Ryan Adams compares Taylor Swift’s ‘1989’ album to Shakespeare, of course

FFN_Grammy_Awards1_KMFF_020815_51648738

I haven’t done much (or any) coverage of Ryan Adams’ cover album of Taylor Swift’s 1989. I haven’t talked about it because I really don’t know what to say. Taylor and Ryan may (MAY!) have some kind of sexual/romantic history, if you believe blind items, and it did seem like a weird choice for Ryan’s career to simply do a cover album of all Tay-Tay. That being said, his covers are not bad at all. It definitely sounds like Bruce Springsteen Lite covers of Swift’s songs. You can hear “Shake It Off” here. You can hear “Wildest Dreams” here.

For her part, Taylor seemed genuinely excited when Ryan announced the cover album, and she tweeted and Instagrammed about it when it dropped. Ryan and Taylor also did a “conversation” together for GQ – go here to see (I’m also including it below). I sort of understand why Taylor is so happy about Ryan’s project – it’s because he obviously adores her and her music and since Tay-Tay is all about Tay-Tay, she obviously loves it when someone else is all about her too. In a new interview with the Guardian, Ryan talks more about the project and why he chose Taylor Swift’s album. And he compares her to Shakespeare. Oh, she’ll love that.

His favorite Taylor Swift song is “White Horse”: “The first time I heard it I got chills head to toe. I remember feeling shocked by her voice, shocked at how clean that song was. I like stuff that sort of penetrates through my regular consciousness and hits me where I’m not looking. That’s usually stuff that’s a little darker. You know, that song is really about disillusionment on such a grand scale. I just thought about how this is hitting me like a tidal wave, it’s so romantic and so beautiful, and yet so sad and so disillusioned – it’s all the stuff I love about the Smiths. That song f–ked me up and I couldn’t believe it. Her voice does this thing. It just goes through all my bullsh-t detectors and right into my heart and soul.”

Swifty as Shakespeare: He compares the exercise of working through 1989’s songs to “being in Ghostbusters or something, and then all of a sudden I have to go do Shakespeare”. As in, his material is the goofy franchise, hers is the oeuvre of the greatest writer that ever lived. It’s possibly an overgenerous analogy. “Well, look, those songs are popular for a reason,” he says. “She’s a popular artist for a reason.”

The criticism that he’s “mansplaining” Taylor Swift: “[It] really upset me. I honestly never thought about gender.”

Why he did the cover album: “It sounds very selfish and it is – I thought about Ryan. I projected into this universe. And the songs were this spacecraft that took me into this parallel universe. It was very cathartic for me, because I found myself singing those songs and feeling things from my divorce, [Adams split from the actress Mandy Moore in January this year] feeling things from a current relationship, feeling things from the distant past.”

He accepts this: “People will give me a certain amount of sh-t no matter what I do in my career. That’s just the role I play in music culture. It’s always going to be that way.”

[From The Guardian]

For what it’s worth, I don’t think his goal was to “mansplain” Taylor Swift’s songs. I think it was more like his particular song-writing well was dry and he thought it would be cool to do a cover album for an artist he enjoys. As for Taylor-as-Shakespeare. No. Just… NO. She is not Shakespeare. Adele is not Shakespeare either. If you really have to compare a modern singer/lyricist to Shakespeare, I would go with Bob Dylan, but maybe that’s just me.

Here’s their GQ conversation.

adams swifty

FFN_Grammy_Awards1_KMFF_020815_51648415

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

95 Responses to “Ryan Adams compares Taylor Swift’s ‘1989’ album to Shakespeare, of course”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Santia says:

    I just find this beyond odd. He’s a little old to be a Swifty-loony. And, let’s be honest, Swifty’s songs are not deep at all.

    • Lilian says:

      He sounds Inlove with her

    • Marny says:

      I’m not a Swift fan but I read this Guardian article yesterday & I listened to a few of his covers then read the lyrics to some of her songs- they are way better than I would have suspected.

      • Fifee says:

        I have to agree. I hadn’t listened to Swifts originals, so I came with “clean” ears to Ryans covers and I have to say I loved them. I then listened to those originals that I could (I use spotify and we know how she feels about that!) using Youtube and Ryan brought depth to the songs that I doubt she ever could. Plus his divorce with Mandy Moore would’ve been pretty raw so I guess he saw more in the songs that Swift could even though theyre her break up songs.

