Harper’s Bazaar did something interesting for their September cover this year. Instead of using some huge star, celebrity or model, they chose a young woman named Emma Ferrer. She is Audrey Hepburn’s granddaughter (Emma is the daughter of Audrey’s son with her first husband Mel Ferrer, Sean Ferrer). Can you see the resemblance? I can, mostly in Emma’s jawline. That’s Audrey’s jawline. But for the most part, Emma is merely a pretty girl who is styled in variations of Audrey’s most famous looks/costumes, and they’re really trying to force the comparison. That must be difficult, having such an iconic grandmother and being asked to do your first magazine cover… but only if you dress up like your grandmother, whom you never knew because she passed before you were even born. Bazaar sat down with Emma to talk about Audrey (for the most part) as well – you can read the full piece here. Some highlights:
Emma’s family, her goals: Now 20, Emma is the eldest of Sean’s three children and spent most of her adolescence in and around Florence, Italy, where Sean, who runs an agency that deals with intellectual property and is also a filmmaker and keeper of the Audrey flame, lives outside the city… Emma herself has no designs on acting, though, like her grandmother, she has studied ballet. Instead, Emma’s heart is set on becoming an artist. To that end, she is entering her third year as a student of the Florence Academy of Art.
She spent part of her childhood in LA: “Growing up there felt entirely normal, since I was only a child,” Emma recalls, although she admits that had she remained in L.A., she might well have become that dreaded Hollywood brat. “I know kids who had to go into rehab,” she tells me. “It’s only now that I realize certain elements of a Hollywood lifestyle are, in fact, not entirely healthy.”
Emma the artist: “I always drew and liked to take art lessons, but I needed intellectual skills to learn about balance and structure.” She showed me some of her drawings on her iPhone: charcoal portraits and sketches of human figures and plaster casts, all done from life. She listed some of the painters she admired—Rembrandt, Titian, Velázquez, and Zurbarán—and talked about learning to imitate the work of other artists. “At first I resisted the process of copying because I felt it wasn’t original. But the truth is, I drew in a very naive way.”
Thinking about Audrey: “I’ve been questioning a lot lately what she means to me. I knew her image, of course, and that I happened to be, by pure chance, related to her. But as a child I couldn’t really relate to Audrey Hepburn, the actress. To me, she was family. I can live with her through my father. His stories are all about his growing up. But honestly, I haven’t seen all of her movies. When I watched Breakfast at Tiffany’s, I enjoyed it the same way any young girl would. I’ve seen My Fair Lady and Roman Holiday, but I suppose my favorite is Funny Face.”
What she has to remember her grandmother: “All I can think of are her cashmere turtlenecks, which I adore and wear all throughout the winter,” she says. “And a white antique stuffed teddy bear.”
I like that Emma doesn’t want to be an actress or a model and that she seems more interested in studying art and living the life of an artist rather than the life of a Hollywood brat with a famous lineage. I think that probably comes from growing up, for the most part, in Italy and Switzerland. Plus, if you read the full piece, you can see that she’s very close to her father and that he’s steered her away from Hollywood. So… I do have to wonder why anyone agreed to this cover.
Photos courtesy of Michael Avedon/Harper’s Bazaar.
My great-great-great-great-great grandmother was an African Queen. Do I get a cover? Preferably Vogue, thank you.
lol
Excellent!LOL!
Nice! You definitely get the thread award
If I ran a fashion magazine you would def. get a cover.
If she doesn’t want to be a model or an actress why did she agree to model for this magazine?
Looks-wise she mostly favors the Ferrar side of the family.
Meh.
Exactly. Nothing exciting or groundbreaking.
The first thing out of my mouth after seeing the photos was “She’s not a model. Pretty girl but not a model.” So I, too, wonder why this was an idea?
Maybe getting her name out there will help to sell paintings.
She does seem to have inherited some of her grandmother’s grace.
Dressing up like your grandmother is a little weird, but I suppose this is better than seeing Jennifer Love Hewitt or even Natalie Portman try to do the same thing.
Or Winona Ryder or Lauren Conrad. Perplexed you make an excellent point. I am so tired of seeing Audrey Clones. These ladies need to figure out what suits them. Audrey had a unique face and body: huge eyes, dark hair, fair skin, a gaunt upper body with a much curvier lower body. That’s why she rocked dark pants and horizontally striped tops the way almost no one else could. Jennifer Love Hewitt and Winona Ryder are fare too busty to pull off that look.
Others may dress like Audrey, but none of them captured her mystique. Her granddaughter is a pretty girl, but like all others styled to imitate her grandmother, they just don’t hold a candle to the original.
Maybe in spirit, but not physically. I find these photos awkward…if these are the best of the shoot…what did the rest look like? She looks uncomfortable & as if she’s really trying to follow someoone’s suggestions. I don’t know why they even did this, unless it’s a ploy to get her onto the world stage for some reason.
