Gwyneth Paltrow launches elite, organic skincare & makeup line, Juice Beauty

wenn23000642

Asking me to talk about makeup is like asking Kim Kardashian to discuss quantum physics. But I do know enough to recognize who should and should not offer up makeup tips to the peasants. I would ask Kirsten Dunst, or Jaimie Alexander, or hell, even Kim Kardashian for makeup tips before I ever asked Gwyneth Paltrow. Gwyneth’s makeup is like her hair: consistently awful. But last year, Gwyneth announced that she was co-creating an organic beauty/makeup line, and now she’s launching the line, called Juice Beauty. To celebrate, Gwyneth and her partners gave interviews to Forbes.

Gwyneth’s makeup concerns: “I wear makeup heavily in my work. And now that I’m post-40, I’ve started to wear it more often in my day-to-day life. But once my lifestyle website, Goop, started investigating toxicity in these products… I was stunned. I genuinely thought makeup was safe, but that’s not the case.”

She worked with investor Amanda Eilian and Juice Beauty founding partner Karen Behnke, who says: “Juice Beauty had been in a place to hire what we call a ‘Triple A List’ celebrity partner for a long time. But I couldn’t help feeling, ‘That’s not us.’ We wanted someone who could actually walk the walk of our brand… and Gwyneth embodied not only the entrepreneurial spirit and business savvy we were looking for, but also the true passion for clean, but fun, living.”

Why Gwyneth didn’t just go solo with her own organic makeup line: “I honestly fell in love with Karen. She’s a mom; she’s authentic. She has such incredible expertise in the space… You have to remember Goop is a startup. Our biggest problem is that we have too much opportunity, but we can’t do everything at once. When you’ve taken on investment and are trying to scale at a certain place, you don’t want to get diluted down by too many options…It would have taken us far longer to execute on our own. Mario Batali, who is like my spiritual godfather, once told me, ‘You don’t have to make all the money.’ And it’s true: I think people often feel they’ll be more successful, at least financially, if they go it on their own… but for us to be able to use Karen’s expertise — and for Karen to be able to use my name and my platform — we’ll all go further.”

Organic prices: “In the next few years, you’re going to see the prices of organic going down as the production quality goes up. Which is exactly what we want to see. We don’t want eating carcinogen free food, for example, to be a luxury. It’s insane, and it should be the same with beauty.”

[From Forbes]

The piece goes on and on and you would think Gwyneth had discovered the cure for cancer. You can see the Juice Beauty line here at JuiceBeauty.com. The price point is rich for my taste, but then again, I buy all my beauty essentials at the grocery store or CVS. The skincare stuff seems to be consistently in the $30-50 range, and organic mascara and eyeliner will set you back $18-24. It doesn’t seem like this stuff will be available anywhere other than online as well. Say what you will about Salma Hayek, but when she launched her makeup line, she made sure it would be affordable to middle class women, and accessible at places where they shop, like CVS.

It’s worth noting that none of the non-organic makeup concerns came up when Gwyneth was getting paid by Max Factor to be the face of their brand. I tend to be conspiratorial, but I think that’s why Gwyneth launched Juice Beauty in 2016 – because after 2015, her Max Factor contract ran out and now she can be the face of Juice Beauty.

wenn23017531

wenn22749556

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

113 Responses to “Gwyneth Paltrow launches elite, organic skincare & makeup line, Juice Beauty”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    I love the part where she’s talking about money to her “spiritual godfather.” Because that’s what spiritual godfathers talk about. Money.

  2. minx says:

    lol…her skin?? Yeesh.

    • BossyKat says:

      I know, right?

      Can skin look ‘fried, dyed and laid to the side?’ Because Paltrow’s does. What person in their right mind wants to replicate that shiny, oily, pink orangeness – she looks like she had a BBQ grill accident to the face.

      If you have lousy skin and want to fool people into buying what you schill, at least be entirely deceptive about it like Jennifer Aniston and buy up all the crap pap pics of your skin, then blow yourself out with white light and CGI on commercials to get those ‘naturally beautiful results.’

