Two weekends ago, when I was covering those photos of Duchess Kate in the green Erdem coat, I said that she was giving me pregnancy vibes. I had nothing to back it up physically – she doesn’t seem to have a bump, she doesn’t look particularly barfy, she hasn’t gained any weight. It was just sort of the vibe I got from how she was carrying herself, the way she was looking at William. Then, last week, Vanity Fair’s Katie Nichol claimed that Kate and William are actually “trying” to get pregnant this summer. Maybe because a “spare” will help the young royals when it comes to the mountain of bad press they will get when they eventually announce a full-time move to their country estate while William flies ambulance helicopters. Anyway, Kate’s “friend” Jessica Hay claims Kate is pregnant already.
With a milestone birthday just around the corner, Prince George will probably be getting a lot of presents. But there’s one present he won’t be expecting – a new sibling! Kate Middleton’s longtime friend, Jessica Hay, confirmed to New Day that the Duchess of Cambridge is expecting, and the royal couple will make the official announcement in the next few months. Hay’s confirmation comes with heavy weight, as she famously confirmed Middleton’s first pregnancy in November 2012 just weeks before the royal confirmation came.
“Kate’s inner circle are buzzing with the news that she is pregnant,” Hay told the Australian publication. “I’ve heard it from several different friends of theirs now and they’re saying that they think there’s going to be an official announcement in weeks.”
Although rumors have swirled regarding the Duchess’ pregnancy status, Hay said that the telltale signs of pregnancy are starting to surface – beginning with weight gain.
“Kate’s face is fuller like it was when she was first expecting George and she’s been changing her hair, which could be to disguise the fullness,” Hay said. “She has rosy cheeks, she’s letting her greys show again, and whenever she’s out in public she goes to great lengths to hold something over her tummy…”
But the royal’s oldest friend is certain that they will keep this pregnancy a secret for as long as possible. Unlike her first pregnancy when she came down with severe morning sickness, Middleton reportedly is hoping to wait for the 3-month period to pass.
“With George, they were forced to tell the world very early on that Kate was pregnant because she was rushed to the hospital with that awful hyperemesis gravidarum at around six or seven weeks,” Hay revealed.
Could be. If I remember correctly… yes, I found it. Jessica Hay also announced Kate’s first pregnancy back in November 2012, saying that Kate would announce in December. And that’s exactly what happened. So, history repeating? Is Jessica Hay the undercover “source” for all things related to Kate’s womb?
As for Kate and William’s near-certain full-time move to the country, The Daily Express says that they have already lodged a request with the Civil Aviation Authority to create a no-fly zone above their Sandringham-adjacent mansion. A plane apparently flew “dangerously and illegally low” over Anmer Hall and Will and Kate want to stop airbourne paparazzi from taking photos of Prince George as well. An unnamed staffer told the Express that Will and Kate were “looking for any excuse to stop off duty photographs of the family being published.” They’ve been pitching fits about candid photos of Kate out shopping and at her friends’ weddings and such. Ugh. These two. I can’t.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
I live in the flight path for a small airport near our home. It is very, very annoying when we can’t even have a conversation. Sometimes they fly so low the house shakes and the windows rattle. I can’t imagine being famous and having that all the time. If I had some clout, I’d try to get the flights restricted, too.
Yes I would be upset too. They’re also celebrity and political figures. I would want a no fly zone for safety. They’re potential targets
yes, and they are also i’m sure targets for terrorism as well. it’s one thing to complain about paps (william didn’t choose this life the way celebs did, she fell in love or whatever you want to say about it) violating privacy, but there are a lot of crazies out there that they need to be cautious of
The Queen lives at Sandringham as well and she’s never complained about any of this. If the Queen isn’t concerned about terrorist attacks, then the heir to the heir shouldn’t either. William doesn’t want the press in his business unless he needs them to promote something. Then, it’s trot George out for PR (hello, Australia & New Zealand)!
Will was born into this but he could also opt out. He takes full advantage of all the luxuries afforded him so he needs to accept the rest of it too. You don’t get to pick and choose so I don’t really have sympathy.
Mia, you make an excellent point. The Queen has never had a concern, yet the second and third in line are perceived targets? bollocks.
AGree. They would be pestered and they would be targets. No blame for that move.
(Just saw you posted this already Mia)
Reading Richard Palmer’s twitter about their ongoing press drama has been interesting. He points out where all the other senior royals home are flown over, have aerial photos, had pictures of them taken when they were in their pram in a public park and no complaints were lodged, etc.
It is legal for a plane to fly at 500 ft above countryside and country houses, 1000ft in built-up areas. If it is proven the plane was flying legally, they have no case. They are demanding treatment that not even HM demands.
Butt, butt…(I know, here I go again) William must stand up for Kate’s rights to sunbathe in the nude!