      • lisa says:

        ita, i dont know much about her music. but i really like these covers.

    • knower says:

      I’ve heard rumblings that his affections for taylor helped break up his marriage with mandy moore.

      • WinnieCoopersMom says:

        Where? From the blind mentioned below? That’s the closest “rumbling” I could find on it. Though I will agree with the poster above, I think he adores/loves her.

  2. Tiffany says:

    They boning. That is it.

    • LB says:

      Everyone says the blind item leads to Jenny Lewis and it very well could, but Lainey later implied it was Tay Tay in another post (one of those news wrap up posts where she linked an article about Ryan and Taylor and labeled it something like “Ahem”).

      I don’t generally give blind items credence but Lainey’s often end up being true.

      • mia girl says:

        Yeah… last week here is what Lainey wrote about them. This is as good as telling us the BLIND was about them:

        “Have you watched Ryan Adams interviewing Taylor Swift about both their 1989s? Oh reeeeally? I say that with my eyes closed, like I’m blind.”

    • Mia V. says:

      He wants to bone her, that’s all.

  3. Allie says:

    I honestly wonder how much Taylor’s team pays for these absurd reviews/comments. If you like her stuff, fine that’s your prerogative, but let’s not be extreme. And that’s what this whole year has been regarding her album. It’s pop and it’s catchy, but it’s not deep or genius.

  4. J says:

    If you have been reading Lainey on this subject, there are some gross reasons he is doing this. Poor Mandy Moore.

    • Bishg says:

      I 100% believe that blind item.
      The flirting between those two has reached top levels of ridiculousness.
      I haven’t listen to 1989, just to the singles that has been released, and while it’s pleasant, catchy pop I can’t believe that artist like Ryan Adams (whom I also don’t know, but apparently appeals to a whole different type of audience) would keep on blabbing about the grandness of it. Plus, I don’t buy Tay-Tay’s “holier than thou” attitude. She could totally be the person that screws around with a married man.

      • knower says:

        agreed. I wouldnt put it past her. if she wants someone she assumes she can have them, regardless of who they are with. cause she’s taylor swift!

      • WinnieCoopersMom says:

        It is interesting if she were to mess around with a married man after all her revenge songs about being cheated on. And then the release of her song ‘Girl at Home.’ The lyrics: “Don’t look at me, you’ve got a girl at home and everybody knows that.” This track was on her Extended version of ‘Red.’ I wonder if he flirted with her a while back, she said no (put out this song) and things went sour with Mandy Moore and now this is his chance to get what he couldn’t while he was still married. Gasp! What will Calvin think? *eyeroll*

    • Skye says:

      Can anyone link to this blind? I’m so curious.

    • Lilian says:

      Anyone think Wildest Dreams might be about him?

    • SlimJim says:

      @ Winnie Cooper’s Mom: “Everybody Knows” is a Ryan Adam’s song, and she’s a horrible person if she’s coyly referencing that. Not a regular poster, but decided to jump into this thread because The whole Moore-Adams break up was sketchy AF. You’ve got this former pop princess, Moore, who tried to be a real musician but hasn’t had a music hit in years and here’s her husband salivating over Swifty for years, as if she’s the second coming (or, err…Shakespeare). I’d divorce his ass, too, particularly for the questionable taste in the music and the jump offs, and never look back.

  5. na na says:

    Shakespeare?? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!

    • Senaber says:

      Thou hateth, hateth, hateth!

      Obviously swift does not have Shakespeare’s command of language. Obviously. But other reasons why Shakespeare was and is super popular are because he was a good businessperson, he knew how to reach all levels of society (hob knob with royal and famous and also throw lower classes a bone- aspirational if you will), was an excellent showman who thought about audience experience (e.g. All swift’s “special guests”). I can see how taking on swifts work would be intimidating if you generally fly under the radar or are banking on a career resurgence.

  6. polonoscopy says:

    They definitely f*cked.

