Someone at Mattel had the questionable idea to turn Dora The Explorer into a Bratz doll type tween with a giant head, lots of hair, and way too sexy look. Enthusiastic, bilingual, three-step problem-solving Dora is probably not thought to be marketable enough to the slightly older kids who are watching Britney videos and emulating Hannah Montana. They’re making Dora “grow up” into a new demographic that has more power to beg for stuff from their parents.
Mattel has only released is a “silouette” of the new Dora complete with a press release touting Dora’s growing fashion sense, but parents see the writing on the wall. Dora is about to care a lot less about catching stars, counting, and visiting her mom on archeological digs. While she’s preoccupied doing her hair Swiper is going to snatch all of Boot’s toys and she’ll just sigh and look wistfully off into the distance. Adults resent the fact that one of the only regular little girl role models for preschoolers is becoming a cookie-cutter tween complete with hair extensions, a cute little skirt and a sassy walk. I wonder if Dora will also get a pony for a sidekick and start going to the mall without a map.
As the mother of a young girl, I know very well that there are very few characters out there aimed at girls that offer the kind of message I feel comfortable with. There aren’t a lot of spunky, non-sexualized girl dolls and tv characters. Instead, preschoolers are bombarded with characters like Bratz and Barbie, two very adult characters. On top of that, Disney offers very gender-stereotyped Princesses like Sleeping Beauty and Ariel the mermaid, who use their smarts primarily to land a man and their happily ever after.
So when I find a little girl character who is smart, curious, spunky and NORMAL looking, trust me, I cling to her. Dora the Explorer is that girl. She solve mysteries by using her brain and her tools. She fearlessly explores the jungle and the rest of her world, learning new things along the way. And most important of all, she looks like a little girl, with a little pot belly and no curves. That is how little girls look. Is it so much to ask that a cartoon character of a little girl actually looks like a little girl?
Apparently, for Nickelodeon and Mattel, who own the rights to Dora, yes, it is too much to ask. They have already manipulated Dora into doing things that don’t make sense for the little explorer- she has been turned into a princess (huh?) and a mermaid (what?), clearly just to compete with the Disney Princesses. But now they are taking it a step further; the two toy companies have announced their plans to sexify Dora.
In a press release sent out last month, it was announced that Dora is growing up. “This groundbreaking initiative, featuring fashion dolls and accessories, is a completely new brand extension that empowers girls to influence and change the lives of Dora and her new friends,” claims the press release. And how are they going to empower the new “tween” Dora? “As tweenage Dora,” trumpets the release, “our heroine has moved to the big city, attends middle school and has a whole new fashionable look.” Fashion? Apparently, that is the only way toy companies can think of to empower little girls.
[From Examiner.com via WeSmirch]
I have a four year-old son who still likes to watch Dora but prefers her new primo, Diego, which is definitely targeted to little boys. Diego will keep acting like an animal rescuer on crack and jumping around saving exotic creatures. He’s not going to change, but some clueless executives made the decision to make Dora sexy and stupid to appeal to little girls. Maybe Mattel was just testing the water with the release of Dora’s new figure and that alarming press release and they’ll realize it’s a bad idea to change a very profitable formula. My kid dislikes the new plush talking Blues Clues figure and won’t watch any of those shows. Focus groups full of kids hopped up on sugar are not the best way to make multi-million dollar marketing decisions.
i am SO sick of this phase that toymakers are going though. bratz dolls are SLUTTY. i cna’t believe people buy their children those dolls anyways. i am 100% against having dora grow up. have you seen what they did to strawberry shortcake? its heartbreaking.
http://contexts.org/socimages/files/2008/06/11_strawberryshortcake_lg.jpg
who is next? either way…i can see how these new images are going to mess with little girls self perception more than barbie did.
i really hope they dont mess with my childhood favorite, rainbow brite!
I work at a daycare, in the two year old room, and I’ll be damned if I am going to put in a Dora disc after her make over. It seems everything these days need to be about sex appeal. I mean Dora is a kids show. She needs to stay a chubby little girl and not some Hannah Montana bimbo.
