Ethan Coen offers thank-yous to everyone who made Pres. Trump a reality

wenn23480387

Ethan Coen is the Coen Brother not married to Frances McDormand. I’ll completely understand if you get Ethan and Joel Coen confused though, because I do too. Joel is the taller brother and he’s married to Frances. Ethan Coen is the shorter brother in these photos. Previously, if you had asked me if the Coen Brothers were particularly woke, I would have said “probably not.” I’m basing that off of their terrible joint interview earlier this year where they whitesplained/mansplained diversity in Hollywood. So, now, I would not have thought that the either Coen would have been particularly vocal about the politics involved in this year’s presidential election. As it turns out though, Ethan Coen has some thoughts. Ethan wrote a “thank you” essay, in the vein of Jimmy Fallon’s on-going “thank you” bit, to all of the people who made Donald Trump’s victory possible. Here it is, in its entirety.

Such a surprise! So many people to thank!

1. Jill Stein voters: You helped elect a man who pledges that he will, in his first hundred days, cancel contributions to United Nations programs to fight climate change. If your vote for Ms. Stein did not end up advancing your green agenda, it did allow you to feel morally superior to all the compromising schmoes who voted for Hillary Clinton. And your feelings about your vote are more important than the consequences of your vote. So — thank you!

2. Gary Johnson voters: Thank you, for similar reasons. You, too, may now reward yourselves with feelings of warm self-approval, and your libertarian agenda will now be advanced (or not) by someone who admires the governance of Vladimir Putin. And to Mr. Johnson himself: Not only can no one blame you for this outcome — we’re all free agents, man! — but you can stop looking for Aleppo.

3. James Comey: Your publicity coup may have affected the outcome of the election. Or it may not have. But it will certainly breed speculation that it did. Such discussion will in some way serve the reputation of the F.B.I. Or not. You had to bravely contravene bureau protocols to make your contribution, so to you we owe a special thanks!

4. Anthony Weiner:
You also found a surprising way to contribute! Thank you, sir — your act never gets old!

5. Jimmy Fallon: How did you manage to shine a nonthreatening light on someone who alarms so many women, frightens so many undocumented families and slurs so many minorities? Can’t have been easy! Thanks! Maybe now you could have the Grand Wizard on your show: He leans his head to you, you slip his hood off and ruffle his hair. Could be a cute bit!

6. All our media friends. Thank you for preserving reportorial balance. You balanced Donald Trump’s proposal that the military execute the innocent families of terrorists, against Hillary’s emails. You balanced pot-stirring racist lies about President Obama’s birth, against Hillary’s emails. You balanced a religious test at our borders, torture by our military, jokes about assassination, unfounded claims of a rigged election, boasts about groping and paradoxical threats to sue anyone who confirmed the boasts, against Hillary’s emails. You balanced endorsement of nuclear proliferation, against Hillary’s emails. You balanced tirelessly, indefatigably; you balanced, you balanced, and then you balanced some more. And for that — we thank you. And thank you all for following Les Moonves’s principled lead when he said Donald Trump “may not be good for America, but he’s damn good for CBS.”

7. The Electoral College. Thank you, for being you.

I cannot thank: Hillary Clinton. She is not a morally perfect person — her fault! She was not the perfect candidate — her fault! Misogyny may have magnified her failings so as to show them balancing the outsized failings of her opponent — and that might not be her fault. But she fought to the very limits of her ability to deny us Tuesday night’s surprise, so I do not thank her. Pooh on you, Hillary Clinton!

I do thank, lastly:

8. The American electorate. Because in the end, we all did it together. We did it! We really did it!

[From The NYT]

While I agree with everything he said here, more or less, I do think there’s room to nitpick. For one, Jimmy Fallon should not be placed so prominently on this list. Yes, I thought Fallon’s “interview” with Trump was appalling and ridiculous, but Fallon was just one part of a journalist/media/comedy complex that worked furiously to normalize Trump’s rampant fascism. I also have to nitpick with the idea that the American electorate as a whole is flawed. As Samantha Bee so brilliantly said in her post-election monologue, “Don’t try to distance yourselves from the ‘bad apples’ and say, ‘it’s not my fault, I didn’t vote for him! #NotAllWhitePeople.’ If Muslims have to take responsibility for every member of their community, so do we.” Word.

wenn22955766

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

80 Responses to “Ethan Coen offers thank-yous to everyone who made Pres. Trump a reality”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. k says:

    Please. Fallon basically had a puff piece with Hitler.

