Patricia Arquette regrets claiming LGBT & minority groups don’t support feminism

During the Oscars earlier this year, Patricia Arquette rallied women and later raised some haunches when she discussed up wage inequality. During her acceptance speech, for Best Supporting Actress for Boyhood, she made the rather awesome to-the-point observation that “we have fought for everybody else’s equal rights, it’s our time to have wage equality once and for all and equal rights for women in the United States of America.” Unfortunately she expounded backstage on the “fought for everybody else’s rights” part of that statement.

In the press conference following her win, Arquette called out LGBT activists and minority rights groups to join the cause, as if they were not involved in women’s issues to date. “It’s time for all the women in America and all the men that love women, and all the gay people, and all the people of color that we’ve all fought for to fight for us now.” She later used Twitter to double down on those comments, suggesting that she was definitely calling out activists for other causes.

In other interviews discussing the wage gap, Arquette made a lot of excellent, valid points about how lower pay for women affects families, children, and opportunities. She didn’t address the fact that she had called out other activist groups, though. That changed in a recent guest column she did for The Hollywood Reporter. Arquette admitted she was wrong about other activists not supporting feminism and she apologized. It took a while, but given how thoughtful she is I assume that she was trying to figure out how she felt about her blunder and come up with the best way to approach it.

I knew that pay inequality was a risky thing to bring up at the Oscars. There is an unspoken understanding that you shouldn’t be political on that stage. But the truth is, I don’t think women can wait anymore. We have to be political. I don’t think we can continue to be left out of the conversation.

I blame myself for my stupid wording that night when I was calling for male activists to have our backs and remember women, to support the women’s movement and to include women in the conversation. I was talking about the really devastating consequences of the women’s movement stalling out. It was my own lack of clarity backstage that made some women feel left out or slighted. This of all things makes me sad, because they are my heroes.

Since the speech, I have learned a lot more about the feminist movement and how women of color have been left out of the process. I understand that more now. I am really sad that I may have added to their feeling of being excluded.

Some people said that women are paid the same as men. Which is not true. Some people thought I was asking for actresses, or even white actresses, to be paid more. When I brought it up, I was talking about all women. I meant Native American women, Asian women, Latino women, African-American women, trans women, lesbian women, white women.

People like to talk about the Sony hack and the pay gap facing actresses, and yes, that happens in this industry. But what the Sony hack also revealed that nobody is talking about is that there is a pay gap in the sound department, in mixing, in editing and on and on. If it wasn’t Sony that was hacked but instead it was another nonindustry corporation, we would have seen the same gender pay bias play out.

It was never about only actresses or white women to me. The reality is that the gender pay gap exists in 98 percent of the world’s professions, and it gets worse the more education you have. Wage disparity costs the average woman $400,000 and robs women with higher education of $2 million over their lifetime. You have a girl taking out the same college loan as her male counterpart in her class. But she will take years longer to pay off her student loan. It will take her longer to buy a house. She will have less money in her retirement account and be more likely to be poor when she’s elderly. Her kids will be affected.

The issue of pay inequality is really important because experts say it will take 40 years for that gap to close. (Editor’s note: The “Global Gender Gap Report” released Nov. 19 calculated it will take 118 years.) We don’t have 40 years to wait. We are not in an Ozzie and Harriet world anymore.

We need to make a radical, unnatural readjustment. We need really strong pay laws like the measure Gov. Jerry Brown and Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson recently passed in California that will better protect women against unfair pay practices. I’m so happy this conversation is happening, but we need to remain strong and make sure our leaders don’t forget women as the conversation continues.

I knew before getting up onstage that the issue of equal pay is what I would talk about. It only took a couple of minutes to write the speech — I wrote it while they were putting on my makeup. A friend of mine, Kamala Lopez, had been working on this documentary titled Equal Means Equal, about the Equal Rights Amendment and equal pay, child trafficking, spousal abuse and many other issues that predominantly affect women. So I had been learning a lot about these topics and thinking a lot about my character in Boyhood. She had to move her kids multiple times, and she put herself through school. Her life — their lives — would have been different had she earned a full dollar.

[From The Hollywood Reporter]

Arquette goes on to explain that the wage gap unduly affects single mothers, and by extension their children, often living in poverty. Unequal pay makes it harder for abused women to escape violent relationships, and it especially affects African American and Latina women, who are statistically paid less than white women. Arquette also said that men need to support women’s causes, because “When men support change, it has been shown that change comes 10 times faster. We need our sons, brothers, friends, lovers, husbands, uncles, grandpas, co-workers and heroes.” I don’t know if that number is accurate but it’s true that people in power can effect greater change, and men are typically in power. I like that Arquette is continuing to talk about this, that she’s revised her stance, and that she is not backing down. We need more celebrities to discuss the facts behind feminism, to not be afraid to lay out both the true meaning of the movement and the way that so many people’s lives are affected when feminism loses ground. And feminism does lose ground when celebrities act like it’s a dirty word.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

35 Responses to “Patricia Arquette regrets claiming LGBT & minority groups don’t support feminism”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Nicole says:

    Love that she’s taken time to articulate a good response. If there’s one thing I cannot take in the feminist movement is white feminism. Her clarification completely ruined her speech for me in a quick minute. Glad she sees the issue.