    • Mia V. says:

      Is any of those cosmetics made with the natural oil of her face?

    • JenniferJustice says:

      I know, right?! Of all the people in the world to be advising us on skin care, we get shiny leather-faced Goop? This must be a joke, b/c I’m LMAO!

  3. Kri says:

    Erm…halt,beeotch.”Mario batali, who is like my Spiritual Godfather “…dear god.Is there an optometrist in the house cause my eyes have rolled so hard I am stuck looking at my own cerebellum.

    • Mrs. Wellen Melon says:

      Thumping the back of your head to help your eyeballs roll back down, KRI. Now you thump the back of my head, please.

      Paltrow isn’t relateable so is she aspirational? To whom, exactly?

      Clinique owns Aveda now, I think. Clinique should do an organic makeup line with a Dove real woman-style campaign, no celebrity spokesperson.

    • Janis says:

      LOL!

    • JenniferJustice says:

      Any man older than her in her circle is her Godfather don’t ya’ know? Because where regular folk like us just have “friends” or “friend of the family”, she’s rich so they’re all Godfathers. What a nube!

  4. Jenny says:

    Yes, you are right, Kaiser, “consistently awful” is a good way to describe Gwyneth’s makeup. At least she’s consistent. But I have no clue why anyone would ever want to buy her make up line. Good luck with that, Gwyneth.

    • Boston Green Eyes says:

      And I agree, I think that one of the Kardashians would be a better founder of a makeup line than Fishsticks. I’m totally not into the “famous for being famous” that the Kardashians got going on, but I will concede that they really know how to work a tube of makeup and mascara.

    • zinjojo says:

      “Consistently awful” is exactly how I think of Gwyneth’s makeup and skincare. She should start a hair care line while she’s at it, and just go for full irony.

      Goop’s been quite busy in 2016 already — announcing her new book, and now the new makeup line. She’s making a statement that she’s going to be in our faces this year, so get ready, peasants!

      • minx says:

        Her skin is bad, her hair is bad.
        That top picture is horrible.

      • JenniferJustice says:

        I want to reach through my computer screen and trim those two inches of dead hair off the bottom. I swear she will NEVER let us see her real hair color which is dark brown. She’s committed to the bleaching for so long, she thinks it’s her brand to be blonde but it’s really quite horrible – yellow and brassy. I color my own hair – have for years and I’ve never come out with brassy, orange, or yellow. I can’t beleive somebody gets paid $100’s to do this awful “professional” coloring.

      • Elisa the I. says:

        @Jenniferjustice: what kind of color are you using? I’m naturally dark ashblond (on top) and lightbrown (neck area) and it took me forever to find the right color in order NOT to get a brassy touch. As far as I understood it’s because I have red pigments in my hair. So if go blonder, the red shines through. I’m now using medium ashblond to dye my hair, and it works. The result is not always the same, though. 🙂

  5. SusanneToo says:

    Wow, those are some really greasy looking pictures. It’s like she slathered on Pond’s Cold Cream then left the house.

  6. MelissaManifesto says:

    I’m not a fan of hers, but I’ve always found her makeup to be pretty fresh, something that suits her. Certainly not worse than most celebrities I’ve seen. At least she or her makeup artist doesn’t seem to use a shovel like the Kardashians. But, I thought there was a makeup line called Juice Beauty already? I’ve seen people mentioned it online in their beauty routine and it’s also natural or at least not too heavy on the chemicals.

    Now that we’re on the subject, I have yet to find an all organic anything that works for my skin, except oils before washing with my hair.

    • Tania says:

      Kaiser, Juice Beauty has been around for a long time and is available in Canadian drugstores (Shoppers Drug Mart’s beauty boutique) and was available at Sephora here in Canada, not sure if it still is. She’s not launching the line, she’s announcing their collaboration. For what it’s worth, I’ve used the green apple peel for sensitive skin and it is a great product.

      • tmc says:

        I was just thinking the same thing. Juice Beauty has been around for a long time. I was not sure if they previously had make up (?) but definitely skin care. I always thought of it as sort of B level in the organic, non-toxic realm but good to know about the green apple peel.