UUUUUGGGGHHHHHHHH. This seriously pisses me off. Are there not enough tweeny sluts out there who are marketed to children, and who are put out there to “empower” preteen girls to be stupid, vapid and easy, just like their idols?
It makes no sense to me. Why does our society promote creativity and independence in young boys, yet tell girls that the most they should aspire to be is “hot” and popular and famous, no matter what the cost. The same society that allowed an airhead beauty queen to get dangerously close to the White House just because she had nice legs.
For every Dora there are 500 Mileys, Barbies and Paris Hiltons. Let us keep ONE character who dares to show girls that there is more to life.
My niece loves Dora and I love getting her Dora stuff…I was so upset to read this. I hope Mattel doesn’t go through with this and just leaves her alone.
so who will be left for little girls who aren’t of age to “aspire” to the new sexed up Dora?
I’m with Dingle, the tweens have multiple toys from Barbies to Bratz to Miley Cyrus, leave ONE for the little ones.
$1000 says some GUY at Mattel thought this idea fricking fabulous.
According to Mattel, she isn’t going to be sexy at all. Just older. Like, 11. And she is going to solve mysteries, like Nancy Drew. And they are only making one doll. The shows & everything else are going to stay the same. I think its a little early to get outraged
Hopefully they leave her the way she is now…but parents shouldn’t be looking to cartoons to be role models for their children.
They’re not trying to sex her up? Then why a thigh high mini skirt – why not capri’s? why long flowing hair, why not an update of her bob? Effin’ spin doctors think people are stupid – and sadly some are and will actually buy this doll. These are the same parents who let their 12 year olds where pants that say “Juicy” across the ass.
Bohdi, good point, it’s a little early to freak, but man, like the posters above, it’s taking some effort. It’s not like we haven’t been down this road before…
Getting older isn’t the problem, it’s which kind of “older” they think will sell the most merchandise that scares us all.
It comes down to power. Every girl, long before they reach Tweendom, knows how powerful sex is. Girls are totally confused about how and when to wield that power and I don’t like the idea of some company exploiting this phase to make a buck (and to keep girls coming back for more crap to keep that particular brand of power intact).
Being that age just reeks enough as it is. Your body suddenly goes AWOL and you just can’t go back to what it was like before your chest started growing. You feel powerful but threatened at the same time. It’s a scary time and the last thing we need to do is to tell girls that Bratz dolls are the only choice if they want to feel “empowered.”
I’m sure boys feel this too (minus the threatened part) and if Diego ever comes out with his pants hanging off his A**, grabbing his crotch and refusing to ties his shoe laces, I’ll be ticked about that too.
And last time I checked, that dim-witted little Ariel mermaid-of-the-heaving-chest wasn’t up to the task of helping girls fit into the real world. Especially when she’s willing to literally trade her “voice” just to sit there and look pretty in the hopes of bagging some dude!
Ahem, ok, enough. Sorry for the ramble.
“And last time I checked, that dim-witted little Ariel mermaid-of-the-heaving-chest wasn’t up to the task of helping girls fit into the real world. Especially when she’s willing to literally trade her “voice” just to sit there and look pretty in the hopes of bagging some dude!”
I am SO glad someone else said this. I’m 23, so “The Little Mermaid” was one of the first Disney movies I ever remember watching. What do I remember taking away from it? The fact that Ariel shoved her chest in her father’s face while crying, “I’m 16 years old! I’m NOT a child!”
No sh•t Sherlock. The C-cups kinda give it away.
I hope my (future) daughters are as nerdy as I am, so they can “look up” to the characters I did as a child– Catwoman and Mrs. Emma Peel!
Although I’m also sad as a parent that they want to change Dora, I don’t think there’s enough information to be so angry yet. Also, she’s clearing wearing leggings under her skirt. Tons of girls wear skirts with leggings now. They make skirts with leggings attached for babies now. Not that big of a deal.
why is she clearly wearing leggings in the silhouette? i am just curious.
i don’t get why they need to change her either. fine, make her grow up, but why can’t she have a ponytail and jeans like many girls that age? and i thought i read something on another site about the new dora having “shopping” as a new hobby. thanks mattel! way to make little dora the explorer into a brainless miley cyrus type.
