Jennifer Aniston has a new interview. Guess what she talks about? HER HAIR! And her skin, because mama’s gotta shill for Aveeno too, baby. Jennifer spoke to Bobbi Brown for Yahoo Style yet again, and this is just another in a long line of interviews Jennifer has given in the past few years where she just goes full infomercial. She just talks to the press to shill Living Proof and Aveeno. A lot of celebrities do these kinds of interviews, but what’s notable is that those celebrities usually have other stuff to talk about too. Jennifer has not signed on to any new films officially since her big Oscar campaign/fiasco. She has no reason to talk to the press these days other than to chat about her hair and her skin. And how she’s not doing injectibles. O RLY?
Jennifer claims (again) that it’s not OK to do injectibles: “Not only is it OK, it’s better. It just doesn’t help. It’s a slippery, slippery slope. And like we were saying before, they just start to lose perspective, it’s their new normal, so it’s a hard one to come back from.”
She still feels like she’s in her 20s: “Maybe because ignorance is bliss, but I don’t feel much different than I felt in my 20s, except I feel physically better. I also love myself more. That’s the most beautiful thing that reflects out is inner confidence and inner sort of love. Our generation knows what we should put in our bodies, and that we shouldn’t be trashcans putting all sorts of crap in there. We know all the benefits of eating organic fruits and clean foods. We learned that smoking and sugar are the enemy. Our generation knows these things. We knew to take care of our skin from an early age. We also have all these technologies that come out. There are things that we can do to avoid any drastic, clown-making looks — microcurrents and stuff that keeps you exercising your muscles in your face. There are 83 muscles in your face, from what I understand.
Her fitness routine: “Usually, my love is running. I like to do a good trifecta, where I do the bike for 15 minutes, elliptical for 15, and then I run for 15. On the elliptical I kind of do sprints for 90 seconds, take it back to a jog for 30 seconds, and do intervals for the last minutes. Then I mix a day of yoga. Lately, because of my injury, I’ve only been able to do Barre method. Boy, I forgot how much that really hurts and kicks your butt.
Bobbi compliments her on her “beautiful skin”: “Yes, that is a blessing. I’m really good with my skin. I think it’s the luck of having a mom who was a model and was always obsessed with her skin. She always taught me to moisturize and wash my face every night, drink lots of water. It’s probably been the same routine since I was a kid. I use a Neutrogena face cleaning bar, then I use the Aveeno Positively Radiant moisturizer. Every once in a while, I bring in some toners or serums from my facialist. And did you see the new products from Living Proof?”
Endless shill for Living Proof: “Night Cap is my new favorite one. It’s amazing. You put it in your hand and it looks like a cream. At first, I was like, “Why am I going to put cream in my hair at night and ruin the sheets?” But as it turns out your hair absorbs it, it wakes up fuller and bouncy and shiny.
She wants to do a lifestyle thing: “I would like to do a lifestyle thing, for people who struggle with dieting. I could just make anything for a diet taste delicious.
She’s working on a cookbook: “I’m working on it! I’m a good alchemist. I can mix certain things together that are all very healthy, but you don’t feel like you’re depriving yourself in any way.”
Tequila: “I love Patrón. I also love Don Julio 1942 as a nice sipping tequila. It’s so yummy, it has a little sweetness to it, which I usually don’t like. Justin actually makes the perfect margarita with it, because there’s no agave, no sugar, no mix. It’s pure tequila, lime juice, a squinch of Cointreau. It’s delicious.
Again, I have two questions about the injectibles stuff. One, does it feel like her comments are in any way pointed to or about Courteney Cox? Because Cox has really messed up her face with Botox and injectibles and it really feels like Jennifer is calling out her friend publicly. Two, do you believe that Jennifer doesn’t do injectibles? I do not. I don’t think she’s at Cox-level f—kery, but there were moments during Jennifer’s Oscar campaigning where I thought, “Damn, easy filler-face.”
And God help us all if Jennifer actually develops a lifestyle brand or a cookbook or something. We’ll never hear the end of it!
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
Let’s ask Goop what she thinks about the Lifestyle brand.
Misogynist!
Ha! Stop being so misogynistic.
*Goop help us all
Known cosmetic ‘procedures’ of Jennifer Aniston:
1)Hairline surgery: early 90s, in pics it shows up as a thin white line. She has no ‘baby hair.’ Because her fake hairline has essentially been shaved or electrolysised back it gives the appearance ofvabkace front whe you see the hairline.
2)at least 2 nose jobs, many believe 3. She’s admitted to the 2nd, had to as her doc who also worked on Olsen twins went to press and inferred he did her work.
3)fillers (obvious) and admitted.
4)botox (admitted)
5)lasering (claimed she has an addiction to lasers)
6)restylane in lips/mouth (too many snaps of her coming out of clinic hiding mouth)
7)rumored saline breast implants (early 90s)
Procedures that ate my best guess.
1) aniston used to have a jaw,chin underbite which led to her speaking as if she had lockjaw. People who watch friends know this. She’s had a jaw realignment and her chin/jaw area shaved to create less of a ‘Leno’ appearance.
Cont.–
2)she also used to have two parenthetical nasal labial folds which EXACTLY mirrored Dustin Hoffman’s (hence the resemblance) she has them still, but they’ve been feminized/reshaped (filler) and her cheeks filled with filler to soften that tootsie mannish look.
My thing with Aniston is that she comes across as soooo dishonest and contradictory. She gets caught in lies a lot. She’s always made me uncomfortable because she appears to be faking it, and suffering from both low self esteem and narcissism.
For example: she speaks as if her audience shouldn’t be aware that she’s already admitted to using botox and fillers. Her goal is to come across asas fraudulently down to earth enough to admit she’s done what most middle aged women (and younger) in h’wood do, while pretending it was a one time experience and never again…meanwhile she has her appts on the regular and if she eve does get caught…she can claim she’s never lied outright.
The comments about her moms good skin…its meant to imply this is a genetic hand me down. But most of people familiar with aniston have long known she has had bad skin, very large pores. So it’s as if even she doesn’t want to come outright and claim DNA gave her great skin because…Google. So she implies the way her mother took CARE of her skin got passed down to her. She’s really not claiming she’sshe’s got ‘naturally beautiful,’skin..it just sounds like it.