    • Lahdidahbaby says:

      I have to agree.

    • Lahdidahbaby says:

      Yes, k, absolutely — Fallon is a weak person who needs to please whatever guest is on the show that night. If you want someone to commiserate with on late-night TV, though — try Seth Meyers! Every single night since before the election, and with a vengeance after the election, he eviscerates Trump, and because his bits are both funny and smart, they give you a feeling of comradery as well as some comic relief.

      I firmly believe Seth Meyers is the new Jon Stewart.

    • Erinn says:

      I think Fallon should be fair game.

      He is a kiss ass at best, but he did this for ratings. He knew the ratings would be insane if he got Trump on the show. Fallon is self-serving, and clearly he doesn’t have a standard when it comes to getting views.

      I used to think he was funny. Most of the time now I find him grating and his bits are just stale. There’s a reason people agree to go on his show though – they know it’s going to be the softest of softballs.

      Seth Myers is honestly amazing though. He’s charming, he’s quick, and he’s SMART. He does dumb bits too – but he’s not parading around singing about tight pants and then recycling it with multiple celebs. His video following the election was the one thing that really made me feel a little bit better about things.

  2. jerkface says:

    Very expensive therapists and doctors have been paid a lot of dollars to help people understand you can only control your own actions. Going forward I think you are either a person who wallows in pain or a person who gets up and does something about it. (Or you are the pain. Don’t be the pain)
    So what you gonna do?

  3. Becky says:

    Judging by their work I’ve thought the Coen Bros have always been out there.

    That interview they came across poorly and was probably coming from their experience in HW and white male pov.

  4. jerkface says:

    Also Jimmy Fallon interviews and works with studio people, Mel Gibson, Roman Polanski supporters, Ted Nuggie, and Charlie Sheen. His job is to literally shine a spot light and speak with people just as gross and dangerous to those a round him. It is literally his job to do such things.

    Think pieces aren’t really helping us do what we have to do to get moving. We are pissed. Got it. Now move your azzes. Action, rich Hollywood guy who works with terrible people too. Do something about it.

  5. Radley says:

    He’s semi-woke. We can work with this. Speak out. Take action. Stay mad.

  6. lightpurple says:

    Great letter!

  7. Elaine says:

    Yes, thank you Ethan Coen!

    Except…isn’t he the guy who equated casting POC in his films to casting *aliens*? The non-human, little green men, variety?

    Glass houses, stones, don’t throw, Ethan.

  8. Babs says:

    I don’t get the ire on third-party voters. Political diversity is sane. The dems must think of why they couldn’t rally these voters, not accuse them of their defeat. IMO.

    • pf says:

      No, I agree. How can you blame 3rd party voters when you read shit like 90,000 people in Michigan voted for everything on the ballot except President. They left it blank. That says something. There were voters out there who just did not want to vote for any of the candidates. Frustrating!

    • swak says:

      I don’t get that either when (according to CNN) only 55% of eligible voters voted.

    • jmacky says:

      completely agree. it’s a really exasperating reflex anyone takes when their candidate doesn’t win. the assumption the third party voters need to “get with the program” and vote main party. the assumption is flawed and why the dems and GOP will continue losing that vote. rather than seeing what policies are making people vote “outside the line” and trying to develop a space for those ideas. for example, why did Cornel West endorse Jill Stein and not Hilary Clinton? it’s an uncomfortable question for people, we’re all smarting from last week, but if we want to get stronger against the hate, we need to ask why, listen and grow—not pout.

      additionally, this election has much lower 3rd party voting than estimated. move on from sour grapes and instead self-reflection on why dems or GOP may be losing those votes. low voter turnout, women voting for Trump–these are issues that need more analysis, not blaming 3rd party people who have strong convictions that are not represented in mainstream politics.

      sorry this Coen apology did nothing for me. i love some of their films with a passion. but i also think they cherry pick a form of liberalism that leaves a lot of people out. i agree with the critique of this election as a “whitelash” and think white elites need to open eyes and not pout. there is an aggressively racist violent energy that needs to be radically changed and shutting down alternative voices that push for civil society is exactly the wrong direction.

