Maria Sharapova claims she was not warned about the meldonium ban 5 times

FFN_CPR_Sharapova_Maria_030816_51991447

It’s been a week since Maria Sharapova stepped out in a hotel conference room to publicly admit that she had tested positive for a banned substance. In the days that followed, Sharapova was suspended from tennis, and she saw three of her major advertising contracts suspended as well. Fellow tennis players have been steadily throwing her under the bus, especially since her story – that she was only warned once about the usage of meldonium and she simply failed to click a link – has generally fallen apart. Perhaps Sharapova is not listening to the advice of her handlers, or maybe she just thinks she can talk her way out of trouble, but she chose to post a lengthy statement on Facebook, slamming reports that she had actually been warned five times about the meldonium ban. You can read her full Facebook post here. Here’s the most relevant portion:

A report said that I had been warned five times about the upcoming ban on the medicine I was taking. That is not true and it never happened. That’s a distortion of the actual “communications” which were provided or simply posted onto a webpage.

I make no excuses for not knowing about the ban. I already told you about the December 22, 2015 email I received. Its subject line was “Main Changes to the Tennis Anti-Doping Programme for 2016.” I should have paid more attention to it. But the other “communications”? They were buried in newsletters, websites, or handouts.

On December 18, I received an email with the subject line “Player News” on it. It contained a newsletter on a website that contained tons of information about travel, upcoming tournaments, rankings, statistics, bulletin board notices, happy birthday wishes, and yes, anti-doping information. On that email, if a player wanted to find the specific facts about medicine added to the anti-doping list, it was necessary to open the “Player News” email, read through about a dozen unrelated links, find the “Player Zone” link, enter a password, enter a username, read a home screen with more than three dozen different links covering multiple topics, find the “2016 Changes to Tennis Anti-Doping Program and Information” link, click on it and then read a page with approximately three dozen more links covering multiple anti-doping matters. Then you had to click the correct link, open it up, scroll down to page two and that’s where you would find a different name for the medication I was taking.

In other words, in order to be aware of this “warning”, you had to open an email with a subject line having nothing to do with anti-doping, click on a webpage, enter a password, enter a username, hunt, click, hunt, click, hunt, click, scroll and read. I guess some in the media can call that a warning. I think most people would call it too hard to find.

[From Facebook]

Girl, you’re making it worse. It’s like… pity poor Sharapova, she would have had to spend an extra ten minutes online to hunt around for information about the banned substance that she was taking. It’s not like she literally has a dozen people (probably more) around her who are employed specifically for the purpose of keeping Team Sharapova afloat. And I still have a fundamental disbelief that this information could only be found in one email, especially since the ITF (Tennis Anti-Doping Program) has made it clear that they were informing everyone on the circuit as early as last fall.

As for other Sharapova problems… The Guardian had a piece about how no one likes her on the circuit and how she’s never had any friends. The piece mimics Chris Evert’s quotes about Sharapova last week, which were: “Maria Sharapova has always isolated herself from the rest of the tennis world. She’s made that known, she can’t be friends with the players. I’m not seeing a lot of support from a lot of the players.” John McEnroe threw her under the bus too, saying: “It would be hard to believe that no one in her camp, the 25 or 30 people that work for her or Maria herself, had no idea that this happened.” But… Sharapova seems to have a notable supporter with Novak Djokovic, who publicly said he “wishes her the best.”

Last thing: French player Kristina Mladenovic let all the gossip and dirt fly this weekend. Mladenovic said:

“All the players are saying she’s a cheater. You sure doubt and think that she didn’t deserve all she won until now. That’s dreadful, but it’s good that it’s finally out. As far as I am concerned if I take an aspirin I worry 10 times about what I do. She’s been taking this drug for 10 years and it’s a serious drug. She has played with the rules and thought, if it’s not banned, then I can take it. For me that’s very disappointing… She can play with words and find a good lawyer but on the principles of the situation, she’s wrong. She has no excuse that can defend what she’s done. For me there’s no doubt. She wasn’t really liked. I respected her for her career but she wasn’t really nice nor polite, let’s be honest. At least the good news to come out of all of this is that the anti-doping programme is working and that even if you’re among the best players you’re going to get caught and it’s going to get out.”

[Via The Guardian]

Kristina Mladenovic might be my new spirit animal. What I like about all of this are the comments from seasoned professionals on the circuit, talking about how much they worry about just taking an aspirin or a decongestant. And we’re supposed to believe that Sharapova was taking this sketchy drug for a decade and never thought twice about it?

FFN_CPR_Sharapova_Maria_030816_51991446

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

20 Responses to “Maria Sharapova claims she was not warned about the meldonium ban 5 times”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Erinn says:

    Thank you, Maria, for explaining for the internet works.

    It’s called ctrl+F or command+F. It would turn that horrriiibblleee long, strenuous task of skim reading into a quick, nearly painless procedure.

  2. Pinky says:

    The people you step on on the way up the ladder are the ones you’ll pass on your freefall back down. And none of them is gonna offer you a tether rope unless it’s to hang yourself with it.

    -TheRealPinky

  3. Sixer says:

    The sense of entitlement is strong in this one.

    And why, oh why, do all these famous fools write endless self-serving screeds on Facebook when they’ve messed up? It’s narcissism gone mad.

  4. als says:

    So Sharapova is the Big Bad Wolf in this story. Now that she’s out, WTA is left without a villain to blame everything on. Who will be blamed for all the mega-contracts that Nike and the likes give away?