    This response was great.

    • Kitty says:

      +1 I am glad she took time to understand all the racial implications and socioeconomic outcomes for other women besides white women. One major issue I have with lots of these so-called celebrity feminists is that they speak from a white woman only viewpoint. The experiences, needs and policy implications for women go well beyond just white ones.

  2. Naya says:

    Well. I wasnt surprised by the backlash, I mean everybody knows the cannibalism within the feminist movement is insane. Sometimes I think some people only claim to be feminist so that they can get in on the blood sport that is tearing up others within the group. Anyway, it was plainly obvious that she was addressing men from disadvantaged groups and pointing out that we have stood in solidarity with them, its time to do the same. Sexism, in case people havent noticed, is still a fairly PC thing and that wont change until people start to view it using the same lens as homophobia and racism. I took no offense in her initial comments but I guess the clarification is welcome too.

  3. Shelley says:

    Hmmm… *side-eye*
    She says she is more read up on feminism, but from this it reads that her feminism is still white women are the saviours of women of colour. Women of colour have not been “left out of any process”. Their feminism preceded that of the mainstream white feminism of the last century.
    She actually annoys me more than the Harry Potter girl.

    • Breakfast Margaritas says:

      +111111111

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      Part of the backlash against her was that she was contributing to the type of “white feminism,” which, as I’m sure you know, asserts that the mainstream feminist movement in the US excluded women of color. I think that’s what she’s referring to. I don’t read it at all that white women are savior of women of color, but that she’s sorry her original comment contributed to that atmosphere of exclusion. Her original comment was idiotic and thoughtless, but I think she’s trying to apologize.

    • Shala says:

      ‘Their feminism preceded that of the mainstream white feminism of the last century.’

      No it didn’t.

      Not in Europe – but I get tirede of pointing out that Americans can ONLY see things through their own lens to the point of BUTCHERING history that isn’t American.

      • Jo 'Mama' Besser says:

        Arquette lives and works in America and is talking about movements as they occurred in America. I’m not American either, but I don’t feel snubbed by this. Black women, however, are snubbed by feminism in a very real way and telling people to start talking about the achievements of white women in Europe at the first mention of black women’s contributions to fighting inequality highlights that. The way that black women are written out of history is butchery.

      • Kitty says:

        Jo: YES!

    • Sarah says:

      I completely agree with you. Many people seem to forget that the civil rights movement benefited white women more than anyone else. Once they got what they needed from the movement, white feminism took off and they left everyone else behind. They only seem to remember their history when they are called out for their racism and bigotry in the media

  4. Breakfast Margaritas says:

    Not really seeing an apology here but I like her and I don’t think she meant to be dense. She mentions “stupid wording”, “a lack of clarity”, and being really sad that she “MAY have added to feeling excluded”. She basically stated white women have fought for everyone else and now it’s time for everyone else to do our bidding by calling out gay people, people of color, and every other group. What this ignores is that people of color, especially black people have been fighting for all kinds of rights for decades and in some cases centuries and women have benefited all along the way. I often read that white women in America have been the group most benefited by the civil rights act and affirmative action. It’s why it puzzles me to hear any American woman speak ambiguously about it. That she ever even thought to say something akin to we did all this for y’all, now you owe us is mind boggling. We were never not supportive of equal pay for equal work.

    • Original T.C. says:

      +1000

      And her continual doubling down on her ignorant comments regarding LGBT and WOM for 9 months. But I do thank her for once and for all showing everyone the self-centered reality of White feminism. All articles with her comments brought out backhanded racism from her supporters.

      Happy to see comments from teenage Cauasian girls on Twitter pointing out the problems with her statements. She can keep going though preaching to her choir because *we* that she can’t relate to are no longer listening to her.

  5. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    I’m glad she clarified. It was a thoughtless thing to say, and hurt her message. I have to raise an eyebrow at the statistic relating to how quickly things change when men support a cause – I’m sure it helps, but how on earth would you measure that? Anyway, I’m not sure if it was poor wording or just a poor concept to begin with (I tend towards the latter) but she took it back, so I applaud her for that.

  6. Angie says:

    When she said all of that I knew what she meant and was getting at but of course since she didn’t articulate properly, everyone completely warped the message since it came off as self serving and exclusive to white women.
    I get it. I just wish these people would be clear! If you’re going to shed light to a crucial social issue like sexism, racism, income inequality or all of the above- please be completely informed to relay the appropriate message without excluding groups that you aren’t particularly a part of!

  7. lucy2 says:

    I’m glad she saw the issues with what she said and is making an effort to learn more and be more inclusive. A willingness to admit mistakes and try to learn from them is a great quality.
    It wasn’t perfect, but I’m still glad she took her chance to speak up on the issue in such a prominent way.

