Robert Pattinson wants a career like Viggo Mortensen or Joaquin Phoenix

sparkles NME

Robert Pattinson is the gift that keeps on giving! Much like our ongoing series “Kit Harington Says Words,” I kind of hope that Sparkles never stops speaking. Last week, NME released some excerpts of Pattinson’s cover story, including his interesting thoughts about his fandom and what he really thinks of the racist internet trolls talking trash about his girlfriend. NME released the full interview – go here to read the whole thing. The best quotes were already released, but there are a handful of interesting pieces of info/quotes. Like, Florence Welch introduced Sparkles and Twigs. Sparkles calls Twigs “just an amazing, amazing artist.” Here’s a bit more:

It took him a while to find his voice as an artist: “It’s taken me a really long time to find out what my voice is or even if I had the right to say anything at all Even at school, when my drama teacher told me, ‘I don’t think you should do the creative subjects’, that had a massive impact on me, and I had to go to an out-of-school drama club because I didn’t feel like I was worthy of the school play. A lot of people, when they’re really young, tend to be like, ‘I’ve got something to say and I want everyone to hear it!’ But I’ve never wanted anyone to hear what I’m saying, because it’s probably stupid.”

The studio bosses were mad at him during the Twilight era: “I thought you could be funny and tell jokes and be yourself, but they were like, ‘No, you can’t do interviews like that.’ I fought really hard to hold on to my identity when all of that started happening.”

He hates being photographed: “You begin to feel like your face is fake, like it doesn’t really represent you anymore.”

His constant whining: “If you complain, they’ll say, ‘He doesn’t deserve to work!’ Talk to certain actors about it and they’ll say, ‘Why don’t you just stop acting if you hate it so much?’”

What he thinks of the Twilight era: It was “something that ended up being quite helpful. Most people, throughout their 20s, really struggle with knowing what they want to do. I was living a massively accelerated life, compacting a billion different experiences, having to comprehend so many different things… there was definitely a bad side, but it was fun. It was an adrenaline rush.”

The kind of career he wants: “Is like Viggo Mortensen’s, or Joaquin Phoenix’s – they’re actors who approach things in a very honest and pure way. They’re not just banging out movies… [I want stuff] where I can look totally different, roughening myself up. In some ways, it looks like I’ve had a really lucky career, even though in my own head, whatever I’ve won, I’ve won in a very skewed way. But that’s just my own ridiculousness. It’s still just winning.”

[From NME]

The part where he talks about how the studio bosses told him to stop being himself was part of a conversation where he repeated his early joke during the beginning of the Twilight thing. The joke? That his hair was styled by the saliva of 12-year-old virgins. Which… is still a great line and he really should be proud of it, although it does make fun of the Twihards. As for his career goals… I could see how and why he would want to emulate the kind of career that Viggo Mortensen or Joaquin Phoenix have had, although I do kind of wonder if Sparkles will ever get there. He’s doing the right thing though, trying to toughen up and work with great directors and tamp down the pretty. He’s still so pretty though. He will always be a beautiful, sparkly vampire and he sounds like he’s sort of okay with that.

wenn22169911

Photos courtesy of NME, WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

102 Responses to “Robert Pattinson wants a career like Viggo Mortensen or Joaquin Phoenix”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Chelly says:

    A little off topic here but, any time I see Joaquin Phoenix in print any where my mind always wanders to River. I wonder the movie sensation he would have been. Man, Im old

    • liahfhak says:

      Me 2.

      River <3 There is no one like him.

    • Luca76 says:

      Yup totally River was everything and he should have had the big career that went to some others of that generation.
      I will heart him forever.

    • Ripley says:

      I had a conversation today about River, Keanu and Johnny… Gah. I’m so old.

    • Heat says:

      I do it, too. River Phoenix was my TigerBeat / BOP! dreamboat.

    • Cindy says:

      Me too. I miss him…BUT, Fear the Walking Dead has an act (the heroin addict) who really really reminds me of River. Kinda makes me happy/sad.

      I like Pattinson. I think he has handled the Twilight stuff with a lot of grace. Doesn’t hurt that he is a multi-millionar I’m sure…..

  2. Lea says:

    Whatever. This guy bores me. Just klicked on this post so i can say i always found the super talented Viggo hot!!!