      • Meggs says:

        I got juice beauty cc cream sample from birchbox here in the US a year ago. It wasn’t my favorite, and I love just about every sample I’ve gotten. I’m confused as to if this is a line of products for them that she is working on? Because she definitely didn’t help develop juice from scratch.

    • Christin says:

      I’ve used Juice beauty samples in the past.

    • Carol says:

      @melissamanifesto I can’t use organic anything on my face either without it breaking out in a rash or acne. Don’t know why. I’m probably allergic to ingredients in organic products.

  7. Amelia says:

    But . . . why on earth would anyone buy a skincare line Goop uses?
    Her hair looks like hay left out to dry in the sun for too long, and her skin is some unholy combination of malnutrition, sun damage, botox and crappy foundation.
    Don’t worry about us peasants, Gwyneth. We’ll continue as we are, thanks.
    Even if that means we have to miss out on looking like you. *Cries in dark corner*

    • QQ says:

      THIS!! like.. Oh this One knows about good Skincare!! meantime she looks like Leather left out in the desert elements to do its thing for a few months…Pffttt Try Is what she did!

  8. Chelly says:

    I cant ever read a story in its entirety when its about her. Her face alone really annoys me

  9. Betti says:

    Her skin and makeup are generally bad so i will pass on this. Another vanity project by the Queen Bee to the peasants. I stopped buying Body Shop products as i kept taking bad reactions to them, particularly the ‘organic’ makeup, turns out its not chemical free. My dermatologist said that products that say they are 100% organic or chemical free as BS, they are full of chemicals particularly to make them smell nice and thats what people react to, the perfume chemicals. I know i did and badly.

    • Birdix says:

      I think Body Shop was sold at some point, and lost all its principles. As for Goop, I’m surprised she was so shocked by this seeing the her friend (spiritual soul sister?) Stella McCartney created an organic skincare line 10 years ago for this exact reason.

      • Betti says:

        This was before it was sold on and Anita was still alive and at the helm. The dermo said that he saw a lot of people with reactions to Body Shop products.

        The brands i swear by (and i have sensitized skin) are Keihls, Simple Soap, Smash Box for my foundation/primer and NARS for everything else makeup wise. I also tend to goto farmers markets and buy hand made soap with my soap of choice being Nettle which is amazing for skin conditions. It does wonders for my Excema.

    • Christin says:

      I had a terrible reaction to a seemingly harmless product sample that has great reviews on Sephora. It was the only thing different in my routine, and the reaction started within hours.

      I attempted to leave a review simply suggesting trying a patch test when trying any new product (which was my lesson learned). It was never published. So now my additional lesson is to not trust product reviews.

    • bokchoi says:

      +1 on the “chemical free” and “organic” labels being bullcookies. First, anyone who paid any kind of attention in school should know its literally impossible for a substance to be chemical free. WATER is a chemical compound ffs! and organic DOES NOT MEAN SAFE. Organic actually means it is, or at one point was, alive. Polio and Ebola and great white sharks are organic. Both terms have been re-defined by corporations to try to fool people into thinking that as long as it says all natural it must be safer and better.

      • tmc says:

        Because people play with some of the language does not mean it is not better to avoid A LOT of the chemicals that are in traditional drug store, etc. makeup. There are benefits to organic. Plus fragrance (which, yes, you will find in natural brands too) has been found to cause reactions (even cancer). You just have to have a basic knowledge of what to look out for. Environmental Working Group has a good web site to track some of this.

      • yellow says:

        Like food, it’s ALL about reading the labels on each and every brand, and knowing which ingredients to avoid. That’s just how it is. And that will eliminate MANY of the so called natural brands out there once you do this, unless you are shopping with a boutique or online shop that is super vigilant about carrying only the most natural of products. There are some out there that are great.

  10. Jag says:

    I agree that I don’t think “makeup” when I think of Goopy Paltrow. Maybe people will be interested, but I just don’t think that she has good enough skin or good enough makeup presentation to want me to use what she promotes. At least Salma Hayek has great skin and makeup most of the time, which leads me to believe that her products would be good. (Reviews love the skin care but not all of the makeup apparently.)

