Benedict Cumberbatch, Timothy Spall lead London Critics nominations

FFN_Ben_Cumber_FLYUK_102214_51565270

Yay, the London Film Critics Association just released their nominations. So we won’t have to go a day without Benedict Cumberbatch’s otter face on the front page!!! HUZZAH. Obviously, the London Critics Association put a greater emphasis on British films and British actors, but they don’t exclude foreigners at all. This year’s nominations are an interesting mix of British and American films, with lots of love for some weirder indie films and performances. You can see the full list of nominees here. Some of the bigger categories:

Film of the Year
“Birdman”
“Boyhood”
“The Grand Budapest Hotel”
“Ida”
“Leviathan”
“Mr. Turner”
“Nightcrawler”
“The Theory of Everything”
“Under the Skin”
“Whiplash”

Director of the Year
Wes Anderson, “The Grand Budapest Hotel”
Jonathan Glazer, “Under the Skin”
Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, “Birdman”
Mike Leigh, “Mr. Turner”
Richard Linklater, “Boyhood”

Actor of the Year
Benedict Cumberbatch, “The Imitation Game”
Jake Gyllenhaal, “Nightcrawler”
Michael Keaton, “Birdman”
Eddie Redmayne, “The Theory of Everything”
Timothy Spall, “Mr. Turner”

Actress of the Year
Marion Cotillard, “Two Days, One Night”
Essie Davis, “The Babadook”
Scarlett Johansson, “Under the Skin”
Julianne Moore, “Maps to the Stars”
Julianne Moore, “Still Alice”

Supporting Actor of the Year
Riz Ahmed, “Nightcrawler”
Ethan Hawke, “Boyhood”
Edward Norton, “Birdman”
Mark Ruffalo, “Foxcatcher”
J.K. Simmons, “Whiplash”

Supporting Actress of the Year
Patricia Arquette, “Boyhood”
Marion Bailey, “Mr. Turner”
Jessica Chastain, “A Most Violent Year”
Agata Kulesza, “Ida”
Emma Stone, “Birdman”

British Actor of the Year
Benedict Cumberbatch, “The Imitation Game”
Tom Hardy, “Locke” and “The Drop”
Jack O’Connell, “Starred Up,” “’71” and “Unbroken”
Eddie Redmayne, “The Theory of Everything”
Timothy Spall, “Mr. Turner”

British Actress of the Year
Emily Blunt, “Into the Woods” and “Edge of Tomorrow”
Felicity Jones, “The Theory of Everything”
Keira Knightley, “The Imitation Game,” “Begin Again” and “Laggies”
Gugu Mbatha-Raw, “Belle”
Rosamund Pike, “Gone Girl” and “What We Did on Our Holiday”

[From the Boston Herald]

You’ve got to think that Benedict will win something, right? Either Actor of the Year or British Actor of the Year. I’m thinking that Timothy Spall, Eddie Redmayne and Bendy will split these awards. Hm…it’s also good to see there’s so much love for Julianne Moore with the London critics. And they love Whiplash and JK Simmons too, yay. JK Simmons is an American treasure! And Jack O’Connell got something, but no nomination for Angelina Jolie. Too bad. Oh, and no Keira Knightley in the supporting actress category? That’s weird.

FFN_KM_HwdFilmAwd_Arr_111414_51585533

FFN_KM_HwdFilmAwd_Arr_111414_51585587

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

83 Responses to “Benedict Cumberbatch, Timothy Spall lead London Critics nominations”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Lindy79 says:

    I genuinely thought there would be no Otter post today. Foolish, foolish Lindy.

    IG got no nod for film…interesting.

    • Kiddo says:

      A day without the curled comet corraller is like a day without sunshine.

    • Angie says:

      I’ve given up hope on that LOL
      Surely we will have a thread with him everyday until, idk, Oscar nom?

      By the way, quite busy these two days, just saw it in SoGo, the engagement card for BC? Just when I thought I understood how imbecile the PR could be……what the f**k was THAT?? I truly truly felt very very sorry for him at that moment.

      • Lindy79 says:

        Engagement card? was he buying one for himself to remind him that he’s actually engaged and should look happy and not like someone just farted in his face?

