In this week’s Time Magazine, Angelina Jolie wrote an impassioned plea for Darfur. Her plea seems aimed at three specific groups: the United Nations Security Council, the media, and the average, everyday concerned citizen. The crux of Jolie’s argument was directed towards the Security Council, who heard a report this past Friday from the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Luis Moreno-Ocampo. Several months ago, the ICC came back with an indictment of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir, but the ICC can only enforce the arrest warrant with military/police action from the UN Security Council. As long as the warrant cannot be served, al-Bashir remains in Khartoum, ordering the slaughter of not only his own people, but now the aid workers who are trying to provide help to Sudanese refugees. Here’s is Angelina’s Time piece, in full:

Friday is a defining moment in the history of justice. The members of the United Nations Security Council will be presented with the results of the International Criminal Court’s Darfur investigation — an investigation that they requested. Their response will determine whether there is going to be an international standard of justice that holds perpetrators accountable for the worst crimes in the world.

The evidence the prosecutor has presented is clear and compelling. Millions of people have been displaced; hundreds of thousands have been killed; and at the center of it all stands Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir, who has been indicted on seven counts of war crimes and five counts of crimes against humanity.

Bashir’s response to the indictments was an insult to the international community and the hundreds of thousands who have died in Darfur. He kicked out of his country 16 international aid groups who were desperately trying to save his citizens. He even appointed one of the suspects, Ahmed Haroun, to a committee supposedly investigating human-rights abuses in Darfur. You’ll struggle to find a better illustration of the culture of impunity that reigns in Khartoum.

Darfur has almost disappeared from the news, and experts now call it a “low-intensity” conflict. But the intensity of the crisis has not lessened for those who are struggling to survive. More than 250,000 people from Darfur have lived destitute lives in refugee camps in Chad for six years now. Camps with more than 2 million internally displaced persons inside Darfur are even worse. Thirty percent of those displaced are school-age children. Girls leaving the camps are raped; boys leaving the camps are killed. They want an education; they want to go back to their villages, to their land; they want peace. But they also want justice.

I first went to Chad to visit refugees from Darfur in 2004. On that trip — more than five years ago — the refugees I met told me that the government was organizing the violence. About a year later, the international community came to the same conclusion. Some began to call the violence “mass atrocities.” Others ramped up the rhetoric and called it “crimes against humanity.” Nothing changed, so as the death toll mounted, activists pushed the Bush Administration to label it “genocide” — hoping somehow that term would arouse fear and horror.

But none of those words compelled us to intervene.

Today the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court will stand in front of the U.N. Security Council. With painstaking detail he will report that Omar al-Bashir — a man who should protect his citizens — has attacked Darfuris relentlessly and methodically for five years and continues to do so.

According to the U.N. Charter, the Security Council exists “to promote the establishment and maintenance of international peace and security.” If the results of the Darfur investigation, which they ordered, don’t merit their active engagement, what does?
Today the Security Council member states will be faced with a simple decision: to embrace impunity or to end it.

As they are considering Bashir’s fate they are also considering their own.

[From Time]

Jolie’s article is well-written, but it is more in the vein of “please do anything, please for the love of God stop the killing.” Which I suppose is better than nothing – it’s not as if anyone has any better idea. For the most part, most people who care about the millions of Sudanese refugees and the hundreds of thousands of murdered Darfurians are merely trying to keep the subject in the press at this point. Recently, George Clooney and Mia Farrow have both been doing the media rounds, as well as physically taking the press to the camps and forcing the media to cover it. Mia also did a hunger strike, but had to stop short of her goal – Richard Branson completed it for her. Clooney even got a meeting with President Obama and Vice President Biden to discuss Darfur, but that seems to be one of the few publicly-acknowledged conversation this administration has had about Sudan. Just Friday, as Moreno-Ocampo presented his case before the Security Council, Obama tried to dodge Darfur questions while in Dresden, just before his tour of the Buchenwald concentration camp.