  3. Sixer says:

    I think, if he wants an “intelligent” career, he should probably stop giving interviews and maintain a bit of mystique. He just comes across as ridiculously needy and stuck in adolescence. Shame, cos I also get the impression he is, at heart, a nice guy.

  4. The Other Maria says:

    Yeah but they have talent, he doesn’t.

    • Mia4S says:

      Yeah that inherent “it” just is not there for him. Keep aiming high Sparkles but…no, not so much.

    • als says:

      Exactly.

    • Tiny Martian says:

      Maybe? But I actually think he does have talent.

      What I do see in both Mortensen and Phoenix though, is an almost crazy level of immersing themselves in a role. Neither one fits into the Hollywood mold, and there seems to be a bit of madness in the way they approach their work – and I love them both for it! Not sure if Rob has that, he just seems like a nice, pretty normal goofy guy.

      • vauvert says:

        I have only seen him in Bel Ami and he was horrid. Totally wooden, only one expression – angry/puzzled – and he ruined a book I loved for me. I do t count his brief role in Harry Potter, he was ok in that but I think being in that vampire thing froze his face in the one expression he always sports whether on film or IIRL. If he wants a career like Viggo he needs to actually study acting and practice moving his face.

      • JenniferJustice says:

        Phoenix is such a method actor, how many times have we wondered if he was serious or not when he was acting crazy or just mildly bizarre? It definitely works for him, because he’s an amazing actor. I’m not sure Pattinson has that level of talent. Always good to aim high, but he has to be realistic. It’s going to be very hard to shed the Twilight image. Phoenix and Mortinson never did anything that stereotyped them or got them stuck in certain kind of role. And it still took both of them a long time to get the recognition and roles they deserved.

  5. Renee says:

    I think that he could possibly have a career similar to Viggo Mortensen. Viggo seems to work infrequently in smaller budget films and does not choose mainstream fare. Whether or not RP can match his talent is an altogether different matter entirely.

    • FingerBinger says:

      Lord of the rings was very mainstream.

      • JenniferJustice says:

        Yes, but he had already done A Perfect Murder, Crimson Tide, and 28 Days. He didn’t bare the brunt of being stereotyped into his Lord of the Rings character. And after the first one, he immediately did Hidalgo which was fantastic.

        I think if Pattinson had more lucrative roles under his belt before he did Twilight, he would be taken more seriously, but alas, it was his breakout role and now he faces the consequences of forever being the pretty sparkly simpering vampire.

      • Bridget says:

        Not actually at the time. It was a huge risk when Peter Jackson did it- no one really took fantasy seriously as a genre, and Jackson was the veteran of some seriously weird movies. By no means was this a slam dunk.

  6. kay says:

    He like Stewart thinks he is a great actor and artist. They aren’t.

  7. Bichon says:

    This guy needs to just stfu.

  8. dr mantis toboggan says:

    I must say, this was a missed opportunity to post viggo mortensen pictures. Any excuse will do.

  9. Isla says:

    In The Rover he was very much like Joaquin Phoenix in his early roles, I can see him going that route with a relative success. Viggo isn’t that versatile of an actor though, is he even still acting? I hear he keeps turning down parts in blockbusters, what does he do instead?

    • Mary-Alice says:

      Viggo is a very versatile actor. It’s enough to compare earlier work to LOTR to Cronenberg movies and there is no need to even go further to The Road and on. He does work but Viggo has many other interests besides acting which makes him who he is.

    • vauvert says:

      Are you kidding? Viggo gas a wide range and he does a lot of European films, just because he is not in HW does not mean he is not working….

      • Saks says:

        This, and also the fact that Viggo also films in Spanish. He was great in Argentinean film “Jauja” for example.

      • Bej says:

        Just want to yell “VIGGO”, Thankyou & goodbye, because he really is a proper actor, but also a well rounded artiste. VIGGO!!!!!

    • JenniferJustice says:

      I beg to differ. He was great in Hidalgo and several other roles whose characters have nothing in common. He is versatile….and did I mention beautiful. Pattinson is not very good looking to me. I may be in the minority on that, but I can’t help but think some of Mortinson’s success and longevity is because he is one sexy dude!

  10. liahfhak says:

    I don’t see that happening. Why am I getting turned off by him when he says he wants a career like Joaquin Phoenix? Haha. 😛 Maybe it’s just me…

    There’s nothing wrong with him wanting a career like Joaquins or Viggos. They are amazing, yet low key. I guess it is because their acting skills are totally different. But anyway, good for him. I hope he will get anything he wants in life. I’m not a fan of him though.