Deceitful shallow weird woman.
don’t be so overwhelmed by her accomplishments, kiddocheezit.
Cookbook, diet etc. She reminded me of Goop. The only difference between the 2 is that Goop can at least have a somewhat semi-intellectual conversation, even if it is condescending. Aniston has a head made of cotton wool.
Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire.
Yup!
“JENNIFER ANISTON: PEOPLE WHO USE INJECTIBLES & FILLERS ‘START TO LOSE PERSPECTIVE'”
LOL! Well, she would know!
I’m actually surprised she hasn’t already
I feel like she thinks she’s interesting.
She has been a lifestyle brand and haircut guru for as long as she’s been around. It would be a good fit to make it formal.
I don’t know. I have no idea how her skin or hair or whatever actually is, it could be rad, it could be terrible, it could look great on Mondays and sh-tty on Thursdays, what have you. I’ve got no room to shame anyone on either of those things, and though I think lifestyle blogs and gurus are crazy boring and pretentious, I agree with you that her formalizing this is not a terrible idea for her financial future.
I guess my thing with her is more like…be interesting. Perhaps read a book that is not described as a “perfect beach read”. Take a class that isn’t titled “How to Make a Better Margarita”. Travel to parts of the world where there is no beach (!) and do more than get a tan there. Have other things to talk about other than these two talking points about your appearance. And, if you won’t, you’ve got to quit griping that no one sees what a “real” actress you are, and how you’re so deep, what have you.
Hey Kiddo, I agree that it would be a good fit. Apparently, she has done well with Living Proof, Aveeno, and Smartwater. It seems to be a no-duh business move in terms of amount of probable output versus potential profit. Meh, that’s what I see anyway.
“Apparently, she has done well with Living Proof, Aveeno, and Smartwater.”
How exactly do we know this?
ITA, she is such a liar. I think its her way of covering up. She definitely did fillers when she was filming marley and me. Also she never ever had good skin, she has some huge pores. As she herself admitted she does all those kinds of facials, lasers, dermabrasion, hence her pores have become less visible recently. But the thing is, she never had good natural skin. Even her skin in the chest and arms looks really bad. Its funny how she talks about taking care of herself organically, when she has to thank for her dermatologist, facialists and her skin clinic. I wish the press would call her out for being such a liar often. I dont know she gets aways with so much fraud and lies. She does not have good hair and yet she endorses hair products, and she endorses skin producst when she has bad skin. Most of all, she tries to buy people and convince them she is a good actress when she is not. Aniston is the biggest fraud in HW.
Skin that has pores- even big ones?! Oh the horror! Tell me it isn’t so! Lmao.
@Franny …
I absolutely agree with every word you’ve written. Not only is she lying about her ‘natural, beautiful skin,’ but this is a woman who for years has told one and sundry that yoga is her exercise routine–hence, the yoga instructor (a.k.a. her good friend and hypothetical–at least, to me–secret side piece) who traveled to NYC with her, dressed like her twin (including that fedora hats they’re both too short to wear) and seemed joined to her hip 24/7. Now her normal exercise routine is 15-minutes on the bike and elliptical and then 90-minute sprints? Right. It that were true, there would have never been comments about those ‘extra pounds’ she’s carried for a while now, which she whines about us mistaking for pregnancy weight.
I also agree with you at being puzzled over what Jennifer Aniston is able to say/do without being called out for it. She could say the sky is canary yellow and people would say, “Aww, Jennifer Aniston said the sky is canary yellow. She’s so down to earth and such a natural beauty!”
Not to mention the fact that this is a woman who has claimed for years that she doesn’t know how to boil water and now she’s writing a cookbook? Can you say ‘Ghost Writer?’
@Emma: You’re totally right about the cookbook thing. She famously doesn’t really know how to cook or care about it. She’s trying to be the next Goop, except that she seems unaware that she’s behind dozens of actresses that are doing the same thing.
Also, I feel like none of these folks have checked out Goop’s financials.
I agree her skin is terrible, I saw a couple of pics up close and couldn’t believe my eyes. But the way I read what she says that she “is good with her skin” is that she has an old, good skin routine. And I don’t understand why I should buy products endorsed by celebs who’ve been genetically blessed with milky dewy complexions.. Now if Jen with her huge pores, yes, they are huge and so are mine, would endorse something and I would see it looks good on her, I’d run to the store.
Why won’t the press call her out for all her lying shenanigans? No one else is given a pass. Good skin? Thank photoshopping. Great hair? Thank weaves. How can you endorse a product like Living Proof when you are wearing weaves? Is it great for weaves? Guess we’ll never know because she doesn’t tell us. Everyone is now going overkill copying the Goop network.
But in reality she’s a silly superficial woman without a thought in her pretty, empty head. Bless her heart.
Lol and +1.
I just imagined Rachel Green giving her the side eye.
Bubblehead. That old expression comes to mind – if brains were dynamite, she wouldn’t have enough to blow her nose.
oh my oh my I am weeping with laughter at this comment! THANK YOU!
How could I have lived this long without that expression in my repertoire? That is HILARIOUS!
Like she’s never done them…what a laugh. And, yes, I agree she’s calling out Courtney Cox.
She probably did and the regretted?
I remember the press tour with Gerald Butler. Her facial fillers could be seen even in photoshopped pics. I remember thinking what an idjit for using fillers just when you are going on an international press tour.
As for organic skincare/taking care of her skin organically which implies simplicity, wasn’t this the same woman a couple of years ago boasting about her use of lasers and how wonderful they were? She went into a lot of detail about the redness and time frame of it all.
You know who I would buy skin products/advice from? Cameron Diaz. She had really bad skin. Then again, she used to eat really badly and it showed in her skin. The best thing about her time with A-Rod (yes, I know!) was finally taking care of herself and it showed in the improvement of her skin.
Jen sells hair and skin stuff , guess what that means? She’s going to talk about hair and skin stuff. If I sold tires , guess what ? I would talk about tires. All the time. I mean is anyone looking for Jen to win a Nobel peace prize ? Umm no…..So why is everyone always up her butt about her talking about superficial stuff. It’s part of her job. And everyone giving her cr*p about wanting an oscar , please that’s equivalant to someone in the real world wanting a promotion – of course she’s going to want one. They all do. Do I think she should have one ? Heck No. But that’s life. You always reach for the top even if you don’t deserve it.