@RIO: “…Ariel shoved her chest in her father’s face while crying, “I’m 16 years old! I’m NOT a child!”
No sh•t Sherlock. The C-cups kinda give it away.”
Ha! funny. You and about a bizzilion other girls (and boys) the world over soaked up that image whether we remember it or not 🙂
I just remember that one shot of her arching her back and sticking out her chest on the rock while the the waves crescendo around her. Too funny. I remember thinking, damn, I bet the ridiculous dork who drew this cartoon got off drawing semi-por*n of an underage “mermaid”. So pathetic.
wow i can’t believe they would do something like this
their is enough sex images out there we need to keep stuff like dora for little kids not teens
Why not introduce the ‘Nancy Drew’ -type character as Dora’s big sister or something? But wait, god forbid there be a solid role-model and example of sisterhood for young girls when they’re really supposed to grow up and compete with each other…
Bananas.
“And last time I checked, that dim-witted little Ariel mermaid-of-the-heaving-chest wasn’t up to the task of helping girls fit into the real world. Especially when she’s willing to literally trade her “voice” just to sit there and look pretty in the hopes of bagging some dude!”
Ha ha, there’s a damn good reason that I decided Mulan was one of my favorite disney heroines when it first came out into theaters. I was turning 10 that year.Esmeralda came second. I was enchanted with Djali and loved the fact she took down Frollo’s army at the festival with just her and her goat – and Phoebus thought that was the sexiest thing he had ever seen. And she was essentially a champion for the minorities in Paris (gypsies and Quasimodo).
But anyway, I’d prefer to see the actual illustration before I threw a hissy fit. But it still doesn’t look pretty.
But just looking at the silhouette, I think two things need to be fixed.
1) Put the hair in a ponytail.
2) LENGTHEN THE SKIRT. Even better, put some flare pants on her.
Becca: It’s hard to find a fellow Esmeralda fan, so even though she’s only your second favourite, I suggest we band together and refer to each other as “sister”.
(Personally, I loved how Phoebus didn’t decide right then and there that he loved her, nor her him. It took a good two, three days of gettin’-to-know-ya before they very calmly shared a quiet kiss without letting their luuuurve distract them from the task at hand. And man-oh-man, I could go on about this for hours.)
Ahem. Back to the subject at hand. I’m pretty sure the silhouette’s shirt only has one sleeve. Not cool.
Also, has anyone noticed that there has been a very noticeable sift from championing the underdog to glamourizing the Regina Georges? Name a major blockbuster after Mean Girls that portrayed superficiality in a negative light. And we’ll NEVER see another “My So-Called Life”. And that really makes me sad. I blame Gossip Girl for everything.
I totally understand why people would be upset & I agree 100% that girls these days have way too many sexed up role models. But I just think that, since it pertains to ONE doll and not the entire Dora brand AND no-one knows exactly what she will look like, its a little early to reach for the pitchforks.
apparently those rules are really stringent…
becca: ahhhh, Mulan, total Fave.
Ling: “…very calmly shared a quiet kiss without letting their luuuurve distract them from the task at hand…” ha! totally cute.
Yeah, good point about Regina George….hmmm, does Ugly Betty count? And, I don’t know much about the movie, but in Twilight, isn’t the main girl supposed to be kind of a dork? Like clutzy and shy, etc. (gasp. how uncool of her!)
who knows Bodhi, maybe the sillhouette was released just to gauge the level of pitch forkery?
Wouldn’t it be great if we who will spend out hard-earned cash on this stuff (or not) actually had some influence on the market?