    • Betsy says:

      In this situation, yes, I do have ire for them, and for the abstainers, too.

      • jmacky says:

        @Betsy i understand but a third party vote is not the same as abstaining. 3rd party are folks who are genuinely not connecting to the policies of our two party system and actively deploying their voice for social change. abstainers are not participating in a citizen duty/right. and in the raw numbers, Clinton did not lose bc of third party numbers.

        a presidential candidate won on a hateful, racist platform. people are genuinely terrified. we have major systematic issues as a nation built on racist ideals.

        we all need to be more active and engaged–and not just at the presidential face off. and it is HARD. i live in a rural county that bled red and i feel like i am in argument every time i go the grocery store or teach. the level of de-programming white privilege feels on par with the civil rights era. but i also don’t think scapegoating third party folks is at all useful. Trump is an unqualified disaster. but both the Dems and GOP have a pretty terrible history and present to answer for—keeping them accountable and not blindly making people acquiesce is NEEDED. and it is done at such a minute level it is NOT the game changer. more like a mouse whisper, which is why third party candidates are disregarded until the results come in and then scapegoated.

        during this election, the civil and sovereign rights of the Lakota people #NoDAPL have been violently abused by the multiple law enforcement jurisdictions and the national guard—with no support from Democratic party (the same folks who love a photo op at Pine Ridge Reservation). a LOT of important issues and peoples rights are lost in the two party game.

      • Anna says:

        As a third party voter who actively campaigned for my candidate, I find it extremely aggravating and frustrating to constantly hear people say things like this. 3rd party votes don’t matter BECAUSE of this attitude. I campaigned and voted for Obama (both times) so I am not opposed to major party voting but I don’t feel like we need to tow the line of the two party system. I have not supported Clinton at any point in her career and Donald Trump is Donald Trump. I wasnt going to just pick the one I thought “sucked less” than the other. If every single person I talked to who didn’t want to vote for Clinton so they voted for Trump simply by default had been encouraged to vote 3rd party he wouldn’t have won. With the exception of the two Trump supporters I know and the one Clinton supporter, EVERYONE I talked to after the election defaulted and voted Republican because “3rd party votes don’t count”.

    • Kate says:

      Agree. The whole point of a democracy is that you vote for who best represents your concerns and interests. The Republicans are turning into an extreme right party, and the Democrats are turning into 80’s Republicans. If those are the only two acceptable options and you have to pick one even though there are parties that better reflect your values, then I wouldn’t call that democracy.

      This wasn’t even a big year for third party candidates. Ross Perot got 18 million votes in 92. All the third party candidates this year barely scraped together 6 million votes combined. If half the Democrats who voted for Obama but skipped this election entirely had come out for Hillary, she’d have won.

  9. pf says:

    If he’s gonna pick on Jimmy Fallon, a Golden Retriever in human form, then he should put blame on Fallon’s BFF Lorne Michaels and SNL, who normalized and legitimized this guy beyond belief. Not only did they let him host the show, but by having so many sketches about him, they turned him into a comedic character when a lot of people at home found nothing to laugh about. This isn’t Alec Baldwin playing Donald Trump, folks! This is real life. Nothing funny about this at all. I hope people stop watching SNL after this week. They should.

    • LAK says:

      SNL didn’t normalise him. He was the punch line. They’ve done the same thing to Sarah Palin and countless other people in previous presidential races. Should they be blamed for *those* people losing their races?!

      • Down and Out says:

        Nope. SNL gave Trump way, way more time than Palin. They invited him to host and be in on the jokes. And while Baldwin’s impression of Trump was great, they have been incredibly weak on criticizing him (see: Weekend Update) and do exactly what Coen lists in his thank you to the media–falsely equate Hillary’s emails with all of the vile sh*t Trump did. Nope nope nope to SNL.

      • pf says:

        Yes, I forgot to mention Weekend Update and whitest person alive Colin Jost who also played a part in all this.