  7. Halah says:

    Wonder if this had anything to do with why Mandy left him…

  8. SusanneToo says:

    The station I listen to has NEVER played TS, but it plays RA’s cover of Bad Blood frequently. It’s very catchy and I like it.

  9. Alex says:

    Ryan loves to take the piss but I’m going to have to reluctantly accept he really does like her music. I don’t care what anyone thinks of him personally, his music is amazing and everything he does has soul, depth, beauty and integrity. Like the music really matters to him, always.

    • Mare says:

      If he’s such a great songwriter, why is he doing a cover of Taylors album? She’s no Shakespeare.

  10. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    I tried to read this to see how Swifty could be Shakespeare, but I drifted off.

  11. OrigialTessa says:

    Um, this is his way of basically making a ton of money off of her and building his own reputation without having to pay her anything. If he calls her Shakespeare, she won’t sick the dogs on him. Her ego is her cryptonite.

    • Bridget says:

      His own reputation is already built as a singer/songwriter (not to mention personally as a tool). In fact him doing this cover gives her more artistic cred.

    • littlestar says:

      I am pretty sure he would have to pay her something in order to use her songs for his own profit. So yes, he is definitely trying to capitalize off of the success of 1989. And she in turn makes more $$$ too.

    • Veronica says:

      He was fairly well known in indie circles before this album, and he’s made it clear previously that he isn’t interested in the limelight. (Or so he claims.) This being said, I would actually respect her more if she allowed him to do it without charging him excessive royalties – not like she needs the money, eh? And having another artist proclaim her album good enough for a cover so soon afterwards is just more fuel for the ego and media attention.

  12. OSTONE says:

    So know we know the subjects of Lainey’s blind. Poor Mandy :/

  13. Miss V says:

    What. A. Tool.

  14. marie says:

    *insert “sure jan” gif here*

  15. lizzie says:

    i think this is an *epic* passive aggressive attack on his ex wife. he has historically behaved like a navel gazing douche bag with ex’s in the past (writing a poem to an ex and sending it to gawker to post b/c she blocked his email) while i think he is very talented, he isn’t AS talented as he thinks he is. exhausting.

    • mimif says:

      Come on, everybody knows Ryan Adams is punk as f-ck. 😏

      • littlestar says:

        I will admit that he has some talent, but ugh, he looks like such a little douche. His stumpy body and terrible hairdo that he seems to think is oh so cool.

        I don’t know why, but he rubs me the wrong way.

      • mimif says:

        Because he’s an XL bag of dicks, that’s why.

    • LeManda says:

      I feel like it’s 100% a dig at Mandy. He would notoriously through fits in interviews if he was asked any questions about her, claiming he didn’t want the attention of her celebrity.
      Then he makes over a rival pop artist of his wife’s album. Claiming her writing skills are beyond amazing. When all through his marriage she Mandy tried to write an album with him. I’m not sure what happened during these sessions but I’m guessing he was as kind to Mandy.

  16. Rhiley says:

    This project would have been a lot more successful if there had been some mystery behind it. But Ryan promoted the hell out of it- at least for him- and so it just comes off as more odd and unnecessary than it does cool and different. Most of his fans will remember that way back in the day he recorded a lovely cover of Wonderwall. It is beautiful and a job well done. He took someone else’s song and gave it his own spin. I think it would have been cool if during his live shows he started doing his cover of Blank Space or to get the crowd going again throw in a cover of Shake It Off, but to release a recording of 1989, even while the original is still churning out singles, is excessive, and I agree, it seems to point that his own song writing is in a slump. Plus, he may perhaps want to capitalize on a bit of a younger fan base.

  17. lower-case deb says:

    compare 1989 to Shakespeare?
    okay Ryan, i take your word for it,
    i better hear at least one finely crafted rhyming Yo Mamma couplet.

  18. mkyarwood says:

    All that glitters is not gold.

  19. littlemissnaughty says:

    First Leto, now this fool. It’s going to be one of those days, isn’t it?

  20. jules74 says:

    I like Ryan Adams’ music. Not a fan of him. Mixed feelings about Swifty. BUT….. I listened to the the whole of his cover of 1989 and I have to say I loved it. And I appreciated T.Swift more as a songwriter. I am just not a fan of her packaging.
    I recommend listening to his version of “This Love”. Gets me every time.