As far as the fillers, she so uses them. I wish celebs would own up to it. But I get what she means, some people go way over board and I’m sure it’s easy to do. I’m 34 and I’m ready for some juvaderm! 😉😂
Oh please, she started promoting Aveeno and Living Proof about 3 years ago and yet she’s been talking about her hair and skin for over a decade. This is why people are tired of it.
She only talked about her hair BEFORE Living Proof. She is dull, boring, and so, so shallow with zero substance.
And she never talks about anything besides superficial stuff. Ever. Her whole Oscar campaign was superficial with her going on & on about how dreamy & liberating (ugh) no makeup was, how her scar was soooooo amazing.
Her fans are just like her. They think she is rachel green.
@bella and sage , oh please yourself. So what she talks about her hair – guess what I talk about my hair too. I talk about clothes and makeup and other so called shallow things all the time. MANY women do. We all must be shallow With zero substance! I better throw away those useless college degrees I worked extremely hard for. Thanks for clearing that up for me Belle. News flash Just because she’s an actress doesn’t mean she can’t also be a regular person, who discusses what she likes. Your strong dislike for Jen is clouding your judgement clearly. Oh and yes I do like Jen- I actually like most actresses- but in no way shape or form do I think she’s racheal green. Come on, stop being ridiculous.
Stop contradicting yourself. You said she should talk about hair because she is an Aveeno spokesperson, then we pointed out that she’s been talking about it for YEARS and your response is it’s a free country? Really?
Sage , get a grip. Spend less time h*ting on Aniston ( or anyone for that matter ) and read a book or something. I am not contradicting myself- I was responding , reread the comments please, context is everything . And most of my response wasnt even aimed at you. I said yes it’s her job to talk about her hair and skin and if she talked about them before so what? Many women do. I find it ridiculous you and belle spend so much find h*ting on a woman who has no impact on your life. It’s one thing to be snarky but you guys take it too far.
That’s quite a non-answer, diversionary response you got going there, Tify.
Quite frankly, Sage has a good grip on this back and forth.
I agree with you. And I just love how Jolies fans ignored the fact that Jolie ran the most shameless, most Oscar-wh00ring campaign I have ever seen and she did not get a single nomination in any award show. She lost out on the Ocars, GG, SAGS, DAGS and many other prestigious awards during Oscar season. Jolie spent 2 years campaigning for Unbroken, she hired an Oscar campaign strategist before a single scene was shot. She spent a ton of money on the campaign and it backfired on her when all the bad reviews for Unbroken came out. Unbroken was not a success as a whole. Jolie turned a story about redemption and forgiveness into a 2 hour torture fest. She did not tell the true story of Unbroken at all.
Why bring her up? Is she mentioned in the article? Why so obsessed?
Aniston is the one who ran the shameless campaign. Bringing up dead exes who sent her Justin for starters. Sending cupcakes. Creating her own distribution company because no one wanted Cake. Claiming to suddenly have dyslexia. Not allowing any other of the stars to have any attention.
AJ already has her oscar. Where is Jen’s? AJ is also a DAME, mother, wife, pilot, Special Envoy etc.
Jen has her hair & money. hmmmm
Unbroken made money, Cake could not even reach 2 million.
And to piggyback on Kila’s comment, in an effort to debunk lisaned’s bogus post:
1. Jolie didn’t hire an Oscar campaign strategist for Unbroken. Universal backed her Oscar campaign because they believed in the film. That’s what happens when a studio believes in their product. They’ll back a campaign to support it.
2. Jolie didn’t spend any money on the marketing campaign for Unbroken. Again, Universal did. Again, that’s what a studio will do when they believe in a film and have the resources to support it. They will go to bat on your behalf.
3. Unbroken was a huge success. It won the Christmas Day box office and brought in $161.5M worldwide. It has also made a star out of the film lead — Jack O’Connell, who is now filming Money Monster (directed by Jodie Foster) with George Clooney in NY and has two other films in pre-production. His Unbroken co-star, Domhnall Gleeson, is also getting notice. He’s in the new Star Wars that’s currently in post-production and in new two projects that are currently filming. That’s yet another sign of the film’s success.
4. Unbroken received 3 Oscar nominations, won a SAG, AFI and Hollywood Film Award. Another sign of it’s success.
5. WWII veterans embraced the film. And more importantly, Louie Zamperini’s family embraced the film. Again, another sign of the film’s success.
If you feel the need to prop Aniston up, then don’t it by spreading lies and hate on Jolie. It only makes you look foolish.
Your comment makes no sense. What does Jolie have to do with Aniston’s unimpressive face and whether she pumps it up with fillers? Why not stay on topic?
Since you brought it up: Angelina Jolie has Oscars, and Oscar nominations. Aniston does not, and after the rightly termed desperate “fiasco” that was her shameless campaign for a dud of a movie, it’s unlikely she ever will. Vivienne Jolie Pitt will win an Oscar before Aniston does. Their bulldog, Jaques Jolie Pitt will too.
As for campaigns: most people know the difference between directing a major studio’s wide releasing film (Unbroken) that needed to make back its big budget (it did, it was a smash) and an indie flop that Aniston had to buy herself.
Angelina’s big Hollywood studio ran its publicity and promotions. Now you can imagine Angelina was a screaming Oscar demanding diva behind the scenes, but its not likely, since she 1)has Oscars already and 2) is on record saying awards are silly and dumb, including Oscar – guess what? They still give them to her, and/or talk about giving them to her. She doesn’t exactly come across as award needy, and never has. I think that’s what burns desperado aniston and her fans.
Aniston bought a crappy little movie, no one else wanted to, bought a distribution arm and showed it herself (to like 5 people) then embargoed it so no bad reviews could get out…her PR flack then pimped it like a two dollar hoooo. To no avail. Her shelf is as empty as it was before the embarrassment of her desperate campaign.
Stop.comparing these women…it makes you look delusional. Aniston isn’t even Elizabeth banks league anymore.
@ Loons.
