The Cambridges got a no-fly zone around Anmer Hall: normal, middle-class?

wenn22938144

You know how the Cambridges like to play-act their super-normal middle class lifestyle? It’s true. They think normal, middle class families have palaces refurbished by the taxpayers and country homes refurbished (at a cost of $3 million-plus) by daddy. They think normal, middle class families have extensive taxpayer-funded security guarding their estates and their non-royal in-laws. And I guess they think that normal, middle class families get no-fly zones over their country homes so no one will take photos of their £60,000 tennis court renovations.

The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have been given permission to enforce a no-fly zone over their new country mansion in a bid to stop photographs being taken of the distinctive red-brick house. All aircraft – including drones – are to be banned from flying within 1.5 miles of Anmer Hall, situated on the Queen’s Sandringham Estate near King’s Lynn in Norfolk, from next month.

The Department for Transport, which has agreed to the request, said it was required ‘in view of the need for security for the Royal Family’. Similar regulations are to come into force for Sandringham House from 1 December to 1 March each year. The three-month restriction covers the Christmas period, when the Queen and other members of the Royal Family are in residence.

Regulations issued by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) state no aircraft is to fly below 2,000ft (610m) within the restricted airspace. It does not apply to emergency services aircraft, including Prince William’s employer, the East Anglian Air Ambulance, and the Maritime and Coastguard Agency. The Queen’s helicopter and any aircraft flown by a member of the Royal family are also exempt, as are aircraft flown by ‘guests of Sandringham House or Anmer Hall, who have permission to land there’.

William and Kate now spend the majority of their time at Anmer Hall, which was gifted to them by the Queen in addition to their official 21-room apartment at Kensington Palace. They have spent several million pounds of their private fortunate turning the ten bedroom Georgian mansion – an historically photographed local landmark – into a ‘dream’ family home for their children, Prince George and Princess Charlotte. The house boasts its own tennis court and swimming pool, as well as a new glazed garden room which allows them to dine under the stars.

Earlier this year the couple complained about paparazzi photographic intrusion into their ‘family life’.

[From The Daily Mail]

Yes, just after Charlotte was born, the Cambridges’ press office handed out “rules” that the press would have to follow about how they (the press) were not going to be allowed anywhere near Anmer Hall or the Middletons’ Berkshire home. They were already complaining about “intrusions” back then. I’m not saying that it’s cool to fly drones around Sandringham, I’m just saying that the Cambridges want it both ways. They want their press machine to tell the world that they are so normal and down-to-earth and just-like-you whilst simultaneously enjoying the extreme kind of taxpayer-funded privileges that can only be maintained, long-term, through the public’s goodwill.

Oh, and the Daily Mail has a really idiotic story about how William and Kate “built a successful marriage.” Who is buying what that writer is selling?

wenn22966953

wenn22966942

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

139 Responses to “The Cambridges got a no-fly zone around Anmer Hall: normal, middle-class?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Ruckhappy says:

    OK, that is _not_ how you pass a rugby ball.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      Ha! That’s the first thing I noticed. I’m a 59 year old woman and I think I could do better than that.

    • LAK says:

      Yep. I’ve been going over different scenerios in my head as to why someone would hold their hands/body like that when passing or possibly receiving a rugby ball……

      …..drawing a blank.

      • Ruckhappy says:

        Can you imagine him in a contested maul, LAK? Not who I’d want on my hip when defending a five metre scrum, speaking as a front-rower. Now Harry, that lad has sand. I’d scrum down with him.

      • Citresse says:

        William is left handed. They tend to feel clumsy but the research also points to lefties as very intelligent and creative.

    • whipmyhair says:

      I’m not even a fan of any kind of football and I can throw a rugby ball better than he can.

      Is Eton too posh for rugby?

  2. Lilacflowers says:

    Who do they think they are? Dick Cheney?

    • Abbott says:

      I’m guessing your loved ones and guests aren’t fly-zone exempt at Chateau Lilac? Am I not allowed to land my helicopter on your tennis court anymore?

      • Shambles says:

        “Am I not allowed to land my helicopter on your tennis court anymore?”