+1
Just like its illegal to fly a plane above the White House it’s illegal to fly a plane above any of the Queen’s residences – Sandringham included. She doesn’t have to ask.
Assuming the story is even true and Amner Hall isn’t already included inside the no-fly zone, it’s probably just outside it and they need to extend the zone a bit.
Can planes fly over a royal property when the queen is in residence? Given the number of terrorist attacks that have occurred in the UK, I would expect some kind of flight restriction over her.
What a joke these two are!
Windsor is well known for being directly in the path of Heathrow Airport. This is HM’s primary residence where she prefers to live. If HM can handle it for over 50 years so can these two ridiculous people!
Megan: Yes is the answer to your first question. HM is ok (or been denied) no fly zones over her residences.
From an article about Prince Philip: ‘His favourite joke is about a US tourist who said: “Why did they build Windsor Castle so close to Heathrow Airport?”’
We’ll know, literally, when we see her eating a donut.
Lmao, well played.
Lol. Literally.
Ah, iI see hat you did there.
LOVE IT!
hahahha!
You’d think that after she blabbed the first time, Kate would go to great lengths to keep her from finding out the second time. I don’t understand this whole stomach-hiding stuff early on. I’m 5 months pregnant and no one can tell. Maybe hiding the early bloat you get?
It sounds like she heard through mutual friends
I believe it. Her hair is so much fuller.
You show sooner with baby 2 usually. Especially if they’re close together. So early bloat might have her feeling self conscious and paranoid.
I was back in maternity clothes by the end of my first trimester in my 2nd pregnancy and they were less than two years apart.
hair is not really a good reference point for her though, she’s known for using enhancements in that department
Yeah I first noticed it like a month ago. Her hair looks different and more naturally full than extensions.
I pointed it out then and some comments doubted it so I passed it off as extensions or something
But combined with the outfits and face and this interview, I’m inclined to believe she is pregnant
That’s true. This will be my 3rd and final baby, but my youngest is 6 years old and my oldest is 11, so I spaced them out a lot. I didn’t think about the fact that she had a baby just a year ago! I need those extra years to catch up on sleep 😉
It is on time for a spare and William has been hanging around lately.
It wouldn’t be at all out of the blue for her to be with child again.
Regarding flight… That’s BS. They want complete privacy to the extent of talking away public property because runners on trails near KP might see a person walking past a window. It’s foolish. Though maybe not aware it’s appearing as though they are taking away the rights of the press and public land for their own preference.
FLORC,
What’s especially ridiculous about all of this is William was raised at KP. His mother was the most photographed woman in the world, he should have been aware of any privacy concerns that location would present.
I remember reading that Sarah Ferguson had to keep the windows and curtains of their flat in Buckingham Palace closed all the time. Otherwise it didn’t look good in tourist photos. W&K aren’t being forced to deal with terrible things no other member of the BRF has. They are demanding a country mile. I hope the press lodge formal complaints against them for what they’re pulling.
AM
Very true. For whatever reason (and I think there are many at play here) William despises the press and his loss of control with them.
They can’t be controlled even though he has tried and to a certain point succeeded. They will show him at bars, yelling at Kate, and not putting out the image he wants. It’s less about his mother and more about William not getting his way. And since he’s been raised a very entitled snowflake it’s a hard reality.
Notasugarhere
The press or something on behalf of the press did file a complaint and won. William was issued a warning I think to stop his actions because the press was within it’s rights and did not print slander. I can’t remember the peticulars if another can elaborate. William cannot control the press and shouldn’t try. As it is now he and his wife and incredibly sheltered. Bad behavior is largely unreported.
I have a long torso like Kate, and I had to tell the health nurse I was pregnant at 7 months with my second. I did have a loose sweater on, but for some reason, I didn’t show much until my 9th month. My girls are 17 months apart, so I think that I still had room for #2 to stay tucked inside ; )
this is going to sound bitchy, but when her first solo tour was announced last week the first thing I wondered was that she was due for an excuse to not do more than that one and if it would be a planned pregnancy.
My first thought, too was–another year off from work!!
Not bitchy at all. I too thought she would deliver a second baby by the time George is two just in time to extend her lack of full time Royal work into a 4 year period. LOL
You don’t need an insider to know that Wills and Kate will continue creating reasons not to take on full responsibility. Will through his pilot “work” or Kate through babies. Very predictable couple.
TC u got it. Close date from Aussie Tour for Willnot.n lazy Waity anorexic Doolittle.
Give us King Henry (Harry). hardworking, great work ethics like his mom and courages (knowing she knew what PCharles was about n took him anyway); n Harry for working his responsibilities for HM firm PCharles. Most important the people!
Retire Willnot line, send him oFf to the parasite middstrash with lazy Waity. He can rule Carole n buckleberry. HM n PCharles keep n raise PG at KP with his nannies.
