Stephen Colbert is doing better these days. He’s certainly doing better right now than he was the last time he was on the cover of The Hollywood Reporter, which was last summer. That was when Colbert was barely 11 months into hosting The Late Show, his ratings had plummeted and there were widespread rumors that he would be pushed out within the year. Colbert spent the last half of 2016 leaning into political coverage and political comedy, plus they brought in some new people (like a new showrunner) and suddenly The Late Show is beating the Tonight Show on a regular basis. So is this THR cover a victory lap? Not really, but you can tell that Colbert feels somewhat vindicated, and he feels like he’s found his voice on The Late Show at long last. You can read the full piece here. Some highlights:
His live coverage on Election Night: “We had a framework for four different shows that night: Hillary wins, and we know it; looks like Hillary’s going to win, but we don’t know it; Trump wins, possibly, but it’ll be a long time before we know because the path is so narrow and Alaska is going to have to come in and who knows. Then the fourth one is that Trump wins, and we know it. We just said: “Well, don’t even write that fourth one. Because I’m not saying it can’t happen, but let’s just say if it does happen, I’m going to be speaking to an audience that are like villagers who’ve been dragged into the soccer stadium in Chile to watch people be executed.” It’s going to be the darkest room you could possibly [imagine]. And I said (knocks on his desk), “Knock on wood we won’t have to do that.” I said, “Look, man, we’re really going to be in trouble if he wins, because we have no plan, and then we will be forced to just be raw. We’ll find out who the f— we are.”
What election night felt like: “The election felt a little bit like somebody dying because you suddenly have an unreal feeling. It’s unreal and yet absolutely as real as possible at the same time. You feel very raw and very base, very awake and dreaming at the same time. We’re about 20 minutes into the show — we did an [80-minute] show — and there’s an hour more with no material, and I’m just talking to people who are catnip to trolls because they’re seeing us publicly upset. We had no commercial breaks. I’m like, “I’ll just start talking and see what happens.” And Chris and I were like, “OK, so that’s the show now. The show is me absolutely not hiding at all how I feel about this and just raw.” That was what that night was for us. I wouldn’t wish it on anybody. (Laughs.) Hardest f—ing thing I ever did.
He doesn’t owe Donald Trump a thank-you note: “No. I would trade good ratings for a better president. How about that? The interesting thing is that when we were prepping all that time, we weren’t waiting for Donald Trump. We were waiting for something that everybody cared about. Do you know what I mean? Donald Trump is epoch-making; he changes everything. And so we were ready for something that galvanized people’s attention and changed their priorities. The thank-you note is to my staff for being ready — that’s the thank-you note. Because if it’s not Donald Trump, it’s something else. There will be something else that we care about, hopefully happy, possibly tragic. But we’re ready to talk about what just happened, whenever it happens now. And that’s what we’ve learned. And so my thank-you note is not to Donald Trump. He can go with God.
His thoughts on what will happen to Bill O’Reilly: “I haven’t the slightest idea. I spoke about it on the show [only] because Trump weighed in, because I really have zero interest in talking about Bill O’Reilly. I did more than my share of that over the years. I enjoy having Bill on the show and listening to him, with his own particular professional form of bloviating. I mean, he’s really good at it. I’ve got to admire it as a broadcaster — the words keep coming out. But if Trump hadn’t weighed in, I would never have said a word. I have been absolutely monastic in my discipline not to talk about him since I got here because I really don’t care that much.
Sometimes I forget that Colbert is a Southern boy at heart and then he says something like “He can go with God.” That’s so Southern! I would probably say it as, “He needs to have a relationship with Jesus” or maybe “bless his baby heart.” Those are all Southernisms for “Donald Trump can go f–k himself.” As for the rest of it… I like what he says about exposing the raw emotion and just letting that be the thing, the voice of his comedy. I also love this: “I would trade good ratings for a better president.” Yep. As much as I love what SNL is doing these days, I would much rather have a good president and a crappy SNL. I would be willing to jettison Stephen Colbert and every other late night host for another eight years of Barack Obama.
PS… Colbert did this interview more than a week ago, before O’Reilly was fired yesterday. Colbert did a bit about it last night on his show:
Photos courtesy of The Hollywood Reporter.
Stephen Colbert is one of my favorites. Smart and funny. And when he’s serious, he can preach.
THIS, so much. His show is what makes all this insanity a bit more bearable.
That video was fantastic. Glad to see Colbert making waves. Fallon is fine but so bland. I like my late night with a bit of guts!
I was ambivalent about Fallon until that time he had Trump on his show and ruffled his “hair”. Colber forevah!
I just love Colbert, so glad he is getting the recognition he deserves.
Right now we need as many smart people on TV as we can get. May family loves Colbert and has for years. As an English professor, I see him as the heir to all the great satirists from Swift to Mark Twain. I am also fond of Fallon; it’s the proverbial “apples and oranges” comparison. For CBS, Colbert followed by the broader hijinks of Corden is a great combination.
Stephen is a thinking person’s late night host. I see him throw in the big fluffy hat and a few silly bits for mass appeal, but his razor wit sets him apart for the Fallons and the Kimmels.
I’m also loving a closer look with Seth Myers, who is doing a great job, and Jon Oliver of course, but I’d burn them all in a pit of Wildfire for Obama to be back, and I’m British…
He was always going to perform best when allowed to do political comedy. I don’t know why they didn’t let him lean into it hard right from the beginning. Although I never thought the show was bad. Letterman certainly wasn’t all that inspired in my opinion.
Colbert and Meyers are like band aids. They make it a little more bearable.
I love him so much.
I was just about to write JUST that. 🙂
It’s a shame that this Golden Era for political comedy is coming at the expense of the presidential era of Golden Showers….
And a shout-out for Samantha Bee, who has been killing it dead and punting it’s sorry carcass across the room.
At this point, I would trade a kidney and half my liver for a better president.
‘He can go with God.’ – I thought this meant he can die. Like, he’ll can die and meet God ?
I took it more to mean that God will be the ultimate one in judgment of Donald Trump. Colbert is responding to the concept that he owes Trump a thank you, that somehow Colbert can look at Trump and determine whether there is value in anything Trump has done. Colbert is saying that he has nothing to say about Trump and he should look to God for His judgment on his actions.
For what it’s worth, Colbert is a devout Catholic so I would I tend to err on the side of this having a more religious overtone of encouraging Trump to become right with God/informing Trump that God is the ultimate judge of his actions (or merely stating Colbert’s own opinion without regard to Trump), rather than a mean spirited statement about wishing Trump dead.
What a thoughtful, intelligent comment. Well said.