      • Angie says:

        I didn’t go and check myself tbh, it’s said that Benophie Daily retweeted that someone in a card shop looking for an engagement card for BC…

        I just don’t understand what does that even mean…Yeah, if it’s done by PR it probably is to follow the “enGAGment party” ? But people just go inside a shop and say, oh I’m looking for an engagement card for BC, any idea? It’s utterly ridiculous. So embarrassing.

      • gg says:

        Benophie also posted a Tweet that somebody just happened to send today. Their grandma or something just happened to see Ben&Sophie at a restaurant *weeks* ago and only told him today. During a slow news week, the day after Eddie Redmayne’s wedding!! What are the odds?

    • GiGi says:

      Lol! I never even click on the Cumberbatch posts… I don’t get it and I can’t keep up!

      However, last night I dreamt he and his fiance went to the church I grew up attending and then I was all, “You guys, they’re really nice!” on the CB comments the next day… Even in my dreams I’m commenting, ha!

  2. paranormalgirl says:

    Keira Knightley was nominated for British Actress of the Year

  3. Alexandra says:

    HUZZAH for the Jonathan Glazer & Scarlett noms for “Under the Skin”. That movie is a thing of beauty. And Julianne Moore nominated for both Maps and Still Alice 😀 .

  4. Miss M says:

    double post, sorry

  5. Beth says:

    Biggest shock is The Imitation Game was not nominated for Film of the Year. Also not nominated for Director, Supporting Actress and Screenwriter. Wow.

    Nice choices for Best Director though I’d loved to see Nolan nominated.

    The love for Mr Turner is real. Very deserving film and excellent performance by Spall.

    And Jake Gyllenhaal scores yet another nomination! <3. This is bad for my heart; I thought he was out of the running but it seems like he is popping up everywhere after the SAG and GG noms. He needs to get an Oscar mom for his terrific role in Nightcrawler; one of the best films this year.

    • Angie says:

      So they do have their tastes? LOL
      As we’ve discussed before, the movie itself doesn’t really that good?

      Finally going to see TTOE this weekend and hope I could also find some time for Nightcrawler, looking forward to both ; )

      • Beth says:

        @Angie

        Yep haha I didn’t like TIG and I don’t remember it winning anything so far at various critics awards in the US. But I’m shocked even the British side seemed unenthusiastic about it. Can’t disagree with them though heh.

        I LOVED Nightcrawler! It is a dark film but totally up my alley. Didn’t like Theory of Everything unfortunately (too obviously Oscar-baity and formulaic), but Eddie Redmayne was outstanding in it.

      • Angie says:

        Tbh I’m not an ER fan, LOL, but it’s hard for me to watch these films in a cinema as m in mainland CN, going to HK this weekend, so I think I’d better grab the opportunity ; )

        It’s a pity it seems they already had whiplash some time ago.

        And I love dark story ; )

      • Beth says:

        I hope you like it! Whiplash is great too. 🙂

    • Sixer says:

      I didn’t think TIG was all that, either. I mean – don’t get me wrong: it was a qualidee production in most respects – good performances especially – but it wasn’t in any way special. It was a very straightforward film, not particularly artistic or in any way groundbreaking. Very um… well… BBC.

      • Beth says:

        Yes I was disappointed at just how mediocre and uninspiring it was. Like here was one of the most fascinating unsung heroes in history and they somehow managed to make the movie conventional and bland. I was also annoyed it kinda glossed over the chemical castration which Turing suffered.

      • Lindy79 says:

        I haven’t seen it yet but I can’t for the life of me think why they chose to gloss over that element of his story.
        I agree that it didn’t need a gay sex scene or anything but it was part of his extremely tragic story so why not focus on it? Especially since Cumby calls him a “gay icon” (don’t get me started on that) in every interview and mentions his treatment and the overdue pardon

      • Beth says:

        @Lindy79

        I was puzzled too. BC has frequently mentioned how awful Turing’s chemical castration was (he grew breasts; gouged out some device they put inside his thigh) and all these would make for a far more compelling and emotional ending than the one they had. The chemical castration was mentioned in a conversation between Turing and Joan Clarke but not depicted directly onscreen.