Waity will let us know soon if true so she can set up at midds multi million house from P Willnot. N he can has separate life with exs; just ban him from royal purse and perks, until he’s ready to work for. HM and his. Responsibilities. What a waste.
We will know sooner another vacation workless waity dormat Kate and Willnot use to. He want sto control democracy free speech what a jerk. Retire his line to the throne. Why Willnot want more children to be drunkards who shucking their duty while enjoying the perks of royal!
Give us the people’s hard working geniune true royal -King Harry. Hope he use role model commoners like Princess Mary Queen to Willem, Q Leticia as strong useful women like his mom, instead of useless workless doormats like Waity.
Wow Pippa, that was quite a mouthful, and mostly very amusing. You just come right out and say it. Go girl!
They don’t want to do a lot of royal work but they also may want their children to be close in age or have all their children by a certain age.
Isn’t she doing a solo tour in the Fall? With the way her last pregnancy went, I doubt she’d want to be pregnant and having to go on tour solo. Not with all that throwing up that put her in the hospital.
Then again, if she actually is pregnant I could see her getting pregnant in order to have to cancel her one or two day tour. Lol. (Sorry, Kate, but that is our legacy at this point .)
She’s going to Malta for the day. Did you actually think this woman was going to actually work? Or ever going to work?
I think the Malta trip says that she’s not pregnant or trying, and won’t be trying this summer. Time will tell.
Who needs a friend who is such a blabbermouth, seriously, you would think after the first time, she would make sure she didn’t find out, like tell her friends not to tell anyone esp the blabbermouth.
They must want people to know, or they wouldn’t tell her. I don’t get it either.
I think they use her as the “source”. So the news gets out as they want it to, without them looking like they’re doing it themselves … an elaborate plan of some sort, for who knows what
Why does everything have to be a big secret??? I don’t get it. They get more attention with the secrets than if they were just upfront and made an announcement. They love the anticipation and attention. Keeps Kate in the spotlight, where she apparently loves to be.
@Bethany To be fair, I would be paranoid about announcing my pregnancy as well. It is such a horrible situation ona personal level if something goes wrong. At least if they keep it under wraps, they can grieve in private.
Maybeiamcrazy
I’m with you on this. 1st trimesters can still result in miscarriages. I am not a public figure and I still woudn’t announce until i’m in my 2nd or start showing.
I will never fault Kate for this. I don’t even think she should parade around pregnant. She can and it’s good pr, but if staying at home and not talking about it is what she needs to have a healthy baby, so be it.
+1 with FLORC
That’s the PR strategy – look for expensive vacations and workless Willnot and waity Doolittle. At the midds.
I think she told her friend to leak it to the press, so she can get some sympathy points to avoid work.
Also, the one-day Malta trip is not terribly far away and a nice sunny spot for the usual sun-bathing. I expect she’ll spend 1-hour “working” and the rest at a resort/spa, though watch out to any press member who gets a shot of her in the buff after her much needed 2-hour massage.
Either the source is right or we will get a wine or liquor drinking photo within the week to prove her wrong.
She drank whiskey at an engagement on May 29. Pregnant but didn’t know yet? Knew she was pregnant and drinking anyway? Not pregnant? Time will tell.
the British should get rid of this their royalty..we are in the 21st century,they are just good at wasting tax payers money..will is just like charles,selfish and only does pr when it benefits him but unlike Charles who married hardworking Diana,William married someone just as lazy as him..Harry is Diana’s replica in all aspects..he should be king and not Will..
EXACTLY! everything you said.
What can the “commoners” do in Britain? Bad press doesn’t seem to be working – can you demonstrate or boycott or anything? I’m feeling too damn frustrated! Help me here. Their privacy, to do whatever they please, seems to be all they really care about.
Do “commoners” who are not on gossip blogs know Will and Kate are lazy? I have always wondered that. They must realize Kate is no Diana but do they realize she does nothing at all?
I think people are getting tired of them and I wouldn’t be surprised that by the time queen Elizabeth dies,we would witness alot of protests and boycott…Kate is too lousy and William is ignorant of his duties..Kate’s and William’s dream to rule Britain may never come true because by the time the are old enough to undertake the position,the British monarchy may have seized to exist..
I’ve heard of these rare creatures that can see past the fairy tale package. That they are people who aren’t perfect and make mistakes. That they are high profile and spend lavishly and publicly doesn’t help the image. It makes them huge targets. That they do little to nothing to counter this image is troubling.
I believe that because of Diana, public opinion almost guarantees a monarchy for her son. I bet there are also people in high positions, who profit, with having a monarchy in place.
I wonder if Will’s desire for a “normal life” came from that same wish that was his mothers. And despite complaints, they look like fat cats that just had some cream, every time they are photographed.
I’m positive that they get presents we don’t even know about…
I really don’t think William wants it. I believe that he will pull a shocker when his time comes or after both the Queen and Prince Charles are no longer around.