        Dirty.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        Well, no, Abbott! Not since we installed a helicopter landing pad just for you! We painted your name on it and everything. And we situated it away from the tennis court because people were complaining that you were making their balls scatter. It’s over near the neighboring golf course because I hate golf.

    • bettyrose says:

      Lilacflowers, It’s all fun and games till someone shoots their hunting partner in the eye.

      • Who ARE these people? says:

        And makes them apologize for standing in the way of the bullet.

      • Pipa says:

        or a plane in the ‘no fly’ ….

        Donothing Willnot do insist on private/secret hid away single lifestyle of disappearance from ambulance regular ‘no show job’ (note the ambulance helicopter allowed to enter, friends visiting); give great access for secret disappearance with his love and toffs. Meanwhile limpet snowflake is back in hiding from royal duties until fun events – red carpet movie premier.

        The added secrecy allow lazy lambridge to continue – limpet runs home to carol in buckleberry – shopping/hair/ trainer and the kids raised by loving nanny Maria. Win win for the workless duo!

    • evermoreOriginalhere says:

      I just find these two more and more annoying. William seems to NEVER stop complaining about something, yet all the while claiming how NORMAL he wants to be. William seems like he’s so prickly all the time. He sounds so precious.

      There was once a St. Andrews student chat site up for awhile during the first and second year or so William was there and boy oh boy did some write what a jerk he was. Not sure if they were blowing smoke, but some of the comments were detailed with examples, at the time. Once the site came to be viewed by a Royal commentary site, suddenly it was taken offline of public view, but it was good reading on insight into PW for a for awhile until it was yanked. LOL

  3. Shambles says:

    I don’t think I can form a sensible comment, because the “letting your husband vacation with Jecca Craig” line hit a little too close to home for me. I just got out of a long relationship, and I’m finding out after the fact that Mr. PerfectNiceGuy is actually a liar and a cheater. He and Normal Bill could have some Normal drinks on Bill’s Normal back porch under his Normal no fly zone.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      I’m so sorry, Shambles. It really hurts. Just remember that people cheat because of something lacking in them – self esteem, honesty, maturity- not because of anything lacking in you.

      • Shambles says:

        Thank you, my lovely GNATTY. We had already broken up, and it was actually one of the most amicable breakups I’ve ever had. I was feeling pretty good about things, then I found out the whole relationship was pretty much a lie. It’s a weird feeling. Here’s hoping that the royals creep on these threads, and someone passes the message that I am single and ready to mingle with hot ginger princes along to a certain someone. 😉

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Aw, He would be perfect for you!

    • Sixer says:

      Awww, Shambles. In the days of yore, when I were a young thing, I fell bonkers in lurve and it all went wrong with cheating. I remember being on the top deck of a London bus, heading off to meet my friends for a night out to take my mind off it, and the heartbreak just rolling over me like a tidal wave. I HOWLED. Mascara everywhere. Snot everywhere. Sobs everywhere. People staring everywhere. And half a dozen middle-aged ladies rushed over to comfort me, saying all the stuff GNAT’s just said. It’s true, you know.

      • FLORC says:

        What GNAT and Sixer said.
        And reading your comment Shambles my first thought was “Awww Shambles” too.

      • Helen says:

        Been there and do understand. I sobbed my heart out in the ladies loo at a posh hotel after losing both my job and my man!! I can sympathise!

      • Jaded says:

        Been there several times Shambles and Sixer – it feels like you’ve been sucker-punched in the stomach when you find out. I lived with a lawyer chap some years ago. Found photos of a Nassau golf vacation he purportedly took with “the boys” the previous year that turned out to be a shagging vacation with one of his female clients. Photographic proof. Guess Waity has a stronger stomach for that stuff than I do – I dropped his sorry ass immediately.

    • Shambles says:

      You guys are all amazeballs. Thank you for the support. It feels like I’ve gotten all the crying out, but it also doesn’t feel like it’s fully hit me yet so I’m sure there’s an epic wail-fest to come. Either way, you guys make me smile, you’re the reason I comment in the first place, and I lurv you.

