Michelle Obama graces the cover of Time magazine this week, and she gives them a really long interview. She’s not breaking any news, and as far as I see, the piece is mainly about how quickly Michelle’s image has jumped from the “angry black woman” caricature to today’s public perception of a groundbreaking First Lady that even many conservatives are moony over. The New York Times ran a similar story last month, making the story about how Michelle and her staff guard her image.
Time’s interview seems to glorify the fact that Michelle’s current image is apolitical. This is probably based on polling – more Americans prefer a First Lady who seems at home with children, entertaining, and doing work that isn’t controversial in any way:
[Michelle] admits that the sheer symbolic power of the role is perhaps greater than she anticipated. “I tried not to come into this with too many expectations one way or the other,” she says on a sunny May afternoon in her East Wing office.
“I felt like part of my job — and I still feel like that — is to be open to where this needs to go.”
She’s always shown a shrewd eye for the strategic detour, suspending her career in favor of helping her husband get elected, then getting her daughters settled and her garden planted and, in the process, disarming the critics who cast her as a black radical in a designer dress.
She will say she’s just doing what comes naturally. But whether by accident or design, or a little of both, she has arrived at a place where her very power is magnified by her apparent lack of interest in it.
“Over the years, the role of First Lady has been perceived as largely symbolic,” Hillary Clinton observed in her memoirs. “She is expected to represent an ideal — and largely mythical — concept of American womanhood.”
That was not Clinton’s favorite part of the job. Maybe this is Michelle’s true advantage: she appears at peace, even relieved, that her power is symbolic rather than institutional. It makes her less threatening, and more potent at the same time — especially since her presence at the White House has unique significance.
[From Time]
The majority of the Time cover piece is the interview with Michelle, but they do get some interesting quotes from President Obama. He tells Time: “Among the many wonderful things about being President… the best is that I get to live above the office and see Michelle and the kids every day. I see them in the morning. We have dinner every night. It is the thing that sustains me.” President Obama also tells Time that he makes sure he gets to have some “Michelle time” during the day, just work breaks where he stops in the White House residence to chat about their days. I’ve pulled some selected quotes from Michelle’s interview – I love her, but she can talk anyone’s ear off. Don’t get me wrong, she’s very eloquent, but she’s very… verbose:
“[As] I grew up and came to work in those places, right, and got to know them, I realized that the misunderstanding or the disconnect goes both ways; that folks outside of these communities have no idea what goes on within these institutions, and sometimes the people in the institutions have no real understanding of the people who live outside. You know, everybody is dealing in these misperceptions about one another because there is no bridge.”
“And I just feel like through the small things that we can do here at the White House, we can start exemplifying the importance of building those bridges, in real meaningful ways, so that when you come … when young people come here, they don’t have to come here and be something they’re not; they can come here and be who they are, and the folks here will listen. And we can go out and be ourselves and listen in their communities, as well.”
“I had this vision when … as we were going through the campaign and you started thinking about, okay, what if my husband wins and I’m the First Lady, what are the kind of things that I’d like to do? And you always get that question … or, I got that question a lot over the course of the campaign. But one of the things that I thought was, well, how powerful would it be for young girls to come into this space and hear from other really powerful, impressive, dynamic women, and to have that conversation go on here in the White House?”
“And as we sort of started thinking through the event and thinking about how I wanted to relate to the D.C. community, as well, I always thought whenever we invited somebody in, I wanted to go out to their space, too. I wanted that to be a mutual exchange; that it’s not just people coming here where I live, but it’s me going out to where they live.”
“So we’ve tried to do that in almost every event that we’ve done from, you know, the White House Kitchen Garden to whenever we go to a school and read to kids. Either their teachers or the kids will be invited back here very soon. That’s sort of a theme.”
“So the event started coming together. And it came off so beautifully. I think it was … it’s one of those events that stand out in my mind as, this is why I’m here … to help make this possible and to see the faces on those girls as they entered the East Room in all its glory, and to be sitting around these tables with women they saw on TV, or saw on the news, and to have them having real conversations. Alicia Keyes, who’s the idol of every single girl under 30, probably, when she came in, she literally walked around to every single table, because everybody is still a little sort of … I’m in the White House, let me behave, I can’t get up.”
“It’s rare [for most families] to have dad at home for dinner, to see him in the mornings, to have him there when you go to bed at night, just to be able to have the casual conversations that happen about life at dinnertime… That’s been terrific. It’s normal. It’s more normal than we’ve had for a very long time.”
[From Time]
I’ve said it before, but I don’t think this is really who Michelle is. Yes, I’m sure she’s at peace with this apolitical image, but she’s a lawyer, a professional woman, and highly educated woman. I find it hard to believe that this current image of Michelle as “apolitical wife and mother” is the last we’ll see. Even if she keeps her political thoughts and advice between her and President Obama, something’s got to give. For now, though, I’m happy the majority of the American public has embraced Michelle. My only hope is that they’ll still embrace her when they figure out she’s just as smart as her husband – maybe even more so.
Michelle Obama is shown on 5/18/09 at a ribbon cutting ceremony at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Credit: WENN.com
She’s someone I’d like to have a real conversation with–so hard to know who she really is. But her personal accomplishments are impressive… and those are some killer eyebrows.
so you cant be as smart as your husband if you are “just” a wife and mother?