All of this complaining,laziness,moaning about royal life is just the long goodbye for him until he just tells the truth…that he doesn’t want to rule. I truly believe that.
Wolfpup
I agreed with you years ago, but as of now and as things are progressing I disagree. William’s reluctance and hesitation to even become a full time royal is going directly against how we viewed Diana. Hardworking and sympathetic.
William is creating his own image and even the press has noticed it’s nothing like Diana.
In time we’ll see how things unfold.
Francis
Me too.
He likes the status, protection, luxuries, and influence, but does he want the job? He’s only ever spoken about it as an albatross around his neck. Time will tell. He wouldn’t be the 1st reluctant royal to suddenly want his role.
Wolfpup. I think that might have been possible if we were back in the era of Diana. It isn’t a case of phoning one editor and putting a bit of pressure on so they don’t publish. There are too many opportunities and avenues for people to share their displeasure, to share the photos and proof of what is really going on.
If William keeps trying to shut down freedom of the press, it will be no holds barred war for Freedom of Speech. An unfettered, international press + blogs and sites they cannot control? William will be out on his ear.
They should make like other European nations. My mother’s family is part of the Bavarian royal line. They still have the titles and they know who they are and such, but no government supports them. They’re more viewed as social and cultural ambassadors who help promote cultural events in the state. They do tend to be “old money” but at least its their money. No government handouts. The British royals, from my understanding, are basically a tourist attraction at this point. I don’t object to them having titles or anything like that, but I’d be pissed if I were a British taxpayer supporting this stuff.
These two will be the end of the monarchy. Lazy, unappreciative, elitist…William will never be king. Unfortunately, I doubt Harry will either, but he would be great. Diana would be proud of the man he’s becoming.
That would be excellent! also would be cool for Harry to date a woman of character – like Michelle Knight – who is now called Lily – she is courage and beauty personified.
Visit to royal residences were at an all time high last year. 2.5 million visitors paid $94 million for a peak inside.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/488286/Royal-Palaces-bring-in-55million-for-Britain
After William got married, there was a record-breaking 500,000 visitors to Buckingham Palace. That same year, there were over 6,000,000 visitors to Versailles. So it seems NOT having a royal family anymore is better for tourism.
Having palaces does help tourism, obviously. But, the palaces have all been built. There is no reason to think the royal family itself (whom the tourists never see) are the draw; rather, it’s the buildings the people are paying to see. And more people would be allowed to visit if the royal family was gone.
But, it’s not my tax dollars.
France has more than 1,000 castles, can you name any other than Versailles?
And how many of them got to see the royals?
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_castles_in_France
http://www.casteland.com/puk/rubrique/licha.htm
Now we all know the castles in France and then some:)
Megan. Why did it matter about other castles? That was a loaded question.
It’s been well established Castles that have been without royals for years and years have been more profitable than casstles with sitting royals.
Even castles and palaces tha give tours when not occupied by royals cut offf much from tours and have the royals personal pictures and decoration around. It’s current and not as historical as it could be. No onw wants a tour through someone’s home That’s weird. They want a tour through history.
Comparing Versailles to Buckingham Palace is what makes no sense. Versailles is one of the most famous and opulent buildings in the world and is a destination unto itself. As one of the largest royal residences in existence, its appeal is quite unique.
My question is about the French castles more on par with those in the UK. Why aren’t they more famous?
Megan,
Why are you quoting the Express today? Just yesterday you criticized someone for referring to the Daily Mail stating it was not a “credible source”.
Is the Express crap, too? I only know about the DM scandal with Clooney.
Here is the source: http://view.digitalissue.co.uk/00000082/00008128/00089455/
Megan, you amke no sense. If you are in America and don’t know other French castles, let me enlighten you that we, in Europe, know them very well. Not only from our school history lessons but also because trips and tours to fontenblau, Tuilleries and the Loire valley with visits to Diane de Poitier’s castle, for example, are the norm. We do know. In fact, the tours doen Loire valley are better preferred then to Versailles these days because most of us saw Versailles as early as high school.
I guess, If royals *do* work very hard, it is somehow useful? But not all royals work hard and it is really unfair to taxpayers. It is somehow unfair to royals too. They have to do a job they didn’t choose. I think a revolution would be good for both sides. I am sure BRF have shitload of money other than what they receive from taxpayers.
I smell another hospitalization due to fake Hyperemesis Gravidarum to get her out of the Malta gig. Or any gig for that matter.
Guess those planes have secretly been harassing the Queen when she’s in residence and she’s just been gracious enough not to whine like a little baby. What if the planes aren’t papparazzi, but surveyor planes or scenic photography planes? How will the Lambridges differentiate between those on legitimate business and those trying to see what they are up to? If anyone is really interested in two of the laziest royals in modern history.
The Lazy Duo strikes again.
what’s that thing at her boob region in the white dress?