    • Emily says:

      They deserve blame here, too. Looking back, it’s so indicative of everything we’ve been reading about why Trump won. Here are these East Coast Elites (Lorne Michaels) who assume that everyone else is as in on the Donald Trump joke as they are; he’s not a normal/viable candidate, so we’ll let him host and have all this free publicity (and get tons of people to watch the show) because there is literally no way the rest of America doesn’t realize what a joke this guy is. But…way too many people didn’t think it was a joke!

  10. Diana B says:

    I would like for someone to guide me through some doubts I have about the media coverage of the election. I read here all the time that the media did not fulfill its duty when covering the orange one and was biased toward him. Then I go into comment sections at the New York Times, The New York Post, Buzzfeed and The Huffington Post and it’s like I’m on bizzarro world because everyone says that the media was biased toward Hillary and that’s the reason all the closetted racist went out and voted for the orange one. I feel like I’m in the middle of the
    Upside down!

    • Betsy says:

      Coen is right. The media, in not wanting to be called biased for Democrats, bent over backwards to be biased for Trump. He barely got called on anything and the investigative journalism was totally lacking.

    • Decapoda says:

      The bias for Hillary comes from the Democratic primaries. The media, and the NYT in particular, did everything it could to sink Bernie Sanders by either not mentioning him at all or portraying him as some fringe commie whack job with no political experience. I stopped subscribing to the NYT because of its horrible behavior.

      • Betsy says:

        It really didn’t. It’s time to stop with this nonsense .

      • Veronica says:

        I really don’t understand the Bernie martyr complex. I’m an independent who spent most of the primary thinking I’d never seen a candidate with as good PR as Bernie had. He was barely pressed on some of his more ambiguously outlined issues while Hillary had an uphill battle from the start.

      • Jess says:

        @Veronica

        What “uphill battle” did Hillary face in the primary? She had Obama’s endorsement and was the presumptive nominee until Sanders showed up with virtually no name recognition and decided to run. & in the beginning, there was no indication that he would be anything more than an entertaining news bit that might drive Clinton to the left. Of course, the DNC always assumed that she would ultimately be the candidate and did everything in their power to make that happen so I’m not really seeing the “uphill battle” here.

  11. QQ says:

    This is all I have for this guy, hisPost, Jimmy Fallon, Pin Allies, the Electoral College, the *sswaffle president elect (not mine) his wife his daughter his *ssmouth serial killers looking sons, The christian ayatollah Pence and Any Dem seating in house or senate “waiting and seeing and hoping” and not obstructing at every turn for the next 4 years, and non voters, and third partiers in FL and craven latinos that think they are white (Im looking at Cubans in Miami, glaring even!), those Black voters who boldly went “im a respectable negro” on us 🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾🖕🏾

    I still am mad

    I still dont wanna hear sh!t, I’m halfway to hoping this whole sh!t collapses and careens off the rails for the instructiveness of it all… if not for the fact that us, and them (muslims, immigrants, black people, sick people in need of insurance services, lgbt people, poor people), the existing footstools of this country are gonna be the first line of affected humanity behind this disaster

    • Shambles says:

      ❤️

    • Down and Out says:

      Please keep speaking out & vocalizing your anger. Your voice is badly needed. I’m tired of post-election think pieces from white people trying to make themselves feel better.

    • Sadezilla says:

      This is what I want to try to make the whitelash people understand. It’s going to be an uphill battle (understatement) to get them to understand (or care) that they just massively f*cked over people who are way more vulnerable than them in exchange for a set of empty promises that can’t be delivered, even under Republican control of House and Senate. There’s going to be a lot of fighting the good fight required for the foreseeable future.

      QQ, I’m not sure what to say other than I’m sorry and thanks for speaking out.

    • jmacky says:

      beautifully said.

    • Nev says:

      WOOOOOOOORD.

    • Lahdidahbaby says:

      Brava, QQ! One of the best and most stirring summaries of the current electoral horseshit I’ve seen anywhere.

      Don’t leave. Never leave.

  12. Nancy says:

    He should thank as well all of the imbeciles who decided not to vote. This race wasn’t even supposed to be close. Thank you pollsters, you suck. CNN, Fox and all he cable shows for making this about ratings as opposed to our democracy. He’s right, Fallon is a biased joke that isn’t funny. Kimmel king of the Jimmies

  13. robyn says:

    Yes he definitely should have included the pollsters and the media that hyped it as truth. It created a false sense of security for the Democratic campaign as well as the electorate. Trump knew better, bless his dark macho racist sexist heart.