  11. paranormalgirl says:

    Juice Beauty’s been around for years. I’ve used their Green Apple Cleansing Gel for over 5 years. Alicia Silverstone used to have a line with them, too. I think she had some skincare products. Let’s see how long Gwyneth lasts with this vanity project.

    • Delta Juliet says:

      Yes I was going to say I’ve been using a Juice moisturizer for years that I LOVE. It’s not a new line. Although Gwennie certainly wouldn’t be the one who would get me to try something new.

    • Shannon says:

      That’s what I came to say as well. I am confused is she partnering with Juice Beauty? Did she buy the company? Their packaging is still the same I actually walked past it in Ulta last week.

  12. Chinoiserie says:

    I am not sure if Gwyneth is triple A-list star anymore.

  13. Greenieweenie says:

    well I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but the earth doesn’t have the natural resources to sustain a serious market for organic daily commodities for all! Like if Subway starts using turmeric-dyed pepperoncinis, the price of turmeric will increase exponentially. That’s how economics works. Either chemical compounds are part of your life, or mass consumerism and overconsumption aren’t.

    And really. She still has her one cigarette a week. Are we really supposed to buy that Ms. Lifelong Smoker has some deep aversion to toxicity in her My Body Is A Temple?

    • frivolity says:

      I agree to a certain point … Manmade chemical compounds do no come from thin air either. Natural resources are needed as building blocks for them too. Thus, it’s not an either or … Mass consumerism and overproduction/overconsumption are either going to need to stop or the earth is going to pay us back in spades (as if it is not already starting to do so).

  14. Boston Green Eyes says:

    Why in the name of Dog is she doing this? There are already organic skin care/make up lines out there. I use Origins – which keeps my skin glowing and dewy – which probably costs a lot less than Fishsticks’ upcoming line. And it is tried and true: I’m 53 and everyone thinks I am in my mid-30s – my skin has been called flawless by some people.

    So, count me as one NOT to use Fishy’s line.

    • Jag says:

      May I ask which products you use? I see they have some sets on sale and need something for my aging skin. 🙂

      • Boston Green Eyes says:

        Try the Plantscription line. Everything: cleanser, milk toner, serum and lifting cream. My sister started using it and started getting compliments from people.

  15. ND says:

    She has enough Botox in that forehead to paralyze a herd of cows and she’s worried about the “toxicity” of her makeup?

    • Boston Green Eyes says:

      BOOM!

      LOL!!

    • Lauren II says:

      I can relate to a herd of cows. They are natural and enjoy grazing. Goopy not so much.

      Goop looks like parched, greasy hell. How can someone who looks so unhealthy shill anything? All this nonsense is due to Goop creating an income stream for herself–since she rarely acts anymore.

  16. my3cents says:

    I keep reading it beatle juice, and no just can’t take her all that seriously.
    Beatle juice ,Beatle juice ,Beatle juice!

  17. Eva says:

    I’m confused. I’ve used Juice Beauty for years. Their peels are amazing. Maybe it’s just the make up line that’s new?

    The products aren’t overpriced considering the ingredients. Organic ingredients, let alone good quality ones, cost WAY more than synthetic ones, so the price for a moisturizer can’t be 5 dollars.

    And yeah her hair is horrible but I’d rather have Goop as my make up inspiration than the Kardashians. I wish a lot of young girls with a pound of make up on would consider the same…

    • jc126 says:

      I agree. I think the women in the Kardashian family wear absurd amounts of makeup. I don’t get the dislike for Gwyneth P’s look, even though she does look shiny in these photos (and I’m sure anyone can dig up a crappy photo of any celebrity).

  18. epiphany says:

    Juices are very astringent, it’ll help with that oily shine…

    • annaloo. says:

      Paltrow’s face has neither Juice nor beauty. Between her singing and her diet/fitness advice and now this….who is she surrounded by that keep encouraging her with these crap ideas? I don’t want to look like her!

      Give me Helen Mirren or Marian Cotillard or Iman’s advice/products/books for beauty and health! Not this one!