Jolie did campiagn and she campiagned very hard. Unbrokens costed about 150 to make million if you include the promotion and all that campaigning Jolie did. Aniston Oscar campiagn probably costed a fraction of what Jolie and Universal spent on Unbroken. Jolie doesnt have an Oscar in directing or best pic so stop acting like she didn’t care for those awards. She really did. . Unbroken got horrid reviews and bad box office and even you loons know this. Atleast Cake was able to land some award nominations.
Speaks from experience does she?.
She has repeatedly said that she doesn’t cook and now she’s suddenly going to write a cookbook? Whatever. I don’t believe she doesn’t use fillers. Just that she hasn’t gone insane with them like some others have.
Only because her career is crap and she wants to get in on the new fad of celebrity lifestyle websites/cookbooks. She’s trying to stay relevant.
This.
Nailed it.
Yep. Every few years, her face gets really chipmunk-y and swollen, and then it disappears after a little bit. I don’t think she goes overboard, crazy like Courtney Cox…but she does them. Which would be fine. If she didn’t insist on going on a crusade against fillers. And she’s had what? 2 or 3 nose jobs? So are fillers the enemy or plastic surgery?
I feel like SHE’S lost perspective.
Seriously, go back to TV. It’s your friend (ha! unintentional pun!). You will win back respect and probably those awards you seem to crave.
Has she ever had perspective though? I feel like throughout her whole career she has seemed dull and done nothing but complain about things. Jennifer should be thankful for her time on “Friends,” especially since she has remained the most successful of all the actors on that show but she practically scoffs and rolls her eyes whenever the subject comes up. I can’t even count the times I’ve read her mention how much she hates/hated the Rachel haircut. It’s the most successful thing she has ever done or ever will do, she should shut up with the complaints already.
I think she looks great but she should shut up about any cosmetic procedures considering her nose is 10x’s smaller than it was before she was famous. You can’t preach about keeping it natural when you’ve had a nose job and some other BS “deviated septum” procedures over the years.
In total agreement on this (good pun, btw). Television provides a lot more choices regarding content and scheduling nowadays (despite whatever her bf says) and I think if she went back to tv a few years ago people wouldn’t have the Jen fatigue they have now.
If Aniston put out a book 15 years ago I would buy it in a heartbeat. With the darker hair and paler skin, I think she looked fabulous. The past 10 years with the year-round tan and hair extensions? Not so much.
Aniston won’t go back to television because she’s a lazy actor. Think about her schedule/lifestyle now: It’s an absolute dream! She makes mindless films that don’t require any kind of research or prep, and she works maybe six weeks a year filming. If she accepted the lead role on a tv show, she’d have to work way more hours, on a regular schedule, and she’d be filming for a few months a year. That would seriously cut into her yoga, decorating, vacation time, dude.
Actually, I never thought Aniston could carry even a TV show on her own. Ensemble sit com, sure…she’s kinda like a less talented much older Caley Cuoco…but she just doesn’t have the skill set that a kudrow or even a Cox (proven now with the long running show cougar town) to carry a show. Sure the first few shows might get great ratings with the schadenfreude and curiosity factors playing into it….but ultimately, aniston is boring as milktoast and not half as exciting.
I actually DO think she could fool many MANY of her coddling type supporters into buying hairdo or diet books though. Her appeal is that for the average plain jane woman of a certain age out there…she’s that celebrity that IF you go to the same recommended stylist, by the same conditioner, same pair of jeans and only eat salad with chicken you will not only look nice…you will look BETTER than Jennifer Aniston… Mainly because these women known down deep she’s not all that and they DO look better. Its why she’s non threatening, and accessible to them and why they support her and hate beautiful girl. Lol
I kind of feel bad for actresses, because whenever they talk about plastic surgery people are always going to think they are calling someone out because so many actresses have had it done. Also, she has totally had injectibles done….her face has been very full at times.
She clearly has been using injectables for years. I’ll give her credit for allowing herself to gain a few lbs so that it’s not that noticeable in stills but when she talks most of her face doesn’t move.
For real! I had noticed there was a strangeness about her face, several years back especially. Maybe she’s stopped, but she def did it at some point.
Jennifer, what about people who radically alter their appearance with surgery?
+1
Yes, I was just coming on to say she had nose job done and I suspect something with her chin as well. I’ve noticed her lips plumper from time to time as well. So surgery = good, fillers/botox = slippery slope??
JUST figured out who she sounds like!
sarah palin.
they could give each other a run for their money with their word salads.
what the what???
some of what jen says makes no sense whatsoever.
it’s like she is an empty vessel – when she speaks and certainly when she “acts.”
rachel was her 1st and last hurrah.
If there is one person that really screwed up her face, it is Courtney Cox.
Those last two years of Cougar Town, was painful to watch. Courtney’s face was just so dang distracting. But she had been jacking with her face, for the last decade. She should have just went in and had a mini lift done at 42, since she is so obsessed with staying younger.
Instead Courtney went the route with the botox and injection-able’s. And it was not a positive way to go.
But no, I don’t believe Jennifer would screw with her face like that.
If there is one thing that she has done effectively. Is age, without losing her mind. She looks great. Makes an effort to be honest, that she does live on a permanent diet. She obsesses with her hair.
I have been obsessing with my hair for decades too. I don’t know a friend who doesn’t.
Are she and Cox not best friends? Did they have a falling out, and why do I care?
She’s working on a cookbook? I swear I thought I read she doesn’t cook, or doesn’t cook much.
She doesn’t have the greatest skin, where did that myth start? She has tanned too much.
I realize that she doesn’t have children (not that she needs them) and her career is on the downward slide of most over-40 actresses who aren’t Meryl Streep. But she sounds so boring and superficial. And she may feel that she’s in her 20s, but she’s closer to 50 than 40 and she’s starting to sound sad.
Maybe I am naive but I do believe that she doesn’t use fillers. She has that look you get from tanning a lot plus maybe her greek heritage helps with aging well. My Italian friends tend to look younger longer because of that Mediterranean skin type.
Regarding calling out Courtney, yeah. I wonder how that conversation might go between them. But she would have to know BFF would read those comments.
You can see in her cheek area near her nose that she definitely uses fillers. I have only seen her once or twice where she had gone overboard so she is judicious in their use, but rather a hypocrite just the same.