Kaiser, that is precisely the point Time was making: that she actually wields a lot of power because on the outside, she seems as though she’s largely apolotical and seeking compromises, not power.
She uses understatement as a lever, which I find a very intelligent thing to do when she could easily let her emotions and passions for political themes get the better of her. Less is truly more with Michelle. I think she rocks and doesn’t at all come across as a mere symbol.
I think she’s just enjoying the break. I’m a very ambitious, very well educated woman myself, but sometimes it is nice just to have a vacation, a break from it all and to do things you didn’t really have time to do before when you were working hard.
It doesn’t sound to me that she plans on doing this for the rest of her life since she was mentioning about ‘taking turns’. To her this is a break from her high powered career to spend more family time and do other things that she might have wanted to do but never found the time.
I mean really, she hasn’t been at the White House THAT long yet. She’s still finding her niche and exploring things and she looks like she’s having alot of fun.
To stir the embers of the “classic beauty” argument again… You certainly cropped the header picture to “highlight her strengths”(to put it nicely). Although I would like to see her soften her eyebrows, she’s prettier on the side of her face where her bangs cover the harsh plucking.
Good morning, All: Kaiser, why can’t this side of her be real and believable? We are all complex individuals, with many facets to us. I believe Mrs. Obama has allowed us to glimpse a very personal side of her, but only one of many. It is possible, as an educated, ambitious, intelligent woman, to enjoy simple “domesticity”. As a paralegal and administrator for a high-powered law firm, I take particular delight in patio gardening, crocheting, cooking and cleaning my apartment. Does that mean I can’t be powerful and assertive at work, also? No. Kaiser, I think you’re wrong on this one.
What strikes me as funny (and I apologize if I’m reiterating anothers’ point) is that America speaks of equal rights and women in the workplace, but you have a strong, assertive woman and she’s an “Angry Black Woman” a “Bitch” if you will.
So what do you prefer? You prefer a nice little homemaker, a devoted wife, a gardener (and all valid..don’t get me wrong) but then you outcry the fact that women get paid 75 cents on the dollar for a man?
Ahh this nation makes my head spin….
But I do see Hanh’s point. That could possible be it as well.
I’m glad Michelle Obama is a talker and in tune with the public unlike some First Lady’s. She reminds of Princess Diana with her caring attitude.
Wow! Great cover shot. She looks fabulous. A+ Michelle.
A little too much glimmer on her shins in the other photos though.
Totally OT: What is up with her hair in the header pic? Do they use hairspray to get that much volume to it??! She would be so much prettier without that style
Hanh, i think that’s a load of new age mumbo jumbo. men don’t get the luxury of “taking time off” and “finding themselves”. i think she’s doing a great disservice to women everywhere by laying low. she should be the “angry black woman” she is *rolls eyes at that lame statement*.
just like hillary clinton didn’t back down when everyone was criticizing her for being a ball buster and whatever and what not… i think each individual female has an obligation to consider the consequences of her decisions on women’s plight as a whole.. .to a certain degree at least… and Mrs Obama, being that she is the first lady, probably has more of an obligation than the average female… i really do hope she sets a good exacple… something bigger and better than her fashion choices and her gardening initiatives.
in my field, there are very few women… about 20% to be exact… and i think we’re sorely in need of more female involvement in more diverse and traditionally male dominated roles BADLY!
All the women I know who stay home with their kids, garden, cook, laugh, etc are all extremely intelligent women who know how to have great conversations and be many different things. Why does our culture insist that homemaker-intellectual be mutually exclusive? It doesn’t make any sense.
what is all that intelligence good for if all you’re using it to do is clean poopy diapers?
I am glad she realises that she can’t please them all. She is intelligent so whatever she chooses, she will do it with her brains. Insisting on having an active career while first lady is counterproductive, sometimes we have to compromise even if it kills us. The trick is to make peace with our compromises. You can’t please them all.
@ChristinaT – the answer lies in the fact that you aren’t only changing poopy diapers, you are raising people. And that takes a hell of a lot of intelligence…
Four kids and a PhD…that’s me
Wow, Christina…ouch.
If you really think that’s all we’re doing and all we’re good for…just wow.
i feel sad for credentialed women who don’t put it to good use. there are so many fields out there that are dying for female input and female presence. it would just be nice if women were as ambitious as men. without a considerable presence in these fields, every generation feels like they have to push themselves in all over again. the fact that women are content with raising other people into greatness saddens me…
The fact that some people don’t value the importance of raising children, of forming intimate, secure, meaningful relationships with the little people they care for and who are the future…that saddens me.
So, we will have to agree to disagree.
And, dude – have you ever had to deal with a five year old and a two year old 24/7… it requires a LOT of head-work. Every mother I know says going back to work is so much easier than staying at home with the kids – there’s just no question about it.
I think we’re missing the real point of an education. No matter what you do with your education it’s still important to have it. Educated mothers will hopefully educate their children. If a highly educated man or woman decides to stay home and watch the kids and they can financially do so then more power to them.
It’s a shame we women are the hardest on each other. Highly educated women who choose to stay at home are just as worthy as lesser educated women who stay at home. Working moms and stay at home moms both work hard and are doing for their children. Maybe Michelle Obama can help unite us. This blog is supposed to be about her not a slugfest between women tearing each other down. Guys don’t do this to each other.