An article from The New York Times got a lot of play the past few days because the author called out several of Hollywood’s leading men for their weight gains. Denzel Washington, John Travolta, Vince Vaughn and Tom Hanks were all criticized, but the article started out with Russell Crowe. Specifically, his double chin.
Am I alone in hating these trend stories? Like the basis of the story is “Suddenly, every guy is totally chubby” when it’s just not the case. They seemed to pick and choose a few stars that are aging, with various stages of grace, into their forties and fifties. I’m not there yet, but doesn’t that happen to every man and woman? They spread out a little in middle age?
A scene from the new journalistic thriller State of Play says it all.
Jeff Daniels, as the politician George Fergus, squares off with Russell Crowe as the pen-wielding journalist Cal McAffrey.
Two men. One notebook. Four chins.
Hollywood’s pool of leading men is getting larger — and not necessarily in a good way.
Based on a close look at trailers, still photos and some films already released, at least a dozen male stars in some of the year’s most prominent movies have been adding on the pounds of late.Hollywood’s women may have weight issues of their own. But it is somehow less noticeable, possibly because actresses who expand do not often get roles to showcase that growth. But the men are still playing leads into their 40s and 50s — giving glimpses of what age, and perhaps a little inattention, can do to a most admired physique.
John Wayne always looked a bit portly,” noted Lawrence Turman, a veteran film producer who is chairman of the Peter Stark producing program at the USC’s School of Cinematic Arts.
“Mike Nichols once told me the one essential for an actor to have is a large head, so as to be seen,” Mr. Turman said.
Photos of midcentury stars — Humphrey Bogart, James Stewart, Clark Gable and others — show them to have remained rather gaunt at an age when many of the current crop are anything but. The change in smoking habits may have something to do with it. Possibly, too, the audience has grown more tolerant of weightier men on screen as the society at large has become heavier.
In the past, heavier leading men were confined mostly to the comedy world, said Felicia Fasano, a casting director whose credits include films like Bad Santa and “Barber Shop 2: Back in Business” and the television series “Californication.”
But a new willingness to cast heavier men “may have happened organically,” Ms. Fasano said, as Hollywood over the last few years has been plagued by what has widely been seen as a shortage of reliably appealing stars.
“The bigger people are, the more concern there is about high blood pressure or the possibility of strokes or heart attacks” during a shoot, said Brian Kingman, a managing director of Arthur J. Gallagher & Company, which sells entertainment insurance. For all but the oldest stars, however, an extra “10, 20 or 30 pounds” is usually not a major underwriting concern, Mr. Kingman said.
[From The New York Times]
As if timed specifically to refute this “Russell Crowe has a double chin” report, a new photo from the set of Nottingham was released. The photo is of a svelte-looking, short-haired Crowe, quivering his quiver. Yummy. Even though I don’t mind a guy with a little extra weight, it’s good to see a healthier-looking Russell Crowe. It takes me back to my Gladiator crush.
The Hollywood rumour-mill had it that Russell Crowe was too fat to play the English folk hero in Ridley Scott’s $130 million epic after piling on 63lbs for his last two films, Body of Lies and State of Play.
However, the first images from the set show that Crowe’s Robin bears more than a passing resemblance to his character in Gladiator, with the same buffed physique and close-cropped haircut. He also appears to be wearing jeans in place of the rather less macho Lincoln green tights worn by Errol Flynn.
Producer Brian Grazer explained: “He doesn’t have the old Robin Hood tights. He’s got armour. He’s very medieval. He looks, if anything, more like he did in Gladiator than anything we’re used to seeing with Robin Hood.”
The script has undergone several rewrites, and an initial plan to cast the Sheriff of Nottingham as the hero and Robin as a morally ambiguous vigilante were dropped. Grazer said the storyline has resonance at a time when City bankers and Wall Street financiers are the new villains. “Oddly, it’s a metaphor for today. [Robin] is trying to create equality in a world where there are a lot of injustices. He’s a crusader for the people, trying to reclaim some of the ill-gotten gains of the wealthy. That’s a universal theme.”
[From The Telegraph]
Russell Crowe is obviously not the only actor to have yo-yo weight issues. If anything, it makes me like him more. He seems to have similar issues to a lot of women, and the tabloids seem to love nothing more than getting in a few punches at Russell’s gut. My problem with a star like Vince Vaughn is that he simply looks gross and unhealthy, like he’s in need of a liver transplant. It’s not the weight – it’s the bloated face that belies alcohol problems, the bad clothes, and the pale, unhealthy-looking skin. Compared to Vince, Russell just looks like a guy who enjoys his cheese fries.
Russell Crowe is shown on the set of ‘Nottingham’ recently, and at the premiere of ‘Revolutionary Road’ on December 15th. Images thanks to WENN.com .
Whoa. Maybe now they should call it “Hottingham.”
What a sad costume! Are these jeans?? I thought he said there’d be leather pants but I swear these look like jeans. But seriously: I’ve seen homemade renaissance fair costumes that were oh, a million times better than this. Isn’t this movie supposed to have a costume designer? And maybe they should also consider getting a different armourer because that bow and arrow set, all squeaky clean and lightweight, does not look real. It looks like they bought it at the toy store.