      • Jaded says:

        One day at a time Shambles….and I found wine to be very theraputic. Wishing you a speedy recovery and that an utterly amazing man comes waltzing into your life and appreciates you as much as you deserve to be appreciated!

  4. Aussie girl says:

    I seriously thought the post pic of Kate was Ali Lohan. Wow, those bangs!!

  5. Sixer says:

    SIGH.

    (This is the short version of an earlier, expletive-laden comment.)

    • LAK says:

      …..but how can you object when they are so in love and are having a successful marriage.

      It’s quid pro quo….they get a no fly zone, we get a saccharine love story.

      Have a heart!!

      • Pipa says:

        …but why try to convince the public of this private regular family ‘loving marriage’ – photogs tell the story (maybe why paps are banned).

        This strategy was used before (Jason maybe too young to remember) to convince people of the same of POW &Diana’s marriage.

    • Olenna says:

      Ditto. That is all.

    • Sixer says:

      Russnfussn.

      (This is also a bowdlerised version of an earlier comment. Which I’ll repeat with interwebz censoring: sh!tf!ckp!ssw!nkc!ntandb!ll!cks.)

    • notasugarhere says:

      To cheer us up, here is the best comment from the DM article about the No Fly Zone over Anmer.

      Mrs Fed Up, England, United Kingdom, 8 hours ago
      That will go nicely with the no work zone for the Duke and Duchess too.

  6. Veronica C says:

    Idk, it’s pretty successful in that he wanted a pretty but bland as porridge wife and she wanted to be Queen. Whatevs. No worse in my eyes than Trump or any other upper class man/trophy wife sitch. Their choice, not hurting anyone.

    • Vava says:

      Yeah, but Trump isn’t living off taxpayer’s money last time I read about him. And granted, it’s been awhile…………….

  7. Birdix says:

    I opened my bedroom shades this past weekend and there was a drone hovering just outside (my next door neighbor’s). I screamed, realized I was in my undies, and hit the floor. Of course everyone in my family thought it was hilarious. After that experience I can see why they’d want the no-fly zone though I doubt my neighbor will repeat that mistake…

    • InvaderTak says:

      I hate the idea that this is even possible. I need a basement apartment and a really long drive and a gate….so a cemetery I guess.

    • msw says:

      I miss the days when you only had to worry about the neighbor across the street 🙂

      • bluhare says:

        Or basement. Don’t ever forget the neighbor in the basement. Turned out he was a peeping Tom.

    • M.A.F. says:

      I was getting coffee one morning before work, this was around 6:30, and I kept hearing a buzz. I finally looked up and it was drone. I was taken aback since I have never seen/encountered one before. I looked around seeing I could find the person but no one else was in the parking lot except for one guy waiting for the game store to open. I ended up just flipping the drone off (it was hovering above me) and went to get my coffee.

      I can understand why they would want a no-fly zone around their place.

    • Vava says:

      Wow – that must’ve been a shock!

    • India Andrews says:

      I saw a drone outside of my window. I made the operator run when I saw him on the lawn below. He hasn’t been back.

  8. Katie says:

    First of all, a four year marriage isn’t exactly going the distance. They’re only just getting started.

    Second, they really are out of touch and straddling the fence between royalty and middle class when either suits them isn’t going to win any respect or support. In fact, it’s an insult to both. They refuse to fulfill their royal duties which earn them tax payer favor. And they parade around pretending to be middle class with no idea what that really means.

    Pick a side and stick to it.

    • Colleen says:

      @Katie, I was just quickly scanning over the comments in this thread til I got to yours. I had to stop and re-read at a normal, comprehensive pace. I read your final comments as “Put a stick in it”.

  9. Bom says:

    How si that? She kissed Prince Charming and she got a frog?
    He turned into the most unattractive man of the planet and he’s not even fourty.

  10. LadyJane says:

    I don’t think you can call it an ‘apartment’ if it is 21 rooms.

    • whipmyhair says:

      I think it is meant to show that they don’t have full reign to the palace.

      Also it probably is an old English meaning of the word apartment. In the U.K they use the term “flat” instead of apartment, but I’ve always seen it referred to as apartment 1A.

