In August, we saw the first trailer for Greta Gerwig’s Little Women, and… I was a bit disappointed in it. I still feel like the central roles of Jo (Saoirse Ronan) and Laurie (Timothee Chalamet) were cast brilliantly. But the rest of the casting choices bug me, and the trailer wasn’t great. I’m saying that as a huge fan of the book and a lover of film-adapted classics. But damn, Emma Watson seems out of place. As does Laura Dern. And Meryl Streep, frankly. Anyway, as a “fall preview” for Oscar-bait films, Entertainment Weekly put Saoirse and Timothee on their cover. The cover and cover shoot is gorgeous, and the interaction between Chalamet and Ronan is beautiful and I want to live there. That being said, the cover story is all about the adaptation and it STILL seems like it’s going to be a big mess? You can read the full piece here. Some highlights:
The imagery of Timothee is perfect: During a break that follows, he wanders, gripping a paper bag stuffed with assorted bagels — from Tompkins Square Bagels, which Chalamet, a lifelong New Yorker, insists are the best in the city — and offering one to anyone in his path. He sings and dances — very Elio-in-the-town-square-like — to Bob Dylan’s “Tombstone Blues.” He creeps behind a distracted Ronan before spooking her with a yelp. “I didn’t even know you were there!” she exclaims, reddening from the fright but with a smile so lovingly at ease, you sense she’s used to the prank.
The difference in the production between this & Lady Bird: “I felt very prideful… about how big it had gotten, how many people were there,” Chalamet recounts. “On Lady Bird it was, like, 25 people hanging out in a house!”
Saoirse on Timothee: “He keeps me on my toes — I’m never quite sure what he’s going to do next. That only progressed more and grew more. It helped that we do have a very natural rapport with each other…. These two characters physically need to be very comfortable with one another. They’re literally intertwined for half the film.” Chalamet adds: “In the least clichéd way possible, it really doesn’t feel like [I’m] acting sometimes [with her].”
How Greta adapted the story: The movie begins with the March sisters in adulthood — typically where the narrative’s second half begins — and unfolds like a memory play, shifting back and forth between that present-day frame and extended flashbacks to the childhood scenes etched in the American literary canon. She poured the same love into iconic scenes, like Jo and Laurie’s ebullient dance that follows their first meeting. Here it goes on longer — and more vibrantly — than in any previous iteration. (Ronan says they filmed it at 3 a.m., to boot, adding, “We must have done it, like, 30 times.”) Then there’s the devastating moment when Laurie asks Jo to marry him and she rejects his proposal. Gerwig tasked the two actors to unleash here. “Emotions just bubble over,” Ronan says. “[Greta] just let us go with it, wherever it went, from take to take. What I loved about that scene is that every take would be different emotionally. It didn’t have the same trajectory.”Saoirse on Jo March: “When Louisa describes Jo, it felt like someone describing me physically: sort of gangly and stubborn and very straightforward, and went for what she wanted.” At an event for Lady Bird, she — in a very Jo kind of way — just “went at it” by approaching Gerwig. “I said, ‘So I want to be in Little Women, but only if I’m playing Jo.’” (Chalamet, for his part, was asked by Gerwig, “Hey, want to do another movie?” He responded: “Yes. Yes, please.”)
Ronan & Chalamet: “I love that in Lady Bird, you broke my heart,” she says to him softly. “In Little Women, I got to break your heart.” (Chalamet, ever the goofball, finds an obvious opening: “Yes, that’s true. Then I married your sister. Ha, ha, ha!”)
Honestly, I will watch this just for Ronan and Chalamet, because I think so highly of both of them and because I expect their chemistry with each other to carry the project. But! It probably would have been less expensive and more fun to just watch Saoirse and Timothee interact and play around and do silly things together, documentary-style. The rest of this film sounds like such a mess! The whole story is told IN FLASHBACKS. Stop.
Cover courtesy of EW, additional photos courtesy of Sony & Getty
WHATEVER- I’m excited for this movie
lol- I guess I’m in the minority, but I don’t think Emma Watson is glaringly out of place, and I think the movie looks good. I love Saoirse and I really like her and Timothee’s chemistry.
Looks good to me, too!
In the nicest possible way Kaiser – I hope you’re wrong. I have high hopes for this one and have thankfully only heard decent things thus far. Plus Lady Bird was quite brilliant and if this is a misstep it will be much harder for Gerwig to get a green light for her next project, simply because she’s a woman. I’m rooting for her (and Saoirse Ronan, always)
Yeah…I’m still seeing this. If it’s a mess, then it’s a mess, but I’m really hoping it’s not.
Wee Timothee looks about 13. He could play the younger brother of Laura Ingells in a Little House on the Prairie reboot.
Laura doesn’t have a younger brother.
After watching the trailer: No!
No.
I actually think this is going to work. we’ll see!
Apparently the script was so bad Emma Stone dropped out (was replaced with Emma Watson)
After what Greta Gerwig & Noah Baumbach did you JJL, I do not support her in any capacity. She is the antithesis of women supporting women.
Such negativity! What absolute rubbish regarding the script. Stone dropped out because she didn’t want to be upstaged by Ronan. The trailer was stunning and Gerwig’s adaptation is going to reel in the nominations. This LW will make a fortune at the box office.
“she dropped out cause she didn’t want to be upstaged by Ronan”
Thats cute (but completely false) excuse 😂 But feel free to keep thinking that. Greta Gerwig & Noah Baumbach are morally bankrupt for doing what they did to JJL, on the set of the film she wrote no less. Yea, that’s a specific kind of cruel and I don’t think we should give our dollars to crappy ppl, but that’s just me. Tho there will always be ppl selfish enough out there to not care and just see it bc “*squeeee* I LOvE LitTLe wOmEn oMg!” Same ol same ol.
Honestly, I will watch it because I’m a sucker for ‘Little Women’ and I watch any adaptation (the last one sucked so bad I stopped halfway though). Here’s hope, since I like the trailer and some of the actors -mostly Saorsie, she is brilliant.
Btw I love Emma Watson but that’s a huge miscast (and I’m so glad Emma Stone got out of it because there would have been even more of a huge mistake.. also, age wise we’re not really there).
I see only a few movies on the big screen now, but I’ll be there for this LW. Chalamet and Ronan are two of my favorites.
I read that interview with the two of them at the Hollywood Reporter, as well as watched a video with them talking about the movie. Saoirse is an intelligent well-spoken woman and she talks about the script in a way that made me interested in seeing the movie. There were interesting tidbits like the fact that Jo and Laurie’s characters swapped clothes in the movie to really show how they were two halves of a whole.
Chalamet *really* leaned into the androgynous look in the photo shoot that they show in the video — at one point he looks like he is wearing a baptismal shirtdress. And I’m pretty sure he’s wearing more makeup than she is. LOL
English professor here, and lover of Alcott. I will see it. I’m probably on the minority here but I actually loved the 1994 Winona Ryder adaptation. Such a great cast and beautifully shot.
English lit lover, and I loved the 1994 adaptation, too. I thought Professor Bhaer was woefully miscast, and they made him an awkward sort of melancholy hero, which doesn’t jive at all with the story. The rest of it was amazing, however, and wonderfully cast and directed. Hard to beat Sarandon as Marmee.
Aw love how in the picture with Ronan in a pink dress, Timothy is hovering his hand above her not grabbing her shoulder 😀