    • swack says:

      All that I could see when he mentioned Joaquin Phoenix is the crazy he became at one point and all the stories surrounding him and thought: Does Pattinson really want a career like that?

  11. PunkyMomma says:

    I don’t think Rob has the acting chops (I sat through both Cosmopolis and The Rover) to have a career like Phoenix or Mortensen. But I find him very pretty to look at – –

    • Kami says:

      I dont even find him good to look at. There are people who I dont find attractive but I can see why people think they are. I cant even say that for him. At all. I’m completely mystified by people raving about his looks.

      • JenniferJustice says:

        I agree and even though I tend to beleive “to each their own” I have to be honest and say I really think his popularity is all about being the sweet vampire that doesn’t want to hurt Bella. It’s the character – it’s gotta be. And they gave him good hair for the twi-movies.

  12. Deidra says:

    I don’t think he’s untalented. He was great before Twilight (I love him in How to be), and he’s being praised post-Twilight. Best things happen to male actors in mid 30s, so I wish him the best.

  13. lower-case deb says:

    if i could ever act to save my life, i’d like a career like Anthony Hopkins or Cicely Tyson.

    but i can’t act, so i’m gunna continue my armchair critiquing 😉

    also i clicked through the post just on the offchance i see a photo of River or Viggo. dunno why i set myself up for obvious dissappointment.

  14. Nancy says:

    When he does his deep thinking in the Twilight of his life, it will dawn on him that his career was literally known for one role. I disagree with those above who dislike Joaquin, constantly being reminded of who he isn’t. He was great in To Die For and the Johnny Cash movie. Plus in his favor, he’s still alive…..and had to witness his brother’s demise.

    • Hudson Girl says:

      Are you serious?? You didn’t even mention Gladiator… Joaquin in that movie gave me chills. He is so evil yet perfectly subtle in that role.

      • Nancy says:

        Didn’t see it, hang my head low. When I saw him with Nicole Kidman in To Die For, I knew he was special, different. He killed that role. River never had a chance. Now he will always be remembered for dying on the street….how sad.

      • JenniferJustice says:

        Yes. He made the hair on the back of my neck stand up. Creepiness to the max, and yet….so damaged and fragile. That character scared the crap out of me. I was glad he was the one to die in teh final battle between he and Crowe, and yet I still felt sorry for him. He played that role to the hilt and it could not have been done by anyone else.

        Love him as Johnny Cash. Liked him alot in Signs – pretty much made the movie for me. Loved his character in The Village – silly movie, but his character was deep and well-played – again nobody but him could be that character.

        FYI – I was IMBDing both Phoenix and Mortenson and see they both were in after school specials in the mid-80s…..MUST SEE!!!

    • Kym says:

      I don’t get it either.
      Joaquin is an amazing actor. The courage he has with the movies he has picked and what he brings to his characters-amazing. Whether or not you like The Master..no one can ever deny his talent after watching it. It is above most actors of his generation. It is the reason why most people in the industry have looked beyond some of his …shenanigans 😉

      Pattinson pleasantly surprised me in The Rover. He needs to stop explaining and defending his choices though.

      • Anname says:

        When interviewers ask him about his choices, what exactly should he say?

      • Kym says:

        He is not obliged to answer every question in an interview.
        Phoenix has practically made dodging interviewer questions into an art form.

      • Anname says:

        And so does Rob. He has expertly avoided personal life questions for the last 7 years. But these are valid questions are about his career, his professional choices. He is taking a very unusual career route, or course he is getting asked about it. I don’t see anything wrong with answering these types of questions.

  15. Dame Heddy says:

    Mortensen is making movies nobody goes to see. Phoenix is a little better, mostly because he’s making English language films with big name directors. Considering Pattinson’s recent boxoffice track records, he’s not far from his goal.

    • D. says:

      My thoughts exactly. Actors making movies no one cares about.

      • Tiny Martian says:

        Well, not exactly no one……..I care about these kinds of movies a lot! It would be very disappointing to me if all that showed at theatres were mainstream Hollywood movies, because I greatly appreciate films made outside of the Hollywood machine.

    • Mary-Alice says:

      Well, here we go to see Cronenberg’s movies, for example.