Wish more people would speak up. If they have a brain, and we know that they do, the maker of this doll is probably trolling the sites as we speak reading and noting any reaction to the new Dora that they can get their hands on. I say, fork ’em while we have the chance! 🙂
My mom hates the whole Barbie/princess thing that is always pushed on little girls, so when I was little, the only dolls I played with were American Girls. Now they also have the “Girl of Today” series, and I bought each niece of my 4 nieces one of those for Chanukah. The dolls actually look like little girls, and all the clothes and accessories are age-appropriate. Unfortunately, they cost about 4 times more than most dolls, or else I think most parents would choose them over Barbies for their daughters.
Oh, and my own “Little Mermaid” story, which I don’t remember very well, but my mom told me a while back: when I was in preschoool, this very pushy girl in my class was obsessed with that movie, and she’d try to force everyone to help her reenact it every damn day. I played along, but insisted upon being the sea witch, and I’d go over to the play kitchen and make “poisons” to give to her (which wasn’t really in the movie, but oh well). After about a week of being “dead” by nap time, she left me alone.
There is a special place in Hell…I am convinced…for people who make their living off of sexualizing children for profit.
@ Zoe – Yeah, Bella in Twilight is clutzy and supposedly “dorky” but not only do the cool kids accept her right away, she is hopelessly codependant on Edward.
Dove,
I totally agree! To me, that was the only real “destructive” part of the stories as far as allowing young girls to read the stories. There is a difference between romance and total sick dependence on a teenage boyfriend. The pathetic factor in that series was just off the charts in that regard. I’m all about girls falling in love with responsible, chivalrous, and respectful men, but Bella couldn’t freaking walk from one side of a room to another without needed some man or other to hold her hand.
It was nauseous!
Mandy: I was an immense fan of American Girl dolls. Samantha Parkington and Josephina Montoya! And then there was also the Magic Attic Dolls. I was a Heather fan all of the way.
Ling: Sure thing sister. 🙂 I was glad as well that Esmeralda and Pheobus’s love developed over a period of time. But Pheobus was still turned on by the fact that Esmeralda kicked the ass of half of the city army by herself with her pet goat. I find that amazing.
Zoe: Isn’t Mulan amazing? 🙂 And Captain Chang was the one that went to her to court her. While I’m all for girls taking the initiative, Mulan never chased after Chang. She may have liked Chang, but she obviously had other things on her mind.
Sorry folks, Bella Swan is not a role model. And the books are not championing abstinence like people think. Look at Eclipse:
Bella: I wanna have sex
Edward: No
Bella: Aw, please?
Edward: No. I could kill you.
-five minutes later-
Bella: Now can we have sex?
Edward: NO!!!!
Bella: OMG, I’m so sorry I made you mad. Will you ever forgive pathetic little me?
Edward: Oh yes my selfless flower. Just don’t be so careless.
-five minutes later-
Bella: Let’s have sex now!!!
And Victoria was just put right alongside that to make the book a little interesting.
Dang Becca, you must be hella young. When I was little, the only American girls were Samantha, Kirsten, and Molly. Then they added Felicity. I don’t even know who Josephina is… but I can’t wait to find out whenever I have a daughter of my own!
Mandy – Hell yes! I’m a Molly-girl for life! Bring it on back to 1944, girl!
As for Disney movies . . . I have a certain affinity for Ariel the Little Mermaid – only because I was a spliff away from being named “Ariel Space Kraft”. (Kraft being my surname.) But I’ve always identified with Jasmine of Aladdin fame. Something about a sassy, independent, non-caucasian female lead really struck a chord with me early on.
I got a little too old for Disney once they r-ed my girl Pocahontas. The stereotyping really hit home on that one.
No offense Jess (first comment) but the Strawberry Shortcake redo is not exactly slutty. It’s just modernised, a cute girl in a cute hat, what’s slutty about that? I also think if they can do Dora tastefully than fine, but why do they have to ruin the origianl character? Can’t they just do Dora’s older sister or something? Meh.
Becca – you just expressed why I loathe Bella and the Twilight series. Thank you!
