Bombshell bombed at the box office. In its first week in theaters, it made about $15.6 million. Part of that is just… the film being released around the same time as The Rise of Skywalker. The other part is that audiences aren’t super-crazy about movies that deal with media and/or terrible people in media. I’ve seen a lot of criticism and hot-takes about the movie, with people of color noting that no one wants to see white women – one of whom is notorious racist Megyn Kelly – play victims when they’re complicit in a larger problem of white supremacy and fascism represented by Fox News. I get that, truly. I’ve said all along that I respect the fact that no one is saying that the women of Fox News were “perfect victims” like that even exists. They were and are awful people. But awful people get sexually harassed too.
Anyway, Margot Robbie will probably come out of Bombshell’s failure unscathed, like every other time she’s been in a bad movie. Margot covers Variety to hustle for Bombshell a little bit, but mostly she’s previewing Birds of Prey, her Harley Quinn movie which comes out in February. She also chats with Variety about all of the stuff she’s doing with her production company, and the tangible changes she’s made to ensure that she’s hiring more women across the board. You can read the full piece here. Some highlights:
On playing Kayla in Bombshell: “I didn’t understand her to begin with. But my process is to do a ton of research, consider every single option, know every single situation, scenario, thought and motivation inside and out, so I can step onto set and then let it all go.” She watched the Fox News shows Kayla would have liked, and created a fake Twitter account so she could observe the performative opinionating of “young millennial conservative girls.” (Robbie wouldn’t specify whom she followed, but picture the Tomi Lahrens of the world.)
The changes she made post-MeToo: The #MeToo resulted in seismic changes in how women’s stories are told on screen, and who gets to tell them — specifically, the battle cry for more women writers and directors — caused Robbie and LuckyChap to look inward. The company had done its first three films with male directors. “At the start of 2018, we made a conscious decision to shift to try to find more women behind the camera,” Tom Ackerley says. “We were looking at our own work in a different way,” Robbie says. “Some of our projects felt extremely relevant and more urgent to tell. And other ones felt irrelevant.”
Trying to understand Harley Quinn: During “Suicide Squad,” Robbie says she “fell in love with” Harley Quinn, though she didn’t understand why the wildly brilliant, unstable character would stay in a relationship with the Joker (played by Jared Leto), who “wants to kill her most of the time.” She dove into research: She read the Sam Shepard play “Fool for Love,” about a destructive relationship, and listened to TED Talks by women with schizophrenia who were also accomplished professionals. She immersed herself in the world of DC Comics, which she adores. “Harley has this unpredictable nature that means she could react in any way to any situation, which as an actor is just a gift.”
She wants to work with more diverse writers too: She created Lucky Exports Pitch Program, a four-week writers’ room for six writers; four of the selected were women of color. Each came in with kernels of ideas, and now, with the program having just wrapped, all have solid pitches — and Hodson and LuckyChap attached as producers. “We are going to go out and pitch to all the studios and hopefully get them sold, and get them made,” Robbie says.
Her thoughts on Joaquin Phoenix’s Joker: The movie, as its subtitle implies, starts after Harley’s breakup with the Joker. Robbie confirms that Leto’s incarnation of the character doesn’t appear, not even as a cameo. As far as that other “Joker” goes, Robbie thinks Joaquin Phoenix “did a phenomenal job.” But “Birds of Prey,” she says, isn’t at all like the Todd Phillips film: “I feel like the ‘Joker’ film was much more grounded. Ours is different. It’s heightened.”
Can I just take a moment and complain about Joker? She’s right that it feels “grounded” and not like a bonkers comic-book movie. But I feel like… Joker was TOO realistic, almost. Not only that, it felt grossly irresponsible overall. Do you trust Margot Robbie to make a good-yet-heightened movie about a schizophrenic doctor recovering from her toxic, violent relationship? I don’t know. But even if Birds of Prey sinks, I’m sure Margot will absolutely survive.
Photos courtesy of WENN, cover courtesy of Variety.
The story of Harley Quinn is tragic. The Joker takes everything she is, rapes her body and soul. I find the some of the fan fascination with her to be a little troublesome.
I agree 100%!
She was the only watchable thing in Suicide Squad. She’s a good actress in over the too roles. I’m cautiously optimistic about Birds of Prey.
Yeah she was, she’s an actress to watch for the future as one day she will win that Oscar. Am actually looking forward to Birds of Prey and WW 1984 – the ladies are bringing it to the comic book big screen.
She’s often the best thing in a not great movie. She really has a star presence on screen, and is a good actress.
I really like that she’s working to help other women write and develop projects.
I still would like to see Bombshell, but haven’t had a chance yet. I doubt it’s going to be a hit, but it might eek along enough to break even. A big part of the problem is that the target audience of this film is turned off by the real women they are portraying, I think.
It kinda pisses me off that she is using women who already write in the industry for her pitch program. All four are not novice writers and have tons of experience in TV. She’s moving them to film from what I’ve been told.
Don’t get me wrong, I do like the fact she is working with female screenwriters to try to further their career, but I really wish she would try to scout NEW screenwriters, (like myself).
It’s such a b**ch to break into this industry. Been trying going on 10 years. UGH. And side note, I know she did the monologue for “Legally Blonde” everyday preparing for her role. For some odd reason, I feel like she’s kind of like Elle Woods in real life except Elle Woods is more intelligent and likeable.
I have to wonder why more aren’t calling her out for having male directors for all the movies under her company. I’d have to check but has she even worked with a female director? I care about that too.
She discussed how she is addressing this in the interview (it is partly in the quotes in this article). She seems to have gotten ahead of the criticism, I guess.
