother–that she set the stage for what is considered stylish. (Shudders)

        I get that the BRF is a conservative outfit but given their collective ages (Anne, Zara, Beatrice and Eugenie), I would think that their “look” would be sleeker and more modern. However, Beatrice seems to have “stepped up her game.” Beatrice struggles sometimes–fashion wise, but I think she is finding her own identity.

  30. PHD gossip says:

    Cressida looks Shlumpy.

  31. The Original Mia says:

    The shirt should have been fitted, but those pants should have been set on fire.

  32. tessy says:

    I thought “backless halter”, big deal. Then I saw it. It looks like she borrowed a much larger friend’s outfit to wear for the evening. Her pants are too long and the top is way too big and too ill fitting.

  33. Jaded says:

    She’s dressed like a million other little club tarts.

  34. Lara K says:

    Her back looks like it’s melting… Not attractive.

    That said, she is generally a pretty girl and I can’t blame her for not wanting to be a princess. Frankly it seems like a total drag.

  35. TG says:

    I like it from the front but as others have said the back is not so great. She doesn’t look sexy in it from behind. People need to learn that skinny does not equal sexy. I am mainly referring to the 100’s of celebs who are skinny and wear those Herve Leger bandage dresses yet they have no hips and no a$$ to pull it off. I actually am coming around to Cressy’s style. I realized that she wears what she wears because she does not need to impress nor prove herself to anyone. Se got that from birth, just like the other aristo’s and similar to how the Olsen Twins dress. They are probably billionaires and don’t give a sh*t what we think so they don’t have to try to hard and follow all the godawful rules we set up for ourselves.

  36. Dame Snarkweek says:

    Tit tape. That is all.

  37. Deedee says:

    Its not a nice outfit. It looks cheap and dirty and tawdry. BTW, Isnt she a done deal? Why is anyone following her?

  38. Tolva says:

    She’s beautiful,,naturally. I don’t find the top tacky, it’s a halter. I find it ill fitting .Shes not trying to boob flash, the top just fit poorly.
    …and NO she’s not going away, her family has been in the UK press pages for decades and now that Cressida is getting acting roles, in films made by Harvey Weinstein she’s not going anywhere this is a educated young woman who not long ago completed her University Degree and is embarking on her career. She also looks a lot happier without Harry IMO. She smiles in photos now, when she dated Harry she always looked miserable, I think she’s stunning and thin naturally.

  39. itsetsyou says:

    She is a really pretty girl! And obviously couldn’t care less about becoming a royal so she is wearing whatever the hell she wants.
    That being said, Harry is only getting hotter 🙂 I never thought of his as anything but Will’s little brother, but he has truly blossomed ;))))