About Hollywood leading men being more chubby than they used to: so what? Let these guys be. I always think the current Hollywood twens, like Zac Efron for example, are a bit too skinny, lean and groomed. At least let the middle-aged men have their occasional double chin and a bit of a belly. They’re real men and I’d rather see that than them trying to starve themselves or getting nipped and tucked.
*breathes in* Ok, rant over 🙂
what a great way to start my 420 – with pix of my fave hunk.
He was so swEEt on Letterman.
*phwoar*
Sometimes we spreadout before middle-age too. *sobs*
Personally I wouldn’t give a shit if he gains 200 pounds, I love that man.
You hit the nail on the head with the Vince Vaughn description.
So the movie has gone from a new twist on an old story to a “metaphor for today”? That just sounds boring and preachy.
I don’t know, I think the costume looks as it should; grubby, with muddy earthen colours which fit into the landscape.
I don’t mind the new-looking armaments, the man is allowed a new bow every now and again, although slightly more used looking might be easier to account for in continuity. It looks better than that woeful Kevin-bleedin’-Costner crudology anyway. I think I still dislike Crowe more though.
well they (the media)have been doing it to the women for centuries — analyzing every pound. at least the girls can get a little break for now.
Sorry but I never paid that much attention to a man’s bow.
I still can’t believe they’re remaking this… again. Put BBC’s Robin Hood on your Netflix, people!
I prefer when guys stay leaner or at least try to (look after themselves).
Sometimes it’s funny watching actors and actresses age over a period of time: the guys end up looking older than their years and the women end up looking younger.
It’s a shame women don’t get the same get-out-of-girth-free card, really.
lookin good Crowe! I can’t wait to see this version of one of my favorite stories!
FF: certainly you can’t argue that Tom Hanks, John Travolta or Denzel Washington (among many others) don’t look after themselves. Having a bit of a belly, having a double chin or just having a bit more mass (like Travolta) and not grooming are two *very* different things. Vince Vaughn, however, disgusts me. His acting, his personality, his appearance, all yucky.
I feel like these guys have paid their dues and we can really cut them some slack. However, I do like the comments saying at least the press is finally scrutinizing men as well. That is so true!
Mairead: what I meant was not that the costume strikes me as inaccurate (although the jeans…) or even that the colours and aging of it is wrong. It just strikes me as pretty flimsy-looking material. Russell has previously boasted about how he has a cape and lots of sturdy leather, even mentioning a rather “big codpiece” (to highlight how manly he is). Looking at this costume, it’s nothing like that. The materials are flimsy, thin and very off-the-rack (look at that top and tell me you couldn’t buy the same at any Walmart). I’d expect more from a production as big as this. As for the bow: okay, so Robin Hood is allowed a new one every now and then. But again: the master of archers would not have such an impersonal, toy-storeish, run of the mill bow.
Sorry, I’m a film buff and journalist and a woman, this kind of stuff just irks me a little. 🙂
If (male) actors are doing action movies, they better look the part too, at least capable of running without looking that they would run out of breath and collapse. If aging actors can’t pull off being the dashing leading men anymore then there are always younger, better looking actors out there eager to take their place. Simple as that.
Well, at least they’re starting to give men as much grief as women.
But really, he looks pretty good. He’s getting older…I don’t know why they’d expect him to look like a 20 something.
Sorry Anna, I don’t understand the being a woman reference.
I’m also sorry if I’ve offended you by my earlier comment – I didn’t realise that I was being so insulting by what I said. But thanks for putting me straight about what you meant. I agree that those trews do look a bit like jean-like – I’m hoping they’re made of thin leather like goatskin (thin and stretchy)
Poor Vince – he’s taking a serious hammering by the posters in this thread! 😆
@ Mairead: no honey, nonono, you didn’t offend me, please don’t think that! I understood what you meant and thought that *I* was the one who didn’t fully epxress what she meant in her first comment, which is why I explained it in more detail in the second comment. I’m sorry if that came off as harsh.
About the being a woman thing: I just meant that women notice clothes, accessories and their details very naturally (as opposed to many men who don’t).
Yumm. It looks like Kevin Costner may be no longer be my favorite Robin Hood.
The costume designer is Oscar winner Janty Yates. She’s probably a “film buff” also. He looks yummy.
LOL Anna – my ovaries are just as good as yours missy! 😛
I’ll happily concede to your victory on this topic though 😉
Oh man, you know what this also means?
Sienna Miller is full of sh!t.
@Dingles, didn’t we know that already?
I’ll take Vince under my wing and work some of that blub off him…
So according to Brooke Shields, by the time actresses are old enough to look like this (40’s, 50’s), they’re gone and replaced by younger models. Actors have a longer shelf life than actresses (for now), so they’d better step up to the plate by stepping away from the plate.
Sienna Miller, go get a BIG carton of Hagen-Daaz and cry your little piggy eyes out…hee hee hee hee.
Oh yes. Yummy.
I think the costume looks perfectly appropriate. I see nothing wrong with it.
I didn’t think he was too fat and gross for Sienna. Silly home wrecking twit!
Poor Vince, he was quite something in Swingers.
Sorry, he’s no Robin Hood
and that cheap, classless no-talent Sienna Miller is no Marian (or real actress)
The comments attached to this article are so funny. Anyway, I hope this movie will be a good one, Ridley is a fantastic director so it probably will be.