Gemma Chan’s supporting role in Crazy Rich Asians was nothing short of a “Star Is Born” sort of moment for her. She was a beautiful scene-stealer, an Asian Audrey Hepburn in that film. It was only later that I realized I’d seen Gemma in other things (one episode of Sherlock, the first season of Shetland) and that she’d been working consistently in British television for a decade before her “big break” in CRA. Just another “overnight sensation,” huh? Well, Gemma is 36 (GAH!) and overnight sensations in their 30s tend to be more mature about it. I don’t expect any angst or confessions of impostor syndrome. No, Gemma came to slay. Gemma covers the latest issue of Allure, and I can’t say I approve of this cover or the entire editorial. I get what the stylists were going for, but her eye makeup isn’t great and this cover shot is tragique. Thankfully, Gemma kills it in the interview. Some highlights:
Despite being a chronic overachiever, she has a wicked streak: “I was away on an orchestra trip in Italy, and I went missing for a night. They freaked out, thinking I’d gotten lost, but I was in a boys’ room smoking and drinking. I behaved pretty badly.” She was 12 years old.
She’s somewhat shy: “In a new social situation, I’d much rather sit back and let other people talk first. I prefer to listen and, I suppose, get the measure of people before I necessarily give them all of me.”
On her racial identity: She is fully Chinese by heritage, but Chan describes her racial identity as “compound. I feel British, and European, and English, and Chinese, and Asian.”
Playing Bess of Hardwick in Mary Queen of Scots: “Why are actors of color, who have fewer opportunities anyway, only allowed to play their own race? And sometimes they’re not even allowed to play their own race. In the past, the role would be given to a white actor who would tape up their eyes and do the role in yellowface. John Wayne played Genghis Khan. If John Wayne can play Genghis Khan, I can play Bess of Hardwick. I feel like Hamilton opened minds a lot. We have a black man playing George Washington. They describe it as ‘America then, told by America now.’ And I think our art should reflect life now.”
She worked on a documentary about the Chinese Labour Corps. “I studied the First World War three times at school. And I never heard that there were 140,000 Chinese in the Allied effort. We would not have won the war without them.” In large part [people forget about the Chinese Labour Corps], it’s because of the images that remain. Chan tells me about a mural made to commemorate that war. It was massive, she says. There was a whole section dedicated to the Chinese, but it was painted over when the Americans joined the war effort. “They left one kneeling Chinese figure, which you can still see. If people understood that, my parents [might not] have been told, ‘Go home, go back to where you came from’ multiple times. If we portray a pure white past, people start to believe that’s how it was, and that’s not how it was.”
On the British political system: “My issue with politicians like David Cameron, of the Conservative Party, whose fault all of this Brexit stuff is — he went from Eton to Oxford, then I think he worked for a time in communications before going straight into Parliament. He’s lived such a privileged life without any real interaction with anyone who’s having to live under his government’s policy. And I think that distance, that disconnect, is so damaging. I’m so grateful for my work. But sometimes it feels almost absurd to be going onto a set to play kind of make-believe. There are so many things that demand our attention.”
“If we portray a pure white past, people start to believe that’s how it was, and that’s not how it was.” That’s a very real problem here in America too. I imagine it’s a problem throughout Europe. I can only speak to how it is America, when politicians or just regular old white dudes start pontificating about how we need to “return” to some long-lost era, what they mean is return to the whitewashed version of that era, where white folks had all the power and people of color either “knew their place” or were written out of the historical narrative completely. As for this: Chan describes her racial identity as “compound. I feel British, and European, and English, and Chinese, and Asian.” That’s a mouthful, but I understand what she means. Guess she’s anti-Brexit too.
Cover & Instagram courtesy of Allure.
I didn’t realize she was in Sherlock. Humans in the first show where I found her.
Loved her in Humans! That was the first time I noticed her too and was excited to see she was cast as Astrid in CRA, especially since if they follow the books, Astrid takes on a much larger role going forward.
She’s so gorgeous and intelligent! I totally agree with her views on historic movies and whitewashing in general.
I hope they make Astrid’s part bigger in the next CRA movies, just like in the books (she’s way more interesting than Rachel and Nick).
Serious question, not intended to be snarky in the least. – Why was there such a hue & cry over ScarJo and Matt Damon playing Asian roles but Gemma playing Bess of Hardwick ok? I am genuinely curious.
The director made it clear from the start that they were using color-blind casting. Emma’s role was minor in the film and more attention went to Adrian Lester as Lord Randolph. Because men always get more attention, even in a film about two women directed by a woman.
Lightpurple, thank you for that reply. I am mixed, half Indian and half British/German, so while I understood Gemma’s comment about identifying as multiple cultures, I was not able to understand the part about her casting. Just wanted another person’s perspective on it, someone who is not Gemma.
Whether you mean to be snarky or not it’s a really ignorant question. Did you not read Gemma’s quotes or it just went over your head?
White people are so used to having everything they can’t even tell what real equality looks like and instead rely on ridiculous false equivalency arguments like yours.