Hmm, not sure. Perhaps some padding has gone astray? Did she store her clutch in there to keep her hands free for wild clapping? A bilby for Prince George?
Why do people think they don’t work? We see pictures of them all of the time out and about. They have a small child at home too that I’m sure they like to spend time with. I’m sure the tourism dollars they bring into the country more than covers their expense. Plus they create jobs for so many. I don’t get all this resentment for this couple. Of course they’re going to live a lavish lifestyle compared to regular folks……they’re the Royals!
tbh almost every other royal outperforms these two when it comes to royal engagements, including in the past the ones that have had children.
Geez – if I could just put my head back in the sand, Mrs. McCubbins…
1) Why do people think they don’t work?
You can look up lists of official engagements each part of the Royal family does. Out of the whole family, Kate and William do the least. Like on average 4 or 5 engagements per month while tax payers keep them in luxury 30 days out of that month.
2) “They have a small child at home too that I’m sure they like to spend time with.”
They weren’t working much even BEFORE the baby. Have 3 women to help with the baby and William spends most of his time away from said baby.
3) “I’m sure the tourism dollars they bring into the country more than covers their expense. Plus they create jobs for so many.”
Not true. Tourism in all countries happens whether they have current royals or not. The most visited locations in the world have no royalty. People travel to visit to see old historical monuments, for the weather or a nation’s culture. There has been no financial statements proven that the mere existence of Kate and William has brought more money to the UK. They people that get more jobs with these two are high end fashion designers, photographers, tabloid journalists and select clothing stores.
Oh, @TC, there you go with your facts and logic again. Admit it, you’re a just a jelly h8er! You wish you had Kate’s (fake) hair!
What Faye said…HA!
Yes, there are financial statements about William and Kate’s impact on tourism …
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/apr/29/royal-wedding-tourism-boost
http://www.eturbonews.com/46940/australian-tour-operators-reaping-rewards-recent-royal-tour
Within six weeks of Kate’s wedding dress going on display already there have been 350,000 visiters. Part of the admission goes to charities of Kate and William’s choice. So they do bring in tourism money. Plus doesn’t Charles own farmland? Doesn’t he have to hire people to run that? What about all of the people looking after their homes, chauffeurs, personal assistants, secuity personel? I could go on and on but you get my drift? They keep many people employed in various positions. Sorry but I’m going to disagree with you.
Yes, T. C. the tourism would happen regardless. As many have said, France’s tourism hasn’t suffering without royals. People will visit palaces without a royal family. If the royals were gone, far more of those palaces would be open for tourism. Charles does not own the Duchy, he is the current steward. If he wasn’t there, the Duchy would still run and employ people. TourismUK does a report annually, and no royal-related items crack the Top 20.
It has been estimated that the wedding cost the UK as much as 6 billion pounds in security, lost revenue and wages because it added another bank holiday rather than using an existing one, etc.
@Megan – A few articles (which don’t provide any actual backup for their assertions) are not the same as actual spreadsheets or certified financial reports. Also, a one-time spike POSSIBLY due to the wedding is not representative of the financial benefit they allegedly bring to the country on a regular basis.
@Mrs McCubbins – Again, the wedding is a one-time event. And the fact that these people are employed changes nothing – the people of England are footing the bill. Potentially, if they weren’t serving the royals, these people might be employed elsewhere NOT at a cost to the British taxpayer.
If people want to be royals fans that is of course their right – but don’t pretend like they’re not a huge financial cost to their country.
RE: Tourism Revenue
1) As others have stated, countless European countries have castles and such that bring in revenue despite not having royal families.
2) Royal Wedding tourism revenue??? It’s not like these are yearly events! The last one(s) that brought high amounts of attention were Diana/Charles and Fergie/Andrew (to a lesser extent). A little less than 30 years before William & Kate’s wedding. Wedding revenue isn’t enough to count in the royals’ favor.
@MrsMcCubbins
So the royals have make work projects? They give employment to so many, right? Where do you think the money to pay the employees comes from?
England’s weather, wine, shopping, countryside, mountains, food, and beaches do not compare to France’s, in my opinion, but they do a tidy tourist trade. Something is drawing people to England.
It was the annual summer exhibition at Buckingham Palace, and Middleton’s dress was one small part of it. Recall the video with 1) HM’s comment “Horrible” and 2) Middleton and the Fabergé egg debacle. The exhibit included one of the largest collections of Fabergé in the world, which was certainly a draw that summer.