  14. LinaLamont says:

    “Don’t try to distance yourselves from the ‘bad apples’ and say, ‘it’s not my fault, I didn’t vote for him! #NotAllWhitePeople.’ If Muslims have to take responsibility for every member of their community, so do we.”

    That’s fine, except that, it’s the Trump supporters who believe “Muslims have to take responsibility for every member of their community”, NOT those of us who voted against Trump and his hate.

    That’s a specious argument that Samantha Bee is putting forth.

    • Amy Tennant says:

      Thank you. I agree completely. Of course not all Muslims have to take responsibility for every member of their community. If Samantha Bee wants to place blame on herself for the election of a person for whom I did not vote and against whom I campaigned, she can, but I reject the blame she places on me. Do not speak for me, Coen. I’m traumatized enough. I will not flog myself. My conscience is clear, and I will continue to work for the good.

      • LinaLamont says:

        Don’t get me wrong, I agree with most of what Coen says here.
        It’s SBee I have a problem with. I believe Muslims have to take responsibility for speaking out (or, not) about their rotten apples, as do all of us about our own….all races, religions, genders. 
        “ A person may cause evil to others not only by his actions but by his inaction, and in either case he is justly accountable to them for the injury.”
        -John Stuart Mill

  15. Sixer says:

    “Fallon was just one part of a journalist/media/comedy complex that worked furiously to normalize Trump’s rampant fascism.”

    I effing love you, Kaiser.

    I really agree with his number 6. The BBC does a similar thing obsessing over balance. And it means that extremism is never presented as what it is: extremism.

    It’s like, “Thank you, Galileo, for explaining to us that the Earth orbits the Sun. And now, for balance, we will hear from a man who would like to burn you at the stake for saying it.”

    This. Is. Not. Balance.

    • Macscore says:

      ^This. Absolutely! Thank you Sixer. And Kaiser, of course.

      I’m still so pissed off. I’ve spent the day defending my page on FB against a couple of “acquaintances” who tell _me_ what to say on _my_ frigging page. One of them, in a bizarre and truly disgusting twist, even wrote that “if Trump were half as bad as you [i.e. me] are making out, you would all be in the gas chambers by now.” WTF?! [That clunk-whoosh sound is the sound of the airlock door being firmly locked as the woman who wrote that is shot into orbit. Permanently.]

    • Adele Dazeem says:

      Bahahah love this sixer. Funny and spot on!

    • Tina says:

      I may be opening myself up here, but I do think the BBC does a good job of being balanced on one topic – Israel/Palestine. There always seem to be roughly equal numbers of people complaining that they’re too biased in favour of either side.

      • Sixer says:

        Perfect example! I think balance works reasonably well at Auntie UNTIL she comes up against extremism in the domestic sphere. That’s when her obsession with it goes Pete Tong.

        In the usual state of affairs, righties say it’s a disgraceful hotbed of liberal handwringing and lefties say it’s an establishment suck-up.

        I actually call that successful balance! Unfortunately, we’re not in the usual state of affairs, you know?

      • Sixer says:

        Tina – this is Sam Kriss on the BBC Marr interview with le Pen. What do you think? Normalising fascism? Or unfairly harsh? And how does something like this compare with the US media’s initial reaction to Trump, which was to hold him up to ridicule at the time, but now looks a lot more like giving him free publicity?

        http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/marine-le-pen-andrew-marr-show-sam-kriss

      • Tina says:

        @Sixer, I think that it was a bit of a softball interview, but I am more inclined to blame Marr for that than the BBC. Paxman would have kept going. And with Trump, I do think that the US media gave him a bit of a pass at the beginning (CNN running his rallies in full) but I think there is far too much made of this. His supporters knew that he lied and didn’t care. They knew about his opinions on women, LGBTQ people etc and didn’t care. It’s not like they will all wake up and realise the truth which the mainstream media didn’t tell them. They already know it.