  16. Vera says:

    Joaquin made a career playing freaks in adult dramas in 90s when those movies attracted crowds to theaters. Nowadays the most looked up actors are the ones who star in superhero stuff or franchises. Both Joaquin and Viggo are respected for their earlier body of work, but where are they now?

    • Mia4S says:

      I assume you mean the public is all about the superhero movies? There’s no “looking up to” there from actors, except for the money. That’s very obvious. You do superhero movies to do your “real” passions (mostly). Young actors who fancy themselves artists would sell their mothers to be considered in the same breath as Joaquin and Viggo.

    • JenniferJustice says:

      No, not just their early bodies of work. Not at all. They are still making amazing movies. You may not care for them or be interested, but some of the best movies are not made in Hollywood. I think you mistake popularity or money for what Pattinson is really looking for, which is longevity and respect – at least that’s what I get out of it. And no, he’s nowhere near their level in those regards.

    • Bridget says:

      The issue isn’t that adult dramas don’t attract people to the theaters. It’s that movie studios are getting more conservative and are trying to hedge their bets – they think it’s better to make one or two “sure thing” big budget movies rather than 6-7 mid-budget movies. We’re at the mercy of what studio heads think people will go to, and they currently think people don’t want adult movies anymore (even though we know that’s not the case). Sequels and comic book characters are known properties and its easier to convince someone to finance a known quantity.

      And Joaquin Pheonix is DEFINITELY doing well. Wasn’t he just nominated for an Oscar for The Master? Mortenson is exactly where he wants to be. He does a lot of foreign language stuff, so we don’t see it here in the US.

  17. Tig says:

    “Movies nobody sees”- well, take a peek at your local theater- it’ll be 3/4 screens showing the same movie in different formats-IMAX! 3-D!- and that doesn’t leave a whole lotta room for anything else. I’m fortunate that a few local theaters will run less mainstream fare, but you have to hunt them out. Will I go see Viggo’s movies for him? Absolutely. I still wish Joaquin had done Dr Strange- if Rob thought studio bosses had an issue with his comments, can you imagine Joaquin with Marvel??? The mind reels-!
    Back to Rob’s comments- to my mind, to want a career like theirs, more power to him. Time will tell.

    • Kym says:

      Exactly TIG!
      That is what I miss about living in the city. Around these parts, there’s not many films to choose from..nothing that I like to watch anyways.

  18. K says:

    I’ve never seen his work so I can’t comment on his talent or ability to get these kind of careers but I have to admit I find him quite like able in the last few interviews posted. Nothing wrong with having a goal and honestly I’d rather see someone say they want a career where they stretch their talent and do interesting great work then be Tom cruise and pump out bullsh*t action movies for fame and money.

    • Tiny Martian says:

      I couldn’t have said it better myself, K. I have zero admiration for actors whose sole goal is to “make it big”. But I have tons of respect for any artist who is ignoring public criticism and honestly doing their best to develop artistically, especially when they know full well that they could cop out and make cliched Hollywood rom-coms , action flicks and dramas and receive endless praise and recognition for it.

      • K says:

        Look I will never fault an actor who spends most of their career doing really interesting challenging stuff for taking the rom com or part in the big budget explosion movie they have to survive and those movies pay a lot of money and afford them the ability to do what they love. But the actors who only do the action and then get mad when they aren’t considered serious nope sorry no time for you.

        I don’t know if this guy has the talent to take him where he wants to go, but I respect the heck out of him for wanting to get there.

  19. Elizabeth says:

    If he wants a career like Viggo or Joaquin he needs to get some talent and a personality. And maybe a nose.

    • Neah23 says:

      What does a nose have to do with anything? Wanting a career like Viggo or Joaquin and wanting to look like them are two different things.

    • Jayna says:

      I’ve seen him in a few interviews. He was charming, funny, self-deprecating humor. He has that dry wit that I like. His personality in interviews made me really like him, actually. He’s still young enough to really work on his craft and develop his acting range. Actors tend to really peak in their late 30s and early 40s. Whether he does remains to be seen.

      • Hannah says:

        The really talented ones show ability at a much earlier age. Phoenix was doing stellar work in the gladiator ( Oscar nominated) and too die for when he was the same age (and younger) as what pattison was when he started out in twilight.
        He can certainly work on his craft but I always wonder why these teen idols who crave respectability so much dont actually you know.. Study acting.