        I don’t know why. Maybe the filmmakers didn’t want to be too critical of the British govt? That’d be strange, since the govt has already apologised for the way it treated Turing. Or they didn’t want to go to far in pushing the buttons of Oscar voters who may not be entirely gay-friendly? Or maybe it was due to time contraints? I don’t buy this though: TIG could have really benefitted from an extra 15-20 min for a fuller closure, or even cut out some of the extraneous scenes in front to give this part of Turing’s life (the prosecution and persecution) it’s proper due.

      • Sixer says:

        @Lindy – I went off Cumberbounce as a (political and/or intelligent) person after the Assange film debacle – all the interviews and PR were parrotings designed to please/placate the anti-war, pro-whistleblowing Assange supporters, plus we had that ludicrous anti-pap stunt of holding up notices attempting exactly the same thing. But the film was a DISNEY-financed propaganda piece taken from an inimical book. Talk about cognitive dissonance.

        Either Ben is too thick to understand the issues or he’s happy to take the cash and the fame and misrepresent a film if required. Can’t have it both ways. And he’s done exactly the same with TIG. What he says and what the film is are two different things entirely. It’s TFE all over again.

        End game for me is that I think he’s a fine actor but I don’t believe a single word he says about any social issue, political issue, or personal view. And that’s from someone who couldn’t give a stuff about his engagement (except for any snigger value it may have, of course)!

      • gg says:

        You know, the way Benedict does bring up the topic of the chemical castration, and the fact that Turing tried to cut the implant out with a kitchen knife…..I wonder if there were scenes dealing with those in the movie that HW demanded to be cut after he bought it? Just a thought.

      • Beth says:

        @gg

        He might, but I’m puzzled as to why he’d do it? Unless Harvey thinks the movie being centred on a gay main character is already treading on thin ice with AMPAS voters, and he doesn’t want to rub the gay theme in their faces by highlighting the persecution Turing suffered due to his sexuality.

        There is a disconnect between how fiercely the filmmakers condemn homophobia and the shameful treatment of Alan Turing vs what is actually portrayed in the movie (rather little, mostly mentioned in passing and depicted indirectly in a conversation between Turing and Clarke).

      • j says:

        Weinstein demands a lot of stuff that doesn’t make sense to me.

        Not a lot of filmed scenes were cut from TIG in number, but cut ones were long, I’ve heard as much as 45 mins’ worth.

        [didn’t bother with TFE, as Assange is a disgusting, awful person, but to be fair BC fought with the director the entire time over script changes. thats what you get for trusting condon though]

      • gg says:

        Vulture has a story today about a long scene cut from the end of TIG. Graham Moore says he cut it but who knows if HW might have pressured him to?

      • Ann says:

        @ gg: Could be. No one involved in this movie but Weinstein have any real power.

        @ J: Yes, I remember Condon saying they were ‘disagreeing’ (read: arguing) over TFE script changes close to and during production. But that is the risk you take when you’re a little (naive? He thought neutron cream was real, ffs) fish in a big pond.

      • Beth says:

        @gg

        Yep I read about that deleted scene in another Graham Moore interview a few weeks ago. I’m glad they cut the scene though – even though the part about a bitten apple is true, I can imagine it could seem cheesy to an unknowing audience, as if the filmmakers were trying to go for some corny parallel with the garden of Eden.

        Also, OT but fun: There were rumours that the Apple logo (an apple with a bite taken off) is a tribute to Alan Turing, who was thought to have died after ingesting an apple laced with cyanide. Turing being the father of computer science and all that. I think the Apple executives have clarified it was not a reference to Turing, although it is a nice thought. 🙂

    • Sunny says:

      Mr.Turner hasn’t opened in my city yet, and I am very interested in seeing it. I’m glad that Spall’s performance is getting some buzz.

      Looking forward to the Imitation Game as well. Though from what I am reading here, the film glosses over some of the tragedies Turing suffered including the hell he was put through by the British gov’t.

      Does the movie solely focus on his work during the war and ignore his post-war life?

      • Beth says:

        @Sunny

        I adored Mr Turner and Spall was excellent. Though I must say that it is not for everybody; it is a “slow burn” kinda movie and is rather long and events move slowly. But I loved it and the cinematography and set designs are gorgeous.