Well, it’s been quite a while, but IIRC, I was drawn to England for the theater; its ancient sites (Stonehenge, Bath); the museums; and sites I’ve seen on TV since I was a little girl like Harrods, the Tower of London, Big Ben and Westminster Abbey. Windsor Castle (Liz & Co. were out that day) was a nice experience, but I enjoyed wandering into St. Martins in the Field and listening to the choir rehearsal more. One of my co-workers is in London now (her second trip), and she and I agree that once you’ve seen the royal stuff like BP and Changing the Guard, it’s time to move on because there are so many other things to do and see all over England.
hmmm, who would be employing these people then? Would they be collecting unemployment insurance? You have to consider the employees of the RF spend money on taxes too plus they shop in the local stores etc. There are lots of spinoffs. At the end of the day the RF still generates more money than they take in. It’s not like there are hundreds of jobs available in England. I think the Royals are good for England in the fact that they promote national pride too…..something we don’t have where I come from.
No, the BRF does not generate more money than they cost. Those people would be employed at the Museums all of these royal residences would become. Or at the hotel, museum, and restaurants that it is rumored Prince Charles wants to turn Buckingham Palace into. People go to the changing of the guard when HM isn’t in residence, they’ll still attend when there is no monarchy. BTW, they are not just England’s royals, it is the British Royal Family.
I’m pretty sure you do not speak for every single person from your country when it comes to the issue of national pride.
Way to throw heavy shade at England, @Megan. I do believe your slip is showing. It’s a shame you don ‘t know the half of what is glorious about her and her history and culture.
Not throwing shade at England but to suggest France doesn’t need to a royal family to attract tourist ignores many of the reasons people travel to France. Barring a massive shift in climate, I don’t see England ever being famous for its vineyards.
Unlike Kate, I wear pants so my slip never shows, nor does my bum.
And let’s not forget the amount of tourism she attracts by people waiting to see another bum-flash – that’s important work too.
Wins the thread.
Agreed. It gives the BRF that something “special”, worth a trip across the pond, I would venture.
Mrs McCubbins – appreciate your comments. Here is a fun blog post that breaks down the value of the royal family … lot’s of great info. When you calculate the income from royal land that goes to the government (as part of a voluntary arrangement with the royal family), the BRF actually reduces taxes.
http://www.cgpgrey.com/blog/the-true-cost-of-the-royal-family-explained.html
Thanks for the interesting link Megan! I don’t understand all the complaining on here. I’ve been to England several times and spent money going to see things “Royal”. I always had to stand in line with many others who were there for the same reason. I’m sure Kate and William generate income for other people plus give back to society.
would we abolish the monarchy tomorrow people would still stand in line with many others to see things “Royal”. I bet even more would go because all the castles would be open for public 24/7.
The royal history with all the palaces and places brings the tourists, not the current ribbon cutters.
Megan: that so-called royal land that was voluntarily given up never belonged to them in the first place. They were merely stewards.
To use a similar though slightly different analogy, It’s like saying Charles/HM own the Duchies of Cornwall/Lancaster and if they hand them back to the government to manage in exchange for a salary (which is what the civil list then sovereign grant amounts to) that they are handing over personal land/property.
The crown estates and the BRF’s own websites in the FAQs are very clear that the land was set up to take care of government which happened to include the royal household. It’s very clear that the royals have never owned the land. Every history book is also very clear on that point. It probably saved English peasants from being taxed into starvation unlike their European counterparts.
People assume they own(ed) the land simply because it has ‘crown’ in the name. You might as well apply the same logic to Her Majesty’s government, or Her Majesty’s Judiciary, or Her Majesty’s armed forces. Ditto the church of England since she’s the Defender of the Faith.
Excellent info and spot on about the “Yanks”. I am one and agree totally. I’ve visited all the tourist sites and love, love, love England. I have a few ancestors who came across the pond in the 1800’s. Love the Queen, and baby George. All the rest, including Kate and William are rather boring. And Harry should keep his bum covered and grow up!
@Megan and @Mrs McCubbins
England has many famous historical sites and a long, long, long history. Yes many people would still visit that country without the existence of the Royal family. I’m afraid you guys really don’t understand English history. Paris doesn’t always have the best weather yet still visit that city. India and Egypt also not the best weather at times and lacking royalty millions of visitors. The USA, never had any royalty and get millions of people visiting yearly. England will still be a tourist site long after the Wills and Kates are gone.
TC – I lived in London for many years and have been to every place you have mentioned so please don’t tell me what I do and don’t understand. And if you are interested in a truly long, long, long history, give Egypt or China a spin.
I believe she was talking about tourists and what draws them. Not what someone who lives there might visit. And stats still show that royal-related items do not break the top 20 of UK tourism sites.
It seems that the frustration on this site is with these two – and not the other royals. They are not performing to the level of the other royals. Look at how much Prince Philip works, a 93 year old man with health conditions. There is a lot of respect for HM. How long can that and the goodwill Diana generated sustain them? It will be a very sad day when HM passes.
I believe that many Americans go to Britain to see the land and culture of their forefathers. But that doesn’t mean that I don’t love my own country. Democracy is a precious gift to me, which posits that it is self-evident; that all men are created equal…such a gift…and a responsibility to bring that vision into being. I hope that you are not talking about my country, Mrs. McCubbins, that you said was not dear, to her citizens.