      • Anname says:

        Hannah – have you read any of his reviews recently? A great majority of the critics have come around and realized he is good at what he does, and not just a teen idol. He was on several short lists for supporting actor for The Rover. Even back in 2010 most critics acknowledged he held the screen very well with Waltz and Witherspoon, 2 Oscar winning actors. There is natural presence and charisma there.

        He has said repeatedly that working with these auteur directors in small movies is how he is learning to become a better actor – acknowledging the fact that he didn’t go to drama school and feeling like a bit of a fraud. So yes, he is striving to better himself, and “studying acting”, as you so aptly put it. Critical reception has been very positive. It is great to see twitter comments from random people who are shocked at how good he was in a role. I don’t think you can write him off quite yet, he just has to continue to perform well and get more distance from Twilight.

  20. Hannah says:

    Bless his cotton socks! He’s nowhere near as talented as Phoenix, and nowhere near as masculine as Mortensen. He really wants to be something he’s not. all the teen stars and Disney stars fight so hard to be credible. Zac efrons been on the same journey for the last 5 years.

  21. kri says:

    I think he’s an okay actor. It’s weird. Sometimes they plod along for awhile, and then a few years go by and boom-they did something awesome. Or not. In either case, he will keep working and he’s got tons of money. But he will never be Joaquin. Or Viggo. Nope.

  22. noway says:

    I am surprised at some of the comments on here. He says he aspires to have a career like two good but mostly low key actors, and the comments are he doesn’t have the talent. This maybe true, but who aspires to mediocrity or less. Shouldn’t we all aim high. Also, the amount of people discounting the work I think it takes to be a good actor astounds me. I think there is a bit of an undefinable quality that a lot of good actors innately have, but a lot work hard on their craft to become good actors. He could still do that.

    • Leah says:

      Who is discounting the work that needs to be put in? I think you misunderstand, i feel that people are saying he should have done acting training if he really wants to be an actor in that league. The best british actors, tom hardy, fassy, cumber, hiddles, ejiofor have all gone to drama school, its not a coincidence that they are at the top of their game. They have talent yes but they also grounded themselves in an education.
      You can hardly find anyone english apart from Pattison that hasn’t actually trained for 3 years at a drama school and even done theatre before they hit hollywood. Even someone like andrew garfield has a a prestigious acting course and worked at the National Theatre in London before he became superman.
      I feel like its Pattison who didn’t take acting seriously to begin with actually. If he did he would have grounded himself in craft and training which would have made him better equipped to do varied work ( because a lot of it is a set of skills and technique that trained actors have in their tool box) and it also would have made him more humble because he would have personally known all these talented actors who didn’t make it as far as him. He would have understood better how lucky he is.

      • noway says:

        Maybe not you, but a lot of people on here are, because the comments are he doesn’t have the talent or chops. My point was he could work on his craft which I think is probably more important than the undefinable “it”/talent in becoming a good actor. Obviously some casting directors think he has the “look” at least or he wouldn’t be cast at all.

        As far as not following the classic British actor path, well if you notice he didn’t pick British actors. One Dutch who is classically trained. One American who would be mostly a learn at work type of actor. There are different paths to acting success, and I am not aware of Mr. Pattinson’s acting lessons or classes, but I do generally like the type of movies after Twilight he has picked, as they are generally pretty interesting directors and off beat kinds of stories. I also like the two actors he picked to aspire too, and find the choices interesting.

        I Just think at his age and with his choices of movies it is possible that he could end up being better than people seem to think. Also, I think you misunderstand his British personality, and to me he seems to realize how lucky he was to have the push on his career with Twilight, but still thinks it was odd scene, which it was.

      • Cassie says:

        Leah:
        Andrew Garfield is not Superman.
        Robert Pattinson is very young and doing low budget movies made by people with good artistic reputations. He is learning and maybe in the future he will be a respected actor.
        Keira Knightley is a terrible actress according to many people and never studied Drama. But loads of people kiss her ass even after doing several big budget movies without showing great acting She works with the top actors always include highley praised trained ones.

      • Anname says:

        More humble? The guy who is constantly called out for being too self-deprecating? Cronenberg and Corbjin have both been quoted as saying Rob says he doesn’t know what he is doing but he really does. He is too humble, constantly puts himself down, and has said over and over that he feels like a fraud because he isn’t a trained actor, and has to learn on the job. Out of all the criticisms you can level at him, not being humble or understanding that he got really lucky are NOT true.