Who’s next? Lil Bop
I’m so glad my kids have outgrown Dora/Diego The wiggles
It was nice to have a normal Dora while we had her…Now we’ve moved onto where none of the tweens have their bellies covered and (my god) the mini skirts
Dancing Nancy: Parents who buy there little girls “juicy” assed pants should be…punished. Any teen/grown woman who wears them should be ashamed.
Girls should be taught to respect themselves as well as the boys. Lest they grow into Pam Anderson or Rihanna
Gah!! Who knew about Twilight? Why in hell is the series so popular then? Are those quotes above from Eclipse real?? Scary. Are the movies this bad or do they fix it a little?
@Mandy: ha! yeah, the sea witch was the best character in that movie. Why do I always picture Harvey Feirstein for the voice? Who did the voice? It was awesome.
As for Esmerelda, I vaguely remember it, I just think I couldn’t like her too much because of Demi Moore. Wish someone else had done the voice.
Hermione; Lyra, the girl from Golden Compass (the book); Pippi Longstocking…
Anyone seen the book: The Daring Book for Girls? It’s all primed and waiting for my two daughters to get a little older!
Diego was a very successful spin-off from Dora, why not just create another cousin for Dora to appeal to that demographic? If the little girls feel they are too old for Dora, they are not going to warm up to slightly-older Dora. BUT they might – and parents might – be more interested in a new character who is of the same genre. My 3-year-old likes Dora and Diego, but when playtime comes around, she wants to be Diego’s big sister Alecia. Why not another Alecia?
I think the Rihanna comment is a little much, but I think I know what you were getting at…
I had (& still have Kirstin). She was defiantly my favy.
As for Twilight, Bella is completely pathetic. If I had been Edward I would have killed her to shut her up. Jacob & the wolves were my favorite bit anyway.
Elisha: I’m 20. I can’t remember when Joesphina came onto the scene, but she’s hispanic and lived in pre-American New Mexico in the 1820’s/1830’s or so. She was great. I grew out of the American girl dolls around the time they introduced Kit Kittredge (1930’s). I went to the NYC store with my family before it closed for some nostalgia and was gawking at the newest doll – she’s from the 1970’s!!! I couldn’t help but tease my parents about it.
Zoe: The quotes that I made? No, it’s not like that word for word in the book. But Meyer does a great job disguising it in romantic prose. You have to look. A scene to look for it when the two of them start making out on the new bed in the house with the gold-colored bedding. Because Bella’s begging there. But there are other things to look for that are just as bad. Bella’s sniveling, whining, and crying the whole time, and Jacob gets so desperate that he forces himself on Bella. Twice. I’m aware of the excuses Meyer made, but honestly? They don’t cut it.
The worst thing about the books is that young tween girls think it’s ok to act like Bella: ungreatful for what she has, and willing to throw it away for a very selfish controlling young boy. Then they think that their ideal man IS said selfish controlling young boy. It’s disgusting. Meyer did a very good job in tapping into the psychological need for true love and soulmates, but she’s damaged the mind of so many girls in the process.
In the first movie, there’s not that much hidden sexual stuff going on (save for a scene where they make out and Bella is in a t-shirt and underwear), but there is one key moment that shows a creepy side of Edward that girls thought was romantic in the books: him sneaking into her room to watch her sleep.
There’s a scene where Bella wakes up to see Edward in there. Edward admits that he’s been sneaking into her room to watch her sleep for the past two months. I’ll never forget this guy with his friends muttering behind me, “and that isn’t creepy in the slightest.” It is creepy, and when girls read it in the book, they think it’s romantic.
If your child is in double digits and still watching Dora, you have significantly bigger problems.
I don’t like the idea of changing Dora. She is not meant to appeal to tweens. She was intended to teach YOUNG children to count and remember short instructions and all that, and teach them a few Spanish words in the process that they will probably not remember anyway.
As a teenager myself, I’m pretty certain that even if they change her, the tween girls still won’t think she’s cool because they will associate her with the old Dora. It will take a few years before she will be popular at all, and she’ll never reach the Bratz status if she keeps insisting on teaching them things.