Come now. Are you one of the ‘Kylie’s just good with lip linerliner’ people? Lol Aniston has admitted to filler use. She just wants people like you to think she tried it just once and left it alone. But google tells a different story….and anyone with eyes can see her face is a different shape and lines she had at 35 by her nose (those crescent moons) that made her look more like Dustin Hoffman than she does today – are now of a new shapeshape which soften that mannish appearance. That only comes from regular filler use and perhaps surgery.
I believe her. I’ve seen her face up close in movies and it’s lined. The He’s Not Into You Movie, she looked so much older than Ben Affleck out in the boat scene in the natural light. She didn’t have any filler. She had a thin face and had a lot of lines. She did use fillers back when she did Marley and Me. I assumed she plumped up her cheeks because she was playing a young 20 something version of herself for part of the movie.
I don’t believe she uses them now because she wouldn’t be so openly bragging about it. In that chronic pain movie she had gained quite a bit of weight for her, and it showed in her fuller face. I bet she uses a little botox, though, just smart enough not to use so much she gets the frozen eyes and face look.
She’s right. These women that overuse the filler and get the pillow face and/or the cat face lose perception of what’s normal and they can’t go back to what they normally look like. It’s almost like body dysmorphia. Look at Brandi Glanville. It’s been going on for years now. The same with Madonna, who is only just now after seven years of this messing with her face has calmed it down. It does make you look older and not normal, definitely doesn’t make you look fresh or younger. I could see using a tiny bit might help but they usually always cross the line eventually into more and more and more and become addicted.
I do not beleive her at all. Ever see her face in Marley & Me? It was painful to look at. So puffy/
If you read my complete post, I mentioned Marley & Me in the first paragraph. That was filmed almost eight years ago and I said she had filler in her face then.
I haven’t seen one of her films in the theater in a long time, so I don’t know about Jen herself, but I’m in full agreement with you on the overuse of fillers, Jayna. The people who abuse them get such a strange, puffy look, and I always think it must be so uncomfortable.
I think she backed off of them only for Cake. Up until then, and since then, she has used plenty of fillers, among other interventions. It’s part of her job, so in some small way I get it, but I don’t get why she’s getting on her high horse to condemn others. She’s always saying what a “girl’s girl” she is, but I find her just as cutting as most of those Hollywood types.
I’m not a big Aniston fan, but I think she’s right about the ‘slippery slope’ of injectables. People start to look…lumpy? Madonna and many other women have pumpkin-faces that jut out aggressively now. And if the tabloid stories tell us anything, it’s rich non-celebrity women who are really having the most surgery, like Jocelyn Wildenstein, so people who live in LA probably see drastic examples at Whole Foods or nice restaurants. Aniston looks like she has a lot of sun damage in close-ups, but no serious puffy face. There was a press call or something around Love Happens with close-ups where I remember being shocked at how much sun damage she had; she was wearing a gray turtleneck sleeveless top and sweater set and she had lots of sunspots. Eventually, all the sun damage is going catch up with her.
You can sort of see it at her perfume launch, but nothing to the extent of those photos: http://jenaniston.net/photos/displayimage.php?album=3&pid=1761#top_display_media
As far as lifestyle stuff, I follow perfume blogs and I have to wonder if Aniston’s perfume didn’t sell because of PR mis-management, rather than anything to do with her. The product itself smells very nice and clean–not tween-appropriate and sugary like many celeb scents–and would be appropriate for a wider range of women, especially people who are old enough to be Friends fans. I liked it a lot. It’s comparable to Kai or Child. There was a last-minute name change and then it launched in the UK first and was more difficult to find in the US. And perfume is a tough market to compete in now–even Sarah Jessica Parker’s Lovely, once so popular, is hard to find in a sea of new releases.
But that’s why she’s so deceptive. She does use fillers when it suits her. She also used them as recently as one of her last E! Online interviews pimping aveeno (contractually obligated) that are supposed to come across as her not hawking aveeno just sitting down with a no-name e! Person for no reason but to talk hair and skin.
Anyway she was so puffy and swollen she looked like a blowfish, and the site WWTDD went all in on her ‘pillow face.’ That was barely 8 mos. Ago. The pics and vid are hard to find because her PR flack probably spends half his time (or his interns do) scrubbing her bad pics and footage from the web. Lol
The last time I saw her onscreen (which was a couple of years ago) her face was obviously full of fillers. Maybes she’s stopped….
She’s so boring, vapid and self obsessed, no wonder Brad left her.
Meh, I know she’s not popular around these parts, but if she wrote a cookbook it would be a bestseller for sure. A lot of people consider her the apex of aging well and living a healthy lifestyle, and she’s much more relatable than Goop.
I don’t mind her, but I am an equal opportunity ballbuster.
I hope her cookbook includes the title: Cooks pasta amazingly.
People do not even pay for her films, why would they buy a cookbook from an actress that probably has her own cooks & rarely cooks herself? Why do people even buy cookbooks when recipes are readily available for free online?
In close up pics, she is far from aging well. So healthy with her drinking & smoking……
How people can claim she is in shape when her belly looks pregnant all the time is beyond me.
My mother buys cookbooks, I use goodfood.com or bbc recipes, but she’s got a library. The Pioneer Woman’s books were all bestsellers, and pretty much all the recipes are on her website, so people still buy cookbooks.
If I look that good when I’m in my 40s I’ll be happy. Hell, I’m 32 and work out/run 5 days a week, and her arms and legs are more toned than mine.
As to the drinking, I like a cocktail as much as the next gal, and I’m pretty sure she stopped smoking years ago.
But to each their own.
I have an addiction to buying cookbooks. I read them like porn. Sadly enough, I’m not a great cook. I cook the same things that are my signature dishes for family over and over and then just the average meals. But I dream every time I buy a new cookbook this is the time I’m going to turn into an adventurous cook at home and for small dinner parties. Everyone has stopped believing me. LOL
“How people can claim she is in shape when her belly looks pregnant all the time is beyond me.” I would love to see a pic of your abs. I am sure you are perfect.
Healthy lifestyle? I wouldn’t say so.