      • noway says:

        @Anname I so agree. I would even say his choice of acting careers he would like to aspire to shows that. Viggo and Joaquin are hard working actors who pick interesting diverse roles and don’t generally go the stardom route. Joaquin is a bit of an interesting guy to put it mildly too. Right now he may be just okay, but keep in mind he went the blockbuster route and survived so far, he could end up a better actor learning through his job. I kind of like him, and wish him luck. As far as someone said leave a little mystery and don’t do so many interviews. I think the audience today is a bit different than some of the others and you have to do a bit more of this than you used too just to get the jobs.

      • Leah says:

        @noway
        I am british, so i perfectly well understand british sense of humour ( seriously why is this always labelled at people who don’t agree with everything this guy says?).
        I totally agree about working at it, there is more to it than just talent, its an actual craft. But if you are looking to emulate the very best (and phoenix is viewed as one of the greatest actors working today), there is a combination of more than average talent and respect/dedication to the craft of acting. If you don’t have immense natural talent drama training will probably help a lot, don’t you think?
        Not meaning to nitpick but Mortensen is not dutch, he is danish-american, born in nyc. His path to fame was vastly different to Pattison, he was in the theatre for a long time, living the life of an artist from a young age. I think Pattison is just referencing actors he admires. I don’t see any comparisons in how they went about their career. Both Mortensen and Phoneix had a very singular artistic approach to acting from a young age which shaped their careers from the beginning. Pattison on the other hand came up through the franchises and hyper commercial work. His awareness about the kind of work he wants to do seems to have come after he became famous. Which suggest that he put less thought into it early on.

        @cassie Sorry, i meant spiderman. Pattison is not “very young”, he will be 30 next year, Garfield in comparison is 32, and has already packed in drama school and working on the british stage. Hiddleston is 34, did a degree at cambridge and went to drama school. While i think there are different ways of doing it, I do think it shows peoples inclination to immerse themselves in learning and craft.
        Keira Knightley is a good example of someone with not a lot of raw talent who is doing decent work or at least is more respected now then she was when she started out. Keira is actually closer to how i think Pattisons career could turn out.

      • Anname says:

        Leah – you are really making assumptions here, and incorrect ones. Rob is well-known as a huge cinephile – has been since he was a teen. Juliette Binoche was quoted about how much he knows about about obscure cinema. All his directors, and several other actors have all noted how much he loves and knows about European cinema.
        Rob has said he is trying to “recreate his DVD shelf” from when he was a teen, making movies with a wish-list of auteur directors. He has mentioned this several times over the years. He says he has worked with 6 out of 14 on his list. So NO, Rob didn’t suddenly discover arthouse cinema after Twilight. Twilight was a massive diversion from what he really wants to do with his career. And he has expressed a million times that he is grateful for the opportunities it has given him in his career, even though it has never been where his heart is.

      • Sandy says:

        @anname
        Don’t think Leah said he dont appreciate art house. Said he didn’t make art house choices, at least not before recently.The question is why sign on for 5 twilight movies if you want to be arthouse? Doesnt make sense.
        Look the guy is nice and I believe he wants to do good work but Even if you are a big fan of his, you have to be realistic. His choices are how people perceive him. You can’t expect everyone to see him through your fan eyes.
        I like him but come on it was his choice to do those movies. That wasn’t the choice of a guy who wants to be the new Phoenix.

  23. serena says:

    Much like Kit, doesn’t Rob have a kind of natural sad face? I enjoy them both, by the way, so please make the ‘“Rob Pattinson Says Words,” happen!

  24. nicky says:

    hahahaha… I actually appreciate an actor who can buck the system because all the young male actors who stay on protocol all sound and look exactly the same. I don’t know why more people don’t rage against this sameness HW throws out. Rob at least feels opposite of that. He does not feel boring, you know whats boring, is an actor so buttoned up and polished they sound like they are rehearsed and wooden in interviews. As for his future… looks like great models. I just saw LIFE – the film he’s promoting. He’s excellent in it. My husbands a photographer and he loved it. I need more versatility from Rob – and Mainstream and indie. He’s got to go back to mainstream so we can see him in something else besides Twilight. Not a twi fan.

    • Leah says:

      There are many young actors who “buck the system”. If you think he is the only one who feels like this then you probably don’t pay much attention to actors outside the mainstream.