If it’s true that they’re only releasing a grown up Dora doll, and that she’ll stay the same in the show, I don’t have a problem with that. I don’t see why it’s necessary, but as long as they’re not trying to change the show to unrealistically portray middle school, I’m not super upset.
If you think about it – the fact that we are all discussing what is really a silhouette of nothing is in itself fuelling this market.
The sexualization of our children via media and marketing is insidious. Parents have a choice…don’t buy anything deemed inappropriate for children, and boycott tv/movies that display adult themes…so many parents forget they are the adult
Woooo go American Girl! I was subscribed to the AG magazine forever (how a girl magazine SHOULD be like not that I don’t like Seventeen and YM and all that) I thought the NYC store was still open? I went there only about a year ago to buy some stuff for one of my mom’s goddaughters. I myself had Kirsten (though I think she is the least popular because she was off sitting in a corner behind all the other dolls in the store) and my sister had Samantha. And there is now a doll from the 70s?? Wow!
and honestly I always found Dora to be really annoying. But maybe little kids like that.
This whole mess started when people readily accepted the word “tween”. It’s a marketing term, not a description of a person. Tell you what, 12 year olds are not going to be into “new” Dora but 6 year olds might be.
SAD!!!!!
Emily: When I went, it was late August, and they said they were closing on September 1st. Maybe things changed? That would be nice.
And I agree. So many parents seem to have forgotten that they are in charge (believe it or not). They can say no. Didn’t Cindy Crawford say the she doesn’t let her girls near anything Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus bc she doesn’t think Cyrus is a good role model?
Even if I wasn’t a parent of a 4 year old girl, I’d still love Dora as is.
If they plan on introducing one doll as an older version & leaving the rest alone as Bodhi suggests, the question is why not just introduce another character all together? Why confuse things w/ the original & an older version?
***
Better yet, why not further develop the ALESSIA character?
***
Dora’s older cousin Diego already has an older sister, ALESSIA who’s a bit player in the series complete w/ long hair and admirable intellect, but minus the bimbette attitude and sexy appearance.
For those of you angry or concerned enough to write Matel, I’d suggest naming the orignal Alessia as a preferred option. In a market already over run w/ Barbies & Bratz, I’d think it a marketable option to push the thinking girls’ tween.
Oh wow…just what we need. Kind of gives a new meaning to thought of “Swiper no Swiping!” Dora is annoying enough as she is…don’t think we really need a sexy version…especially since I don’t know anyone under the age 6 who likes Dora!
A friend of mine has studied female roles in anamated Disney movies. It’s very rare you come across a strong female character that isn’t dependent on a male, and when you do find one, they are usually portraied as evil, like Ursula in Little Mermaid.
velcrodots: your friend actually had to study the characters to come to the conclusion that disney princesses were codependent? It’s no great secret. The disney corp themselves practically paint it on their banner.
I am in no way suggesting that I support the movement from cute little girl Dora to prosti-tot tweenaged one, but I did see a segment on this on CNN where the reporter had actually seen the doll. Although they could not show the outfit and it was apparent that her bias was for keeping the Dora as is, she did describe it as best she could.
She *is* wearing leggings and the ‘mini skirt’ is actually a long tunic top. Her hair is not as long and flowing as it appears; rather, she still has her fringe just with a longer style. The reporter was not personally offended by the doll but stressed that she hoped the story line would not change as she enjoyed the inquisitive, smart little Dora and really wanted to avoid exposing her own little girl to tweenaged angst so soon.
Thank you genevieve. I saw that segment too & I was trying to convey what I saw & the reasons for not being alarmed. You did a much better job!
Sadly, this isn’t just a phase. This is part of a well-planned, surgically executed marketing strategy to create life-long consumers. If you want to read a really good book about this and learn ways to protect your child, check out “Too sexy, too soon.” It talks about the media targeting girls AND boys and how it can damage their ability to form meaningful relationships as adults.
Now you know why you see chicks with mini skirts, thongs and shirts that barely cover sh*t.
I’m glad I look up to Kurt Cobain, not some blonde headed bimbo like Courtney Love.