Oh yeah, her cookbook would be a bestseller, lol, i dont think so! Her perfume flopped, her movies flopped if its Just her, you know without the help of bigger movie stars or a dog. She should be embarrassed talking about diet and being slim when all these years she has been rumored to be pregnant all the time because of her gut belly and weight gain.
Why would she believe that she can sell a cookbook now? Just because GP did, she can do also? At least, Paltrow has her blog to prove that she can cook and is a good cook.
Anyways, What is it with Brad’s exes being so shallow and superficial and full of themselves?
Gee you’re right. Maybe Brad is also shallow and full of himself and picks partners that he has those things in common with. 😒
annie said his exes have those flaws, not his current partner 😉
He had the good sense to marry and have children with someone compatible.
Yeah, but considering the utter garbage people buy, that’s not saying much. People who take advice from celebs completely baffle me, and sadden me.
I’ve never heard of anyone considering Jen the apex if aging well and living healthy. I’ve heard that about JLo, Halle Berry, Gwen Stefani, Charles Theron and so on but never Jen. I head people say she has a nice body but that’s it.
Are the people who think Jen is the apex if aging well and living healthy. The same ones who think that Goop has the butt of a 22 year old stripper and great here in skin?
Because she’s maintained her figure consistently without huge changes in her body, I would be more inclined to buy a cookbook (and exercise dvd) from her than any other celebrity.
I was kind of interested in Cameron Diaz’s beauty book (or whatever that was), but the cover photo kind of put me off. I couldn’t imagine having the book lying around for people to see with that cover photo on it.
Even Brandy Glandville is a two-time NYT Best selling author.
Anyone, and I mean anyone who’s ever had a platform…can sell a book (looking at losers Chelsea Handler and Farah Abraham)
Next up the Courtney Stodden memoir, which will also sell.
What exactly do her fans see in her? She is dull with nothing interesting to say. Just the same lines about her average looks.
She can’t even bother to go to Texas while Justin films, instead stays in LA with not work.
In those Sony emails she was never on the lists for film roles. Only mentioned once because her buddy Sandler brought her up for Pixels saying she wanted the role, & yet she still did not get it! She is not a sought after actress at this time & her next film is VOD. Another flop after Cake & Life of Crime. Career is in a downward spiral.
Am I the only person who finds her super un-likeable? She always comes off like she is one of those women who carries on and on about how she isn’t like other girls. There is always an element of trying to be cool, in my opinion. She seems so dull.
Gah. Yes. She is frozen in 8th grade.
Never have liked her. Never will.
+1.
She comes across very passive aggressive imo.
She irritates the hell out of me. And she’s going to have a lifestyle brand? Yay, just what the world needs another actress living in her little Hollywood bubble blathering on about what everyone else should do. My guess is it’ll be as boring and bland as cardboard just like her.
I didn’t think about her one way or another until the big breakup, and that’s when I started to not like her. Her PR manipulated that whole thing to make her look like poor sad jen, whose husband got stolen by a thieving hussy.
She is stuck in time. I think she’s highly immature and highly insecure, and not very bright to boot. But I also think she has good comedic timing and is not without talent. I’ve always thought it best for celebs to keep their mouths shut. Their universe is tiny – they are entertainers, but that doesn’t mean they know a thing about the world.
I agree she is stuck in time. I’m her age and loved her in Friends, but cannot relate to her at this point in my life.
I don’t like or dislike her.I don’t know why someone so dull is so polarizing. For some reason her very existence offends people.
I don’t understand it either. I’m not sure why this woman elicits so much hate.
Seriously. Is there a name for this bizarre phenomenon? Blake Lively Syndrome?
It’s hard to say why people get irritated by certain public figures and not others.
I don’t mind Amal Clooney, Kate Middleton (so much) or Cumberbatch’s wife. But I can’t stand Goop, Blake Lively and Aniston.
Go figure!
I like her OK, not a huge fan…but it always gives me a chuckle to see all the usual suspects on here with the same posts about how boring she is. if she’s so boring, why do people rush here to comment? just to say how boring they think she is? (I agree she gives one-note interviews, but I don’t understand commenting on every post about her one-note interviews to expound upon on how she gives one-note interviews.)
clicks = interest = money, so every time someone clicks on this story to post how boring she is, they’re essentially “feeding the beast”. if no one clicked, there would likely be no stories. there are already over 100 comments…and how many are saying “she’s so boring” or responding to a “she’s so boring” post to agree how boring she is, or describe, in detail, WHY she is so boring? to me, if I find someone boring, I don’t even click on a post about them. I’ll believe that everyone who says they find her boring truly does when they stop clicking, and her posts only get about 15 comments.
Read an interview with her years ago where she said she loved to curl up with a book and a bottle…of water. Just no.
How is her skin so nice even though she’s a smoker? Even though I quit, I can still see the damage it’s done to me. I call bullshit. She’s had help for sure.
Ever see her skin close up without all the photoshop? Yikes. Her skin is terrible.
Didn’t she say she’s tired of talking about her hair during her failed Oscar campaign? This woman? I give up.
LOL!! Y’all know she smokes, right? Yep.
I find it really hard to tell from photos whether or not she uses fillers. I would have to see a close-up shot, taken in natural light, when she isn’t wearing a ton of make-up. It seems to me that she has pretty average skin for a 45-year-old — lines on her forehead, sun damage, etc. — so I’m not convinced she’s a botox-er.
Frankly, I think having kids ages (most) women more than anything else. Years of sleepless nights, worrying about another little life… Aniston hasn’t been down that road, so I will say that the skin around her eyes looks better than most of the women I know who’ve had kids. But whether that’s because she’s had work done or not, I don’t know.
Rich people dont have to worry about where the next meal is coming from, duh. So if your gonna compare barren jen to women in HW who have kids, youlll be embarrassing jennay.
Eh. On the one hand, it is her job to shill. At least she is keeping her end of the contract (ad nauseum). On the other hand, girlfriend has had more than a few tweaks over the years. They all do. She hasn’t approached Kidman Warp Face , so maybe she tried a bit and learned a little filler goes a long way. Well, I for one am praying for Horrible Bosses 3 to get greenlighted. Anyone else? Anyone? Bueller….?