  25. Leah says:

    First thing if he wants to be like those guys. Stop giving these interviews, maintain some mystery Secondly: go to drama school!

    • manta says:

      Yeah and maybe, resist the urge to be the face of luxury brands like all the young Hollywood crowd.Too late for this one.

      It helps your cred as an Artist strictly about his craft if your face isn’t on every billboard or counter trying to sell a perfume or a suit. To me anyway.

  26. Ashby says:

    He should’ve said “I desperately want Orlando Bloom’s career” to escape the shitstorm, lol

  27. Bethie says:

    “But I’ve never wanted anyone to hear what I’m saying, because it’s probably stupid.”

    I know the feeling. The struggle is real.

  28. ell says:

    HAHAHAHA good luck with that.

  29. Anname says:

    Why are people suggesting Rob stop doing interviews? He doesn’t do interviews unless he has to promote something – it’s required, yes? He is getting asked about his role choices, his path since Twilight, how he came to accept the role in Life, his work with auteur directors. His interviews are interesting and candid – like he says, he tries to keep his personality in them, not become some sort of studio mouthpiece, but without selling his private life. Makes for more interesting reading, and is frequently amusing. Mortensen and Phoenix, even Daniel Day Lewis do interviews when they have movies being released. That is part of an actor’s job.

    • Angela says:

      Srsly, he’s been on a down-low for ages by now, no red carpet appearances, no new photoshoots, no paparazzi pics even, maybe some tabloid stories about his lovelife – but it’s beyond his control… It’s the third CB’s entry about the same interview he gave promoting his new movie. And some say he should be more mysterious, stop talking, be more low-key… is he supposed to move to Mars to finally stop irritating people?

    • Josefa says:

      IKR? I find it funny people are like “oh so shut up and get to work!”. Eh, dude… the interviews are a part of the job, you know? Sparkles has kept a low profile for a while now and hasn’t really done any big blockbusters post-Twilight. What exactly do you expect him to do?

  30. Sarah01 says:

    I just saw the immigrant and Joaquin was incredible, he has such range and depth in his performance I loved it! I really don’t think Robert could match these two actors they are quite brilliant!

    • Tig says:

      Have to respectfully disagree re The Immigrant- thought his performance there had all the subtlety of a brick. On the other hand, I really enjoyed his performance in Her. Has anyone seen his Woody Allen movie-anyone? Anyone?

  31. Green Is Good says:

    Robert , you sparkly douche-bag vampire . Your name and Viggo Mortensen should under any be in the same sentence .

  32. iheartgossip says:

    So shut your trap and get to work, then.

  33. Eru says:

    His problem is that he is bad actor. Thats why he will never have after-twilight career. He is really new Orlando Bloom. Literally. He is good person. But cant act at all and looks like himself in every movie.

    • Anname says:

      I could bring over tons of critics’ comments that say otherwise.
      In fact, he is being recognized for completely disappearing into his roles, and for being a whole lot more than Twilight allowed him to show.

  34. PaulaG says:

    He’s not a bad actor, not the best one out there, but showing promise for sure… He proved to be versatile and not scared of taking risks in his choices post-Twilight. The thing is none of his recent roles can overshadow Twilight or even come close, it’s mostly obscure arthouse stuff only stubborn cinephiles seek to watch. He needs a big complex breakout role to make bigger crowd see him differently, but sometimes it takes years for an actor to find the right stuff.

  35. Amy M. says:

    Viggo has always been super offbeat, doing his own thing (kind of like Bill Murray but less weird). My mom went to college with him and remembers him being all artsy even back then, going off on his own and marching to the beat of his own drum.

    Not sure Pattinson will have his kind of career but I wish him luck trying.

  36. Sandy says:

    Less talking about how great he wants to be more doing. Let the work speak for itself IMAO.
    Nothing wrong with ambition but honestly
    think it’s a bad idea to name drop great actors for these type of actors.
    It’s like when cara delewhatever said she wants to have meryls career. People are going to mock them. To be fair I think his friend Tom Sturridge have a better chance at this type of career. Best of luck to rob though!

  37. Josefa says:

    I like Robert and I think people exaggerate when it comes to his “hate” for Twilight. I think he’s well aware the movies are crap and just takes it with humor.

    I don’t think he’s as talented as Viggo or Joaquin but power to him if that’s his goal.