Minorities have been shut out for so long, that even by having roles that are supposed to be their ethnicity as well as some that aren’t, even still they won’t be anywhere near the opportunities and options available to white actors. So it’s REALLY shitty when Scarjo takes an Asian role and it’s really inspiring when Gemma plays Bess. If you can’t tell the difference you’re part of the problem.
(Not to mention it’s not a true reflection of european history to be so whitewashed.)
@YOKO_OHNO Trying to make someone feel bad for asking a genuine question is never the way to go, it only makes them unwilling to aquire new information and develop their opinions for fear that they will be shamed. Don’t we want ignorant people to become educated? The ones who actually want to change are gonna give up if we shit on them for owning up to their ignorance in the first place.
@SCARLETT So much of much of film & tv is told by and through white people that well-developed POC characters are honestly few and far between. Additionally, there is a history of white people being cast to play people of color, limiting the already limited number of non-white characters that appear on our screens even further.
Because there are so few non-white (not to mention well-written non-white) characters relative to white characters, every time a role intended for a POC goes to a white person it significantly cuts down overall POC representation in the media. Casting a POC in as a white character may be the same principle, but it has no where near the same effect.
ScarJo and Matt’s casting were typical of the problematic nature of Hollywood believing POC can’t play POC. That whites somehow captured other races better than the races themselves.
there is cry over her playing Bess hence her answer above.
She’s great in Humans. She was a former model who also almost went into law after she finished school. She turned down joining a firm to go into acting. She learned to play the violin and piano as a child. She’s also done theater earlier in her career. This woman can do anything.
Ya, she was extremely accomplished before she started working as an actress, but she’s been in British telly for a while now (I’m American, but with close ties to the U.K. and the BBC is always playing in my house)!
I love what she says about politicians like David Cameron; are people who are hyper privileged who therefore no ideas of the hard work that must be provided by ordinary people. Reasons why they are able to make completely terrible decisions without really worrying about the impact that its will have in the lives of their citizens.
I am also looking forward to seeing more of her in future CRA movies! Astrid is one of my favorite characters in the books.
I love her. She really did steal ever scene in CRA.
Has everyone forgotten that she played a Dominatrix in ‘Secret Diary of a Callgirl’? She was amazingly funny and sharp in that…I love her.
Yes! She was also a perfectly annoying drama student in Fresh Meat – great role.
She is stunningly beautiful. Carved by the gods literally. I hate how CRA changed Astrid’s character in the movie , but I was thrilled when I heard she was cast.
All I came here to say is: She is so beautiful! And her red carpet game is one of my all-time favorites! She and Constance Wu and my long-time fav: Tilda Swinton are my red carpet divas!
Hmmm… I love Gemma Chan and I’m so excited that CRA gave her the exposure that it did. That being said, I don’t really feel like she stole any scenes. I actually think that they could have deleted almost all of her storyline and the movie would have been better. Did anyone really care about her loser husband? That’s no shade aimed at Gemma, more at CRA – which I thought was a mediocre movie all around.
She was by far my favorite part of the movie. While I was watching it I kept thinking, Rachel go away and stop whining, I want to see more Astrid! So clearly there’s mixed opinions 🙂
Whereas she’s a minor character in the first book, Astrid’s story line is upfront in the sequels. So I assume they needed to introduce her in the first if they intend to make sequels and somewhat follow the plot line from the books. I think she’s stunning as well! Look forward to seeing her more of her. Love her red carpet looks too!
She has tremendous elegance and a quiet charisma and is quite beautiful. Saw her Jimmy Kimmel intereview and boy, that man was cringeworthy. He joked her involvement in an AI/robotics program was just “an excuse to see her naked” and asked her if her parents approved of her profession (imagine him asking a non-Asian that question; that’s right, he wouldn’t). She, to her credit, was super sweet and “smooth” but not in a fake way. And very modest about having a law degree (she read law at Oxford). She’s awesome.
I would love to see her do Austen.
I love her.
Secondly, I really relate to feeling a compound of ethnic identities. My father is an immigrant, my mothers parents were too. I hold 2 passports, I’ve lived on the other side of the world for several years, and my country (NZ) is pretty young in the scheme of things/a country of immigrants.
It’s always been a reason why I’ve found Nationalism so silly, and been so pro-Globalisation. I’ve never understood how people can feel superior to others because they just happen to have been born somewhere.
I’m bicultural as well and I agree with you to some extent. But celebrating multicultures / being cosmopolitan culturally doesn’t necessarily mean nationalism is a stupid thing. Positive nationalism with established national borders is the only viable way at the present to have a society based in shared values, legal rights/rules, and so on. A borderless world and extreme globalisation with very powerful supranational entities, as we imagine and implement them now (the EU for example), usurp democracy and can be a recipe for autocracy and extreme centralisation of decision-making at the expense of the demos. It’s a fantasy at this stage, possibly until we can get all countries and their peoples on the same level playing field in economics, wealth, education, women’s and minority rights, political development / democratic values, and so on. It’s not so black and white.