    • Mary-Alice says:

      That’s what it’s called in castles. Like in Versailes there is the King’s apartment, the Queen’s apartment, etc. It’s actually the whole wing with the King’s rooms. Same in Austria, even in Russian castles.

  11. InvaderTak says:

    Laws have not caught up with drones and the potential problems they create (voyeurism for starters). So I really don’t blame them for this. The paps are invasive enough and now they can do it remotely.

    • Birdix says:

      I wonder where it’ll go–individual no fly zones (paging Jennifer Garner and Halle Berry)? What’s to stop a drone following a celeb around like the raincloud that follows Charlie Brown?

      • InvaderTak says:

        I don’t know. No fly zones can be defeated with a long range camera. There was an incident a while ago where a guy literally shot one out of the sky because someone was spying on his teenage daughter while she was sunbathing in her own back yard. It was fenced in and they lived in a rural area, so it wasn’t like a balcony of a high rise in a huge city situation. The debate over that became about airspace over private properties. There’s also been one hit an airplane now too. So there has got to be some more rigorous regulations/laws come in to play soon. I would support a license to buy one and registration like you would your car. They are not like model planes; these things have the potential to do some real harm in the hands of the wrong people.

    • M.A.F. says:

      I can fully understand why they would want this. And yes, individually we should be allowed to go on with our daily business and not have to worry about some creep from down the street flying a drone over their neighbors back yard.

    • notasugarhere says:

      Normal, middle class people do not get to demand no fly zones over their private property.

    • Pondering thoughts says:

      Isn’t it possible to take them down with an air rifle – provided you notice them as some of them are really small?

      In this case I like German laws:
      It is forbidden to take pictures of a private person without the person’s consent, especially when the person is on private grounds / at home. Taking pictures of people while they go on about common daily business is forbidden, too, as long as it is really common daily business (shopping groceries, going to the doctor etc.) So no pictures of politicians dropping off their children at school.

      People of public importance (politicians) on duty or during suspicious activities are not covered by this kind of protection.

      There was a German politician who was married and went into a swimming pool with not his wife and cuddled with her. That activity wasn’t covered by German privacy laws because affairs can impact political decisions and therefor it was of public interest to have this reported. If she had been his wife or his official girlfriend (and him separated from his wife) then German privacy laws would have protected his amourous activities.

      • FLORC says:

        I like this way too. It would still be outright rejected for the Cambridges. It’s not simply themselves and family they wish to not be photographed, but also cars and methods of transportations. As they are not often where they are thought to be a better timeline can be built with that bit of info.

      • InvaderTak says:

        So i need to move to Germany. Got it.

  12. Ruckhappy says:

    OK, that is _not_ how you pass a rugby ball. You don’t swing it like that, and you always keep your hips square to your line of advance in order to maintain your charge, just in case you choose to challenge the tackle. You keep your shoulders low and set and you just flick it across the plane of your torso. You never hang the ball like that.

    That’s what we call a widow maker pass on the pitch. You toss it like that and you’re setting up your inside center to get creamed by an oppo flanker coming hard off the scrum. Oh well, at least the point’s up…sorta.

    Ol’ Billy sure ain’t no Lomu….

    • LAK says:

      You know, he probably thinks he is pretty good with that ball. That’s what a lifetime of yes men will do to you.

    • Sixer says:

      I just SO fell in love with Ruckhappy!

      • Ruckhappy says:

        Aw, I bet you say that to all the busted-up old props….

        Now Sixer, though, this colonial does have a question for you, as a republican. Would you be more inclined to suffer the continuance of the Crown if young George was brought up as less of an effete and useless figurehead like his father? You know, no polo and poncing about on the Civil List, but a sound childhood of public school thrashings, cold showers, gunfire at dawn and rugby? You know, a bit of the old rum, sodomy and the lash, so to speak, but ended up actually serving British society in some useful way eventually? He’s going to end up a toff no matter what, but say the lad ended up doing real service to the nation. Say a solid military career–_not_ like his father’s, but like William the Fourth’s–and then went on to do something more useful than cutting ribbons at flower shows.