    • WinnieCoopersMom says:

      Agree. He recreates her songs in a fresh way that harks back to the 70s. Only 2-3 tracks aren’t that great, but overall, IMO he highlights her lyrics in a way her production doesn’t. It is fascinating to hear the same song two different ways and get something different from each version.

  21. cleveland girl says:

    I love Bryan, but this is just weird

  22. justagirl says:

    “People will give me a certain amount of sh-t no matter what I do in my career. That’s just the role I play in music culture. It’s always going to be that way.” No, it’s because he’s a tool and poser, see above sunglasses photo of 40y old.

    Also, the vanity. Thinking he’s important and influential enough that he’s a magnet for controversy and always a target for group discord? SMH. Just wow.

  23. Ben Dover says:

    Ryan Adams can take a seat.

  24. The Eternal Side-Eye says:

    I have to say…thank God for marketing.

    I’ve never been much impressed by Taylor’s music since she went out of her early country phase but I always felt at best she was on average lyrically with the rest of her music peers.

    Then I heard ‘Wildest Dreams’ on the radio. Yes the same Wildest Dreams that was so hyped up and discussed for its video content. The same one that I assumed was a generic happy song.

    “He’s so tall and handsome as hell” I honestly felt embarrassment and pity. That is just bad. Genuinely bad, in a field of women typically aiming for generic popularity and from someone who’d already given us such hits as “Haters gonna hate, hate, hate.” and “We are never, ever, ever, getting back together” that was newly achingly bad.

    I just can’t look at her and not see a robot entirely designed for a music career because her song lyrics are terrible, I doubt Ryan was so impressed by them that he just HAD to write a cover album. What the real story is will come out soon enough.

    • mimif says:

      If I hear red lips and rosy cheeks one more time, I’m going to choke on my Punkin Spice Latte.

      • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

        Oh mimif, if you must choke just please…say you’ll remember me standing in a nice dress, staring at the sunset, babe.

        (Ironically the less outright hit jobs she’s done on her relationships musically the more she’s revealed her bizarre dating logic. Why that memory would be worth hooking up with some jerk she already knows is bad is a compelling mystery that can only be solved by baking meditatively).

  25. Veronica says:

    I find some of the praise from some for his cover kind of grossly misogynistic. Like, it’s not smarter and better just because a man deemed it worthy of a cover. Though I’ll give him that I never got the sense he was covering it for that reason – I think he legitimately thought it was a good pop album.

    Beyond that, I’ve always found him to be kind of a douche after how selfish and emotionally manipulative he with to Mandy Moore. I like his music, but he’s optional.

    • WinnieCoopersMom says:

      I want to know more about his marriage to MM. They seemed super private. You say he was emotionally manipulative to her..give us the deets please!

  26. Green_Eyes says:

    Taylor definitely writes a lot of songs that refer to her as a Princess and the guy a prince. She may live and dream about Camelot, but Shakespeare she is not!

  27. Sophia Phawkins says:

    He looks like a muppet now.

  28. TeamAwesome says:

    I don’t think it is because his writing well had run dry, he’s already mentioned he is either in the midst of or finished recording a new album. He’s constantly writing and recording and has a catalog of unreleased stuff that is perhaps even bigger than what he has released. There’s definitely more to it, and the Mandy and TSwift pop princess backgrounds kind of makes it seem like some kind of odd passive aggressive relationship asshattery. Or Swifty just spoke to his dark, navel gazing soul.

  29. GreenieWeenie says:

    I don’t know if I’d even recognize his music. I see a boring white dude trying hard to be not boring. It’s hard to get interested.

  30. lila fowler says:

    He’s such a hipster douchebag. That pic of him in the sunglasses makes me want to punch him in the face.

  31. GreenieWeenie says:

    Whatever happened to BRYAN Adams? I’ll take some of that.

    • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

      THANK YOU.

      For the longest time I actually didn’t realize they were two different people and assumed someon had misspelled his name. Once it finally clicked it was truly a life-changing moment.

  32. dilettante says:

    He has to wear sunglasses in bright light or it triggers his Menieres disease. It’s a big issue for him and his shows are always very dark and no flash photography.

