Jackie Chan is known for several things: being one of the best stuntmen/actors ever in the history of film; being one of the richest entertainers ever to come out of Hong Kong or mainland China; and lastly, for being a favorite of Beijing’s ruling class, because of his pro-authoritarian-government statements and views. He has been critical of Taiwan’s government for years, and has often been at odds with the parts of Taiwan’s and China’s population that are striving for democratic reforms.
Jackie’s latest comments have created another storm. While Jackie was attending a forum in Hainan (in which China’s prime minister Wen Jiabao was in attendance), Jackie claimed “I’m not sure if it is good to have freedom or not… I’m really confused now. If you are too free, you are like the way Hong Kong is now. It’s very chaotic. Taiwan is also chaotic… I’m gradually beginning to feel that we Chinese need to be controlled. If we are not being controlled, we’ll just do what we want.” Yikes. Of course, the Chinese audience applauded. But now some prominent activists are taking issue – as they should.
Jackie Chan has triggered controversy by claiming Chinese people are so chaotic they need to be firmly controlled by the government.
The actor told a forum on the southern Chinese island of Hainan, whose attendees included Wen Jiabao, the Chinese prime minister, he was not sure “freedom” was necessary.
Chan, 55, whose latest movie, Shinjuku incident, was banned in China, was asked about censorship and restriction on the mainland. He expanded his comments to discuss Chinese society in general.
“I’m not sure if it is good to have freedom or not,” he said. “I’m really confused now. If you are too free, you are like the way Hong Kong is now. It’s very chaotic. Taiwan is also chaotic.”
He added: “I’m gradually beginning to feel that we Chinese need to be controlled. If we are not being controlled, we’ll just do what we want.”
His comments were applauded by the Chinese audience, but triggered fury in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Leung Kwok-hung, a pro-democracy MP in Hong Kong, said: “He has insulted the Chinese people. Chinese people are not pets. Chinese society needs a democratic system to protect human rights and rule of law.”
Albert Ho, another MP, said Mr Chan was “racist” and added: “People around the world are running their own countries. Why can’t the Chinese do the same?”
Mr Chan is a favourite of the authorities in Beijing, and performed in both the opening and closing ceremonies of the Summer Olympics. He is also the vice chairman of the China Film Association, a key industry group.
However, he lost some of his goodwill among the audience when he criticised the quality of Chinese-made goods.
“If I need to buy a television, I would definitely buy a Japanese television,” he said. “A Chinese television might explode.”
[From The Telegraph]
In interviews or profiles, I always like Jackie Chan, even though I’m totally ambivalent about his films. I respect his stunt work and the career he’s forged through decades of work, blood, sweat, tears and many, many broken bones. He’s very active in many charities, and he’s given away millions of dollars, mostly to children’s causes. His broad success around the world should be and is admired, considering he’s one of the very few Asian actors to achieve it. Obviously, he’s entitled to his opinion. But it seems like the proponents of democratic reform in China, Taiwan and Hong Kong have a much better case – to me, at least.
Here’s Jackie Chan at the press conference for the film ‘Soldier and General’ in Beijing on April 2nd. Images thanks to WENN.com .
I agree that he’s entitled to his opinions but wow…just wow! I am totally taken aback by his line of thinking.
“I’m gradually beginning to feel that we Chinese need to be controlled. If we are not being controlled, we’ll just do what we want.”
Democracy does NOT equal anarchy Mr. Chan.
It’s so easy for someone in his position of privilege and wealth, not subject to the government-imposed restrictions and human-rights violitions that those who actually live there have to contend with, to suggest that freedom is a negative thing. Wonder does he see the irony in him being able to voice his views in prominent and influential circles while those high-profile people with opposing views would never be extended the same courtesy. Probably not.
He’s entitled to his opinion but, in this case, he should be ashamed of himself.
Wow. I had no idea he thought that way. I admit to just watching his movies and not really getting into anything else he says/does.
It’s disheartening when I find out what some people really truly believe and it’s a shame when those beliefs undermine the fight for human rights in any country.
If China wanted to go to war with the US, they’d outnumber us 20 to 1. So while I don’t agree with the “control” statement, I have refused in the last year to buy Chinese made goods due to lead counts in children’s toys, poisonous pet food laced with rat poison, and corroding sheetrock that renders home-insurance useless against replacing it.
Anyway, I admire Jackie Chan for standing up for what he believes. This is going to have a huge backlash against him, but nobody can deny the fact that he’s brave for saying it in the first place.
well, yes, freedom and independance are by definition messier and less contollable than centrally controlled forms of government.
but what’s the surprise? His views are totally in sync with all those on the left who wish for a nanny state form of government.
I still love him. LOVE.
If I need to buy a television, I would definitely buy a Japanese television,” he said. “A Chinese television might explode.”
LOL!
western world has no clue about Chinas culture and way of thinking its diffrent the way they been raised and what they believe BUT its changing as they emerge into the modern world but its only till recently that they are coming into the modern age Jackie is old as in old way of thinking its generational for him ties to the past and the china culture is very tied to its past so trying to think outside that is not something that comes easily to the majority of the Chinese population such as Jacki Chan
and I most definitly do not buy anything that says made in china.