        Would you stand for the monarchy to go on under such a king? Mind you, nationalize about three-quarters of the palaces and whatnot, cut way down on what the Crown costs and so forth.

        The reason I ask is that my dear sainted mother was both an unregenerate Marxist radical and yet loved the Queen. Even whilst doing her doctoral thesis on hard Left British union self-management practices, she drug me out to go see Her Nibs during her Silver Jubilee. Never could understand how she could reconcile her adamant Marxism–and she was an American, mind you–with her affection for the monarchy.

      • Sixer says:

        (It’s a far cry from sitting on the scrum machine at my brother’s rugby practice!)

        Ha. That’s kind like asking which would you choose: Tom Brown or Flashman?!

        Um… no, no I wouldn’t. I favour a republic along the Irish model (not US with head of state and govt the same person). But then, I’m not active in the republican movement here now, such as it is. I don’t think it’s a big priority. When we’ve sorted out everything else – that’s when we can move from constitutional monarchy to republic.

        I have a friend a bit like your mother. Unrepentant socialist too. And she sees the BRF as exhibits in a gilded cage and an important reminder of how we achieved democracy through attrition in this country. She loves the Queen’s Speech as a symbol of the neutering of the monarch in having to read out the legislative programme as instituted by an elected government, for example.

        To me, that just seems petty, but she won’t have it!

    • frisbee says:

      Yes you’re right and that’s EXACTLY how I get round my local Supermarket….

    • antipodean says:

      There will never be another Jonah, he was a blazing star. I remember seeing him at Twickers where he mowed those suckers down like they weren’t even there, I will never forget it. Having said that there is always new talent coming up, so there is hope. Alas Bill will never be one of them.
      As far as Betty Windsor goes, most people applaud her sense of duty, and long term service to the Commonwealth, while still side eyeing the manner in which their coffers are filled.
      Ruckhappy, the phenomena you described with your mother is inexplicable, but a certain generation were raised to adore the monarchy, hence old ladies knitting booties for the royal babies, and on an even worse note, the colonies sending a generation of their youngest and brightest to be slaughtered for the glorification of foreign agendas. Madness.

      • Ruckhappy says:

        Well, _her_ father was an Ulsterman who fought for the Crown in The Great War, so some sense of loyalty may have come of that, as you say, although she would never have let me do anything as silly as enlisting to fight in the name of some classist remnant of feudalism.

        Mind you, there’s a lot to be said for the parliamentary system of government. You might be stuck with a bit of a tosser at No. 10 at the moment, but compared with the crap that we’re dealing with on this side of the waters….

      • antipodean says:

        Hopefully that will change soon, unfortunately, as with the Presidential candidates on offer, it’s a pretty unpromising selection at the mo.

  13. Deedee says:

    All I see is fake hair and teeth in those photos of Kate. Meanwhile, the sugar blogs are busy playing paper dolls, “Dress Kate for the state banquet” because Kate is still planning how she is going to “hit the ground running” and step up her appearances, when really she is not doing any of that. At all.

    • Olenna says:

      “Dress Kate for the state banquet”… AYFKM?

      • Deedee says:

        I take it you have not submitted your “Dream Look” for Duchess Kate yet? There is much debate about the gloves and the shoes.

    • LAK says:

      You have to feel sorry for them. This is what they’ve been reduced to since they aren’t receiving good or any material to justify the blog or their presence on it.

    • bluhare says:

      Hey, what’s wrong with that? She’s going to a state banquet and it beats the hell out of bitching at each other to have everyone engaged in choosing an outfit and Charlotte’s doing a giveaway for the winning outfit. I’m all for something that stops some bitchitude over there, which happens when Kate isn’t doing much. The silly part is people who actually think she’d choose one of their outfits.

      • LAK says:

        Bluhare: I didn’t mean to insult. I really think this is a way to keep up the blog because Kate isn’t giving them anything to work with.

        Now the h8er blogs are a different matter. They are tossed morsels practically everyday.

    • Birdix says:

      can’t help it–I love the name sugar, even if it is derogatory. I might start a fanblog just so people will snip, “oh, Birdix, she’s just such a sugar.”

