An agreement has been formally reached in the custody of Michael Jackson’s three children. All of them will stay with his mother Katherine, with whom they’ve been living since he passed away five weeks ago. Debbie Rowe, the mother of Michael’s oldest children Prince Michael and Paris, will get to see them on a scheduled visitation system.
A Los Angeles judge signed off Monday on a deal granting Jackson family matriarch Katherine Jackson custody of her son Michael’s three children, with a family allowance paid out of the entertainer’s estate. “It’s not my intention to deprive the children of anything,” said Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff at a hearing.
Katherine, 79, reached a custody agreement last week with Deborah Rowe, Michael’s ex-wife and the biological mother of his two oldest children – Prince Michael I, 12, and Paris, 11 – with visitation rights for Rowe based on a schedule worked out with a child psychologist and continued spousal support.
Prince Michael II (a.k.a. “Blanket”), 7, Michael Jackson’s youngest child whose surrogate mother has never been identified, will also stay with Katherine, the judge said, finding there was “no legal mother” of Blanket.
“Today the parties and the California court brought about a result that is selfless and wise through a process that was collaborative and fair,” Rowe’s attorney, Eric George, said outside of court. “Everyone sought the same objective: Doing what is best for the children of Debbie Rowe and Michael Jackson. Today’s result – five-and-a-weeks after the tragic death of Michael Jackson, eliminates uncertainty and offers stability to the lives of these children.”
Katherine attended the hearing with son Randy and daughter LaToya. In addition to the custody hearing, the judge is expected to decide who will be permanent executors of the singer’s estate. Last month, attorney John Branca and music executive John McClain were made temporary executors.
According to published reports, Michael supported his mother financially up until his death on June 25. The judge said the family allowance will continue through the end of the year. Lawyers will return to court Jan. 11, 2010, for a status hearing.
[From People]
The biggest advantage here is that the three kids get to stay together. A lot of people thought Debbie should fight for custody because she’d presumably be a better parent than would Katherine Jackson – because Katherine is married to legendary bad dad Joe Jackson. And she’s also 79 years old, which is a tough age to raise young children. Certainly other grandmothers have done it, and God bless them. But it’ll be a challenge.
Obviously money plays into this a great deal, and anyone going after custody becomes the object of suspicion. Actually the reverse is true as well – when it was first reported that Debbie Rowe agrees to let the Jacksons raise Prince and Paris, it was also said she essentially sold the kids to the family. There’s no way to talk about Michael Jackson and not talk about money. It does seem like they came to an agreement relatively quickly – not lightening fast, but it wasn’t an epic feud either. That’s something. Hopefully the kids will have some kind of relationship with their mother, and it’s wonderful they’re not getting split up.
Here’s Katherine Jackson in May, 2008. Images thanks to Fame Pictures .
Wonder if Blanket’s legal mother will come out of the woodwork for her piece of the pie?
Yeah I hope she don’t just sit around and let Joe Jackson beat them.
I don’t know why this is an issue. Grandparents have been raising their grandkids for YEARS! I don’t even think Joe and Catherine live in the same house. MJ knew what he was doing when he wrote that will. Joe gets nothing and Catherine could get control of everything. She’ll have all the power. See ya Joe!!! I’m happy for the kids. They need the only family they have ever known. God Bless them all!
I’m pleased to read Debbie is restored visitation rights. The judge, seeking what is in the best interest of the children, restores their right to a relationship with their biological mother.
I don’t think Debbie Rowe did anything except what she thought was truly best for the kids from day one. She knew Michael would provide them a loving home and be a great father, and that Katherine would be involved to a large degree from start to finish. It’s harder to do the right thing when it makes you look bad than it is when it makes you look good, and this woman has always seemed to want the best and right things for the kids, even when her actions appeared to make her look less than caring about them. They are lucky they have a strong grandmother and a strong mother as well, both of whom will always be on their side. MJ would be proud, I’m sure.
My concern is that (1) he was supporting his mother so she clearly was a dependant (2) whether Joe lives with her or not he is clearly still often in her company as shown by all the latest photos and that gives him free access to the children (3) I have worked with many grandparents it is very hard. In this case there is an extended family so why not pass the children onto them legally. (4) Sooner than later Grandma will die, and what then? This all over again? The children need long term stability. God Bless.
@Clare not sure at this point that Blanket’s biological mother could come back and claim him. Maybe she would be granted visitation… I pray that Katherine lives for another 5 years by then the kids will almost be adults and can make their own decisions about who they want to live with. I hope Debbie Rowe will be a positive role model for them too cause at this point she’s never really had any influence on the kids.
boomchaka – totally agree. I’d say more but you said it best 😉
I bet there is a collective sigh from those people who had shitty & weak mothers that never defended them from crappy step/fathers, in general. The Jackson Matriarch is a failure as she never protected her children from abuse.
Finally there is resolution for the children in this matter.I think this is the best possible outcome as I am so sick of certain people trying to paint Katherine as a bad mother while trying to make that dirty,lowdown Debbie as some type of saint.This woman clearly did not want those children as she gave them up for money and it is obvious that their grandmother loves them.As a person who was raised by my grandmother after my dad died I was grateful to be with people that loved me and not my mother who chose to abandon me but used my daddy for money but had no interest in being in my life at all.
I’m very GLAD to hear this news that’s what Michael wanted and she’s the best one for the job, god Bless her & be with her, great ruling the Judge has my total respect.
The way I understood it, Katherine Jackson has legal guardianship, but Rebbie Jackson is their day to day caretaker. I hope that’s how they work it out.
You know, this custody case has a real downside. First of all, Katherine is 79 — honestly, I know seniors are living longer, but the kid’s can expect another hard loss in who know how long. Also, if my kids bequeath ed their kids to me in my elder years, I would do it but
it wouldn’t be my most ideal wish for my autumn years. Be that as it may, she is in for a ride since the teen years are looming. My advice would be to put them in private school with other kids and give them some normalcy. I bet they are thrilled not to be covered up all the time.
agree with BlueSkies.
Those poor kids are done for. At least they will be together going down the same road MJ went.
oh God!! yeah blueskies ure right! i just pray for these defenseless children and katherine jackson whos an enabler…yeah maybe shes not abusive but shes a crappy mother if she cant protect her own children and now the grandchildren….God please help these kids.
This is the worst that could happen. Those children will be raised Jehovah’s Witnesses. This is a mistake. Many of Michael’s problems started with this fundemenatal religion, it will only continue. No xmas, birthdays or TALKING TO ANYONE except cousins. EVER. Do you have any notion of how this represive religion screws up people? I do.
ooh Mandhy… I wouldn’t start that. It’s not wise to go criticizing a person’s religion, nor is it kind. You may have had a bad experience with JWs, but you have to let it end there. Or this turns into a big mess with all different belief systems condemning all the others ones and then next thing you know, you broke the internet.
I am sure that there are hundreds upon thousands of people who would love to tell you that they grew up as Jehova’s Witnesses and did just fine. Just like there are hundreds upon thousands of people who will tell you how Catholicism fucked them up, or Islam made them miserable, or how being Baha’i ruined their life or whatever.
The custody issue wasn’t never really OUR business, but the religious upbringing of those kids is way beyond NOT OUR BUSINESS.
I agree with bluesskies