      • Sixer says:

        I’m still struggling to form a fixed opinion really on the general principles within the context we suddenly find ourselves in. I don’t agree with no-platforming at all but there’s a difference between no-platforming and normalising the inexcusable. Fascism is, and always will be, inexcusable. You wouldn’t put a self-confessed murderer or rapist on TV and let them justify their murders or rapes in a comfortable setting, would you?

        Can happily say that I think Marr is, and always has been, utterly useless and emblematic of the comfortable establishment criticisms of Auntie. Andrew Neil would at least have prepared!

        ETA: Newsnight last night was very good on Bannon, FWIW.

      • Tina says:

        I agree that fascism is inexcusable, but people on both sides have some unsavory friends, i.e. Corbyn and his Stalinist and anti-Semitic supporters. And as much as I despise Bannon and his ilk (I didn’t see Newsnight) I think we need to confront the reality of what the voters are saying. Over 52 million Americans voted for Trump. I think the left, and elites in general, are far too eager to dismiss concerns over immigration as “racist,” and that’s dangerous. Because what it results in is situations like this, where people continue to believe what they believe, and vote accordingly, but don’t talk about it openly. It’s better to confront it, say “this is inexcusable, and here’s why” rather than not to engage at all.

      • Sixer says:

        I think everybody’s urge is to over-simplify according to their own set of priorities (and biases) though, don’t you? (I take on board serious concerns about Russia and British hard left).

        The picture is complicated, not least because every voter manages their own, usually complex, identity.

        Here’s my problem with your analysis: it is racist if it is framed in a racist way. Economic concerns are being presented as the preserve of poor white people. That’s racist, you know? Also, a proportion of those poor white people are voting for racist reasons not economic reasons. They have no right for this to appeased or massaged away – it’s just as damaging because it confirms their prejudice.

        I’m not even going to try to go beyond Rust Belt deprivation to justify a vote for Trump – presumptuous of me, probably, if I did. But I certainly think there were plenty of honourable reasons to vote Brexit and wasn’t so far from some of them myself. I voted remain, as I’ve said many times, a) for stability and b) against racism and xenophobia. The latter reason is seeming more and more important of late!

        Anyway – here’s some data and commentary on social attitudes trumping (pardon the pun) economic anxiety. From, of course, that lefty perspective. 😉

        http://classonline.org.uk/blog/item/immigration-and-brexit-and-trump-its-more-about-social-attitudes-than-socia

      • Tina says:

        Sixer, thanks for that article, it was very interesting and well set out. And I can’t say I disagree with any of it. There are elements of racism in both votes, and it is facile to say that only white working class people voted for either Brexit or Trump, and/or did so purely for economic reasons. But I suppose my question is, well, what now? It takes us back to the issue of whether we should engage with these ideas or simply shut them down as beyond the pale. I think we have to do the former, because too many people are either overtly or tacitly supporting them for us to do anything else.

      • Sixer says:

        I don’t know the answer at all. I think we are in uncharted waters in terms of the postwar consensus in collapse all around us.

        I suppose I think opposing fascism trumps (pardon the pun again) everything. I think we’ve got to stop thinking about whether the centre left or the centre right is the answer to our problems. Centre right and centre left should be working together. Opposing the fash is the only game in town. But opposing the fash doesn’t mean that economic anxiety isn’t a thing: it just means that WHITE economic anxiety isn’t a SPECIAL thing.

    • Emily says:

      My mother in law posted something on facebook and I was trying to come up with an example of how her pleading that we consider all sides of an issue and consult multiple sources was just a stupid thing to say…your Gallileo example works pretty well. No, some things are just dumb and wrong, and I’m not going to waste my time trying to get a balanced view point because there isn’t one.

    • I Choose Me says:

      A-freaking-men!

  16. Frosty says:

    He’s blaming James Comey? Comey had ended the matter until the investigation of anthony Weiner got it reopened. don’t get it twisted ethan, place blame where it belongs – Weiner, Huma and Hillary – victims of their own hubris. It wasn’t Comey who was sloppy and negligent and then tried to play it all off as though it a US secretary of State using high insecure email to discuss matters of state was not something to be worried about. (and when all else fails, blame the Russians!)

    sheesh, this guy really needs to step outside his showbiz bubble. I imagine his awakening to the public’s overwhelming rejection of the neoliberal drift of the democratic party will be limited to snide auteur crap movie depicting hateful formerly employed blue collar workers. Clue train, Ethan: these people were the democrat base. Had they not been kicked to the curb by clintonism they might still have been.

