Kesha’s lawyers claim her legal situation with Dr. Luke is akin to ‘slavery’

FFN_Kesha_Court_SPARTAN_021916_51975231

In the past month, Kesha has been courting public opinion rather successfully. She lost the right to break her contract with Dr. Luke back in February, and what followed was a widespread outpouring of support for Kesha and her situation. The court of public opinion has deemed Dr. Luke to be a user, a douchebag and worse. Prominent women in music like Kelly Clarkson, Adele, Taylor Swift and Ariana Grande have come out to publicly lend their names to #FreeKesha. And while there are rumors that Sony wants to dump Dr. Luke, it hasn’t happened yet. Legally, Kesha is still in the same terrible situation she was in a month ago. So her lawyers filed an appeal, and they maybe (?) went a bit too hyperbolic with their statement.

Kesha is not about to let this Dr. Luke legal battle come and go without a fight. The singer and her lawyers appealed a judge’s decision last month to keep her in her recording contract with the Sony music producer, real name Lukasz Gottwald, arguing that the ruling denying Kesha’s request for an injunction on her recording contract to release music outside of the producer’s authority is in the likes of “slavery.”

According to Kesha’s appeal, which was obtained by E! News, the singer’s legal team stated, “First, the Court erred in basing its decision on its finding that Kesha could record without interference from Gottwald. Although it recognized that “slavery was done away with a long time ago” and that ‘[y]ou can’t force someone to work…in a situation in which they don’t want to work,’ the Court’s ruling requiring Kesha to work for Gottwald’s companies, purportedly without his involvement, does just that. As the Court itself recognized, ‘[i]t’s slavery. You can’t do that.'”

The singer’s camp also disputed the judge’s opinion that no irreparable harm had been done to Kesha’s career, explaining that “affidavits by individuals with over 100 years of collective personal experience in the music industry” have proven that “a young pop star’s fame will fade quickly, and permanently, due to a loss of momentum. Indeed, New York courts have found irreparable harm to the careers of young musicians like Kesha where those careers are fleeting and in danger of destruction if not timely pursued.”

Dr. Luke’s spokesperson has released the following statement to E! News in regards to the appeal: “The Court repeatedly stated Kesha was already free to record without Dr. Luke, and that she had not presented any facts supporting her claims. That’s because all the evidence—including Kesha’s own sworn testimony—show her allegations are false. Her attorneys can continue manufacturing even more false and outrageous claims, but the fact remains that her time would be better spent in a studio than wasting time having her lawyer and mother spin lies in the media.”

[From E! News]

I genuinely and truly believe that the New York court’s February judgement was wrong. I believe that Kesha’s contract with Dr. Luke should be broken, and I believe the fact that he’s fighting it so hard, and the fact that he won’t simply let Kesha go is further proof of his twisted feeling of “ownership” over Kesha and her career. Now all that being said… we don’t need to start throwing around “slavery” as an explanation for this situation. That kind of hyperbole – or is it a legal argument? – should be put to one side. Kesha is not being forced into lifelong, unpaid servitude. She is not in chains. Her body is not being legally treated as property. She is in a horrible legal situation with a man she claims abused her. It’s an awful, tragic situation but it’s not slavery.

FFN_Kesha_Court_SPARTAN_021916_51975225

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

24 Responses to “Kesha’s lawyers claim her legal situation with Dr. Luke is akin to ‘slavery’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Pamspam says:

    Uh oh.

  2. Original Kay says:

    I believe her body was treated as property.

  3. Down and Out says:

    Ugh. No. Nothing is like slavery except slavery.

    • Wentworth Miller says:

      That seems to be the buzz word of the moment.

      Bully
      At the end of the day
      Rape
      Troll
      Racist
      Slavery

      I don’t have time to finish this list.

  4. Alex says:

    This is problematic…

  5. swak says:

    Why oh why did they compare it to slavery?