I was bored and watched the Scream quadrilogy (sic) recently. The change in Courtney Cox’s appearance is staggering. She really needs to lay off the injections. She does not even look human.
And here I thought it was makeup for the movie part.
What I want to know is WHY she hasn’t signed on to a single movie since her Oscar campaign where, between talking about her divorce from Brad and her dead ex boyfriend, she mentioned how she felt like this was a new beginning in her career, that she’s just getting started. She’s so ridiculous, she has the money to fund a passion project for herself if she’s not happy with the scripts she’s being sent. It’s nobodys fault but her own that she has no upcoming projects
I would imagine she’s not getting any serious movie offers. She’s not that talented and she persists in imagining herself as a movie actress, not a TV actress. She could probably do well for herself back in TV comedy but in her mind that would be a comedown.
It’s because she’s pregnant with twins… Sorry, people, but I just couldn’t help myself! I guess it’s because she’s taking time to shill a cookbook? In all seriousness, I think you are right, and that she should use her gazillions to fund a project and get on with that next step in her career she talked about ad nauseam during her Oscar push.
a cookbook from a woman who ate the same exact lunch every day for 10 years while shooting Friends. she has never mentioned cooking anything before.
Does it mean that people who spend too much time talking about beauty products have no perspective?
It’s official – Jennifer’s career is truly down the toilet. Everyone knows only people who have no movie offers are the ones who go into this lifestyle/cook book line.
As someone mentioned above – someone (preferably a well known journalist) please call her out on her constant lying. But the good thing is that the public is not falling for her lies and are calling her out on Twitter, Facebook etc. – Media can be bought but the public can’t.
She has admitted to having two chefs, various skin treatments, sunbathes religiously, smokes like a chimney and is always drunk or high on stage. All of that will have made her skin not so nice and that is evident when she has been pictured out and about.
Her hair is the same – has admitted to extensions, Brazilian blow dry etc and yet she boldly claims that Living Proof is the reason for her thick hair and straigh frizzy free hair.
+ 1000
and she still cannot carry a normal conversation at the best of times.
Does her lifestyle/healthy eating & beautiful skin regimen include smoking?
Quite sure there are plenty of pics with her holding a cigarette.
If you are gonna smoke, just own it.
Don’t lie about it and credit your zeal for fitness to keeping your weight down & eating “clean” when actually she smokes to keep the munchies away.
……and do people who wear fake hair start to believe it’s real?
Do anyone remember some untouched pictures of her was leaked online. They showed how they erased wrinkles and clear up her skin. I saw these photos on Jezebel.
I get the criticism that Aniston is boring and doesn’t talk about much else, but she’s being interviewed by Bobbi Brown. That lady isn’t Ted Koppel. Does anyone expect Bobbi Brown to ask any celebrity about world peace?
I think the bigger question is why is she putting out these interviews about her hair/makeup/NOFILLERS!, when she doesn’t even really have anything coming out. She’s part of a big ensemble in the Imogen Poots movie that was shot three years ago, and if I’m not mistaken read that it’s going to be released on VOD either just before/after it goes into theaters–so that doesn’t seem like it’s going to be a great hit–in August. I don’t imagine anyone from the cast is going to do much press for the movie, being that it WAS shot three years ago. So other than that, why is she doing all of these pointless interviews? Like I could see if it was something to promote her endorsements (SmartWater/LivingProof), in conjunction with her movie coming out in like five months or something…..but she’s really got nothing up. And we see that by her pointless interviews.
True, but I think Yahoo Style (or anything on Yahoo) is kind of pointless (maybe their graphics hurt my eyes and that’s why I’m so bitter against them). Honestly, I wouldn’t have seen the interview if I hadn’t come here or wouldn’t have known the interview existed since I’m too impatient to read anything on Yahoo with their ugly designs. I think this form of interview would be pointless for Vogue (even though that magazine isn’t deep in the true sense of the word), but for Yahoo Style it kind of makes sense that everything she said on there is sort of extraneous.
I’ve seen other celebrities give style tips on those new blog style sites the way Aniston is doing for Yahoo. I’ll come across them when I’m doing a google search for a new haircut, but those interviews don’t ever seem to be covered here. It seems like other celebrities are doing less interviews when they’re actually doing the same amount as Aniston. I think they all do this, but the extraneous frivolous interviews by those other celebrities when they’re talking about hair and make-up (probably in conjunction with some make-up line that paid them off?) don’t seem to be covered on this site for some reason (maybe nobody cares?).
@perplexed
I agree that it’s more annoying to us, because it’s covered more on this site. But my thing is that personally, I don’t think her hair and skin looks all that great. Just average. So I’m already annoyed when I see her giving out her “beauty” secrets–especially when we know it’s NOT Aveeno, but lasers and other really expensive stuff in spas. Like I don’t think I’ve ever seen Jennifer Garner outside a spa that specifically does skin lasers, nor has she ever talked about getting the age spots lasered off her skin. So there’s that.
And then most celebs do these kinds of interviews in conjunction with a movie coming out, or an ad for their product coming out. This is sort of the first (but not really, as I doubt there’ll be more than one red carpet for “She’s Funny That Way”), and definitely not the second.
And then to me, it just looks like a great big I’M STILL HERE! after her talking about wanting to get more roles in dramatic films, and keeping her name in the news with rumors that she’s going to be doing “Mean Moms”…..which sure, I admire her hustle, but geez. Please have a project in the works before the next one. Or even talk about margaritas. That’d be good.
I think she probably has tried it all at one time or another but let’s face it, she looks like she is in her forties. I think she looks great and I don’t have a problem with her shilling products. The cookbook is pretty dishonest though. I think she needs to seriously consider going back to TV. She is a little long in the tooth to be doing rom-coms. That is not a slam, just a reflection that a woman her age seems wildly out of place in those films.
If she did really good ones, I don’t think it would be as much of an issue–like “Something’s Gotta Give”….I like “romcoms” with older people, who come with actual baggage, etc. I think that’s interesting. But hers/majority of all romcoms I don’t like. Same with comedy films. 90% of them I think are just stupid and dumb.
But I think she’s getting too old to be The Girl, and Horrible Bosses and We’re The Millers–to me, were just gimmicks. The same movies she’s always done, but more cursing.