My advice: Get some proper cartoons or start listening to some Nirvana, cause when a show for 3 year olds has that, then you know how bad off we are.
“#
Jill:
March 8th, 2009 at 12:36 am
why is she clearly wearing leggings in the silhouette? i am just curious.”
Because she is. Told y’a!
Let me get this straight? Our economy is in a downward spiral, people are losing jobs and their homes, and you guys are p.o’d because Dora got a makeover. I bet you guys are probally the ones who participate in the non-competetive soccer leagues too. Come one people, go help serve dinner at your local homeless shelter, and really take a long hard look at what societies bigger problems are.Atleast your kid has their own bed to sleep on and it’s not in a room full of strangers either. Is Dora really worth the worry?
First of all they are still going to keep the old Dora. Second of all the new show is MEANT FOR PRE-TEENS you freaking people and not little kids. ITs not a big deal so don’t make it out to be one. Dora does not look SEXY she looks cute. Just because you are behind on fashion (KIDS WEAR DRESSES!)doesn’t mean everything is skimpy. Plus she IS wearing leggings. Its not a big deal.They did the same thing with the RUGRATS.
Do any of you remember “Blossom”?
So, If a girl lets her hair grow long, puts on some jewelry and wears a dress she’s a slut? Are we to believe that just because she has longer hair and stylish clothes she no longer has a brain? Does she suddenly lose all interest in nature, map reading and speaking in two languages? If anyone truly thinks the cartoon image currently being circulated is “sexy” they are out of touch. Girls don’t have to act and dress like boys to be smart. And by the way, as a mother of two girls, a middle schooler and high schooler, girls don’t wear their hair in ponytails regularily until they start middle school sports.
DORA IS TO SEXXI, AND YOUNGER KIDS SHOULD NOT PLAT WITH A DOLL THAT LOOKS THAT GROWN. A LOT OF NYOUNGER KIDS PLAY WITH DORA DOLLS, AND WATCH THE T.V. SHOW, AND NOW THAT SHE IS A TENN, PARENTS SHOULDN’T LET THEIR KIDS PLAY WITH THE NEW DOLL.
People GET OVER IT and GROW UP!!!! All this hoopla over a cartoon character. The children that watch Dora grow up and thier bodies change, why can’t she. Keep your minds clean and stop putting guilt where it clearly doesn’t belong.
Yeah what she said!
Parents need to get over it and stop using the tv to raise and teach thier children…I hope you all realize that your little girls will all grow up and trade in thier back packs one day…Would you want a postive roll model or the ones we currently have havine babies as teens or what some type of addiction…If you teah your children the right was and raise them with morals whats your concern..If a Cartoon has more influnce on your child you may need to pull them from in front of the tv…I think the new Dora is cute …Parents can not tell me that you have not dress you 5 0r 6 years old in fashion tights along with a dress..Get over it and stop using th TV to raise your children..
Get Over It!!! What is wrong with the new Dora, She looks adorable for one thing! Not to mention that if you guys are so upset about the new dora look at the old one her belly is showing in that, lets just cancel that show too!!! I mean seriously there is nothing wrong with the way the new dora looks, she is dressed better than the way a lot of little girls dress anymore. Maybe this will be a positive view for young tweens to look at!!!!
I THINK THAT ALL OF YOU WHO HAVE NOTHING BETTER TO DO OTHER THAN WORRY ABOUT WHAT DORA IS GOING TO LOOK LIKE NEED TO GET A JOB OR A HOBBY. I AM A FATHER OF TWO AND GUESS WHAT I DONT LOOK THE SAME AS WHEN THEY WERE BORN SO SHOULD I BOYCOTT MYSELF FOR GROWING UP. GET REAL AND WORRY ABOUT SOMETHING THAT REALLY MATTERS SUCH AS THE WORLD OR THE ECONOMY.