        RE TIG, the movie mostly focuses on Turing’s war-time activities at Bletchley Park. The post-war period is depicted rather briefly, and the persecution Turing suffered is dealt with indirectly in a conversation Turing had with his colleague Joan Clarke. The movie does not show any scenes of Turing undergoing chemical castration or the more awful effects it wreaked on his body (although Turing does look pale and ghastly at the end). In fact, it was only after BC said in an interview that he gave Turing a limp in the last scene because the real Turing used a knife to gouge out a device they put in his thigh that I realised why his character was walking awkwardly (never explained in the movie).

    • icerose says:

      not surprised because the UK critics have always been more circumspect about it than the USA critics and rightly so. Besides which Harvey does not have as much influence with the media here.
      I think the addition of the spy scenario’s to create atmosphere muddied the waters,
      @Sixer I agree re Assange and this film. Some of his PR puts me off his films and when he said he would choose prison over HRT treatment I felt like posting him Peter Wildeblood’s Against the Law which described the conditions of prison at that time and was instrumental in the outcomes of the Wolfenden Report,

      • Sixer says:

        Ah yes. The Scrubs. Fabulous place. Not. Post him a DVD of A Very British Sex Scandal!

      • anon says:

        Wow! Cut 45 min from the movie? That’s probably where the chemical castration and resultant effects take place. Maybe even includes the suicide! Perhaps this could be (at least part of) grumpybatch. Can’t wait for the Director’s cut on DVD!

  6. Miss M says:

    Whiplash got another nomination, yay!!!

    I think the British actress of the year will go to either Keira or Rosamund.

  7. Dani2 says:

    No David Oyelowo for Best Actor and/or Best British Actor? Okay.

  8. Coco says:

    I’m here to spread some love for Jake Gyllenhaal!

  9. Sixer says:

    Ra ra Riz Ahmed! He’s had a really interesting career and I hope he finally wins something. I would say Timothy Spall for EVERYTHING but honestly, I think he got all he wanted from Cannes. The rest is just cherry on the top for him, I feel.

  10. Lilacflowers says:

    There seems to be lots of love for Jake.

    • scarf girl says:

      Has anyone seen Nightcrawler yet? Would like to but also think it might be better to watch in my home with the lights on to shake off what I hear is a very good, yet creepy, performance? But glad to see him getting recognition.

      • Lindy79 says:

        Planning on watching it this weekend, I shall report back with bells on!

      • Beth says:

        Nightcrawler is amazing! Jake is fantastic in it and his character was creepy and abominable but incredibly compelling. Definitely one of my fave movies and performances of 2014. It is not a horror movie though and I didn’t find the level of gore excessive (definitely not Tarantino-esque). And i was very impressed by the director – apparently this is his debut feature film.

      • MtnRunner says:

        I’m watching it tomorrow… can’t wait.

      • Coco says:

        Agree with Beth, the movie is not gory at all, in fact is quite funny at times.

      • k says:

        I thought the acting was great yet the movie was…okay. I wouldn’t go as far as Edelstein did in the Vulture review, but it raised some of the issues I had with it.

        It’s funny this year, because Nightcrawler and Birdman were both better received by critics than audiences, while Boyhood, TTOE and TIG went the other way.

        I don’t know, I was disappointed by Birdman too. Great visuals, great acting, so-so writing. I’m over this Oscar season already 🙂

      • Beth says:

        The movies I like this year havent got much hope at winning anything at the Oscars so I’d be thrilled if they just score some nominations. TIG and TOE (both of which I dislike, mind) have gotten almost no love at all at the critics awards but critics groups tend to go for edgier picks (not all though; some are v boring and predictable) while the televised awards like Globes and Oscars go for more middle-of-the-road, conventional baity stuff (like TIG and TOE). Boyhood has won several critics awards and from the looks of it will do well at Oscars too.

      • gg says:

        I was completely knocked out by both Birdman and Boyhood! Really big steps forward in filmmaking, unlike TTOE or TIG which were very conventional. Eddie and Ben were both much better than their movies. Haven’t seen Nightcrawler yet but hope to, soon.