I just looked up her upcoming films that she’s producing, and there’s one with Greta Gerwig attached to direct, a short from Francisca Alegria, Promising Young Woman directed and written by Emerald Fennell, the Harley Quinn one is directed by Cathy Yan, and the episodes of Dollface are 50% men and women.
@writermarie
This is the reason why I don’t like Greta Gerwig (aside from the CRAZY callous/shady shit her & Woody Allen wannabe Noah Baumbach did during Greenberg & beyond).
If it wasn’t for her being his muse, she would still be hustling for financing, distribution, everything. But bc she became his muse, it opened up doors female filmmakers spent their lives trying to open, often to no avail. Baumbach’s special treatment fast-tracked her while other female filmmakers (ESPECIALLY WoC filmmakers) work & hustle w/blood sweat tears for years & years to get a fraction of the access & investment Gerwig got like *snap* that. Her feature film got a full awards campaign (& her current one is now even tho many ppl say it isn’t award caliber) even the most established female directors/screenwriters have never had such a privilege. Her FIRST film. Ever! She got the money, she got a cast that was already famous, etc. And then her second film, a $30 million budget.
It’s sad. I know so many hardworking ladies…and Greta Gerwig got *all* of this in whiplash fashion bc one of the white male gatekeepers of the directors chair decided she was his ideal muse (& let’s be real, their affair sealed the deal)
I think people need to stop having expectations that the people who try need to be all things, all the time, straight away. Someone tries to be better and we tear them down for not being good enough, for not being perfect. It something the left in particular does – we tear ourselves apart saving the right-wing most of the effort, while they stick together.
Yes, it would be great if she did that. Let’s be realistic, she’s got a small production company that is still earning its stripes. They likely can’t take the risk on completely unknowns at this point. Perhaps this is something they’ll be able to do in the future when they are more established and as they continue to learn and grow. In the meantime, let’s be happy that they are making the effort to be inclusive and to help female writers.
@SKF You are correct, normally you wouldn’t want to have novices pitch when you’re talking to studios. BUT… remember “Project Greenlight”? It’s been done. Grant it, I don’t believe one person saw any of those films made. From what I’ve heard/read in the industry, if you write a killer script, and can get the right person to read it, then who cares!
Studios/producers/agents are always looking for the next big hit. Otherwise they wouldn’t have pitchfests, or the blacklist.com. If you have a “high concept” idea and can write worth a s**t, why not? You never know until you read someone’s work how much they suck. If you can’t get past the first 10 pages then it shouldn’t be made.
All I’m saying, some hugely amazing screenwriters in the industry started out at as pitching their “spec” script and then become Oscar winners. Otherwise scripts like, “Juno”, “The Social Network”, and “Whiplash” would have never been made. Just sayin.
I honestly did not think this movie was going to be in theaters. I got more of a “made for TV/streaming docu-series adaptation” type vibe watching the trailer and would not have paid money to go see it. I think it would’ve done great on netflix though.
It would have done way better on Netflix. I went to see it in Christmas day with my mom. I liked it but now that I’ve read your comment I totally agree Netflix would have been better. It would have been a major prestige project for streaming but it does kind of fall flat on the big screen. Plus it was a movie centered around television so it seems logical, to me, that it be seen on television.
I like Margot even if she’s a bit overrated. And like you said, she’s unscathed despite being in a number of box office bombs.
Having said that, she’s a good actress and I love what she’s doing with her production company. Look forward to Promising Young Woman that she’s producing.
Also Birds Of Prey looks like the only interesting DC project. Rooting for Margot.
Huh, I wouldn’t think of a $15 million first week for a movie about women to be a bomb. I mostly liked it but my sister and I agreed that its subject matter is such that we never want to see it again. I thought Margot Robbie was great in it and her early scene with Kate McKinnon was the best part.
Awful people get sexually harassed, yes, but I think the focus should be around the fact that while sexual harassment (which no one deserves) occurred in the Fox News workplace, there is a larger issue in heaping too much praise on women who chose to work in and uphold an institution that is itself misogynistic, racist, homophobic, etc. This is not the Me Too story we needed. I’m not surprised that Nicole Kidman did this movie (friend of Rupert Murdoch) but I’m surprised at Charlize. I think Margot Robbie is just trying to establish herself in the industry and this is a high-profile project…not that that makes it a good decision.
The thought of people leaving the theater thinking that Megyn “Jesus is white, Santa is white” Kelly is some kind of hero turns my stomach. Her role in Ailes’ takedown was also apparently greatly exaggerated in the movie. She cares about nothing and no one until it affects her bank account.
I have to admit I don’t get it. I haven’t seen a lot of her work but what I’ve seen doesn’t explain why she’s so bulletproof.
Shes a blonde knockout, thats why
@kerwood @meg
Meg is right. Margot is physically a ‘knockout’ – she’s very beautiful & doesn’t have the slightest hint of asymmetry in her face (hollywood is all about that ) (& ofc blonde w/a hot body – but she Can act. I’m not calling her the model looking version of Meryl Streep, no way. what I’m saying is that she isn’t bad at it, you know? So she’s exactly what Hollywood wants – a gorgeous woman who isn’t horrible at acting (see: Angelina Jolie)
Im skeptical of her age tho…she always looked a few years older than she claimed. I mean that obviously means nothing but I more blame the industry on the pressure/demand to be under 30 & gorgeous.
I have a real problem with the glamorization of schizophrenia. I mean, you can use the term as an adjective, but it doesn’t sound like that’s what this is.
THIS 🙌
I want to see Bombshells but haven’t been able to get to the theatre; the usual mom and baby showing at the theatre have been off for the holidays.