  19. littlemissnaughty says:

    Well, aside from the Max Factor bit, I can’t sh*t on the product itself. Looking at the website, I’m immediately ecstatic that they list their ingredients. A lot of major companies don’t. And the ingredients do look pretty good. As does the shade range, which to me personally is not that important but so so many makeup lines don’t offer anything for dark skins or very light skins. And it does look like makeup she’d wear. The prices are comparable to high end cosmetics, they’re not outrageous.

    Having said that, I can’t with the “toxicity” of cosmetics. Yes, sure, some products do contain ingredients that I won’t put on my skin. But toxicity is a question of dosage. I will bet a month’s salary that Goop can’t explain how exactly one ingredient or another is toxic, i.e. what it will do to me upon application. I’m also pretty sure that spending an afternoon walking the streets of any major city in the world will leave more “toxic” sh*t on my skin than using the worst face cream out there. It’s fear mongering to sell products.

    • Birdix says:

      Someone just tested the fog in San Francisco and found that even that gentle grey blanket is tainted with mercury :(.

  20. ncboudicca says:

    This is just a specific line of make-up within the Juice Beauty brand. Honestly, I ordered the foundation and mascara a couple days ago – waiting for it to show up.

  21. Kate says:

    It’s not that expensive, it’s priced around the mid-tier range. Hardly elite. $4 lip balm, $15 gloss, $26 powder, foundations around the $40 mark…that’s cheaper than MAC.

    I don’t get why people insist on acting like Goop’s every endeavour is some wildly expensive and exclusive thing regular people are shut out of. Like every other lifestyle business ever, she’s not targeting people on a tight budget, but she is targeting the middle class consumers more often than not. For every expensive designer product she touts, there’s 10 products that your average person could easily afford.

    • soxfan says:

      Hate to break it to you, but us “middle class” consumers ARE on a tight budget. Really tight.

      • Mon says:

        Since when?

      • Kate says:

        I’m lower middle class. I’m not on a tight budget. A tight budget was when I had only $30 a month for food and a few dollars spent on something unnecessary could end with being evicted.

        I still have a budget, but now it’s on my terms. I can make choices about what I prioritise instead of just scrambling to keep a roof over my head. For me it’s my living situation, but a different person with my income would have plenty of disposable income for luxuries like mid-tier make-up if thats what they budgeted for.

    • swak says:

      Don’t know about anyone else, but $4 for lip balm is out of my range and I’m middle class.

      • Kate says:

        Ok, but it’s like $1 more than Nivea, Blistex and other drugstore balms. The basic ones, not the ones in cute tins or the ones with nice scents. Whether it’s in your budget or not, it’s not remotely pricey for lip balm. For organic lip balm it’s a bargain.

    • Chaucer says:

      Agreed, Kate. It’s really not any more expensive than MAC, Urban Decay, or any of those other brands that are popular right now. I’m on a lower class (read: poor) income atm, and when you compare quality and the length of time higher cost products last, they really are the clear winner. It’s all about being a smart shopper. I’d rather spend $30 on a Benefit foundation that lasts me a year+, than $12 on a Revlon one that will only last a few months.

      • Betti says:

        Totally agree on the quality of the more expensive brands. I have a couple of Chanel nail polishes that i’ve had for several years and they still go on like they were brand new. They don’t go that funny way that the cheaper and some other higher cost brands do like MAC, whose products are sh!t quality.

    • Jaded says:

      $26 for powder? $40 for foundation? No thanks. I use a great mineral powder, Fit Me! by Maybelline and it costs maybe $12. Have used Great Lash mascara for years and years, I can usually get it on sale for $5 or $6 bucks. When lipsticks go on sale I generally buy 2 or 3 at a time and they’re usually in the under $10 range. That’s my idea of good pricing. And my foundation lasts a whole lot longer than a few months.

      • Winterberry says:

        But the point is that cheaper lines use the cheapest ingredients. Some of us really try to avoid that. I haven’t touched drugstore makeup in ten years.