^^THIS.
I don’t see a resemblance at all. But the clothes are nice
Having just re-watched a couple of Audrey’s films, I see no resemblance here either. Audrey had a square jaw, finer features & straight brows. That’s a Ferrer nose.
The line of her jaw in the first photo captures the slight resemblance best. It’s her jaw, at that angle, that is Audrey.
Wouldn’t look at her twice
I always feel for these kids who have mega beautiful mothers and grandmothers.
Putting themselves out in spreads like this…..is just……..like being set up for a fall
Agreed, the doesn’t look a thing like Audrey but she does appear to have some grace (though I suppose most people who have studied dance have an element of grace, anyway).
But I love that she inherited audrey’s cashmere turtlenecks – what a beautiful image.
This is so unnecessary. And no, I do not see any resemblance.
Barely any resemblance and that’s with heavy styling for resemblance.
This is my takeaway. Her grandmother was famous so she gets to soak up the benefits from someone elses achievements.
^^^This. Agree FLORC. All I think of when I see this is the many children of famous actors who get roles/gigs because of who their parents/grandparent are, when there are many others who are more deserving.
Absolutely Belle.
Sadly, talent is easily fabricated today. Fan bases are constructed over social media without a person earning it. It’s so rare today to find someone with real talent in acting or singing.
Just to play devil’s advocate – if the celebrity parent has acting talent, it wouldn’t be too far a stretch to imagine that the child also inherited the same acting talent. After all, many “regular people” have inherited the same talents & abilities as their own parents. Obviously not all celebrity offspring get roles based on their own merits alone, and not all children are born with the same level of talent (if any at all) as their parents but you can’t say that there are NO celebrity children who aren’t just as good as their parents and therefore don’t deserve it.
The magazine cooked up the granddaughter photographed by the grandson, I don’t think it’s so egregious. It’s a photo shoot for a magazine, not lifetime employment and exposure. Who buys magazines anymore? People who were around when Audrey was popular and might be interested in what her granddaughter looks like. Sure, nepotism is a thing and we need less Kelly Osborne but this seems pretty innocent in the scheme of “spoiled children of”.
I don’t see any resemblance either.
A cute girl in Audrey’s dresses, there was no need to do this. UNLESS the celebrity they wanted for the cover changed mind and they had this last minute idea. My conspiracy theory.
She’s VERY lovely in her own right. I hope she’ll be able to forge her own identity in whatever she does.
I agree-I also appreciate the fact that she is very different in build than her grandmother. Audrey Hepburn was very tiny & waif-like. This girl looks like a healthy young lady who isn’t starving herself to look like a model
Audrey had struggles with food through out her life. She and her family starved during the war and forever after she had trouble eating enough. She was beautiful and I adored her but she was always much too thin, IMO, because of her childhood deprivation and her difficult relationship with food. I am a fan of Audrey, not only her film work but her amazing work for UNICEF, she was a lovely woman.
In the article it seems to be mentioned that the grandson of the fellow who made some of Audrey’s famous portraits photographed her for this shoot. So maybe that’s why she agreed?
Ah, that makes sense, I guess? Seems a silly idea though.
I think it could have been cool if they’d done more “legacies”. Throw Charlotte Casiraghi in there, and maybe see if any of Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward’s grandkids would be into it, etc. And instead of interviewing just Emma Ferrer, who to her credit does come off very lovely and well-spoken, talk to all of them about living with a great Hollywood legacy and how they work to differentiate themselves. Emma seems perfectly nice and all, but she’s just 20, she’s not very interesting yet. I would be more into it if they’d made it a group thing and gone full-theme with it.
The top cover is a knockout, just gorgeous. Agree the rest are a bit meh.
+1. I think it’s beautiful!
if i were her, id blow it up and hang it over my fireplace til the end of time. i love it.
Funny Face is my favorite, too… that’s all I have.
Nice shoot but she just looks like another girl styled like Audrey.
She’s quite pretty. Nice pics!
I actually liked her interview. I can see how she can’t relate that the woman playing Holly Golightly is her grandmother. Who could if you’ve never known her except through stories from your father? I see very little of Audrey in her but sometimes I think that whatever the IT is that makes one beautiful it is often far more than a physical appearance and Audrey had that in spades. Good luck to her.
Strange idea for a cover and it doesn’t look great.
She kind of looks like Emily Vancamp. I don’t think she necessarily looks bad though.
I think wear she differs from Audrey is in her physique, but Audrey was unusually thin.
Maybe the family agreed because she was paid? Seems odd to me too, in light of the fact her father doesn’t have sought out the spotlight.
She’s a young woman and is working to become an artist – a paycheck from something like this could go a long way towards her supporting herself. Considering that she’s not a model, I wonder if the magazine deliberately sought her out for this, and if that’s the case the paycheck could be very generous.