The best comedy IMO is on TV. Actually the best drama, too.
She should go back to TV comedy but, as I said upthread, she probably thinks that’s a comedown. She got proximity to movies and movie actors by being married to BP and probably doesn’t want to give that up. But, good luck, any quality over-40 women’s movie parts are not going to Jennifer Aniston.
And yes, she is WAY too old to be The Girl.
She really does pick some stinkers. I watched some awful show with her and Aaron Eckhart. Yuck. I was embarrassed for both of them. Horrible Bosses was fine but you don’t want to do too many of those. I agree that she probably thinks TV is a step back career wise but if your professional career has you playing second chair to Adam Sandler and Jason Sudeikis, maybe you should consider a change. She could easily be headlining a show on HBO.
I don’t think she looks less than being in her 40s face-wise, but I don’t necessarily think she looks bad either.
Halle Berry is the youngest looking celebrity I’ve seen in photos, but I feel she might be some kind of anomaly among all mortals, both celebrity and non-celebrity.
Halle Berry and Gilian Anderson are unicorns. They probably bathe in the blood of virgins. I don’t think she looks bad at all, I just think her look is tired. She has been hanging on to the same soccer mom image for so long, just minus the minivan and kids.
She looks like a real housewife mixed with Iggy Pop.
Who cares if she is shilling her product line? The girl has got to eat. and so what if she talks about diet, hair or injectibles? I just don’t get why this bothers anyone.
Hello Huvane, sorry your client is so darn boring that her life revolves around how to wear her hair & which Aveeno product to pretend to use today.
She has enough money to eat without talking about these products on a weekly basis it seems like.
And this is all she ever talks about, it gets boring when we read about her hair for the 100th time.
I don’t think that the shilling that bother people, grace. It’s the lying. Her hair is extentions and she has admitted to using lasers and micro-current treatments. So when she says her hair is Living Proof and her skin is Aveeno and water, it’s disingenuous.
On the one hand she says her looks were down to those cosmetics.
On the other hand she has probably had plastic surgery and botox and fillers.
Isn’t that fraud?
Why does her chin look so massive in these pics??
It has always been massive, she tends to cover it with a scarf, hair, or hand.
So reiterating what’s already been said, JA’s…
1. Shading Courtney Cox, way to treat the one “friend” who’s always listened to her BS over cocktails
2. Feeling like she’s in her 20s because she’s actually still stuck there in the “Friends” era
3. Still eating Mexican like in the old days of margaritas and cigarettes at Marix, the only surprise here being that she didn’t namedrop her good Cabo friend George and his Casamigos (otherwise, Don Julio 1492 is the only thing she’s said that makes any sense here).
God help us if she starts a lifestyle-anything; she’s just not a very interesting person.
Is she ever going to talk of anything else? Does she know anything else? Is there anything of substance to be said about fillers, etc., which she steadfastly denies doing. Last time I looked when repairing a deviated septum, most folk’s nose doesn’t shrink or look “brand new”. But what do I know?
She was always pretty-now with the work she’s had done-she’s VERY pretty. Her nose is much better and the fillers around her chin really helped. And the eye lift of some time ago really helped open her great blue eyes.
But the point is–she’s just not smart and has nothing to say. Skin-hair-blah blah. Such A boring woman. So rich and yet so vacuous. Read a book-help someone-there’s a tough world out there beyond your yoga and diet.
Really hard to respect such a smug, self-involved person. And if you believe that she uses Aveeno-you are just plain dumb.
Don Julio! Girl knows a good tequila!
“Justin actually makes the perfect margarita with it, because there’s no agave, no sugar, no mix. It’s pure tequila, lime juice, a squinch of Cointreau. It’s delicious.”
Could somebody on the board explain this? I am under the impression that good tequila should have 100% agave. The less agave would be less expensive and a killer hangover?
I think a cookbook might end up on the same shelf as her perfume.
Still would like to know about the agave. She would be an expert on tequila though. Doesn’t she have her own margarita fountain? I make my margaritas the same way, but with 100% agave.
I’m thinking she means agave nectar as a sweetener in the drink, as opposed to the tequila itself. Agave sweetener has a consistency and taste similar to honey. Fresh lime juice plus a sweetener is usually called for in recipes in place of a store-bought mix. But it sounds like she’s using Cointreau in place of a sweetener.
Personally, I like really sweet margaritas with amaretto and Cointreau, so Justin’s recipe sounds really strong to me.
Barre Method kicks my ass too. One of the best workouts there is, IMHO.
She is turning into a second Goop. On every level.
Not a fan at all, but if what she means by “losing perspective” is that the frozen botox joker faces are worse than a few wrinkles, I’d have to agree with her.
She’s had hair reassignment surgery. I kid you not. Google it. Her hair used to be half way down her forehead like that housewife in prison. She had her hair line moved UP. If you look, you can still see the scar. Hilarious.
She is full of it isn’t she? Women her age start to hollow in the face and to achieve that full cheeked look, they use fillers. There is no way I believe that Aniston doesn’t use fillers. She uses all kinds of injectables, Botox included, to look the way she does – considering she is a smoker as well. Smokers age prematurely and encounter many issues as they age. Lines start becoming more pronounced, especially along the lip area and I think she has thwarted this early on with injectables, but denies it.
Every celebrity lies about their so called beauty regimes and their BS superfood diets. Next she’ll be shilling some type of fruit, vitamin or some ‘elixir’, like Elle McPherson does, to make money and keep herself relevant, because what else is there for her? She is a mediocre actress and where film production is concerned, her productions are failures as well.
Thank you for your comment. I never really get who used what as I am rather uneducated in plastic surgery and botox and whatever.
I start wondering if it might be legally relevant if an actress claims she hadn’t used any fillers or botox or plastic surgery but had achieved her looks by using cosmetic products and supplements. And if she then starts selling those supplements … Isn’t that fraud?
If you get the ingredients list of that night cap living proof hair product you will be …
well, my google-ing told me that it apparently contains meth acrylate. Polymer apparently. Or short: some kind of plastic something.
And the ingredients list is rather long.
P.S. I am not a chemist. The information above might be wrong but I don’t know any better. Oh, and those living proof hair products are very very expensive.
If anybody knows more or better please enlighten us.