I think a lot of Americans go to England because of the BRF, Jane Austen, Shakespeare, Charles Dickens, and JK Rowling. Not to mention they speak English.
In the past, I did not want to go to England, because I thought that it would be too much like being in the US. And so, although I traveled, I hadn’t made that a destination, Now I definitely, would like to spend a few months there. But my visit would have nothing to do with the royal family; they are just another family in my mind, and I’m sure QE will be busy as well. However, I will curtsy, if ever the chance might come, mostly, because I would be curtsying out of respect for the Brit’s who post here, and (knees shaking), probably out of fear as well..
It’s hard for me to understand a Monarchy…all mixed up in church and state, the schoolroom and the coin. Even more so because I’m trying to understand how people feel. If there are any suggestions on a great book, that would show how the British people are rooted in the centuries. and in current thought; I would love it.
I also think she’s pregnant but for other reason: Will’s been really nice to her lately, like she’s suddenly more attractive and more precious to him. It was clear at Wimbledon and I thought there must be a reason behind it.
This plus one trillion!!! She won’t almost die from HG this time either because she doesn’t need to go to hospital to wrench him away from his friends/side pieces. He learned that lesson the hard way.
No more Kate is pregnant rumors. Just leave it up to the Town Crier to notify me. 🙂
Indeed! This is most fervently wished!
+1
William complains too much about everything. Now he wants to control all airspace over his homes, when the Queen and all Royals have had planes flying over for generations.
He really is becoming unlikeable. IMO.
Another baby, well no surprise there, but I’ll wait and see for official word from Palace.
The ‘heir and the spare’ are part of her duties and the only thing she actually seems to enjoy about being a royal.
You would think I’d be more inclined to believe her after I rolled my eyes at the pregnant in December story but I’m still unsure. On one hand, I thought she was pregnant too. On the other hand, her scheduling that Malta solo tour makes me doubt it. With her HG last pregnancy I don’t think she’d want to go on it alone. I also don’t think she’d use it as an excuse to cut the trip short or not go at all. I know some of you think she would but she’s not stupid. That would be a terrible decision.
Is she is pregnant, I hope they have a girl this time.
Didn’t William give a hint in the Australia tour back on April when he told the woman who made George’s shawl ” You might have to make another ” ?? 3 months back!
Public Safety Announcement: If you don’t want a rude response or a slap-down to your comments, just agree that anything these two job creators do is just peachy.
Ah, who cares about those slappers, anyway?
OK, what’s William hiding? His press paranoia is so extreme. And about as well thought out as his ‘destroy all ivory at BP’ stance.
What about the people who have legitimate reasons to be flying overhead? His own family, including the head of state don’t have these ridiculous no-fly zones over their homes even when in residence.
Also has be considered drones AND his new BFF business partners google who he spent last week promoting with Harry????!!!
Nitwit.
Idjit.
Somebody take him away to a desert island. Please.
There’s no foundation for this level of entitlement and paranoia. Not with William.
What are you supposing, FLORC? Very interesting theory…
Several things I’ve read this week make me wonder what they are doing covertly to bar paps from their lives. FX
1. I read that the Ikon pictures guy applied for a permit to take photos in Kensington gardens 5 months ago but still hasn’t received his while others who applied 1 or 2 months ago have gotten theirs.
2. It is strange that for several months now there are there no pap photos of Kate getting coffee, shopping, strolling George through the park. There are tweets, but no photos.
3. Just read this today but it supposedly went out from Ed Perkins in their press office 3 months ago.
“I am afraid we regard the taking of photographs on private occasions as incompatible with the work of photographers who wish also to attend official engagements,”
http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/488292/Duke-and-Duchess-complain-to-Civil-Aviation-Authority-to-create-no-fly-zone-over-new-home
This is why I want the press to go to the PCC against W&K. They did it before and won, time to do it again.
I think this is William’s way of dragging his feet about his duty and obligations. Mr Special is so pissed off about having to toe some sort of line, that he’s throwing the biggest tantrum in royal history. He wants what he wants when he wants it, but there is pressure for him to actually grow up and act like a man. He will never go for it, IMO. Hence, the public/press/aliens are his whipping boy and he is ever the victim. It is meant to distract from his lazy, entitled, puerile way of life and the fact that he really doesn’t want to be king. So, to add to all the other epithets, he has the makings of a bully, and he is a grade A Coward.
Now they’re banning press from charity events?
Rebecca English @RE_DailyMail
Remarkably – although not surprisingly, given recent form – no photographers or journalists have been invited to record this charity event.
What are they afraid of, that we might see her panties?
I think given the circumstances of his mother’s death, William has a fear/hate of the press. Is it rational and healthy? Probably not, but not a surprise.