That’s what I was thinking. A way to meet someone who could tell me stories about my grandmother from actual experience AND be able to pay for my own tuition and supplies (art supplies are expensive!). Also, I’m 20, and they’re not naked photos. The kid is no dummy.
She sort of looks like Anna Paquin.
I thought the same thing. Glad I’m not the only one that sees it.
Hmm. pretty girl, some resemblance, and I like the shoot, but mostly it’s a”why?” Audrey is such a money spinner still though so I guess that’s obvious, though I don’t think the visual impact is strong enough for this to go any further. It’s way less creepy than the CGI Audrey in that Galaxy (U.K. chocolate) ad though, that thing weirds me out. My favourite film of hers is Funny Face too.
The US has a weird cartoon-y CGI Audrey ad too. I think it’s for Dove? I can’t remember, but it’s based on Roman Holiday which makes no sense for whatever it is that they’re selling. It’s just a creepy little ad. It makes me wonder who sold her likeness to sell candy bars? Are they that hard up for $$$?
I think it’s the same ad, if I’m not mistaken Dove is basically what we call Galaxy. It’s so creepy!
I think she has a really pretty face. The cover is awkward, but the second pic with the hat makes her look stunning.
She looks like Alison Williams.
Never heard of her but she looks nice. Reminds me of Sofia Loren on the second pix
Harper’s Bazaar may not have used some huge celebrity for their cover, but they sure did use nepotism by hiring the grand daughter of Hepburn, and they exploited Hepburn’s name, even if only a little bit, to make sure everyone realized the association of the grand daughters connections to the late actress.
since most magazine covers are just actresses and the occasional reality type, i can’t complain. it’s actually better than some actress etc covers because they are rather demure, which seems to have gone out of fashion.
I agree. I am finding a non-model/non-actress/non-reality star to be interesting as a cover subject because it is so different. I LIKE that she doesn’t seem to know how to model, or want a career in showbiz. At least she isn’t giving us the standard open mouth sultry shtick.
I saw this last night and was hoping we’d get to talk about it today!
I think the shoot is absolutely gorgeous. I do wonder how this actually came about, though. Did she go to them? Did they track her down? I don’t know.
I hope this is a once-in-a-blue-moon type of deal for Emma. I’m an Audreyphile and ADORE her, so I love that her granddaughter is carrying on her legacy through ballet. Audrey loved to dance.
Funny, I was JUST in Florence a month ago! I wish I knew she was open to some kind of “public image”, I honestly would have sent her an email asking to have coffee or something. A long shot I know, but you’d be amazed at the responses you get when you think it’s a long shot! You never know until you ask.
I actually think she resembles Mel Ferrer more than Audrey
I was thinking the same thing….
She’s all Ferrer.
It’s a nice shoot. No complaints. She’s not trying to become a model or an actress, so I have no problem with them using her.
Weird. What was behind Harper’s decision to put her on cover? I mean, this is the fall issue, one of the biggest, if not the biggest, of the year – and they put her on the cover? It would be fine if she worked the clothes, but she doesn’t. She’s pretty for sure, but come on – she’s got no standing to sell a magazine and she’s not editorial material.
Well, it’s better than using Kim Kardashian…
Meh, but at least it’s not another actress cover, I hate it when actresses are used for fashion, they are NOT fashion (except for Audrey, of course). I would actually prefer to see a complete unknown – doesn’t matter to me that she’s the granddaughter of Audrey, we don’t know her – than another photoshopped Hollywood face. She’s lovely but boring. However, I can’t imagine how tough it is to create excitement in covers every month, the best ones seem to be revisiting the Supers. That’s all I’ve got.
She’s very pretty but her expressions give away the fact she didn’t enjoy this shoot much. I won’t give her a hard time on this, though. 80% of these kind of editorials don’t turn out right, and she’s not a model.
“Audrey Hepburn’s granddaughter” is how they introduce her? She shouldn’t even be on the cover if she has no other claim to fame. This cover is extremely pointless and a fail.
Finally, a new face! Regardless of her relationship with Audrey, she’s gorgeous! I’m really happy that they didn’t use Rihanna, Katy Perry, Beyonce, Cara Delevigne, etc. I’m soooo sick of them getting all the covers.
I agree with you: she is pretty and, at least, she is a new face. That’s refreshing.
Don’t see the resemblance. But I like reading how her thoughts, ideas and plans for life are so different from many other Hollywood connected 20 year olds I read about here.
I totally get why they would put her on the cover. She is a lovely girl and I would assume Audrey would be proud of how she turned out. We are a society that latches onto things that are associated with famous people. An autograph or a dress Audrey once wore would prob. sell for hundreds/thousands. This girl is literally Audrey’s flesh and blood. It’s the same for all children/grand children of the famous or notorious. There will always be interest in them.
I see you share interesting things here, you can earn some extra cash, your blog has big potential, for the monetizing method, just search in google – K2 advices
how to monetize a website