This is a still from Destroyer, the film where Nicole Kidman plays a grizzled cop. Kidman underwent quite the transformation for the role, including hours of “pigmentation” makeup to look like a boozy older lady who has lived a hard life. Grey wigs were also involved. Much was made of Kidman’s transformation, because… well, there are a million reasons why people talk about an actor’s transformation for a role. But here’s the question: is all of that conversation sexist? It’s more complicated and nuanced than yes or no. Nicole chatted with the Guardian about the role and the expectations that an actress has to look a certain way even if she’s supposed to be playing a hardened cop or an action heroine. Some highlights:
The look of action heroines: “A lot of times if you are going to be a female in an action film, they want you to look gorgeous, be bad-ass, be capable of firing guns and doing high kicks and still having lipstick and being svelte and being in a whole different class of action hero.”
Destroyer is different: “This is gritty and raw and totally authentic. It’s very different to give screen time – and this amount of screen time – to a woman who looks like this, who behaves like this, who is riddled with shame and anger and fury and rage, yet is also a mother and not a good mother.”
How we discuss actor’s transformations versus actress’s transformations: “I’m always astounded at the harsh way in which women are judged, and I shouldn’t be. I should know that by now, but it is what it is…. Maybe in 20 years time, for the next generation of women, it will be different but by god, I want to be one of those women who’s helping carve a path for the next generation, because I’m the recipient of those that have come before me to even be in this position. We didn’t get to work 25 years ago, women were pretty much cast out by now, and that’s abominable. But that’s in any work force, and those trends are changing, thank god, but we have to keep the conversation moving forward.”
Here’s my take on the whole “transformation” thing: most of the time, the transformations wouldn’t be so noteworthy if only a different actor had been cast. I hate the fact that they award actors for being so woefully miscast in sh-t that they needed ten hours in a makeup trailer. Like Gary Oldman as Winston Churchill – he won an Oscar for his makeup and for acting drunk. And that’s it. And while I appreciate the fact that many actresses and actors are willing to put aside their egos to make drastic transformations, let’s also acknowledge that they’re happy enough to make that the conversation because they want to win awards for “uglying up.” Nicole’s right about the whole looking pretty-while-shooting-a-gun thing though. It’s like, Manic Pixie Dream Avenger or something.
Here are some photos of Nicole filming The Undoing last month. These photos have gotten so much attention because Nic went back to her red hair for this movie! She looks a decade younger with red hair.
Photos courtesy of ‘Destroyer’ still and Backgrid.
I get annoyed when action movies have twigs knocking out massive dudes with strength techniques. Er, no, it doesn’t work like that. A good example of small fighter with good and useful technique is Saoirse Ronan in Hanna. More of that please.
My niece is named Hanna after that movie. 🙂
A sexist conversation? I think not. I know this is coming from a man, but still. Men and women have both benefited from make up and prosthetics. Kidman for example, and his fake nose won an Oscar for The Hours. Charlize did lots of makeup and prosthetics and won an Oscar for Monster. Even if they gave tremendous performances, they always get help of make up artists and fx to shine and win the big awards.
Did she borrow Keith Urban’s wig?? My god
She looks so much better and less washed out as a redhead.
I totally agree!
Are there a ton of chubby poorly dressed male action figures? Usually it is a fantasy type of movie where the viewer identifies with the protagonist. So it makes sense that they be attractive people. Male and female.
FYI- She was amazing in Destroyer and that movie deserved more attention.
Well… This depends on context. Lots of BBC series have normal looking men and women being badass cops and no one complains. In the American The Killing the actress looks normal too. It’s all about the expectations created by the cast, the director, the trailer etc. I agree with the writer that such a role should not have gone to Kidman or, if it is, she should just take it as a role and talk about the depth of the character.
I’m kinda sick of his whole “unlikeable female characters are feminist” new trend (in the UK with Fleabag).
This is why I love Killing Eve. She doesn’t wear heels, and she’s fit not stick thin.
I strongly disagree with Kidman.👎
When I recall throwback characters like Sarah Connor, Cynthia Rothrock and Ripley, they were strong and imposing celluloid characters.
Makeup wasn’t any more of a factor on them than it was on dudes.
The other day I watched that nun horror movie and the nuns had mascara and lipstick. I also cannot stand it when people wake up full makeup already on. I can’t stand it when period drama has women with makeup, before makeup “existed” (yes I know it has always existed but you know what I mean), or when someone with bright red lipstick kisses someone else and there’s no stain whatsoever. I’m really pedant, and anything like this will ruin the whole movie for me.
There are red lipsticks that don’t transfer when you kiss someone or drink something, just fyi.
I’m pretty sure that red hair is a wig. Her hair is not that thick — it’s been fried by all the processing and hair dye.
However, I loved her real curly and red hair. It’s a mystery to me why she destroyed it.
Destroyer was great and Kidman did a truly fantastic job. I’ve never thought of her as an action heroine, but I was sold hook, line, and sinker after that one. She reminded me a lot of Natalie Portman in Annihilation, another great action performance.
Hours of makeup? It just looks like she rubbed dirt on her face.
I feel like this woman has been terrified of aging since she was 20. One of the first stars to shun the sun, as I recall. But age catches up to us all….eventually. No matter the floppy hats you wear, sunblock you apply & fillers and botox you inject…you just can’t win the fight against time. Age happens. With or without grace.
If you watch the movie, you can *see* the brown spots (makeup) and the wrinkles. She’s also not wearing much eye makeup (prob just mascara) and no lipstick.
She is and has always been beautiful. But she has facework now. I don’t know if it’s fillers, but I’m guessing a really good facelift.