      • Anon33 says:

        I have incredibly sensitive skin, and The only drugstore skincare product that hasn’t Broken me out for one reason or another is Neutrogena, and even then that’s only their haulyronic (sp?) acid moisturizer, which is at a higher price point than their basics. And my skin tone is so odd (very pale, almost sallow, with yellow-gold undertones and brown undereye circles, almost like Asian skin even though I’m white) that not a single drugstore brand of fondation, concealer, or powder-believe me, I’ve tried them all-matches it. In my opinion it’s about what works best for me, so if I have to pay a bit more for a moisturizer that ACTUALLY absorbs into my skin or a foundation that TRULY blends, I’m going to spend that money and not feel bad about doing so.

    • ND says:

      “I’d rather smoke crack than eat cheese from a tin” is going to follow her to her grave.

      I think there’s this disconnect with all things Gwyneth because she lives an aspirational lifestyle – and clearly enjoys it – but she adamantly refuses to admit that’s what she’s selling.

      Take her cookbooks. “Regular” people can afford them – until they try to actually make one of her recipes. It’s all so very “let them eat [gluten-free, soy-free, dairy-free, flour-free] cake” of her. Of course obnoxiousness of the caliber found in her average recipe is going to color people’s reactions to her latest endeavors, even if they are affordable. How could it not?

      The heat she takes isn’t always fair, but she could certainly help her cause by managing to get through an interview without dropping a name in the most pretentious way possible.

      She can beat her “I’m a working mom just like you” drum until her arms fall off but your average working mom has not the time, money or inclination to scour specialty food shops looking for black truffles to put on her kid’s grilled cheese sandwich.

      I’d challenge anyone to visit her website and find ten affordable products for every designer/luxury item she sells.

      • JenniferJustice says:

        And besides the cost, what about availability. I live in Michigan – work in downtown Lansing – live in a small bedroom community 20 miles away. We have ONE – hear me say ONE! – organic grocery store in the entire tri-county area. It wouldn’t matter is black truffles were a dime a dozen when any person attempting to cook with them has to drive 20-25 miles to get to the one produce shop that has them. She is so stupid!

      • ND says:

        The exercise in condescending vanity that is Goop is like falling head-first down a rabbit hole of stupid, and I’m sorry I ever got curious enough to check it out.

      • kate says:

        My crappy local chain supermarket (not a Whole Foods/Trader Joes or anything remotely similar) sells 90% of the ingredients in her cookbooks. The flours, the grains, the slightly interesting veggies. None of it at crazy prices. The ones they don’t stock, like truffles and duck eggs, are available even in my boring rural area if you choose to seek them out (I don’t).

        Every cookbook I own (I have a couple of hundred) has a couple of dozen prohibitively expensive recipes, and a few that rely on things that are hard to source outside of major cities. Goop’s are actually pretty practical in comparison to many I own. She’s not targeting people who want basic, budget recipes, and she’s not trying to con them into thinking she is, but she’s not making unusually pricey recipes either. The average recipe in Nigella’s latest cookbook would set you back more!

        I guess I just don’t see the problem. I can’t afford couture, but when I read Vogue I don’t get pissy because they’re trying to sell me something out of my price range. If that was something I wanted to avoid, I wouldn’t be anywhere near a Vogue magazine in the first place.

        Goop is marketing towards people who can afford what she’s selling and are interested in it. It’s not her fault if it’s not in your price range anymore than it’s Jamie Oliver’s fault if you can’t make his single origin chocolate tart of Glamour’s fault if you can’t afford a skirt they feature.

    • fiona says:

      In australia that would be considered a bargain brand. A drugstore loreal or revlon foundation is $36 over here. $23 for mascara.

    • ND says:

      We’ve gone from “For every expensive designer product she touts, there’s 10 products that your average person could easily afford” to “It’s not her fault if it’s not in your price range…”

      😉

      Even without cherry-picking the most complicated and expensive dishes in “It’s All Good,” to stay as true as possible to the ingredients requires a fatter wallet than most people possess. And that’s fine – she’s (mostly) never claimed otherwise.

