Megyn Kelly interviewed three of Trump’s accusers & Megyn didn’t bungle it

SFFILM Awards Night

Have you noticed that as soon as Matt Lauer was pushed out of NBC, the rumormongering around Megyn Kelly kind of faded out? It was no secret that Lauer didn’t like Megyn Kelly that much, and that he was not doing anything to help her. I would argue that, knowing what we know now, he probably tried to lock Megyn in his rape dungeon and she rejected him outright. That doesn’t mean that suddenly we have to like Megyn Kelly, by the way. I still think she’s a vapid Foxbot and I still think she sucks, in general. But I’m also hoping that she grows into her position and actually learns how to be an effective morning-show host because, sh-t, we’re stuck with her for now. So what do you think of this: Megyn Kelly interviewed three women accusing Donald Trump of assault/harassment on Monday’s show?

There were several moments where it felt like Megyn was encouraging the women to second-guess their actions and Trump’s actions. But generally speaking, this was not the absolute worst. I actually hate-respect Megyn for using this moment and platform to spend more time talking about how the #NOTMYPRESIDENT of the United States has been accused of repeatedly assaulting and harassing 16 women that we know about. Here’s more about the interviews:

As the #MeToo movement continues to gain traction and fell powerful men across the country, the over-20 allegations of sexual misconduct against President Trump have resurfaced. Last week, former Fox News anchor Juliet Huddy claimed the president tried to kiss her in an elevator in Trump Tower in 2005, and on Monday morning, three women who have accused Trump of sexual misconduct appeared on Megyn Kelly Today to share their stories.

Samantha Holvey, a former Miss USA contestant, told Megyn Kelly how Trump would come “inspect” pageant contestants while they were changing, before they went on stage. When asked what it was like to watch Trump’s inauguration, she answered: “That was a rough day, a very somber day for me. […] It was just a tough day because it was like the entire country said ‘Meh, we don’t care that he’s like this.”

Rachel Crooks said she was 22 when Trump kissed her on the mouth outside her office in Trump Tower, and that she didn’t tell anyone at her company for fear she would lose her job. Jessica Leeds said that 30 years ago, during a flight back to New York, Trump grabbed her breasts and tried to put his hand up her skirt.

This is not the first time these women have told their stories, and the Trump administration has repeatedly denied their claims. In fact, during the broadcast on Monday morning, the White House issued a statement saying: “These false claims, totally disputed in most cases by eyewitness accounts, were addressed at length during the campaign, and the American people voiced the judgement by delivering a decisive victory.”

Now, however, tides seem to be slowly shifting against Trump, and even members of his own administration and party are saying his accusers should be heard. On Sunday, when asked about the three women’s upcoming appearance, Trump-appointed U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley told CBS’s Face the Nation: “Women who accuse anyone should be heard. … I know that he was elected, but women should always feel comfortable coming forward. And we should all be willing to listen to them.” That same day, Republican Tim Scott of South Carolina told NBC’s Chuck Todd that while the claims have been heard before and it is impossible to relitigate the election: “Should people who have been victimized have an opportunity to have their day in court or their day presenting their information? I have no problem with that issue.”

[From The Cut]

I’m surprised that the official White House statement wasn’t the same line that Trump used in the campaign, which is that none of his accusers are attractive enough to be assaulted. He basically said that over and over during the campaign and now that he’s president, he’s just flat-out calling all of these women liars. As for the on-the-record “reaction” from the White House to the new accusers… it really is just more of the same. But that doesn’t mean that Megyn Kelly and literally every other journalist/news-reader/interviewer should stop what they’re doing. Keep interviewing Trump’s accusers. These women should not be forgotten.

Also: is this Megyn’s future on Today? Will she focus more on these kinds of stories? Life & Style claimed last week that Megyn’s been trying to score the first interview with Harvey Weinstein too, which I think is a terrible idea. No one should interview him.