        I will start a riot if Keaton doesn’t win Best Actor.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        What is creepy is the lack of ethics all around and one character’s additional lack of a moral code; not any kind of bump in the dark scariness.

      • Sixer says:

        GG – if you loved Boyhood, I recommend Everyday by Michael Winterbottom, which charts what happens to a marriage (and the children of a marriage) when the husband goes to jail. It was shot over five years and stars John Simm and Shirley Henderson. It’s really beautiful.

      • Birdie says:

        @Scarf Girl:
        It is a very creepy movie, my friend and I looked at each other multiple times in the movie theatre and mouthed WTF?? But don’t get me wrong, it is good-creepy. Jake just owns his role and he is brilliant! He deserves all the awards.

      • MtnRunner says:

        Finally saw Nightcrawler today. Had to go to a neighboring town as it was only in my town for two weeks and not at times I could go. Talk about making it hard to see! Jakey G was as creepy as described and his lack of a moral code frightening. As much as I’d love to see Keaton win the Oscar (and I think he will), I think Jake’s performance deserves it more. My two cents.

  11. Insomniac says:

    Glad to see Essie Davis getting some love. She was incredible in “The Babadook.”

  12. MtnRunner says:

    That is a misleading headline. Eddie got two noms just like Ben and Tim. Plus, ToE got a Film nom, unlike TIG. Not that I think either one deserves that award after seeing Birdman and what I’ve heard about the others.

    Glad to see JK and Julianne get love from the Brits.

  13. SA says:

    While Spall was A+, sitting through Mr Turner and The Theory of Everything reminded me why I have to stop listening to critics and other people during Oscar time.

  14. ellesbelles says:

    When someone else tends to Bens clothing, he looks sharp as F. 10/10 would strip him off with my teeth. When left to dress himself… oh Ben.. no.

    Aside, I finally saw parades end last night, and I know its not generally his best received work, but I loooooved it. Fell in love with the old ben all over again. Still not back in love with Otterbot 2.0

    • Angie says:

      There’s one set pic of him in PE, with suits and top hat doing the makeup, and it’s lovely, soooo adorable, he had that childish little smile, oh I missed that ; (

    • Lucifer says:

      That pant was torn in the hemline. I mean wat was his “fiancee” doing??
      so bad choice of clothes.

      • tasha_nat says:

        TBH, I wouldnt have guessed on a Secret GF all this time partially because of the way he dressed. No woman would let a boyfriend out of the house looking like that (unless boyfriend is stubborn and hardheaded). :p

  15. CK says:

    I’m loving the love for Julianne Moore, but that could all go to hell in a heartbeat. Same for Marion, I just don’t see her getting an Oscar nomination this year, since she (like Tilda Swinton) has been snubbed on repeat nominations since winning. Aniston might just get that nomination prize if they feel like the award is destined to go to Moore anyway. And thankfully, they won’t just give her the award for being well liked like they did Sandra Bullock. I wonder how Oyolewo v. Gylenhaal v. Spall v. Spall is going to turn out since, absent any snubs, they are fighting for the same 2 spots (Keaton/Bendy/Redmayne being as lock as possible).

  16. Sophie says:

    I thought Tom Hardy did a magnificent job in Locke. Just him in a car and it was thrilling and moving!

    • Jake says:

      I’m with you. Not a film for everybody but my God, that man can act!

    • alice says:

      Yeah, I thought he/it was great.

    • Flora says:

      I agree! Tom’s performance was one of the best of the year. The film company seriously dropped the ball with this one. They should either have released the film last year after the Venice Film Festival or released it this autumn, instead of dumping it on the public in March/April and misselling it as a thriller.

      • Cathy says:

        True! Maybe things would have been different. Well, at least Tom’s been chosen as ‘best actor’ at the LA film critics and the Toronto film critics. He really deserved this!

  17. Sunflower says:

    Not very many comments today…something exciting better happen or we’ll be scrounging around for threads to comment on like common Dragonflies!

  18. Lucifer says:

    Someone tweeted to Harvey’s official account calling this engagement a farce.
    Who knows will he see it or not?
    Crazy people

  19. Intro Outro says:

    Wha.. No! Can’t be!! Only 80 comments (well, 81 including this one) under a Cumberbatch post?? NOOOOOO!!!