      Addressing critics of how pricey some of her recommended ingredients are, Paltrow said something to the effect of “Well, I use organic chicken, which is more expensive; you don’t have to.” And that’s exactly where she runs into trouble when it comes to her brand message. Swap pricey organic chicken for more modest peasant meat and you’re violating the fundamental live-clean-and-feel-good principle of the book. You’ve failed before you ever even turn on the stove.

      (Which reminds me that I also take issue with the “medical advice” slant of “It’s All Good” – as do many in the medical profession – but that’s a whole other conversation.)

      I’m calling “apples/oranges” on your fashion magazine comparison. Vogue isn’t screaming from its pages “I’m just like you!” They’re not. They know it, and I know it. If I’m ever feeling aspirationally haute couture-curious, I know where they live. So we’re good.

      Nor do they see fit to complain, every time you turn around, how super-duper hard it is just to BE Vogue. Vogue understands its demographic. Gwyneth clearly doesn’t.

  22. vauvert says:

    There are already good organic makeup and skin care lines out thee, been using them for years, and they don’t need a celebrity to sell. The products stand on their own. I would never buy a product just because a celeb slaps her name on it – in fact that is usually a turnoff. I would rather the money goes into research and ingredients than to support endorsement fees. And anything she endorses… I would avoid like the devil!

    • yellow says:

      Same here. This is how I feel as well!

    • Lucy2 says:

      I know, I find it hilarious she was “shocked” to discover toxic chemicals in make-up, when the more natural/organic stuff has been out there for years and years. Has she been living under a rock? Was that rock also pinning down her Max Factor contract? She will say anything to sell.

  23. Aprilbaby says:

    My teenage daughter has been using Juice skincare for at least a year. We like that it doesn’t test on animals and isn’t too harsh…here in Chicago, it’s available at Ulta, which I think is a step below Sephora? BTW, it wasn’t cheap, but it wasn’t crazy, considering how much organic ingredients cost.

  24. Cindy says:

    I don’t know what goop’s net worth is, but I’m guessing it is enough to live comfortably for several lifetimes. Her children have Chris Martin as well and probably wouldn’t have to work for the rest of their lives. I don’t understand why she is doing this. Can’t be the money. She is already famous. She’s my age. If I has her wealth I would not be spending my time trying to sell crap to peasants. She could do anything she wants, why this? Who cares? I get why Jessica Alba does it- she really does need the income because her acting career died years ago. But goop? Not the same. Don’t get it.

  25. Wentworth Miller says:

    Y? Her skin doesn’t look good.

  26. Lurker says:

    Her skin in the photo where she’s wearing the white and red floral dress – YEESH. The tanning and smoking has really caught up with her. Thanks G, but I’ll pass on your skincare advice.

  27. islandwalker says:

    Everytime she opens her mouth she sounds more ignorant. We have known this for years, but of course, her website discovered it. “But once my lifestyle website, Goop, started investigating toxicity in these products… I was stunned. I genuinely thought makeup was safe, but that’s not the case.” The Juice beauty products are good as any but not because she is suddenly getting paid to rep them. Her skin and hair look absolutely tragic.

  28. claire says:

    Really? She is not someone that comes to mind when I think about great healthy skin.

  29. Mon says:

    I just can’t with this woman…. If she is so concerned about healthy living then why had she signed up to represent Max Factor?! A company which tests on animals and also sells cosmetics full of harmful chemicals? Oh, I know, its because she is full of BS and because of $$$$. I know that this article is not about her Max Factor contract, but its very recent, and things like that make her look like a massive phoney who only cares about herself and money. Shut up and stick to… errrr… I don’t know, cos she is not even a good actress, so I can’t really go with acting….!

    • frivolity says:

      I’m glad the hypocrisy regarding Max Factor was pointed out, but it really should be the crux of speaking about Goop. None of what she says should be taken seriously, It’s all about profit and prestige for her, and too much is never enough. She is a hideous human being.

  30. Jaded says:

    If Mario Batali is her so-called ‘spiritual advisor’ why can’t she get him to stop wearing crocs and manpris?

  31. Colleen says:

    You know what makeup line I’m impressed with? Drew Barrymore’s. What’s it called, Flower? I don’t wear makeup very often but I have some of her stuff, and when I use it, I’m impressed by the quality of pigments and how nice her powder foundations are. I know nothing about its safety in terms of toxicity, but it’s very affordable and accessible. Just thought I’d toss that out there.