    • Marny says:

      I just read this quote from Pres. Roosevelt and it’s fits my impression of this situation very well, “It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles…The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena…who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly..”

      These days, people take a huge change when they make any kind of political statement-because of the incredible number of people just waiting to point out their mistakes. She took a chance by doing the right and brave thing and, despite the backlash, she’s sticking with it and refining her message. I think she should be applauded.

  8. Me says:

    I agree with everything she said

  9. Greenieweenie says:

    Personally, I think if you want well-reasoned points and clarity of communication, you shouldn’t be looking for either from an actor. There are many intellectuals who have spent careers writing on the topic with much more to contribute. I don’t know when we started expecting actors to be all things.

  10. The Eternal Side-Eye says:

    I think one thing people don’t get is how hard it is for minorities to feel like 1. People don’t care about an issue that involves us until it effects or bothers them and 2. That when they do care suddenly the trumpets should sound and the band should start up and it’s day 1 for everyone.

    It is one thing that especially rankles me with the coverage of transgender rights. Minority women and transgender women have been fighting and having this discussion for decades but you know…thank God for Caitlin bringing ‘awareness’ to it (because the only way to get aware is when the message is presented in a neat white package).

    If you want to have a conversation about working together then understand you are LATE to the conversation, that you have actually been impeding the conversation and progress already taking place by being willfully ignorant and that if you want unity then you approach with respect. Nobody likes the new guy who strolls into his first day of work and wants to tell everyone else how to fix the problems he just learned about.

  11. JKL says:

    I think she is right about men getting involved makes change happen quicker. Someone observed on Twitter that one of the reasons we’ve seen such exponential change in gay rights is because it’s one of the only times white men have been told they can’t have something.
    Flip, yes, but I think it has a ring of truth to it.

  12. Narak says:

    I think she raised hackles rather than haunches?

  13. SJO says:

    “If it wasn’t Sony that was hacked but instead it was another nonindustry corporation, we would have seen the same gender pay bias play out.”

    While everyone knows which industry she is talking about, this is another part of the problem. If you spend any time around the ENTERTAINMENT industry, you know that they refer to it as “The Industry”, as if no other exists, or only exists in the shadows of Hollywood. It is an over blown sense of self importance that permeates a business that is constantly creating award shows to pat itself on the back. So while I commend Ms. Arquette for her insightful clarification, this industry wide arrogance is part of the problem.

    • koalacoco says:

      If she’s such a hero, why doesn’t she use her clout to have CBS make public all the salaries on her show and then work with an independent consultant to make sure that there is absolutely no pay inequality between anyone on set. I think the process would be educational.

  14. koalacoco says:

    Good for her for speaking her mind, but she doesn’t have the educational background or long-term engagement with deconstructing the statistics behind the pay gap to make her a reliable source.

    I’m not so sure why people are so willing to give her a pass on this.

    Arquette’s dismissive sentiment towards minorities was disappointing.

    And it was rude.

    In 2014 Time magazine published an article debunking the way the pay-gap is formulated, as have several other media sources over the years. Every time I hear that “77%” figure, I know which source it’s coming from and that it hasn’t been vetted beyond that one formulation.

    3 men commit suicide for every 1 woman that does. Who’s talking about that?

    • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

      That’s because men choose more effective forms of suicide such as guns and hanging vs. women who choose less effective forms of suicide such as pills.

      Women actually attempt suicide at a higher rate than men.

      • koalacoco says:

        …but at the end of the day there are three times more dead men as a result of suicide.

      • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

        …because men choose methods that tend to kill themselves better, not because they attempt or are more susceptible to suicidal actions.

    • anon33 says:

      I love how in the same paragraph where you make assertions that only people with an “educational background” and “long term engagement with deconstructing the statistics” can contribute to these issues, you also admit that your citations supporting your later argument re:77% are…a “Time magazine article” and “other media sources.”

      You know the media is not academia, right?

      • koalacoco says:

        anon you’re missing my point. the Time article was referencing scholars and economists.

        what i’m pointing out is that Patricia Arquette isn’t a scholar, she’s an actor. She has the right to her opinion and I have the right to point out that she probably didn’t spend a lot of time checking her sources.

    • Pinetree13 says:

      I found the MRA 😀

      • koalacoco says:

        Nope not MRA. I completed my undergrad degree in a rural county where overall unemployment was 14% and male unemployment was 27% and wrote a paper about it for my gender studies course. It was fascinating to look at gender issues from a different angle. I will admit that I do feel bad for men who are subjected to social services in this country because their needs aren’t nearly so well publicized. Personally it feels like there is one basic narrative that is allowed, and questioning it gets you mocked and labeled as an MRA which we know in certain circles is meant as a dismissive put-down. World is a complicated place, and when people throw out statistics that are cherry-picked, they are essentially contributing to a deception that I would argue hurts people. Arquette is well intentioned, but not well-informed.