  17. Sally says:

    ‘#NotAllWhitePeople’ except not ALL white people voted for him and a fairly large number of Hispanics DID, oh and some Black people too but you know…

    • WTF says:

      No. Don’t put us into that group. 92% of Black people voted against Trump. And a majority of White voters did in fact vote for Trump. I don’t think that every White person (especially those that voted against him) should take the blame for Trump’s presidency, but if we are talking about what demographic got him elected, that was White people.

  18. Rhiley says:

    Does anyone else like the electoral college? Doesn’t it keep a bunch of people with money putting their money into selected cities throughout the United States to promote their political agendas? I think it does its job and helps to represented the under-represented. Instead of going after the electoral college we should go after voter ID laws. Those went into place in Wisconsin thanks to Walker, and it is starting to look like they had an affect on the election.

  19. prince says:

    oh please. all u Hollywood elites are so full of urselves. they behave like they are curing cancer or something. u make movies for a living. get off u high horse. u have no opinion in this matter. go home to ur millions of dollars and ur huge mansions. the hard working middle class have spoken and they elected trump so deal with it.

  20. Laura says:

    Love it!

  21. Aud says:

    Ugh. Is “hard working middle class” the new term for “racists and misogamists?” Please.

    But I absolutely DO blame the third party voters. In this particular election it was pointed out over and over that there was no room for error. We needed all sane and reasonable people to vote for HRC. I also blame the abstainers. I blame the idiots who swallowed the bullshit the GOP has been spewing for decades.

    Oh yes, I’m taking action too. Volunteering and donating. But I’m pissed as fuck and I’ll blame as long as I damn well feel like it.

    • Jessica says:

      I blame the third party voters too. In some states Hillary lost by such a small number of votes. Oh what could’ve happened if people hadn’t been so stubborn and threw away their votes on Johnson and Stein.

  22. Marianne says:

    I still dont get why people are angry with Fallon. He is not and never has been a “serious” journalist. He does fluff interviews and plays silly games. That’s his schtick.

    • genevieve says:

      Because he made Trump seem harmless, normal. That’s not ok. He could have, you know, just not had Trump on his show.

    • Kate says:

      Exactly. So maybe he should have said no to interviewing a KKK endorsed racist instead of having a fun little chat with him.

  23. Sasha says:

    He forgot to thank Julian Assange. Other than that, I have no problem with this letter.

  24. Catherine says:

    What Mr Coen wrote is right, smack on point!
    Jimmy Fallon does deserve to be on that list, Kaiser, because he is a huge, brown-nosing butt-kiss. He looks like a dummy, literally, a puppet, a marionette.
    And, Kaiser, I live in Europe. Most muslims here do NOT take responsibility for their other members. Even the poor refugees are being supported here by the Catholic church and our Christian government, although there is an enormous Muslim population. I don’t see their organizations taking in refugees. I’m a white person who is taking responsibility for Trump. I voted against him, and now I am protesting, speaking out, like I did all along. This piece puts some blame on people of power who didn’t do that, like Jimmy Fallon, who found it more important to keep Trump on his good side, just in case he won. Ahh, makes me a little sick.

  25. Anare says:

    I disagree with Samantha Bee. I don’t hold hold all Muslims accountable for terrorist Muslims. I refuse to be held accountable for this mess of a Donald Trump presidency.

    Ethan Coen is dead on. Ruefully funny bit. I can’t laugh due to the bitter taste still in my mouth.

  26. Sarah says:

    well, gee! It makes so much sense that he would be blaming third party voters! I mean, I understand why he wouldn’t think thank the DNC for all their hard work to push such a great cantidate such as Hillary Clinton into the running! Since he forgot to thank the DNC, I will do it for him. Thanks, DNC for pushing out Bernie sanders! Thanks for doing everything it took to push Hillary Clinton into the running! That worked out great. While I’m at it, thanks to our political system that offeres us two awesome alternatives and successfully marginalizes other options. That is also working out wonderfully. I really like the technique of making people feel bad for voting third party year after year so there is someone to blame when things don’t work out. Smart.