    • notasugarhere says:

      Is that the creepy blog that put her head on Diana’s body and Jackie Kennedy’s body?

    • Vava says:

      LOL…………I’ve noticed the sugars are playing paper dolls too. It’s really quite comical.

    • bluhare says:

      I post on that blog and if you’re all going to dismiss me as a “sugar” playing dress up I’m out.

      No one here ever does silly things to entertain themselves. Nooooooo . . . . .

      • Olenna says:

        Please don’t bail, bluhare. I know it’s hard not to take some comments personally at times, but it’s all in jest and the real joke is not you and those you post with on another site. It’s on this pair of royal slackers who think they’re getting over on everyone.

      • notasugarhere says:

        I don’t post on that fashion blog, but I am a serious reader of Order of Splendor!

      • Deedee says:

        Yes, it’s the Duke and Duchess of Mustique who are letting everyone down. Too few appearances and she’s just a clotheshorse. Disappointing all around. Unfortunately, she will never choose any of the lovely outfits that are thoughtfully put together on the blog, because she lacks creativity.

  14. MinnFinn says:

    This raises a lot of questions. How will their air space be monitored? What happens if it is breached, will they scramble a few RAF fighters and shoot the drone or human piloted aircraft down? RPOs will need to be trained to launch surface-to-air missiles.

  15. Betti says:

    Well of course they have – don’t want the great unwashed to see what they are really up to. Don’t want the press to report on the secret vacations they go one while they leave a newborn with Granny and the nanny (in her first week on the job), all the shopping/salon trips Kate goes on, the pubs/hunting trips normal bill goes on when he’s not working on his 1 day a week job.

    I really want the press to let loose on them.

    PS. That Fail article made me laff with the un-photoshopped images they used, particularly with the first one. She def has had a lot of work done, she looks like a different person in some of the newer ones. And as for Billy he’s really an obnoxious baffon who reminds me every day of an incompetent Conservative politician.

    • daisy says:

      Gosh Betti you are so right agree with your post very well written
      they are such a spoilt couple have everything their own way
      or stamp their feet in tantrum
      they really are unbelievable with all the spending
      and wanting normality with all the privilege of all the money being spent on them

  16. CarolinaBelle says:

    Don’t planes fly over/near Windsor Castle?

    • Nanea says:

      Windsor Castle is underneath an official flight path to/from Heathrow, as is Eton. Or Buckingham Palace. Too bad William the Conqueror didn’t take this into consideration when he started building Windsor!

  17. notasugarhere says:

    Given the state of technology today, how much of a barrier is a 2000 ft ceiling? My guess is, not much to the enterprising or tech-enabled.

  18. Cricket says:

    With all the money spent on new kitchens, moving of tennis courts….why oh why doesn’t normal Bill get a new suit? Kate wears a new outfit for one hour a quarter work and yet Bill sports same navy blue suit and red tie!

    • LAK says:

      I think normal bill has multiples of the same clothes in what appears to be his favourite colour.

      There was a rare ‘William shopping’ story a few months ago where he bought multiples of his usual casual look, in blue.

  19. Chickadee says:

    We wouldn’t want any more French balcony incidents, would we?

  20. Amy M. says:

    To be fair to them I HATE drones. I think they are stupid and people fly them where they really have no business of flying them. They can definitely be useful (science, military etc.) but anybody can buy one and fly one. I wouldn’t want drones buzzing above my house either. If I bought one far deep in the woods or wherever, I would expect a certain level of privacy and tol not be interrupted by some idiot who wants to fly his or her fancy toy.

    Sorry for the rant but I really hate drones

    • Pipa says:

      Willnot may have increased drones around AH with this no fly – paps want to know – what is he hiding?

      Technically, if you select to take the perks and privileges from tax payers funds – 21 rooms palaces for four (+4 meddeltons), willnot and family must be reporting and available to be pap weekly – as heir to heir – you and family of four are no longer ‘private’. Hiding and workless makes photogs even more necessary for reporting to the people of a healthy ‘ sane’ heir of the heir to the British Throne .

