I think I’ve said this before, but during the run of HBO’s Sex and the City, and throughout the terrible SATC movies, I grew to despise Carrie Bradshaw. Carrie was a narcissist and a poseur and she was actually kind of awful in relationships. Carrie started out as Candace Bushnell’s alter ego, but obviously Candace’s life wildly diverged from Carrie’s fictional life. And whenever I read Candace’s interviews, I’m always struck by how she’s actually quite different than Carrie. Candace is curious and interesting and anthropological and she actually thinks a lot about what’s happening in the modern landscape of relationships, sex, technology, love and marriage. Like a 21st century Jane Austen. Candace is still promoting Is There Still Sex in the City? and I only just saw this Vanity Fair interview (which was actually published a few weeks ago, my bad). I found it very interesting! You can read the full piece here. Highlights:
She tried Tinder as a 50-something divorcee: “What was interesting about Tinder was [that] everyone was on it, but nobody seemed to like it. Is that how dominant technology is? Nobody likes it, yet we are obliged to use it?”
How she felt post-divorce: “I went through a period where I absolutely did not believe in relationships at all. I think it’s really important to question all of these societal expectations…as a woman we do have to think about where we put our time. You can put a lot of time and energy into a relationship and come out with less…that’s another reality. These are things that women have to weigh. And nobody wants to talk about it, but that’s life. You see that when you get older. When you’re younger, it feels like life is going in just one direction. But then when you get older, you see how all these little pieces actually fit together. But the great thing that I found is that women seem to be extraordinarily good at knowing themselves and what will work for them eventually in their life. And also, they are great at reinventing themselves and taking on new challenges. The age group of women I am writing about—they’re go-getters.… It’s okay to have ups and downs. And it is okay to be down. The trick is finding the strength to get up again.”
What she understands about relationships now: “It’s okay for a relationship to just be. It’s not like it has to hit a bunch of markers—like you have to get married. It is not goal-oriented. It can just be. It doesn’t feel like one has to be in a rush, because really, where are you going?”
Tackling the subject of women who marry for money: “No one ever really talks about it, but some women do it and it is an option for them. It might work out, and it might not. But there’s always more to the story. One of the things that I would like to look at more…yes, people talk about sex. But what they really don’t talk about is money. That’s almost the dirty little secret. But money becomes a reality, and a concern in a way that it wasn’t when you were younger. It’s just life, and it’s a reality. And it’s better to accept that it’s life rather than make a value judgment on it and just get through it.”
She thinks the romantic landscape will get even stranger. “I don’t want to criticize the times we live in, or the technology, [which is only] increasing exponentially. To me, the bigger question is, how is this going to affect us as human beings in the next 20 years? In 20 years, you may not ‘need’ a man as a woman to reproduce. How does that look? Will everybody freeze their eggs and their sperm? What effect will that have? Who will be able to do it? Who will be able to afford it? Those to me are the interesting questions.”
I’m not going to do the hand-clap emojis but please believe that they are here: I love that she talks about money. I love that she talks about marrying for money. I wish people could be more honest about this and I wish this was a bigger conversation in relationships. There are rich men out there, and some/many of them are terrible people who only want someone pretty or young or loyal on their arm. And there are some/many women who just want financial security. And what’s wrong with talking about that sh-t? Money is a huge part of many relationships and most marriages. TALK ABOUT IT.
Also: I love what she says about finally understanding that a relationship doesn’t have to be goal-oriented, and it doesn’t have to be a series of steps. I think women feel the pressure to meet all of those markers when they’re in their 20s and 30s and… that’s not the path for everyone.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.
You don’t even have to get married for money. Sugar daddies/ babies are a thing (always have been, really) but people are starting to really talk about it, probably because of the anonymity of the internet now. I really appreciate Candace’s ideas. She was on the forefront of something with SATC and she’s probably got it right this time too.
I’m now a fan and I’d like to hear more from her. Great observations. As a 49 year old, and twice divorced, I’m not interested in ever getting married again. Didn’t need to in the first place but it’s a societal construct and there was so much pressure to do it. Now I’m 5 years in to a relationship that “just is” with no end goal of marriage and I like it.
I need an explanation of what in the Sam Hill is that Cookie Monster pelt looking jacket she is wearing.
thanks for the laugh this am, funny comment!
I liked what she said about exploring the relationship that stays together mostly happily, because I don’t think that gets a lot of play since it is not as interesting as the ups and downs of a single life. I was the second person in my group of high school/college friends to get married, the only one who had kids, and I have lived in the same area for my entire life. I love my husband and my kids and I wouldn’t change it for the world but, yeah, I am fascinated by people who move to the big city to advance their careers or roll out of bed at 11:00 to hit up brunch bc I didn’t get that experience.
It’s kind of the one enduring critique of SATC. How did Carrie afford her lifestyle. Yes, there was one episode where she inadvertently became a hooker, and felt real real bad about it, and another where she had to buy her apartment or move and tried to get a side job writing for Vogue for a pittance, got envious of her friend with the huge diamond from her profitable divorce (how exactly was Charlotte managing before is kind of a mystery). And then Samantha added up the cost of all her ridiculous shoes. Finally, when he boyfriend who was going to buy the apartment leaves, she gets the down-payment from her ex, yet no further details on how she paid the mortgage for the next 30 years, save for one short term arrangement where she quit her job to follow some guy to Paris and he paid for her apartment during that little story arc.
There were definitely these tensions all along in SATC between professional working women and let’s just call them “creative” types who put the bulk of their energy into dating but still have to keep up with the bills for cocktails at hot spots and 400 dollar shoes, let alone a pad in the city. Even at 1990s prices, it strained credulity, and these days…
I believe Charlotte was trust fund baby and Carrie sold a book that she would’ve gotten a huge advance for and didn’t she have a sex column? Wasn’t that what all of her musings about? Needless to say I am a huge fan of the series and the 1st movie.
Love her, I feel like she’s one of a few who just tell it like it is.