I don’t think it’s too early to be outraged! While the new design is not specifically known, what is known is that the old design is changing. I am familiar with the character, but not the show, nor do I have kids that watch it. I do manufacture toys, so I know a bit about kids. Blame Mattel and Nickelodeon, both. Mattel clearly wants to compete with Bratz (who they are in a legal battle with). For 30+ years, Mattel has been lame at what they do, as bean counters look for a quick solution to profitable toys using licensed characters. And the products are equally lame. Unless Dora’s popularity has been declining, Nick is clearly selling out for a supposed “win-win” with Mattel, in pursuit of more dollars.
Since this is all about money for Nick and Mattel, fight in their terms! Make a list of companies that advertise during Nick cartoons. Contact these advertisers and tell them you are going to quit buying their products. Kids grow up too fast with too much violence. Having a show that is clearly a throwback to more innocent and simpler times is refreshing. This actually makes their character (Dora) stand out today. It surprises me because even bean counters aren’t usually this stupid – to change something that’s working. But then again, there’s always “New” coke!! Good luck. I’ll be watching.
People who keep saying “get over it” don’t realize that this is not about you or the adults who do not like this new, older character. Kids should be allowed to be kids without corporate greed sucking the pleasure out of their lives. Kids can start worrying about “the world and the economy” soon enough! And since when do cartoons age?? This is about an established character who is getting eliminated. If you can’t deal with people voicing their opinions against this, you need to get over yourselves.
People want to talk about corporate greed, umm do you not put gas in your cars, turn on a light switch, buy groceries at the local market and use your coupons trying to get the most for your money? Do you own a Sams Club card or Cosco? Go to Wal-Mart to buy toilet paper? Use a cell phone. Hel-lo! All or most of the items we use in everyday life somehow support these big corporations. You want to be old tymie and traditional then why read into these things, let Barbie be Barbie and let the princesses ride off with their knight in shining armor. These aren’t insults to feminity. Maybe by reading so far into these things we are teaching our children to over analyze and trust no one. Did you not dream of being the princess with her prince charming. I know I did and when we took our kids to Disney world I know my daughter and I were thinking the same thing as we gazed upon that big castle. It was priceless. Oh and buy at your local farmers market!!! Save farmers and their farms!!
Seriously! So you mean to tell me that there is nothing wrong with a big headed little girl with her belly hanging out, traveling through deserts, forests,and over volcanoes and mountains WITHOUT any parental supervision is perfectly acceptable BUT Dora getting older is wrong. Where is the sense in that!?
i am fear to this kind and nervous them as like i am human less thanks for sharing
You know… people are quick to bash the commercial products on this site because they are *using them to raise their children*… if that were not the case, why all of the outrage, the misplaced guilt? I have two daughters, and if something inappropriate appears in a show they watch, its gone. And guess what? I go outside and PLAY with them. Bitching about Dora and Strawberry Shortcake? Ffs… find a real cause. Besides, I noticed that quite a few of these profile pics of the people complaining about Dora’s new ‘slutty’ look (again, why do we care? Turn it off) have on three layers of makeup and are doing the ‘look how different I am’ pose for their pic. Teach your children YOURSELF and stop putting the responsibility on Nickelodeon, for Christ’s sake. Bad role models ARE the problem for modern tween girls, but it isn’t from the TV. It’s from their lazy, ‘overstressed’, clueless and likely reluctant parents. Flame on, whiners, but I’m right and you know it. When you’re done being indignant, go turn off the TV and check on your kids. Also, Chris, this isn’t about corporate greed, its about parenting at its core, so get off of the Bohemian fraud causehead soapbox.
We are a gaggle of volunteers and opening a brand new scheme in our community. Your web site provided us with useful info to paintings on. You have done a formidable process and our whole neighborhood shall be grateful to you.
Wow, there is nothing wrong with the new dora. Get a life and get with the program. Just because she looks “sexy” as you all say it, doesn’t mean they will change the show. Nothing wrong with how she looks its friggen 2012 people, not 1950. Don’t like it? Don’t watch it!
І was very happy to unсover this site.
I wanted to thanκ you for ones time for this fantaѕtic read!
! I dеfinitely savored every little bit of іt
аnd I have you boοkmarked to see nеw infοrmation on
your site.