Is that Jackie Chan’s son in the above photo?
I have seen some photos of Jackie Chan with his wife and they look great for their age, especially his wife who looks like she has hardly aged at all.
Why do people insist on taking actors’ political statements seriously? Most actors never even finish high school.
You can tell by the wording Jackie Chan uses that he’s not exactly an intellectual thinker. The man’s a comic and a genius at stunts.
Let’s not have Barack Obama jumping out of burning buildings, and let’s not take Jackie Chan seriously when it comes to political rhetoric.
Or Sean Penn, for that matter.
Woah….I thought Jackie Chan was dead!
I’m not going to say a word about this goverment thing because I don’t know enough to judge it. When you look it up, both sides have such a great base to stand on.
I really liked Chan’s movies as a kid. His stunts were amazing.
Independence was the right of all the peoples, and Chinese society needs a democratic system to protect human rights and rule of law.
while i’m not condoning jackie chan, i just wanted to mention that posters are either super sensitive or super sheltered. it’s no surprise that people of varying descent have “interesting” viewpoints to say the least… i know my chinese co-worker certainly has voiced a few baffling opinions… i dunno, americans seem to be so outraged at everything but i think it just means that nobody has trusted them enough to be honest…
although i agree that having super-star status should make people more cautious of what ideas they are promoting, at the same time… i’m not very surprised… people with very different backgrounds ten to have outlandish opinions… at least in my experience…
Man, I don’t normally go for Chinese guys, but yea, if that’s his son…he’s pretty hot.
We Chinese have a very descriptive analogy for this kind of dilemma — there are those who would worship ox excrement as fragrant flowers that would from time to time be surprised to find the odious emissions really objectionable.
Jackie Chan and his persecutors/admirers deserve one another …
thats not his son(he’s another actor), his son is really ugly
“Anyway, I admire Jackie Chan for standing up for what he believes. This is going to have a huge backlash against him, but nobody can deny the fact that he’s brave for saying it in the first place.”
How is it brave to tell a group of Chinese businessman (who will completely agree with you) exactly what they want to hear? Sounds completely safe to me, like a flag wearin’ fundamentalist declaring abortion is murder to a crowd of Texan cattle farmers (no offense intended toward any left leaning Texan cattle farmers here, lol).
He’s created a bunch of five-minute animated films (mini-sodes, they call them) that are being shown on tv here in Asia these days. You fans should check them out!
His feelings are not uncommon in countries with huge, teeming populations – where I live there is definitely the feeling that democracy might not be the best political system suited to either our people or our society. Perhaps in a country where there are low levels of education, a stricter form of governance can be imagined to be a good thing, but human rights tend to suffer.
It’s definitely true, however, that populations like ours (I don’t know if this is true in the rest of Asia) tend to do exactly what they please, including driving on the wrong side of the road, breaking every kind of law possible, throwing litter everywhere, etc.
Bina – I agree with you. In Singapore, there are restrictions on chewing gum. Why? Because some people can be disgusting, sticking their chewed gum under desks, on the poles in the buses, and when I was in high school, there was even someone who had spit his/her chewing gum in the water fountain. There are strict laws in Singapore, but the country is very clean, orderly, and organized. Yes, being “controlled” isn’t good, but I think some restrictions should apply to Westerners about their manners. Chewing gum is not a big issue, but if even that small an issue and people can’t even be bothered to spit their chewed gums in the trash, how can we expect these people to act responsibly?
I came from a country that is a “republic” like the US. Independence was something that was a given. I think people can abuse that independence, because my native country is so filthy with garbage, the waters polluted, and people in general do not have respect for laws and the government. They see signs of “keep off the grass” but they do it anyway. Their reason: no one’s here to see me violate this rule so whatever, I’ll do what I want.
And the actor with Jackie in the main pic is Wang Lee Hom, he’s American-born, but he’s very popular in Asia. He’s hot, too. 😀
Quote: “When you look it up, both sides have such a great base to stand on.”
Tell that to the kid who stood in front of the tank in Tiananmen Square in 1989. Too many people in free countries who have never been forced to fight for anything are too quick to tolerate and excuse tyranny.
They don’t know what it means.
I know I’m just a moronic ninny with nothing to offer the world but “twaddle,” but even an idiot like me can see which side of this issue is the morally correct one.
People being “disgusting” is not a valid reason for dictatorial communism.
Law enforcement can handle chewing gum and environmental policy without pounding the populace back into the Stone Age.
I just found out the bra I thought was made in Scandinavia (the company is named Change) was actually made in the PRC (People’s Republic of China). 😮
I dislike it the most when certain groups of people imposes their beliefs on others. The only people who can really backlash against the so called “control society” should be the people experiencing it. If those people, like the ones in mainland China, are not complaining about their freedom then outsiders who are experiencing “democracy” should just butt out.
Also, I find it totally ironic that most people in Hongkong and Taiwan are so quick at terming themselves “chinese” in this kind of controversies, even generalizing that the remark affects all entire “chinese” nationalities. Apparently they all forgot that they were condemning the idea that they are called “chinese” because they view themselves as a separate nation from China.
Very strange thing to say, i know his audience is growing in China too.