  6. EM says:

    I know I will be in the minority but I very strongly dislike how this case is being “tried” in the media. I feel that if Dr. Luke is innocent then he should fight hard to keep the contract otherwise it’s just extortion. If guilty then strong punishment but since this is a civil suit it will not be jail time. Either way he is presumed innocent but the media (with stars throwing in their support for Kesha) have deemed him guilty. He has already lost his reputation and I can only hope that he is truly guilty.

    • INeedANap says:

      HAHAHAHAHA

      No one in the entertainment industry cares about female victims. Terry Richardson, Chris Brown, Roman Polanski, Terrence Howard, et al still get and produce work. This will do nothing negative to Dr. Luke in the long run.

    • Esther says:

      yeah why dont people think about allthepoormens? the presumption of innocence protects rapists and has no place in rape cases.

      • Jay says:

        The presumption of innocence is what the US is supposed to uphold. I know false rape accusations are relatively rare, but you should tread lightly. The presumption of innocence may benefit rapists, but it also protects the truly innocent. Sorry, but I’d rather have 1000 guilty people go free than see 1 innocent person locked up.

      • gene123 says:

        Esther, thats an extremely dangerous statement to make. Our justice system is built on the concept of “innocent until proven guilty” and if we start removing it from rape trials, that could cause a slippery slope.

  7. Oli says:

    Didn’t he allegedly rape her or was that someone else.

    This isn’t slavery though, what her lawyer is talking about right now. Seriously find a better word, I’m sure they could have thought of something else, I get they wanted sympathy for her but using that word isn’t the way to do it.

  8. Fiorella says:

    Since she could just forfeit this time and lose out on her career momentum for these (few?) years and still have enough money for a simple (or luxe?) life without working, no, please don’t mention slavery :/

    • Beth says:

      Except she’s broke. He allegedly added a lot of extra songwriters for everything she worked on, so she barely gets anything in royalties.

  9. INeedANap says:

    Yeah, this is a totally inaccurate and unnecessary comparison. Nothing is like slavery except actual slavery.

    But I wonder if it was brought to that point because the situation is already obviously terrible and she still wasn’t released from her contract. Was this the lawyer’s way of rubbing the court’s nose in it, so to speak?

  10. Kimbers says:

    Out of all the women speaking out I find Kelly Clarkson’so the strongest since she worked directly with the “Dr.”

    I would love to hear a few tales from Katy Perry since they had worked together closely, and appeared together often during her sophomore album. Has she put out any statements?

    Agree terming her situation as slavery instead of servitude was bad choice, but not a deal breaker in believability of what occurred between the two.

  11. Darkladi says:

    I REALLY wish people would stop throwing the word slavery around.

  12. Luca76 says:

    Not going to blame a lawyer for lawyering. It’s obviously not the same exact thing but it’s a bad enough situation.

  13. tealily says:

    She is being forced to work for someone who she alleges is treating her body (and her work) as his property. Perhaps the use of the term “slavery” is slightly thoughtless, but I can see the comparison. And, as you say, this may be part of a legal defense. I’m not really bothered by the use in this instance.

  14. Bluesky says:

    Can we please stop with the “slavery” argument?? I’m sympathetic to her situation but it’s not slavery. Slaves did not have free will, did not get paid, and were repeatedly beaten, raped, and forced to work hard labor. Slaves didn’t have a choice in being slaves.

  15. pinetree13 says:

    I wish she would go after him criminally. It would help her case and if he did this (which I think he did) then he should have charges against him and not just a civil suit.

    Also, *cringe* don’t throw the slavery word around. She’s been through a lot but she still has it much, much better than the millions of true slaves around the world.

    • cab224 says:

      She can’t. Criminal charges can be filed only by the state or the federal government.

  16. Jay (the Canadian one) says:

    Slaves do not get to negotiate the terms of their obligation nor their compensation for it. The “Dr.” sucks and her situation sucks, but what we have here is a poor contract negotiation (particularly of the “termination for cause” clause) that has now come back to bite her, but not slavery.