Whatever his history, he does not have the right to re-write the laws of the UK because he is a petulant child instead of a mature adult. The era of absolute rulers is gone – thank goodness. It doesn’t get to be one law for him and another for the people who pay for his lifestyle.
“the way she was looking at William. ” – how does she look at him? Pregnantly?
She often stares adoringly or very timid. Basing this on numerous photos where they are at the same event that isn’t more fun than work.
Adoringly more when William is around very often.
That’s really too much analyzing.
FLORC – Ha-ha, you made me think of this gif where Kate’s behavior is more shall we say libidinous. I just saw it the other day.
Scroll down to the middle of the page. This must have been from QEII’s jubilee flotilla because Kate’s wearing her red McQueen dress and plaid scarf.
http://colormecambridge.tumblr.com/tagged/she%27s-right-you-know
Sorry MinnFinn
Estelle stole that page!
May234
Not really. It’s just very noticable.
Kate shows how she’s feeling very easily on her face. She can’t hide how she feels. So when she gazes at her husband, feels sad, etc… It’s no secret. Minimal analyzing required, but that is a common defense to discredit the observation or observer.
i’d like to know what niraj tanna thinks about this
Since they are clearly blocking his permission to photograph in Kensington Park in retaliation? (He’s been waiting months longer than other photographers who submitted a request at the same time.) Some day soon we will know exactly what Tanna is thinking.
He’s the best when he gets annoyed! And Tanna will get pics. William will be off flying helicopters and when he’s not he’ll still be off elsewhere. Kate will move back in with her parents. Tanna will get shots and info while she’s in Berkshire.
Or at least that’s what happened last time.
Don’t think he is cheering. Between Tanna, Rebecca English and Richard Palmer, they are providing information and stats that support all those who think the no fly zone is ridiculous.
Re: pregnancy, he hasn’t commented or hinted at all.
What is curious though is that he has taken to being complimentary to Cressida. And by extension Harry.
When he starts hinting, I’ll start believing.
I’m really enjoying Tanna’s snark and commentary about the royals. Who knew?
yeah he’s been especially praising Harry for being REALLY frugal, instead of merely claiming to be frugal. Apparently his USA tour of last year only cost 10k, and he flew with easyjet/ryanair and he said this sneeringly in combination with the whole kitchen debacle of the Cambridges.
So Jessica Hay now has to rely on other people to get news from them? That actually makes me less inclined to believe it actually. William has said to have given false stories to friends as a means to test them to see if they would go to the press with them. The real story here is that Ms. Hay unintentionally implied that she’s been frozen out of the circle.
And William pitching a fit about the paps? Must be a day that ends in Y.
I noticed that – the, “I’ve heard it from several different friends of theirs now and they’re saying that they think there’s going to be an official announcement in weeks.” Fairly solid admission that she gets precisely nothing from the horse’s mouth; just knows people who run in the same circles.
I don’t blame William for hating his position. I just blame him for wanting the money, perks and privileges, and none of the downsides. If he doesn’t want the job, history tells us there’s a sizeable queue of people who would do it in a heartbeat. And if he wants a huge security detail plus holidays and houses at our expense, he has to work for the public good in an official capacity, and accept that part of his job is to be the embodiment of a family monarchy, and visible. Or fund that lifestyle on his own money.
TO Mia (poste wrong spot)
KP has addressed rumors too many times when they should have simply ignored them. Very odd.
Like Kate’s scalp scar. People thought extensions and it should have been left to speculation, but instead KP issues a statement over basic internet gossip.
So, they do something foolish. They issue a statement that creats bigger questions!
Her scar is from a major childhood surgery… MAJOR?! On her head! What happened that she needed ca major operation leaving a huge scar on her head.
Also, that had HG. That’s right. KP diagnosed her with HG. Not normal morning sickness, but HG bad enough to be hospitalized for a few days. Considering it takes much longer to diagnose.
Bad move KP.
KP is denying the report by saying Kate and Jessica haven’t spoken in years. Hmm…why even comment on a story that is supposedly false.
@ FLORC, yes, this is another example of KP’s stellar handing of W&K’s press. The press has her pregnant every other week, and they decide to comment on this story. Brilliant move said no one. These missteps are going to come back to haunt W&K. Can’t wait!
One of the reasons they don’t want candids taken is that they both smoke. Apparently, they’re chain smokers. Popbitch reported that, when they were in France and the topless photos were taken, Buckingham palace was more interested in killing the photos of her smoking than those of her topless.
First off, yay I was right! Though to be honest Jessica gave herself away with her own words so I actually believe KP this time.
Second, why comment on this story when tabs have her pregnant every week? Perhaps this denial is to send a message to Ms. Hay. Like this is their way of saying “You’re not in with us and never will be.” When anyone from The Firm wants to shut a person out, they shut them out cold.
“When The Firm wants to shut a person out they shut them out cold”. That sounds very cold-blooded, and frightening: is that person’s life changed forever, for the worse?
x