  21. Murphy says:

    This has William’s name all over it, he has some serious paranoia issues

    • evermoreOriginalhere says:

      William landed his helicopter in private land next to the Middleton’s years ago, without permission.. but that was OK, because William did it…..to show off for the Middleton’s. He’s such a hypocrite.

      Really not liking him much lately…

  22. imo says:

    In other news, it’s World Sight Day Today and Sophie, Countess of Wessex “speaks movingly about the plight of blind people across the world…” Alas, a story & photos about a royal who cares about others and regularly does meaningful work is too boring…

    • Charlotte15 says:

      It is shocking to me that there is only one (AFAIK) blog dedicated only to Sophie – and it is fairly new, within the past year or so, I think. It was started by a fan who was getting so frustrated by the lack of coverage of all of Sophie’s good work. How many blogs/fan sites/IG accounts/ etc. are there about Kate? Many hundreds? And ONE for the Countess of Wessex. For whatever reason, Kate is the one who caught the public’s eye and she generates clicks and magazine purchases. Poor Sophie works her butt off and it is barely mentioned! 😫

    • India Andrews says:

      +100 on Sophie

  23. SP says:

    You always sound so bitter and jealous of Kate Middleton. It’s actually getting annoying. Sorry she’s not as perfect as you are…

    • imo says:

      Who’s jealous and who is claiming to be perfect? I can’t speak for everyone else, but I would wager that any anti-Kate sentiments are from those who place a value on things like having a work ethic, a sense of purpose and compassion for others — all things Kate lacks but other royals have in spades (Sophie, Harry,). Despite doing very little to pull her weight, Kate is riding the royal gravy train into the ground and living the life of Riley. Jealous? No. Fed up? Yeah.

      • seesittellsit says:

        She looks awful in that photo – the bangs have aged her, they were absolutely a mistake. But they’re longish, they’ll grow in enough to be pushed back fairly soon. Re the no-fly zone, I hate to bring up a serious topic here but I wonder if it’s about more than photographs – there are huge security concerns behind the scenes about the number of IS operatives possibly embedded in the floods of refugees pouring into Europe. I read there aren’t enough staff or finger-print equipment to register and track the numbers in many places, and many have burnt their papers so they can claim to be Syrian and some have refused to be registered. I’m wondering if that no-fly zone could be more tied to security than might be supposed. After all, the Cambridges, much as I loathe their pretensions to middle-classness (unless anyone is talking about Kate’s bloodline then suddenly the pretensions to middle-classness go awfully quiet) would be prime targets . . .

      • Pipa says:

        Well done Countess Sophie (not even close in Line like snowflake but hard at work for HM/the people). Fingers crossed HM POW Line/heir could change.

    • CrystalBall says:

      SP – if you can’t stand the heat, stay out of the royal celebitchy kitchen. Maybe you lost your way whilst googling ‘whatkatewore’. Just ask yourself if Kate would be bothered to stick up for you (like she champion’s her forgotten causes) before you stick your neck out for HER.

      • Feeshalori says:

        I think someone took a wrong turn over the air space here: this is a no-sugar zone.

      • notasugarhere says:

        I don’t think it is a no-sugar zone. It is a place for discussion and debate. When the only argument a poster has is, “You’re jealous” or “You’re a hater” there isn’t room for debate. There are some strong defenders of KM on here, but even her strongest defenders on here have been known to question her lack of work.

      • bluhare says:

        Really Feeshalori? Thanks for the warning. You sound like the super fans on Duchess Kate. Seriously. Flip it around and it’s the same type of thinking.

      • Feeshalori says:

        Oh, please, lighten up. No warning was issued, Bluehare, and I assure you that I’m no extremist one way or another. Seriously. Who are you to compare me to these fans on Duchess Kate? I don’t even post there nor do I make it a habit of frequenting all these sites. My remarks here, when I do post, are always fair and equitable and never incendiary. If my light comment to a poster who claims people here are jealous or haters was taken out of turn, that’s your interpretation and certainly not my meaning. Perhaps a “lol” would have made that clearer. It’s attacks like this that keep many a well-meaning poster out of sight here and why I don’t post that much. It seems tempers and emotions can run too high around here.