SFFILM Awards Night

Screencaps courtesy of NBC.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

27 Responses to “Megyn Kelly interviewed three of Trump’s accusers & Megyn didn’t bungle it”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Rapunzel says:

    The Deplorables have smearing these ladies, Rachel in particular. I’ve seen trolls and bots claiming she’s solely accusing him of harassment because he asked for her phone number, which is a lie.

    I really hate these cult45ers.

    Donny Twelve Cokes is a pig and I am praying Mueller hurries. And praying for a Doug Jones victory to restore my faith in humanity.

    • Mrs. WelenMelon says:

      Just gonna state the obvious, forgive me.

      The mark has to want to be conned.

      The master con Denture Donald is running is to make stupid people feel smart. THEY know the real truth about X; THEY understand; THEY see through X. The deplorables feel smart for maybe the first time in their lives. I

  2. Nicole says:

    *yawn* what’s with people giving half passes when terrible people manage NOT to be terrible for 5 seconds. I don’t get it.
    No this wasn’t awful but it was still bad.
    More reasons why I’m glad I switched to GMA because Lauer was an @$$ to Curry

    • Applecore says:

      Thank you! How the f did she not bungle this if she encouraged victims to second guess themselves?

  3. Rapunzel says:

    And Two Scoops just responded on Twitter:

    “Despite thousands of hours wasted and many millions of dollars spent, the Democrats have been unable to show any collusion with Russia – so now they are moving on to the false accusations and fabricated stories of women who I don’t know and/or have never met. FAKE NEWS!”

    Sigh. I am never forgiving the folks that voted for this lunatic.

  4. Louise177 says:

    Kelly is still bad. I’ve only seen clips but most of her shows are about sexual harassment and assault. When she has start doing other subjects the cringeworthiness will return. She would be better on a Today Show type show but people don’t like her. She’s not going to move to 7am. Also I disagree that Matt harassed/assaulted her. She’s too big and NBC’s flavor of the month. Matt’s mo is attack people with a lot less power.

  5. Lolo86lf says:

    Some of Trump’s supporters were saying yesterday that is impossible Donald Trump harassed the woman with grey hair because she was not young or good looking enough for him. I was so disgusted as to how the victims are mocked and made fun of by misogynistic men.

  6. grabbyhands says:

    Megyn Kelly is still terrible, and I really wish they would have picked a different interviewer for this piece. Actually, NBC has no business airing any interview with women who have been victimized considering how long they aided and abetted Matt Lauer. Although I guess no network is going to pass a purity test in terms of not treating women like they were actual human beings.

    I feel pretty awful for Samantha Holvey, because her reaction to his election – (“That was a rough day, a very somber day for me. […] It was just a tough day because it was like the entire country said ‘Meh, we don’t care that he’s like this.”) is unfortunately, spot on. That is literally exactly what happened. And there are people that still don’t care that he’s like this.

    This is my favorite part of the WH response – “… and the American people voiced the judgement by delivering a decisive victory.”.

    Which is it??? Did you have a decisive victory or did you not win the popular vote because of all those illegals voting??

    • holly hobby says:

      Exactly! Funny how that narrative changes to suit their story. So I guess they are disbanding that voter fraud committee?

  7. littlemissnaughty says:

    Do NOT interview Harvey W. Nobody should interview the man. He will never have anything of substance to say about this, it will always be a clusterf*ck of self-pity and bullsh*t.

    As for Trump, god I hope these women are given a bigger platform (if they wish) and the media doesn’t forget them. It’s just too important. And I hope at some point, Republicans manage to find their balls.

    • swak says:

      I would hope that NBC would put the kabosh on airing any type of interview with Weinstein.

    • Red Snapper says:

      I disagree profoundly. The #metoo movement is about giving women a voice. It would be hypocrisy of the highest order not to give the men a chance to respond. By all means let HW come on tv and try to justify his crimes. Then we can all laugh at him and move on. Would it be upsetting for his victims? I guess so, but this is ALL upsetting, all of these asshole men and their asshole ways.