  32. Robin says:

    Who would buy makeup from a woman with greasy, blotchy skin and badly-dyed hair that somehow manages to be oily at the roots and dry as a bale of hay at the ends?

  33. roses says:

    Caught the new status for her being dropped in the article, ‘Triple A’: girl bye!
    !

    !

  34. Kitten says:

    Salma Hayek’s brand Nuance is overall pretty awesome, from my experience at least–and I consider myself a skin care junkie. She uses high-end ingredients and the price point for her products, while certainly not cheap, is very reasonable in comparison to similar products. Also, her stuff periodically goes on sale at CVS.

    • Marty says:

      Her makeup brand is really good too, Kitten. One of the hidden gems of the drugstore.

      I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again, once you go Korean skincare, you’ll never go back to your old regimen.

  35. Rainbow says:

    Thanks but no.
    Her hair, skin and make up look awful. She should be the last person to talk about health,diet and beauty.
    The last picture is terrible! Non existent eyebrows, terrible make up,fried hair and aged skin…Not a fan!

  36. Winterberry says:

    Well, I will say this; her skin looks normal for a 40-something woman. We are the ones with the problem this time. Not Gwyneth. Juice is the only natural/organic brand readily available in a major cosmetics retailer (Ulta). I like the brand. I hope the products are great because I’m sick of getting all of my sad and un-fun makeup at Whole Foods.

    • Rainbow says:

      Her skin looks REALLY bad for a 40 something year old woman imo. The skin and hair of a person who follows a healthy and balanced diet/lifestyle don’t look like this.
      You can tell that that she deprives herself,smokes and tans.

  37. Mean Hannah says:

    This is such an unpopular opinion and I always seem like a goop apologist, but having seen her in person with no makeup on, I think she has good skin, though she clearly tans.

    She often wears very little base makeup so in pictures she’s a bit ruddy and very oily. A light dusting of powder before pictures will do her wonders.

  38. CornyBlue says:

    Why would i buy Beauty or skincare products from someone who looks like shit ? My mother is 10 years older than her and looks 15 years younger without having a pile of money to throw at random things to keep her young.

  39. Natalie says:

    Mario Batali was sued for stealing employees’ tips so Goop’s spiritual godfather should take his own advice

  40. fiona says:

    She has really severe sun damage for someone only in their 40s.

  41. babs says:

    I don’t get it. Juice Beauty has been around for years. I’ve seen it at my local whole Foods. Maybe she’s just their new spokesperson.

  42. Sofia says:

    So… can we establish that she isn’t an actress anymore?

  43. Pegasus says:

    Why pay her to shill? Just put a catcher’s mitt on a broomstick and call that a spokeswoman.

    • Giddy says:

      Right! Goop is all about aspirational living, but I certainly don’t aspire to having my hair or complexion/makeup look like hers.

      • Pegasus says:

        I would only aspire to look like her if i needed to scare all the crows out of my backyard.

  44. GoldenHouseSouth says:

    Not that healthy, additive free (not just carcinogenic additives also endocrine disrupters etc.) cosmetics aren’t something we should all have access to and use; but I wouldn’t buy anything this woman is selling in the first place. Secondly her hair and skin always look dull and unhealthy to me. If it’s what she’s using, then I’m definitely not using it.

  45. gwen says:

    Does her new skincare & makeup line leave your face as greasy & shiney as hers?
    No thanks goop.

  46. Rockin Robin says:

    But…her skin looks like leather….ok Gwen. *eyeroll*

  47. Me too says:

    Ummm I am VERY middle class, but i understand the value of quality make up and regularly pay those prices for make-up at Sephora.

  48. poppy says:

    she is a terrible salesperson, especially for an oscar winning actress. she grows sloppier with each new endorsement.

  49. Ms. Blake says:

    Not that it matters but Juice Beauty has been around for several years. Princess Goopy is only signing on as the creative director, she isn’t the founder/launch person of the line.