    • WinnieCoopersMom says:

      Isnt this the case with Bono as well? I think I have seen it mentioned he has major sensitivity to light, which is why he is always in sunglasses.

  33. shannon says:

    sounds like punk as f*ck has a little crush.

  34. Bridget says:

    He’s trying to go pop as a producer.

  35. Boston Green Eyes says:

    I saw Ryan in concert with the Rolling Stones some-odd years ago. He was stoned/drunk out of his gourd. So much so, I didn’t know how he could actually perform.

  36. DONNA MARTIN says:

    Wow I was cringing at all the feelings from one of her songs. Does that make him a shallow person? Or is he just not so secretly in love with her. Sounds like someone got dumped.

  37. littlestar says:

    Leonard Cohen is who I consider to be the greatest living lyricist!

    • Norman Bates's Mother says:

      This! But Bob Dylan is a close second. And from the younger generation, I think Joanna Newsom and Kristian Mattson/The Tallest Man on Earth are both wonderful lyricists with a great potential. Their voices are definitely an acquired taste, but their song-writing skills are impeccable. Even the simplest of their songs are masterpieces in comparison to what Swifty usually writes. Adams mentioned White Horse as her best song. With repeated lyrics like “I’m not a princess, this ain’t a fairy tale, I’m not the one you’ll sweep off her feet” it’s not exactly Shakespeare. More like Stephenie Meyer.

    • Veronica says:

      Hozier’s pretty good, too, if you want something a little more modern mainstream, though he’s not quite the level of Cohen and Dylan. Indie culture has plenty of good writers, they just don’t have good crossover appeal.

    • GreenieWeenie says:

      I feel like I’m reasonably skilled at parsing lit. Yet I cannot, for the life of me, make sense of the lyrics of Hallelujah.

  38. Tacos and TV says:

    I desperately want her to f*ck off. I am so sick of her! And Ryan Adams needs to step away from the Peyote, visit a barber and meditate because clearly he needs to regroup .

  39. Moi says:

    I’m more offended that he compared her music/lyrics to The Smiths. I love Ryan Adam’s music but he gets a BIG thumbs down for that fuckery.

  40. Emmygrant says:

    Oh, dear… I just watched the video of Taylor and Ryan on my iPhone, and at the end of the video when Taylor said, “Hey Siri,” it actually invoked Siri on my iPhone. I was confused for a moment, thinking it was a cute way for them to end the video. LOL. Now I can truthfully say that Taylor Swift used Siri on my iPhone.

    • Senaber says:

      Poor Siri. They should program Siri to say “that bitch” whenever you say “Sorry, that was just Taylor Swift.”

  41. WinnieCoopersMom says:

    I will say she has had a couple of lyrical home runs (All Too Well) but doesn’t every songwriter? While she writes or co-writes almost all her own stuff (as compared to most the other pop acts who dont), do I think she is skilled at writing? Yes. Is she a genius? No. If so, I could list about 10 or more other current artists who are lyrical “geniuses” as well…which wouldnt make them genius after all would it? Doesn’t helped that a while ago even Adam Levine called her a genius. Ugh. Enough with unjustifiably boosting this chick’s ego.

  42. LA Juice says:

    Look, Shakespeare was not all that deep either. Sure he had a way with iambic pentameter and lyric, but the stories are only revolutionary because they were unique for the times in that they publicized intimate details of the workings of the aristocracy and monarchy that other playwrights had no access to or first hand knowledge thereof. Hells Bells, William Shakespeare didn’t even write the damn plays. Because I studied Shakespeare (and am published on the topic) for 8 years, I feel qualified to assert my opinion here. You don’t have to agree, but this is my educated opinion.

    cut Swifty some slack, haters!

    • Hannah says:

      Um yeah, I also studied Shakespeare, must say I disagree very much with what you said.
      I have not studied swift nor do I wish to. Does that make me a ” hater”? ( oh how I hate the word “hater” -so infantile …).

  43. iheartgossip says:

    So those ‘blinds’ about him and Vanilla Bean must be true

  44. eileen says:

    comparing Swift”s music to Shakepere is like hitting someone with a rolling pin and calling it cooking