      • littlemissnaughty says:

        That’s what they said about Trump and in effect, he was given a massive platform to spout his bs.

        In an ideal world, we would laugh at him and he would expose himself (no pun intended). But that won’t happen. Journalism has me in despair, frankly. And unless it’s someone like Christiane Amanpour interviewing him, it’s going to be nothing but a chance for him to sh*t on his victims. Unless they have ALL been given the chance, I say no. He is absolutely last in line. Plus, he wouldn’t agree to an interview with anyone who could actually take him on. Why do we need to be fair to him? His vicitms most likely won’t get their day in court so he shouldn’t get his on TV.

      • Kate says:

        I don’t think it would be hypocrisy not to give Weinstein a national broadcast platform to defend himself. To expand on your statement, the #metoo movement is about giving women a voice because we haven’t historically been given a voice so we are now taking it. Harvey and white men always have had a voice and power and now we are trying to level the playing field and stop letting powerful men get away with bullsh*t.

        All it takes for Trump supporters is literally a “lies” tweet and they will disbelieve anything a woman says against him. The Depp/Heard divorce statement which specifically does not deny that she was physically abused is being used by all of Depp’s fans, the studios, producers, directors (i.e. people who have a financial stake in his success) as proof of his innocence. All it takes is a lil’ gaslighting or a play on words or a self victimizing statement by a man for people who don’t want to feel uncomfortable to go back to ignoring the women who are speaking up.

        If Weinstein wants to defend himself he can release a statement or he’ll find a way to get someone to interview him – we don’t have to worry about being fair to him because the scale is already tipped in his favor.

    • Cranberry says:

      Oh republicans have balls alright. They just don’t have souls.

  8. Becks says:

    I think Megyn is terrible for many reasons (which NBC seemed to think people were just going to forget) but I think she is a good person to do these interviews, considering her experience at Fox News and her experience with Trump at the debate (which really raised her profile to non-Fox watchers, in my opinion. I knew who she was before then but after that I was kind of like….”oh wait, she stood up to him, kind of, she might not be that bad.”) I HAVE SINCE REGAINED MY SENSES.

    Now, that said, I think NBC is misusing her. This pseudo-today show format is not good for her. I think they need to stop trying to forget that she was a big FN star for years, and use her more like they use Nicolle Wallace – who is very good (and was more conservative before the Trump era). Will people like her? Eh, still probably not. but NBC needs to stop pretending that she wasn’t a Fox News mouthpiece for years and that a lot of people dislike her because of that.

  9. Squiggisbig says:

    The only time Megyn can do a decent job is when it is off Trump’s back. She was just as terrible and bigoted as any of the blonde fembots on Fox News and NBC promoted her over a slew of more talented individuals. So no pat on the back from me.

    • Cranberry says:

      Agreed.

      I just can’t with her. Her demeanor is aggressive and somewhat smug. I don’t find her very likable.

  10. Neelyo says:

    Nope. Kelly’s going to have to do a lot more than that to wash the Fox stench off of her. Harvey Weinstein???

    • Cranberry says:

      Yup. And I don’t see it happening no matter how hard she tries. She really can’t pull off a sincerity.

  11. Adele Dazeem says:

    I see Kelly is attending the Middleton School Of Eyeliner Technique.

    Seriously on what planet do people think a heavy BLACK lower lash line (no waterline mind you) works? Not to mention on a fair skinnned blonde. Sheesh.

  12. adastraperaspera says:

    Ridiculous that Megyn Kelly is getting this work. Tamron Hall, Robin Roberts or Ann Curry would have actually been qualified to conduct these interviews. SICK OF FOXBOTS!!!

  13. claire says:

    This was probably NBC’s way of overcompensating for the Matt Lauer debacle.

    A former coworker of mine said yesterday that these women were being paid by George Soros. *eyeroll*