      • bluhare says:

        Right. This is a no sugar zone. Very friendly and welcoming to all points of view, Feeshalori.

        My point stands. People who can see nothing right with them are the other side of the coin to those who can see no wrong. Both sides fail to see we’re talking about human beings, with all their facets.

        What attack? I didn’t like your phrase, said so, and pointed out how similar it sounds to things I hear all the time in the sugar zone. I didn’t attack you at all.

      • Feeshalori says:

        Right, Bluhare, and may I point out the comment upthread from mine that another poster made in response to someone saying that if they can’t stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen. Not very friendly and welcoming I would think according to your terms, yet that didn’t seem to offend you.

        My point stands as well. I didn’t like your comment and took it as an attack, so my opinion differs from yours. That’s because you’re comparing me to these super fans on another site and I do take offense at that since I’m not an extremist at all. And unlike you, I don’t go on those sites and don’t engage in discussion so I don’t like that comparison. I did say that this was meant in a lighthearted way, but you rejected that explanation and I suppose that’s because of the judgmental attitude you seem to have.

        We’ll have to at least agree that we have a difference of opinion. And as far as I’m concerned, this discussion is over.

      • Citresse says:

        Oh well look on the bright side Feeshalori you weren’t ordered to STFU.
        Some people on here show their own problems very clearly- sometimes it’s pointed out by others (when the behavior continues) and sometimes it isn’t.

      • Feeshalori says:

        LOL, Citresse, this is so true. 😉 And notice the use of “lol” and the emoticon just to clarify my lighthearted manner!

    • Citresse says:

      I don’t think the majority of people are jealous of Kate Middleton. I think the majority see we’re well past any grace period of adjustment. I would like to see a change for the better from both William and Kate someday, but I wouldn’t hold my breath.
      The best predictor of the future is the past.

    • jerry says:

      …a recent survey suggested that half the families in uk get more in state handouts than they pay in taxes so really bill n kate are completely normal..plus I remember so many commentators used to say chas should pass on being King in favour of his son…where are those ppl today…blown away in the wind…royalty endures…

      • anne_000 says:

        If Bill and Kate want to stay on the dole without working, then they should get the same amount the other families get. Not 124039328403248 times more like they get now.

        If they signed up for a reality show living only on the average dole paycheck, I would watch that show.

  24. Giddy says:

    Of course a no fly zone is needed; how else can one take advantage of a sunny day to get a base layer tan on the Royal tittays? To get ready for the odd jaunt to Mustique, doncha know. One must always be ready for one’s bikini.

  25. msthang says:

    I swear whenever the media announces a celebrity couple how happy they are, and gee they should give tips for a successful marriage, it is usually over in a matter of months. Or better yet when they have another over the top wedding to celebrate how wonderful a match they are it is usually kaput! A tangled web indeed!

  26. anne_000 says:

    How about letting everybody else get this same air space ban over their own residences if they want to?

  27. sauvage says:

    The Daily Mail article quotes someone literally identified as a Celebrity Relationship Expert.

    Somehow that, to me, exemplifies everything that’s wrong with this world.

  28. grumpy pants says:

    its a f@cking fringe…not bangs.

  29. wow says:

    Good for them! I wouldn’t want people to eye-stalk me or my children in the privacy of my home either. They should have already established this for all royal homes. Way too many lookie-loos disguising themselves as real press photographers. Plus they already release approved pictures of their kids throughout the year. That should suffice as far as seeing pictures of their kids. Anything else is just the press being nosey and voyeurism. Weird.

  30. Pondering thoughts says:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3267482/Caring-Kate-William-join-youngsters-battled-psychological-illness-mark-World-Mental-Health-Day-Harrow-College.html

    Kate’s list when going out:

    – Big Blue
    – short designer dress
    – eyeliner
    – makeup
    – highheels
    – clutch for clutching

    – Accessoires:
    — wiglet
    — bangs / fringe
    — jewelry
    — Prince William

  31. What does she find so terribly funny all the time when on her “visits?”

    • dmfan says:

      Can someone get Waity flea treatment? She walks like she has fleas down there and clutches that area with her hands. Walmart sells K9 Advantix for 48 bucks and change.