    Everyone is too focused on being glad that Sharapova got hers to ask themselves why the Anti-Doping agency and the WTA did not come out first to tell the world they caught a big fish of tennis doping. Instead, they allowed the lady to play PR games and move ahead.
    No one is asking themselves why this meldonium was not banned until now. They knew about it and they let it go for at least 10 years. What other drugs are still allowed?

    If I were Mladenovic or any other tennis player I would not worry about Sharapova, I would worry about myself and about the system I work in that seems to be complicit to doping and general cheating. The WTA apparently sent a list to the players instructing them how to answer on this issue. What is that about?

    Sharapova should have been kept in check by the authorities in tennis, the people that make the rules and supervise that they are applied, the people that make sure no one plays with advantages. Lance Armstrong should have been kept in check by the people that enforce rules and regulations. And now we see how they were kept in check.

    To say that the anti-doping program works after Sharapova LEGALLY cheated for 10 years is just dumb.

    • Tala D says:

      Well said!

    • Lama Bean says:

      Didn’t they learn about the Meldonium from USADA because there were 22 plus athletes with the drug in their system, all from Russia? I think that was late 2014.

      That would be why it wasn’t banned until now. You can’t ban something you don’t know exists.

      There are also questions surrounding her claim that she took that drug for 10 years, as many doctors say it is a short term solution.

  5. OrigialTessa says:

    I’ll believe that perhaps for Maria herself finding the new regulations buried in the emails may have been hard. BUT, it is the job of her physicians and trainers to know these things. She must think we’re all really stupid or something. I’m sure it won’t be long until someone resigns and takes the fall for Maria.

    • lucy2 says:

      Thank you – if it were just her, I could buy it. But with that large of a team, including medical professionals, someone should have known. If you know your athlete is on a certain prescription (that it doesn’t seem she needed) wouldn’t you check religiously every time new regulations came out?

  6. AG-UK says:

    She just needs to shut up and go away. She cannot be that naïve or stupid but she must think the rest of us are. She can take all that noise she makes on the court and be gone.

  7. The Original Mia says:

    Keep on lying and digging that hole, Maria.

  8. Apsutter says:

    She’s playing a very dangerous and stupid game here. So if she was warned in an official capacity about this drug multiple times(email or otherwise) I guarantee it can be verified. Does she think evidence disappears just because she may have deleted the emails on her end? There’s no way that the anti doping people are going to let her make a fool of them. Entitled brat is what we see here.

  9. Another Nina says:

    Spaeaking of Guardian piece…and the quote of Nick Bolletieri and the unfriendly little Maria…Why did they fail to mention that she was heavily bullied in the Academy? She lived with much older Girls in the dormitory, she has just started learning English, when she got accepted in Academy, she was penniless; her dad worked as a construction worker (perhaps illegally), he made enough money to stay in the room with 5 other guys (and this is where Maria stayed on the weekends). She had not seen mother/sister for years…So, yeah, white privilege at its highest, spoiled brat.

    • Lucky says:

      While money certainly offers privilege, it has little to do with white privilege, or the privilege she has from being a beautiful blonde. Many players more accomplished than her make much less money- that is t because she is an astute business woman…

      • Another Nina says:

        Maria has had her share of hardships and in a way they had formed her. I’m not her fan but I admire that she did not break down when she was a little girl and went on to achieve 5 Grand Slams. And I’m fairly disappointed that in all recent discussions here her success is being distilled to “white privilege.”

      • perplexed says:

        I don’t think anyone is attributing her Grand Slam success to white privilege — just her financial endorsement success.

    • rosie says:

      I think many people believe Maria sailed through life because of her apparent good looks and white privilege. Maria’s parents were not wealthy people by any countries standards, they went through much hardship for their child’s future. Maybe she is aloof and unfriendly, but this narrative in the press that she has lived her whole life privileged is untrue. Condem and ban her for her failed drug test, but the pile on is unpleasant.

  10. Ravensdaughter says:

    What the hell is she wearing? The fringy purse only makes it worse!

  11. Emily C. says:

    If my entire career was riding on clicking on a website, entering a password, and scrolling, you’d better bet I’d be doing it whenever applicable. And seriously, she thinks that’s “hard”? Hard work is winning 5 grand slams, even with chemical help. I find it difficult to believe she’s so lazy that reading something online that is integral to her multi-million dollar career is too much.

    She would do much better to keep her mouth shut at this point. Definitely stay off social media at all costs.

  12. Viktoria says:

    For someone who supposedly didn’t click the link or dig deeper into any of the other information newsletters/emails/etc she got she sure knows very precisely where that information was located.
    I quote: “find the “2016 Changes to Tennis Anti-Doping Program and Information” link, click on it and then read a page with approximately three dozen more links covering multiple anti-doping matters. Then you had to click the correct link, open it up, scroll down to page two” –> she even knew to scroll down to page two yet she didn’t actually get the info? I call bullshit on all of this….she just thought she wouldn’t get caught and that’s it….and even though the drug was allowed up until 2016, it still leaves a bad taste in my mouth that she won all these things in the last 10 years while taking a drug that enhanced her performance beyond what was naturally possible…just sayin….

  13. JaneS says:

    If she had just come out and admitted ‘Yep, I took it for endurance. It was legal for ten years and I made a mistake and didn’t stop taking it once it got banned’…. there may be some redemption.

    We all know she’s lying and that just makes it ten times worse. Blaming her family doctor. Coming up with bogus excuses like a heart condition and diabetes. Not buying it, Betty.

    What is interesting is how many players have been busted with this drug. Who know so many top athletes had heart conditions. LOL.